Plenty of people at Capcom are scrubs, too. That is why Sentinel got nerfed.
Why wouldn't I be vocal about the game changing in a bad way? What kind of thought process makes you think silence is better? Hell, it isn't like folks need to make it an argument. I just said I was sad about a change to my potential main, and everyone jumped on me and said it was too good. Then I told people why they are wrong, but that makes me "upset". Now folks are ignoring the various escape options I have listed and say I should get over it.
I don't mind nerfs. What bothers me is that it ruins a STYLE of play. Like, they just gave him V-Trigger cancelable Knee Press. That is probably WAY better than Beta Psycho Inferno. It means a stray Knee Press can lead into a 500 damage combo. That is goddamn madness.
Am I happy about that buff? No. It isn't about him being good or bad. It is about him playing in a way that I found really fun in the beta.
I shouldn't have said "scrubby". I just meant he was free.
Because of scrubs at Capcom. Seth Killian said there was a big internal debate over it. Some people wanted Sentinel's health nerfed because they got bopped. Seth said that Sentinel needed the health because he is so easy to open up, and that he would become more manageable over time.
The scrubs won. Scrubs can direct games. Scrubs can be producers. Smash 4 was created by a person I assume to be a scrub, based on his character balancing.
Is it wrong? Folks here didn't know about any of the options I listed for getting out of it, all while saying the move is too strong. How does that make sense?