• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Play-Asia says SJWs to blame for DOAX3 not coming west

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd like to know certain data such as sales and review scores for the previous games that made it over.

SJWism / toxic feminism is definitely an issue for gaming but imo to say they had a part in halting the game coming to the west would be giving those groups too much credit.
 
I'd like to know certain data such as sales and review scores for the previous games that made it over.

SJWism / toxic feminism is definitely an issue for gaming but imo to say they had a part in halting the game coming to the west would be giving those groups too much credit.

Alright, so since we seem to have moved beyond Play-Asia's successful marketing stunt, maybe we can talk constructively on something else.

Like, where do you see Toxic Feminism as being an issue in gaming?
 
South Park has been pretty right-wing extremist for a while now. They hate anyone who dares to speak for or argue about the rights and regards of the disenfranchised they constantly attack. And it's these ideals that are supported quite a bit by Gaters.

I don't know if you can call them right wing extremist considering this season's treatment of the Republican party's frontrunner.
 
Does anybody still unironically identify as an MRA? Or have they moved on to 'egalitarian humanist?'
If MRA's dare soil humanism for the public, I'm going to personally summon up Carl Rogers from his grave to treat them with universal positive regard and try to find the good within them. Maybe I'll even use client-centered therapy to discover what is preventing them from achieving their self-actualized potential and help them meet their basic needs.

(Actually I'd probably try to help from a cognitive perspective and identify unhealthy schema and how they have led to their hateful worldview, but that's not quite pure humanism for the sake of Rogers)
 
Granted I don't watch South Park, so I can't make any hard judgements about it.

From my perspective it seems to be a show about extreme parodies of everything, and I think a diagnosis of it as a "safe space for the apathetic" seems accurate from a cursory perspective.

I'd like to know certain data such as sales and review scores for the previous games that made it over.

SJWism / toxic feminism is definitely an issue for gaming but imo to say they had a part in halting the game coming to the west would be giving those groups too much credit.

What exactly is "toxic feminism"? I've honestly never seen that term used, could you concretely explain what it is to me what it is and what impact it has?
 
If SJW is an insult does that mean MRA is too?

MRA's are pretty much an insult to everyone tbh.

I mean, the things they "fight" for are not actually men's issues, and when they do bring up legitimate men's issues it's to cover up their crap and get all up in your face about it. They mostly try to ruin the lives of women.
 
It weirds me out that people have the time to screencap tweets and reviews and post them together as a sort of shitlist because they have a fear of "the sjw bogeyman".

http://abload.de/img/deadoralivewesteysro.png

^Got this from gamefaqs thread where people are already saying Sarkessian had a hand in this. People are fucking crazy

I've made tweets and deleted them within a minute and still had them noticed and cataloged by GGers.
 
It weirds me out that people have the time to screencap tweets and reviews and post them together as a sort of shitlist because they have a fear of "the sjw bogeyman".

http://abload.de/img/deadoralivewesteysro.png

^Got this from gamefaqs thread where people are already saying Sarkessian had a hand in this. People are fucking crazy

It's a common tactic, taking multiple out of context screenshots and putting them together into an image that will fool people on simple investigations into believing that their cause is real.

A deeper examination of the image shows that most of the images they've captured have nothing to do with the current manufactured controversy.
 
I'd like to know certain data such as sales and review scores for the previous games that made it over.

SJWism / toxic feminism is definitely an issue for gaming but imo to say they had a part in halting the game coming to the west would be giving those groups too much credit.
wait what
 
If MRA's dare soil humanism for the public, I'm going to personally summon up Carl Rogers from his grave to treat them with universal positive regard and try to find the good within them. Maybe I'll even use client-centered therapy to discover what is preventing them from achieving their self-actualized potential and help them meet their basic needs.

(Actually I'd probably try to help from a cognitive perspective and identify unhealthy schema and how they have led to their hateful worldview, but that's not quite pure humanism for the sake of Rogers)

MRAs who have jumped the label have gone on to call themselves "Egalitarian" mostly. They start off saying they're egalitarian and will then attempt to change the subject of the topic they've entered (usually about women's rights or some other such issue) into one about men. When it doesn't go their way, they get mad. Some use the name humanist as well but egalitarian seems to be the one they've attached themselves to.

I don't know if you can call them right wing extremist considering this season's treatment of the Republican party's frontrunner.

Considering their treatment of literally any minority who at all dares to speak out about their hardships, I'm pretty inclined to believe that they're extremists on the right-wing. They've been like that for quite some time now too.
 
It weirds me out that people have the time to screencap tweets and reviews and post them together as a sort of shitlist because they have a fear of "the sjw bogeyman".

http://abload.de/img/deadoralivewesteysro.png

^Got this from gamefaqs thread where people are already saying Sarkessian had a hand in this. People are fucking crazy

7 people and 10 articles as old as 4 years all stopped doax3 from coming out in the west. you heard it in that image folks, solid proof. check and mate.
 
SJWism / toxic feminism is definitely an issue for gaming but imo to say they had a part in halting the game coming to the west would be giving those groups too much credit.

I know this is not helpful, but the only response I can muster is the following:

lolololololololololololololololololololololol
 
Here's a question that DOA producers were asked last year regarding DOA5:

GamesBeat: In the West, the games industry is going through an extremely volatile time when it comes to sexuality and gender representation in games. Dead or Alive is one of the medium’s prime examples of females being overtly sexualized. Is this controversy on Team Ninja’s radar? If so, what’s your viewpoint on these issues?" SOURCE

In review: Journalists have acknowledged how extremely volatile the landscape is and publishers have acknowledged the controversy as well. It's ridiculous and disingenuous to pretend that things aren't volatile.

This post exactly.
 
It weirds me out that people have the time to screencap tweets and reviews and post them together as a sort of shitlist because they have a fear of "the sjw bogeyman".

http://abload.de/img/deadoralivewesteysro.png

^Got this from gamefaqs thread where people are already saying Sarkessian had a hand in this. People are fucking crazy
MjSINk8.png


fucking timetravelling SJWs!!
 
Considering their treatment of literally any minority who at all dares to speak out about their hardships, I'm pretty inclined to believe that they're extremists on the right-wing. They've been like that for quite some time now too.

Examples? They're libertarians and have been pretty consistent as far as those beliefs go.

And I mean, the whole safe space plot point wasn't just mocking people that didn't want to hear mean things said about them, it was mocking people that didn't want to be guilt-tripped into donating to children in third world countries. That's not extreme right wing at all.
 
This post exactly.

Did you read the responses Coolio got? Because you probably should. That poster is pretty intellectually dishonest if they sincerely believe non-existent tweets and outrage are what is preventing this game from coming to the West. This is manufactured controversy, something GG is well experienced in.

Pray tell me what feminism is doing to ruin gaming. I'll be waiting.
 
Examples? They're libertarians and have been pretty consistent as far as those beliefs go.

And I mean, the whole safe space plot point wasn't just mocking people that didn't want to hear mean things said about them, it was mocking people that didn't want to be guilt-tripped into donating to children in third world countries. That's not extreme right wing at all.

The entire episode was meant to mock both strawmen extremes but idk who cares cause no one who wants to examine the nuances seem to want to talk about South Park anymore.
 
it's very odd reading patrick klepek's article about this in which he notes that nobody can actually find or cite this backlash against DOAX3 except vaguely pointing at these darn PC kids these days, and then half the comments section (yeah, i know) is people going "wow, it's a shame that people complained about this until KT canceled it. ever try just ignoring something if you don't like it, feminists????"
This is the weirdest controversy of all time. I'm still waiting for someone to explain what KT had to lose by releasing this game. It's not like the people who would supposedly be offended by this game were going to buy the next Atelier anyways
 
Anita Sarkeesian, videogame critic.

She works for a lot of game companies and tells them to cancel games.

Or so I gather from a quick scan of the internet.

*media critic, actually.

Gaming is just the audience that happened to turn it into a big controversy.

Is there anywhere to read their doctorate dissertation or articles they've had published in peer reviewed journals? Google isn't turning up anything in that vein.
 
MRAs who have jumped the label have gone on to call themselves "Egalitarian" mostly. They start off saying they're egalitarian and will then attempt to change the subject of the topic they've entered (usually about women's rights or some other such issue) into one about men. When it doesn't go their way, they get mad. Some use the name humanist as well but egalitarian seems to be the one they've attached themselves to.



Considering their treatment of literally any minority who at all dares to speak out about their hardships, I'm pretty inclined to believe that they're extremists on the right-wing. They've been like that for quite some time now too.
Oh no... I remember taking a political quiz that identified me as "egalitarian"... what if I was the demons the whole time????

Jokes aside, there are valid issues facing men with regards to sexuality, but the time to discuss them is not when the discussion is about problems facing women. And ironically, when I do talk about problems that men have with sexuality such as society instilling the unhealthy belief that everyone "deserves" sex for doing tasks and that due to the tabooing of healthy sexual content and near exclusive presentation of hypersexualized non-sexual situations leading them to think the only way to have sexual gratification is through subversion and disregarding consent, it's the MRA who hate it the most.

I wouldn't say South Park is extremely right wing, at least far as I can tell. It shares a similar view on minorities and their treatment, but I know South Park is also very derisive towards theocracy as well. I think the best way to put it is that a lot of right wing rhetoric looks like it belongs in a South Park episode.
 
Is there anywhere to read their doctorate dissertation or articles they've had published in peer reviewed journals? Google isn't turning up anything in that vein.

I didn't know that you had to have been published in peer reviewed journals to be a critic.
 
hey if sjws are powerful enough to cancel doa in the west, can we harness their powers to get a release of policenauts on the ps4?
 
Is there anywhere to read their doctorate dissertation or articles they've had published in peer reviewed journals? Google isn't turning up anything in that vein.
you've done it now... you've upset the NATURAL ORDER!! (i legitimately can't tell if this is sarcasm or not, guess it's time to necromance up poe and ask about his law)

Are you seriously implying that you need a doctorate degree to criticize video games? And in what field does it even have to be?

If I write you some (amateurish) psych papers, can I be privileged with the right to criticize video games?
 
Examples? They're libertarians and have been pretty consistent as far as those beliefs go.

And I mean, the whole safe space plot point wasn't just mocking people that didn't want to hear mean things said about them, it was mocking people that didn't want to be guilt-tripped into donating to children in third world countries. That's not extreme right wing at all.

They were pushing a right-wing narrative about how safe spaces deserve to be mocked when all they do is benefit minorities who deal with enough shit as is. Safe space is more than the moronic simplicity that SP and other righties online degrade it to and it's a term that has existed for some time. It's not out of nowhere all of the sudden or some fad just because the people mocking minorities have no clue what it is. I would much rather see attempts to understand and emphasize but South Park does not live in that kind of world and never did. Their aim is to make a quick "joke" at the expense of people that the creators have no desire to actually understand.

South Park constantly does this in regards to minorities. Be it the lgbt community (especially it's horrible treatment of trans-issues), racial concerns, etc. etc. the example is pretty much the whole series.

As for them being libertarians? That's rich. Matt and Trey could give two shits about liberal social issues. Whatever they can do to disenfranchise a minority and push media out there that encourages and supports harmful behaviors to them they do that and don't really seem to have any qualms about it. Plain and simple. That doesn't read as libertarian to me. But South Park is getting way off-topic and that show can go fuck itself with a thousand pitchforks for what it does to simplify the issues.
 
The USGamer dude and the dude who posted here are the same person.

I am indeed.

This post exactly.

The answer, which by the way was prior to DOA5: Last Round being released:

Gender equality, misogyny, gamer gate are all industry topics/issues that we are certainly aware of and paying close attention to.

As a fighting game, our position on Dead or Alive is that we are creating female characters in an obvious fantasy setting where they compete with other male and female characters using extraordinary abilities. They are each strong and unique in their own individual way. And they are no less powerful than any of their male counterparts/opponents.

So, if we’re going to showcase strong female fighting characters in a game, why not make them look beautiful as well? Obviously, beauty is a subjective thing and everyone has their own opinions or interpretations of it. And that opinion of beauty also changes and varies from time to time and from culture to culture. We choose to represent our fantasy female characters in the manner in which we’ve become notable for.

But, we also don’t feel that we are demeaning women by doing so and we certainly don’t condone that type of attitude or behavior. We want to portray our female characters as strong, sexy, confident and attractive fighters.

Sure, some people may find our presentation of this notion in poor taste or even juvenile. Even within our own team, we have our differences in opinion about what is tasteful or appropriate. And we’re well aware of our critics who continue to accuse us of objectifying females.

However, we as well as most of our fans around the world don’t share the same sentiments as our critics. We are creating video game characters in a fantasy setting. Their actions, aesthetics and overall visual presentation is more than obviously set in a light-hearted, over-the-top, candy coated universe. The dissimilarity from REAL life women, situations and settings should be pretty apparent as soon as you start our game. And we feel most gamers in this day an age are sophisticated enough to make this distinction quite easily.

TL;DR: "We know we have some critics, but eh, our stuff is good."

In the months between Last Round's release and now they just mentally reversed course?
 
you've done it now... you've upset the NATURAL ORDER!! (i legitimately can't tell if this is sarcasm or not, guess it's time to necromance up poe and ask about his law)

Are you seriously implying that you need a doctorate degree to criticize video games? And in what field does it even have to be?

If I write you some (amateurish) psych papers, can I be privileged with the right to criticize video games?

I can't tell if it's sarcasm precisely because I steeped myself in the arguments of Goobergarb during it's genesis to better understand it. It was a fruitless endeavor to be sure.

This was a big talking point amongst them though.
 
I didn't know that you had to have been published in peer reviewed journals to be a critic.

They've been referenced consistently throughout this thread on a first name basis, so I assumed there were some credentials beyond "target of gamergate" or whatever. Fuck me, right?
 
Alright, so since we seem to have moved beyond Play-Asia's successful marketing stunt, maybe we can talk constructively on something else.

Like, where do you see Toxic Feminism as being an issue in gaming?
Every group has bad seeds no matter how good the intentions are.
 
I am indeed.



The answer, which by the way was prior to DOA5: Last Round being released:



TL;DR: "We know we have some critics, but eh, our stuff is good."

In the months between Last Round's release and now they just mentally reversed course?

maybe they saw a sudden drop in doa5:fr costume dlc sales
 
Every group has bad seeds no matter how good the intentions are.
i mean

this has to do more with specific people being assholes than any sort of group though. the only "toxic feminism" that exists as a group are TERFs and they have like nothing to do with gaming at all.
 
Wait a second... Just the other day people in off topic were telling me that an anime equivalent of Feminist Frequency to help promote better usage of tropes and healthy sexual content over hypersexualized non-sexual situations would be useless because the west has no impact on Japan...

(Yes, I know that the game isn't being changed in Japan, but this was done in response to literally nothing: imagine if people actually DID criticize the game)
 
Is there anywhere to read their doctorate dissertation or articles they've had published in peer reviewed journals? Google isn't turning up anything in that vein.

There is a wiki, start there.

They've been referenced consistently throughout this thread on a first name basis, so I assumed there were some credentials beyond "target of gamergate" or whatever. Fuck me, right?

Not on the first date.
 
They were pushing a right-wing narrative about how safe spaces deserve to be mocked when all they do is benefit minorities who deal with enough shit as is. Safe space is more than the moronic simplicity that SP and other righties online degrade it to and it's a term that has existed for some time. It's not out of nowhere all of the sudden or some fad just because the people mocking minorities have no clue what it is. I would much rather see attempts to understand and emphasize but South Park does not live in that kind of world and never did. Their aim is to make a quick "joke" at the expense of people that the creators have no desire to actually understand.

South Park constantly does this in regards to minorities. Be it the lgbt community (especially it's horrible treatment of trans-issues), racial concerns, etc. etc. the example is pretty much the whole series.

As for them being libertarians? That's rich. Matt and Trey could give two shits about liberal social issues. Whatever they can do to disenfranchise a minority and push media out there that encourages and supports harmful behaviors to them they do that and don't really seem to have any qualms about it. Plain and simple. That doesn't read as libertarian to me. But South Park is getting way off-topic and that show can go fuck itself with a thousand pitchforks for what it does to simplify the issues.



*scans*

yep. this whole post is bullshit
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom