PlayStation 4 hits 35.9 million sold through to end users

Wow, wow, wow! What an impressive number. Quite a turnaround for Sony this gen. Looks like focusing on the pure gaming experience at a fair price has helped them tremendously. I don't see 2016 slowing down any either, especially with the strong release schedule PS4 has.

Also, two threads active, should probably merge those!

Who could have thought?
 
Im curious if anyone thinks NX will be a success off the bat, I don't see how it can sell well initially, who's just jumping on the latest Nintendo hardware?

I could see how they could build up some decent games like WiiU but I don't see anything they are doing that would improve the situation drastically.

They caught the lightning by hitting all the casuals with wii , then the lightning struck them down as it all went to mobile. So does this mean they need a new tech or device/innovation to strike again?

I guess the gamepad was the thing this time, but didn't quite work.

We don't know anything about it right now, so I think it's far too early to say anything about it.
 
Any Xbox 1 estimations?

Hard to say due to recent Holiday sales. No clue. "Around half of what PS4 is at" is probably the best estimation.

Anyway, the PS4 "has no games" is such a lazy/silly thing to say. Why can't people simply say the PS4 has no games that they are interested in? Was easy for me to say before 2016.

It's obvious that the PS4 is selling from multiplats. Saying one system "doesn't have games" is pretty much the same as saying no systems this gen have games. And this year (2016) is looking far too good to make that statement about any console with third party support (many games including exclusives coming soon).
 
Hard to say due to recent Holiday sales. No clue. "Around half of what PS4 is at" is probably the best estimation.

Anyway, the PS4 "has no games" is such a lazy/silly thing to say. Why can't people simply say the PS4 has no games that they are interested in? Was easy for me to say before 2016.

It's obvious that the PS4 is selling from multiplats. Saying one system "doesn't have games" is pretty much the same as saying no systems this gen have games. And this year (2016) is look far too good to make that statement about any console with third party support (many games including exclusives coming soon).

"Has no games" is the juvenile, trolling, stealth warz statement.
 
Over time? Nintendo dropped the ball to Sony in one fell swoop with the N64. And Sony again with the PS3. I'm not saying that brand doesn't matter at all, it obviously does, but it's clear consumers care more for the product and games than they do the name. Were that not the case, the original Playstation would have never eclipsed Nintendo the way it did.

the only ball sony dropped was on price. phat ps3 was the best, the only thing that hurt them was price.
 
Not sure what's the point you are trying to make with this list but Nintendo absolutely NEEDS to release first party games as their third party support is anemic and yet the WiiU is still selling terribly. 3 Forza games in 2 years isn't really a good thing as that resource could be used to bring some new IPs. You name Gears of War Remaster and Collection of Rare Games and omitted TLOU remaster and the Nathan Drake collection, which I believe generated more buzz than their counterparts. Titanfall and Sunset Overdrive you can put in the same category as Knack and Killzone (forgottten). Why are Bloodborne and Until Dawn outliers? And there is absolutely no mention of the hundreds of smaller titles available. If the Ps4 has no games, then it's fair to say the WiiU and Xbox one has even less. It just doesn't make a lick of sense, unless you don't consider indies and multiplatform games games.

Sure WiiU wasn't marketed right and confused people with the name and MS stumble out the gate with the xbox one but lets not sit here and pretend Ps4 is selling so well because the others are failing. Xbox one is still selling faster than the xbox 360 at the same period.

It's obvious that the Ps4 is doing well because Sony had the right message from the beginning and stayed the course by delivering a steady stream of a variety of games that caters to many different types of gamers. Heck everyone seem to forget MLB the show but it's the ONLY good baseball game to buy on any platform. The multiplatform games generally run and look slightly better (I am sure some people care about this) Althought the AAA games are taking a while to come everyone knows that they will come (look at the lineup for 2016 and beyond) because that is just how they operate. People have short memories and seem to forget that the Playstation 1 and 2 were winners because of that and Ps3 was able to claw out of the dire situation it was in because of the same reason. They made some terrible decisions with the Ps3 and still able to claw out of it. At the end of the day the Playstation name is a stronger brand WW. To think they are selling like this before the big name games even come out is ridiculous!

Of course Nintendo needs first party to survive since all third parties have jumped ship. That's the reason the Wii U has sold anything, it's strictly from first party support. In this case, exclusives has literally sold consoles.

3 racing games in 2 years is not a waste of resources. The main series, Forza Motersport is released every two years since the first game. That pace was going to continue regardless so no resources wasn't going to be wasted since it was on pace. The spin-off series, Horizon, was created by a studio made specifically to make this series, so again resources aren't being wasted since all Forza games that's been on Xbox One has been critical and commercial successes.

You are right that I forgot to mention the Nathan Drake Collection and The Last of Us Remaster however them getting more buzz than Rare Replay and Gears of War Ultimate Edition is highly debatable.

Titanfall and Sunset Overdrive definitely is not in the same category as Knack and Killzone. Titanfall has a sequel on the way while we have heard no word about a sequel to Knack nor a new game in the Killzone franchise. Sunset Overdrive is still constantly talked about on Xbox centered posts on this forum (just look at the Xbox biggest sale thread and how many people wanted Sunset Overdrive) and Sunset Overdrive was more critically praised than Knack or Killzone Shadow Fall.

Bloodborne and Until Dawn outliers because they are some of the very few exclusive games to the PS4 that actually pushed the console as of now. Those titles definitely pushed some sales out while we can't say the same for other exclusive titles (maybe Nathan Drake Collection).

There's no mention of hundreds of smaller titles because it's not worth mentioning those titles. Wii U has strong indie support as well as catelog of older games via virtual console. Xbox One has smaller, some even free to play games, and when you open up the fact it has backwards compability now with a increasingly growing list, Xbox One probably has the most smallest titles out of any of the big three. So all consoles have small titles, that's nothing new.

It's pretty easy for Sony to have the right idea when its competitors had two completely off base ideas. Nintendo had the right idea the Wii. It was a huge commercial success, but that doesn't mean it had the stronger library of games compared to the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3. And I'm not saying that having a little more power than Xbox One didn't help it but I'm saying that the biggest reason for Sony being where they at now is because of the blunders of Nintendo and Microsoft. If Microsoft didn't fall flat on its face with all the kinect and Tv integration and used the resources that the kinect ate up for more powerful hardware we'd be looking at totally different number right now.
 
He probably has not come to terms that as you get older, the giddiness is not the same. Your expectations are more leveled, and younger nostalgia has weight with it all.

My older gaming bretheren at it again I see. Ain't this the truth.

Although, every once in a while a game creeps up and slays your "defenses" one way or another. :p
 
I actually never had a phat PS3, I had a slim model, but heard they were like heaters.

they blew out a ton of heat, would heat my whole theatre room, but that doesn't have anything to do with all the features, options, tech they had in them.


edit - to be clear I am not saying PS3 was the best console ever or something (it is one of my personal favorites) but this rhetoric of PS3 was a huge misstep is annoying, it's put out as though they made a piece of shit and then they had to climb out of a hole. The mistake was that consumers didn't want to fork out 649 (Canada) for a high end system. this has been tried and failed before but I guess they thought 600 was just in the range that would work.

I would have loved a 600 dollar ps4 but I know that for sony to do well they have to hit that 400 sweet spot. But gaf would have loved the 600 dollar version of ps4, I know it.
 
Heh, that count is going to increase by 1 more, since I finally bought mine yesterday (mainly for Horizon Zero Dawn, Gravity Rush 2 and FFXV, but now that I'm thinking about it, I'll probably also get Killzone: Shadow Fall and The Order at some point).
 
I'm not sure what the point of this post is, anyone fill me in? A meme?

in 2012, everyone was predicting that consoles were dead because phones and tablets were gonna kill the PS4/XB1. It was near impossible to have a conversation about next-gen without some moron bringing them up in a vain attempt to sound knowledgeable.

Who have thought that people would still wanna play CoD with a fucking controller?
 
Not really, there is still a big audience on Xbox One that no publisher would want to cut out just because it's less work.

If it was completely different making a Xbox One game vs making PS4 & PC games I know for sure that some devs would make the choice to make PS4/PC only if the PS4 keep pulling away like this.


It's already happening there is almost 2X as many games on PS4 as it is on Xbox One & they both came out the same month & it's just as easy to make a game on Xbox One as it is on PS4.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Xbox_One_games

List of Xbox One games
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a list of Xbox One games currently planned or released either at retail or via download.

Exclusive = 39
Microsoft exclusive = 9
Console exclusive or timed = 72/32
Multiplatform/TBA = 344/3
Playable = 273 available to purchase
Total = 494


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PlayStation_4_games

List of PlayStation 4 games
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a list of games for the PlayStation 4 (PS4). It includes PS4 games available on disc (all of which are also available digitally) and PS4 games only available to download from the PlayStation Store. It does not include PlayStation 2 games rereleased for PS4. Some publishers have indicated that they are developing titles without explicitly stating what they will be, which are not included in this list.[1] Sony says they have "every" significant third-party developer supporting the PS4.[2]

There are currently 867 games on this list (58 of which have been confirmed as free-to-play)

Exclusive = 100
Sony exclusive = 99
Console exclusive = 179
Timed = 28
Multiplatform = 462
Total = 867
 
Ya know, this fucking "salt" thing has got to be the biggest killer of actual intelligent discussion and debate that we have had in years.

Everybody that doesn't jump on the Sony love bandwagon isn't fucking "salty". Shit is so incredibly childish. As is the personal investment I am seeing from some people in Sony's sales, it's like friggin listening to sports fans talk about how "we're" gonna do this or "we" did that when referencing a team of individuals who don't know nor care about them. Get a grip.

I'm glad this thing is selling. It's good for this entire industry to have a console with this kind of runaway success, but I also feel that for me personally Sony themselves haven't done a great job so far. The main point being SONY. There are tons of great 3rd party games on the PS4 and that is ultimately what sells consoles, it always has been. However me and many others associate the Playstation brand with a certain level of first party support. An area that Sony has excelled in in every other generation and one where they have been faltering quite a bit this gen so far.

A lot of their biggest franchises are MIA, and that is why I personally don't feel like it's a great platform for me at the moment. I buy Playstation consoles for Sony games. I also primarily play on PC so their exclusives are the absolute only thing I have the PS4 for.

I am well aware that many others aren't like this and if it's your one system then the lineup so far has been pretty damn solid, though it really wasn't until 2015 which saw tons of great stuff release for it.

I also don't think the whole "it has no games" thing is accurate at all. Obviously that's complete bullshit. But it looks to me like the idea of new hardware is selling it just as much as software this time around.

I just want Sony to start releasing the games in the franchises that I have cared about for years. The constant delays of Uncharted are really an underline to this point. I am always on board with devs taking time to make games the best they can be, but so far a lot of their best first party studios have barely shown anything. That's where the disappointment stems from for me personally.

Regardless, it's good that it's successful. I hope it keeps them on the route they are on now rather than the way they were last gen. And I SURE as fuck hope it shows people that consoles aren't going anywhere.

Fantastic post. If only more people could put forward their dissatisfaction in this way rather than post disingenuous arguments like 'no games' etc. than I'm sure there wouldn't be the reactions that you describe as 'childish'.

Even though I am satisfied with my launch day ps4 I do agree that Sony's first party output has been slow and erratic in terms of quality. However, with the games announced for release this year I think this issue will be addressed in short time. If people still put forward statements like 'sony needs to start releasing game's' at mid point of this year than they deserve the derision that you describe in your post.
 
in 2012, everyone was predicting that consoles were dead because phones and tablets were gonna kill the PS4/XB1


I dont think they're close to being dead, but they are on a steady decline due to the loss of the casual market and kids. When its all said and done this generation will be lucky to match the sixth generation in sales.
 
Sony really played their hand beautifully with the PS4, and it all started at the reveal in New York. They didn't confuse people like Nintendo with Wii U and they didn't piss anyone off like MS did.

2016 could really be it's defining moment, with PSVR hitting along with the wave of exclusives coming all throughout the year.
 
If it was completely different making a Xbox One game vs making PS4 & PC games I know for sure that some devs would make the choice to make PS4/PC only if the PS4 keep pulling away like this.


It's already happening there is almost 2X as many games on PS4 as it is on Xbox One & they both came out the same month & it's just as easy to make a game on Xbox One as it is on PS4.

Just because PS4 has double the install base doesn't mean there isn't money to be made on Xbox One even if it was harder to develop for.
Some indies already don't go on Xbox one just because of the parity clause, so I'm not sure it would make a huge difference.
 
I'm saying that the biggest reason for Sony being where they at now is because of the blunders of Nintendo and Microsoft. If Microsoft didn't fall flat on its face with all the kinect and Tv integration and used the resources that the kinect ate up for more powerful hardware we'd be looking at totally different number right now.

That's not true. The main difference is that Sony makes a global product while Microsoft doesn't care about appealing to anyone outside of UK and North America.
 
3 racing games in 2 years is not a waste of resources. The main series, Forza Motersport is released every two years since the first game. That pace was going to continue regardless so no resources wasn't going to be wasted since it was on pace. The spin-off series, Horizon, was created by a studio made specifically to make this series, so again resources aren't being wasted since all Forza games that's been on Xbox One has been critical and commercial successes.

But i think it is. Waste of resources and Forza franchises are in decline for sure. The heck, Forza 5, Forza 6 and Forza Horizon 2 combined probably are in same ballpark in sales like GT6. Forza franchises need a break.
 
Ya know, this fucking "salt" thing has got to be the biggest killer of actual intelligent discussion and debate that we have had in years.

Everybody that doesn't jump on the Sony love bandwagon isn't fucking "salty". Shit is so incredibly childish. As is the personal investment I am seeing from some people in Sony's sales, it's like friggin listening to sports fans talk about how "we're" gonna do this or "we" did that when referencing a team of individuals who don't know nor care about them. Get a grip.

I'm glad this thing is selling. It's good for this entire industry to have a console with this kind of runaway success, but I also feel that for me personally Sony themselves haven't done a great job so far. The main point being SONY. There are tons of great 3rd party games on the PS4 and that is ultimately what sells consoles, it always has been. However me and many others associate the Playstation brand with a certain level of first party support. An area that Sony has excelled in in every other generation and one where they have been faltering quite a bit this gen so far.

A lot of their biggest franchises are MIA, and that is why I personally don't feel like it's a great platform for me at the moment. I buy Playstation consoles for Sony games. I also primarily play on PC so their exclusives are the absolute only thing I have the PS4 for.

I am well aware that many others aren't like this and if it's your one system then the lineup so far has been pretty damn solid, though it really wasn't until 2015 which saw tons of great stuff release for it.

I also don't think the whole "it has no games" thing is accurate at all. Obviously that's complete bullshit. But it looks to me like the idea of new hardware is selling it just as much as software this time around.

I just want Sony to start releasing the games in the franchises that I have cared about for years. The constant delays of Uncharted are really an underline to this point. I am always on board with devs taking time to make games the best they can be, but so far a lot of their best first party studios have barely shown anything. That's where the disappointment stems from for me personally.

Regardless, it's good that it's successful. I hope it keeps them on the route they are on now rather than the way they were last gen. And I SURE as fuck hope it shows people that consoles aren't going anywhere.

wpqrfBO.jpg



Lol I'm just messing with you, but the "salt" posts when used correctly, some people obviously don't know what it refers to, is people who are bitter and cry bitter , salty tears ... not for specific posts like yours. It is pretty easy to tell which is which, the difference between

"cmon I can't wait anymore for UC4" or "I just wish uncharted was out" is a whole lot different than
"no gamezz"

but honestly your speech about sports teams did sound a little bit bitter, I mean why does it bother you if others are excited about something or want to belong to a club or a group?

If you wanted like say a dozen Sony exclusives, why didn't you just wait and buy one for cheaper a bit later?? I'm just curious because I bought my ps4 for destiny (sadly) bf4, and fallout, but got bloodborne say as a bonus.
 
No it's not. It's because Sony makes a global product and Microsoft doesn't care about appealing to anyone outside of UK and North America.
They care, the markets just don't care about them. That's a big difference.

What company would want to cut 1/2 their market and just not care? It's a strategy that a massive firm like ms wouldn't do on hardware.
 
I dont think they're close to being dead, but they are on a steady decline due to the loss of the casual market and kids. When its all said and done this generation will be lucky to match the sixth generation in sales.

There's no evidence for this though is there? Both the PS4 and XB1 are selling faster than their predecessors. And no, this won't match the previous generation in sales, because the previous gen included the Wii which was a cultural phenomenon/fad. The people that made the Wii popular never bought consoles before and likely never will again. This doesn't mean phones and tablets are taking over.
 
But i think it is. Waste of resources and franchisesis are in decline for sure. The heck, Forza 5, Forza 6 and Forza Horizon 2 probably are in same ballpark in sales like GT6. Forza franchises need a break.
Forza does need a break I agree. Great games but a total revamp could really invigorate the series.
 
They care, the markets just don't care about them. That's a big difference.

What company would want to cut 1/2 their market and just not care? It's a strategy that a massive firm like ms wouldn't do on hardware.

If they cared they would not make their products focus on just those markets.

World wide reveal, lets talk about the TV services, ( by the way they only work in USA )

Seems stupid at best, retarded at worst
 
There's no evidence for this though is there? Both the PS4 and XB1 are selling faster than their predecessors. And no, this won't match the previous generation in sales, because the previous gen included the Wii which was a cultural phenomenon/fad. The people that made the Wii popular never bought consoles before and likely never will again. This doesn't mean phones and tablets are taking over.
It's two different markets that exist along side one another and don't really compete. The supplement each other. That's my viewpoint any ways
 
They care, the markets just don't care about them. That's a big difference.

I'm sorry, but calling European and Asian nations Tier 2 and constantly peddling American military men in bulky armour as your device's defining characteristics does not present a particularly global image.

You can't just blame the market for not paying attention when Microsoft makes abundantly clear that they only really covet America and its lap dog and will take whatever else they can get as a bonus.
 
No it's not. It's because Sony makes a global product and Microsoft doesn't care about appealing to anyone outside of UK and North America.

I think they do care, they're just completely unable to. Look how hard they tried to win over the Japanese with the OG Xbox and the 360 at the start of its life cycle. They were grabbing all those JRPGs and making them exclusive to the system in a committed effort to gain marketshare in that particular country. Of course it didn't really pan out for them in the end, but you can't say they didn't try.
 
If they cared they would not make their products focus on just those markets.

World wide reveal, lets talk about the TV services, ( by the way they only work in USA )

Seems stupid at best, retarded at worst
That doesn't mean they don't care at all, they are focused where more money is and they have limited resources or options to be everything to everyone. Not caring is entirely different.
 
That doesn't mean they don't care at all, they are focused where more money is and they have limited resources or options to be everything to everyone. Not caring is entirely different.

I am not saying they dont care AT ALL, obviously they care about money and more customers will bring that.

However the perception they left from they reveal was pretty telling, that every other market was an after thought more than anything else, maybe even ignorant thinking they could ride the wave of 360.
 
What was the uptake rate for Kinect on 360 when it released. What %age of 360 owners bought a Kinect when it came out? I only ask because Sony will be sitting at about 40 million PS4 users when PSVR hits. If 1 in 40 buy into it in the first year that's a million PSVR sales, which from all accounts would make it a decent success.

If PSVR comes out in the price ranges being most talked about $300 to $400ish I just think that 1 in 40 seems very doable. Surely, when the holy grail moment of tech hits accessibility level for many consumers who already have the console that more than enough enthusiasts will be there to snap it up. I think it will sell to more than 1 in 40 PS4 owners. It seems good enough with enough support from some surprisingly good looking native VR games, and support from huge games like GT Sport, that I just can't see it being a flop.

I think Sony could be on to a winner with PS4 and PSVR. I think it could hit the ground running and of course word of mouth and real life hands on demos amongst friends and family will be the real excitement driver for VR, advertising just doesn't quite get across the brevity of the situation that VR is now actually relatively affordable and available to all, at last. See it take off.

My prediction, hold me to it. Will change avatar or whatever to reflect my defeat if totally wrong. :p
 
I'm sorry, but calling European and Asian nations Tier 2 and constantly peddling American military men in bulky armour as your device's defining characteristics does not present a particularly global image.

You can't just blame the market for not paying attention when Microsoft makes abundantly clear that they only really covet America and its lap dog and will take whatever else they can get as a bonus.

That doesn't mean they don't care. It means they made some bad choices for sure but you can be certain that ms would love to dominate each market. They just lack the resources to make it happen or are busy playing catch up where its easiest right now.
 
I am not saying they dont care AT ALL, obviously they care about money and more customers will bring that.

However the perception they left from they reveal was pretty telling, that every other market was an after thought more than anything else, maybe even ignorant thinking they could ride the wave of 360.
God that reveal was bad... I was going to get an Xbox this time around till that happened... Just awful.

Anyways, like you said, they do care and want to care but they are kinda behind the 8 ball right now.
 
That's not true. The main difference is that Sony makes a global product while Microsoft doesn't care about appealing to anyone outside of UK and North America.

Microsoft was never truly successful in other countries regardless, which is probably why they don't even bother anymore. Anybody remember those exclusive JRPGs for Xbox 360 that got quickly forgotten?

But i think it is. Waste of resources and franchisesis are in decline for sure. The heck, Forza 5, Forza 6 and Forza Horizon 2 probably are in same ballpark in sales like GT6. Forza franchises need a break.

Each Forza since 5 has sold at the very least a million copies and I'm not sure if that's even including the Xbox 360 versions of 5 and Horizon 2. And honestly they don't really need a break because both series offer completely different expereinces. Forza Motorsport is strictly a racing simulator and Forza 6 it doing over a million since its release is pretty damn good. Forza Horizon 2 is an open world racing gaming that's a lot less realistic than the main series. It's a much of a difference between 2D Mario and 3D Mario. Both are platformers but they offer different styles of play.

edit: I maybe a little biased towards the Forza series since Horizon got me hooked, I'm loving the hell out of Forza Horizon 2 and I plan on getting Forza 6 soon. I kinda wish they get a third studio going so the development cycles of Horizon and the main series go even longer and have another new racing experience.
 
I think they do care, they're just completely unable to. Look how hard they tried to win over the Japanese with the OG Xbox and the 360 at the start of its life cycle. They were grabbing all those JRPGs and making them exclusive to the system in a committed effort to gain marketshare in that particular country. Of course it didn't really pan out for them in the end, but you can't say they didn't try.

But they also dropped them like a hot brick once they got Final Fantasy. I get what you're trying to say, and there may be some truth in it, but you have to make long-term efforts to make in-roads. You can't just buy up a bunch of JRPGs and then think all is well in the world.

Look at PlayStation - it's still a major Champion's League sponsor despite dominating in Europe, because it knows it needs to stay relevant in that market. Sony's been pushing the brand relentlessly in this territory since 1995 - and that's what you have to do if you want to reap these kinds of rewards.

Microsoft was never truly successful in other countries regardless, which is probably why they don't even bother anymore. Anybody remember those exclusive JRPGs for Xbox 360 that got quickly forgotten?

Right. So, the launch didn't hinder them, then - the problem is their attitude. After all, you're not going to get anywhere if you've already given up.
 
That doesn't mean they don't care. It means they made some bad choices for sure but you can be certain that ms would love to dominate each market. They just lack the resources to make it happen or are busy playing catch up where its easiest right now.

Lacking resources? the years of planning and putting it in place, they never realized they lacked resources, riding the wave or 360?

I don't buy the resource argument.
 
The problem is that "has no games (or any lesser iteration of it)" is a false narrative and purely a subjective comment. People can pull up dreaded lists and charts to convey that this is hardly the case. This will in turn cause more lists to pop up like gremlims hitting water and they we will reach a fever cry of what constitutes an exclusive and reading tea leaves towards seeing what will be delayed. No one wants that.

Returning back to your points. The line of thinking "has no games" becomes accurate when it is immediately followed by the caveat of "that are exclusive and that I personally want." That is an opinion and opinions rock. This is not the system for you and there are others that will scratch your particular itch. If you are considering it as a future investment for games like Nier or anything else, well what's the point of complaining in a sales thread? It is coming out relatively soon.

Btw, you seriously rock for being civil in this discussion and in circumstances different than this one, I understand having an personal experience with a product that goes against the popular tide.

Wasn't trying to complain but that is how it came off. I was mainly annoyed at the "salt" thing that keeps popping up. I get that it's being used with posters that I guess are notorious for coming in threads like these and shitting on them or something, but I like to give everyone the benefit of the doubt if I can and seeing people being dismissive of others instead of just ignoring them rubs me the wrong way.

wpqrfBO.jpg



Lol I'm just messing with you, but the "salt" posts when used correctly, some people obviously don't know what it refers to, is people who are bitter and cry bitter , salty tears ... not for specific posts like yours. It is pretty easy to tell which is which, the difference between

"cmon I can't wait anymore for UC4" or "I just wish uncharted was out" is a whole lot different than
"no gamezz"

but honestly your speech about sports teams did sound a little bit bitter, I mean why does it bother you if others are excited about something or want to belong to a club or a group?

If you wanted like say a dozen Sony exclusives, why didn't you just wait and buy one for cheaper a bit later?? I'm just curious because I bought my ps4 for destiny (sadly) bf4, and fallout, but got bloodborne say as a bonus.

Well, I guess it bothers me because I am a very easily agitated person. Not trying to be a smartass either, that's just kind of the truth.

And I did just that actually. I got it a couple months ago because after Sony's E3 I knew I friggin needed one for this year. However I was super excited for the PS4 before it came out and have desperately wanted a reason to get one for years, it always bummed me out not being able to justify it until recently. I'm not pissed at Sony or anything, it came off that way earlier I guess because I wasn't in a great mood.

I'm actually just relieved to see the lineup for this year, of course I wish it didn't take so long, but I shouldn't hold it against them. There are good reasons for these things that have been pointed out to me.

Also that picture actually made me laugh.
 
Microsoft was never truly successful in other countries regardless, which is probably why they don't even bother anymore. Anybody remember those exclusive JRPGs for Xbox 360 that got quickly forgotten?



Each Forza since 5 has sold at the very least a million copies and I'm not sure if that's even including the Xbox 360 versions of 5 and Horizon 2. And honestly they don't really need a break because both series offer completely different expereinces. Forza Motorsport is strictly a racing simulator and Forza 6 it doing over a million since its release is pretty damn good. Forza Horizon 2 is an open world racing gaming that's a lot less realistic than the main series. It's a much of a difference between 2D Mario and 3D Mario. Both are platformers but they offer different styles of play.

Forza 6 over a million with much larger install base objectively is not good. Especially when Forza 5 sold more at smaller user base.
 
Top Bottom