On topic, heard some people waiting for a new UI, those guys are going to be pissed if Denuvo blocks new UIs since it will probably block Script Extender.
I don't think it has anything to do with budget and anyone even remotely familiar with the working conditions of AAA game developers would be an idiot to call devs lazy. It just comes down to using the same engine for at least one more game. When this game began development, the thought of coming up to speed on a new multi-platform 'next-gen' engine for a giant Bethesda style open world game that would allow them to remain so mod friendly was probably unimaginable for a reasonable launch date.
I wonder why they can't achieve 60 fps on PS4 when the game looks like that.
neither does any of us.
believe it or not.
no one was expecting it to look like the order 1886.no one is bashing the gameplay either.
but this is a screenshot thread. people will analyse and like or not like the them.
the 'gameplay is supreme' or 'sales speak' argument has nothing to do with this and just pathetic defense .
sales or gameplay dont make the screenshots look better. how much it matters in the end is a different story and a completely unrelated one.
This is a Bethy game, bugs are part of the gameplay , also illogical things :
![]()
![]()
I don't need games that are technically pushing the max and up to modern standards, graphically. I just need a good game. Super excited for this, though I'm getting the Xbox version.
Yeah, it was. Skyrim was even worse on PS3.That was due to the save game bloat right? I remember the ruckus that caused with New Vegas too.
Yes.
At least it will hopefully be 30 FPS throughout, unlike Bethesda's previous-gen console attempts.
It is.
And knowing Bethesda, it won't even be stable 30 fps.
*applause*..."it's 30fps"..I was about to applaud them for targeting 60 on consoles.
I was about to applaud them for targeting 60 on consoles.
neither does any of us.
believe it or not.
no one was expecting it to look like the order 1886.no one is bashing the gameplay either.
but this is a screenshot thread. people will analyse and like or not like the them.
the 'gameplay is supreme' or 'sales speak' argument has nothing to do with this and just pathetic defense .
sales or gameplay dont make the screenshots look better. how much it matters in the end is a different story and a completely unrelated one.
Well said. (Except for the lack of proper capitalizationno one was expecting it to look like the order 1886.no one is bashing the gameplay either.
but this is a screenshot thread. people will analyse and like or not like the them.
the 'gameplay is supreme' or 'sales speak' argument has nothing to do with this and just pathetic defense .
sales or gameplay dont make the screenshots look better. how much it matters in the end is a different story and a completely unrelated one.
Yup! That's why I liked Fallout 3 more than Scrolls, it's harder to relate to a weirdo fantasy world than "what if you had to live in a post nuclear world?"I wish I could understand the appeal of Bethesda games, but I just don't.
The mechanics in their games are never great, the graphics are very mediocre, and the story is never all that exciting or engaging.
I guess the immersion and world building they create?
This game is going to be absolutely massive but I just cannot really grasp why.
You haven't seen those animations?
Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMLbEAxjzj8
The original games had ridiculously detailed and intricate death/gore animations. Obviously that is much more complicated and difficult to portray in real time 3D, so detail regressed significantly as 3D standardised and things have slowly been getting better since. But that gif is basically 1998 levels of basic 3D gore.
Okay, I rescind my post.Him saying it needed it was more so about the graphics since this is a screenshot thread so again u bringing in sales does nothing. Haven't said the game shouldn't be released at all either idk where i saidthat.
Carry on buttercup
Because like in skyrim, we can probably put a shit ton of tiny objects inside a space and then use a weapon that makes them fly all over the place. My friend did that, he used the dark brotherhood's dining room as storage for food, he would pile a ton of bread and shit on the table and floor, and then fus ro dah the room which made the framerate tank to 5fps at best. Being able to do that is most likely the reason why fallout and elder scrolls games will never be 60fps on consoles. Ofc that situation is far from the norm....I hope.I wonder why they can't achieve 60 fps on PS4 when the game looks like that.
Man you guys crack me up.
Just enjoy the fucking game lmao.
Fallout wasn't ever about being good looking. It's about bugs and crashes mixed in with lots of playtime.
Man you guys crack me up.
Just enjoy the fucking game lmao.
Don't forget about the terrible shooting!
This is a Bethy game, bugs are part of the gameplay , also illogical things :
![]()
![]()
If they were, I doubt there would be as many people getting on the graphics like there are.
Man you guys crack me up.
Just enjoy the fucking game lmao.
Exactly. I would be stoked at that point. But 30? With a lot of recycled low res textures, very low geometry, little to now shadows, zero ambient occlusion, flat lighting, etc.. Come on son.
Man you guys crack me up.
Just enjoy the fucking game lmao.
Looks like a playstation 2 game.
Game isn't out. So we enjoy screenshots.
The trailer looked nice, but damn...none of that made me say ''this can't be done on these consoles, surely this can definitely be Xbox One footage''. But it's starting to look like it was PC after all.
Ah yes. Thanks.
I always thought this one was hilarious
![]()
If they were, I doubt there would be as many people getting on the graphics like there are.
Npcs in dark souls don't even have facial animation. -_- FFXV is coming out last year, it's natural that a 2016(maybe) title, would look better.At 60 bucks, with the level of detail we are going to get in the coming months with other games? lol no right.
FF 15 shits on this and that's going to be open world.
Shoot Dark Souls 2 looks better then this.
Even on PC none of their games looked top of the line and were filled with bugs to top it off.
Except it's not out yet? If game play sucks than what(doubtful but still). I enjoy my tales games very much but I'll be the first to tell u after vesperia every game graphically hasn't done it for me doesn't mean the games are bad but graphical discussions are to be hadThis. Alot of negative comments in here.
It doesn't look good on PC either, so I'm sure a lot of what you saw could have been done on consoles. It's an ugly game through and through. For a company that spends years and millions on their games, I expect a bit more. It's the art direction that bothers me most, though. Doesn't do anything for me.
That said, I'm open minded. Still plan to play it at some point and see what all the fuss is about.
What's more concerning is how some show no restraint with their "criticism".Remember when driveby shitposting was bannabale? Good times.
Maybe they opted for more AF.I wonder why they can't achieve 60 fps on PS4 when the game looks like that.
There still would be.
I don't understand it either with Bethesda, i mean don't they see that it looks stupid and on the other hand looks wrong visually in so many ways. I just can't comprehend a art direction meeting at that studio. Do they even try?