Someone posted this in the first threat or in the second? I don't remember. Anyway, I think it's worth re-posting again:
http://www.theatlantic.com/technolo...moby-dick-i-s-first-critics-to-pan-it/281499/
From the article:
The review concluded by ridiculing the novel for its employment of a first-person narrativea peculiar choice, the reviewer scoffed, since "not only is Ahab, with his boat's-crew, destroyed in his last desperate attack upon the white whale, but the Pequod herself sinks with all on board into the depths of the illimitable ocean."
Except, of course, not every member of the boat's-crew in Moby-Dick sinks with the Pequod. There isspoiler!a significant survivor of the wreck. And he goes on to tell the tale. Call him Ishmael.
Which is, in part, how the book that is today regarded as one of the best novels ever written became, to many of its contemporary readers, something of a disappointment. (London Examiner, November 1851: "We cannot say that we recognize in this writer any advance on the admirable qualities displayed in his earlier bookswe do not see that he even greatly cares to put forth the strength of which he has shown himself undoubtedly possessed.")
Not all the reviews were negative. Not all the negative reviews had to do with the missing pages. Still, though: Imagine being Herman Melville. Imagine writing Moby-Dick. And imagine, then, reading that dismissive assessment of your work. Nearly one-half of this book! Imagine being confused, indignant, furious, worried.