RustyNails
Member
The end. There was similar cringey super positive reaction from early MoS screening from comicbook nerds.A bunch of comic nerds blessed with an early screening gave positive impressions of said film? Shocking.
The end. There was similar cringey super positive reaction from early MoS screening from comicbook nerds.A bunch of comic nerds blessed with an early screening gave positive impressions of said film? Shocking.
He becomes a lot better if you erase Lex Luthor from your mind and assume that he's playing the true villain of the movie: Max Landis.
Keaton has to have one of the most overrated performances of all time. He was a pretty bad Bruce and great Batman. The guy acts nothing like Bruce. With his acting ability, I have to accept that he never read a comic because the guy didn't seem to know shit about Bruce Wayne based on his portrayal. He was a 1 dimensional cool rich guy with no depth at all during Bruce's portrayal. Bale always did Bruce as an amazing job but had that awful Batman voice as Batman.It's not hard to be better than Val Kilmer or George Clooney's Batman. Nor is it probably hard to be better than gravel voice always-has-his-mouth-open Christian Bale Batman. The only real competition Affleck has is Michael Keaton.
Grace Randolph loved it too.Devin Faraci suggesting this movie is anything less than an absolute trainwreck that makes the human raise collectively give up on cinema is utterly bizarro. This is Bizarro World.
I like the Batman fighting footage. But his acting is just atrocious. I can never take him seriously.
Are Early impressions ever not positive for these types of movies?
Please show me images of these men wearing red pants over trousers in this movie.
The thing is, this movie has had the most anti-hype ever. Really.Reality hadn't sunk in yet before the hype died down.
The end. There was similar cringey super positive reaction from early MoS screening from comicbook nerds.
Everyone wanted SW to be great though, a lot of people have been shitting on BvS before they ever saw it.Well, no, they're almost always positive, but it's still encouraging that SOMEONE liked it, especially once it's critics you might know and/or respect.
Then again, there's also the infamous "honeymoon" phase... The Star Wars prequels had some of the most hysterically funny reviews in hindsight, praising it from here to the moon as this absolutely transcendent, near-religious experience with high scores and acclaim. Reality hadn't sunk in yet before the hype died down.
The thing is, this movie has had the most anti-hype ever. Really.
So what are you gonna say if the critics come out and give it a positive review? That they're bunch of idiot fanboys too?
The thing is, this movie has had the most anti-hype ever. Really.
nobody is seeing this for cavill though
None of these things are for kids. Zero.
(maybe Sky High? That's like, the one exception I can think of)
Crazy Sepia tone scenes of Batman fighting demons only happens in a dream sequence?In short:
The trailers are deceptive
It looks okay, but why do we keep getting movies from a director whose biggest fans expect at-best C- reviewed films from him?
I'm going to go out on a limb and say you haven't watched any Batman vs Superman trailers.
Or watched Man of Steel.
Or read any recent Superman comics.
I'm just here to see the big screen debut of Ambush Bug.Interesting. I and others have no desire to see Affleck as Batman, so ... it probably evens out.
Keaton has to have one of the most overrated performances of all time. He was a pretty bad Bruce and great Batman. The guy acts nothing like Bruce. With his acting ability, I have to accept that he never read a comic because the guy didn't seem to know shit about Bruce Wayne based on his portrayal. He was a 1 dimensional cool rich guy with no depth at all during Bruce's portrayal. Bale always did Bruce as an amazing job but had that awful Batman voice as Batman.
All Batmans were awful. Keaton was solid, Bale was pretty good.
You're not better than the guys you complain about though. Everyone will know whether he thinks the movie is good or bad once he's seen it, not by copying whatever other guys opinion.It's not a children's film, but yes, I am.
I won't, though my opinion will still be the ultimate say on my impression, but I'm more willing to trust actual critics than a bunch of comic nerds granted an early screening. Do you think they would be granted such a screening if the big wigs thought they'd spread bad word?
So am I to understand you think that literally every person who has seen the movie thus far was hand selected by WB because they are fanboys?
In short:
The trailers are deceptive
Batfleck is best live-action Batman to date
Gal Gadot steals the show
http://comicbook.com/2016/03/21/first-reactions-to-batman-v-superman-are-very-positive/
Does this affect anyone's RT prediction?
https://twitter.com/carlcunningham/status/711720615896600576 said:Carl Cunningham
‏@carlcunningham
I love Keaton more than anyone, but this is the best live action Batman ever. And it's not even remotely close. #BatmanvSuperman
White male privilege.
I refuse to believe that Ben Affleck of all people is the best live action Batman.
Yes, that is 100% what I am saying...
Let me put it this way, random movie goer already foaming at the mouth to watch the movie is going to have a less objective opinion of the film than an actual critic.
I'm just saying early impressions for movies like these are one sided.So what are you gonna say if the critics come out and give it a positive review? That they're bunch of idiot fanboys too?
What.. HOW? Seriously, how did you get to that conclusion? I can't even fathom how someone can have this perspective. Where was Keaton ever shown have a semblance of personality other than cool rich guy. Every scene with Alfred you see the real Bruce with Bale.I'm actually in the opposite camp regarding Bale's Bruce and Keaton's Bruce. Bale's felt really one dimensional and fake to me while Keaton's felt like it had some life behind it, granted that could be Keaton's natural charisma oozing into the performance a bit. The scene in the 89 Batman where he's in that armory with Knox and Vale is a good example of this, I was also a fan of how Keaton's Bruce just walks into Christopher Walken's board room in Batman Returns and immediately starts grilling Walken about his ties to the Penguin like any snobby business executive might. That stuff made Keaton's Bruce feel like an actual person and I can't think of anything Bale's Bruce did that was like that.
I know playboy Bruce Wayne is supposed to be just a cover for Batman - but Keaton's Bruce actually felt like a second person while Bale's Bruce felt like a really fake persona.
What.. HOW? Seriously, how did you get to that conclusion? I can't even fathom how someone can have this perspective. Where was Keaton ever shown have a semblance of personality other than cool rich guy. Every scene with Alfred you see the real Bruce with Bale.
In short:
The trailers are deceptive
Batfleck is best live-action Batman to date
Gal Gadot steals the show
http://comicbook.com/2016/03/21/first-reactions-to-batman-v-superman-are-very-positive/
Does this affect anyone's RT prediction?
Except critics have already seen the movie and have given positive impressions. Also, you don't seem to know how these things work, lol. The fan screenings haven't even happened yet. That's tonight.
This... is the worst post I've seen on this forum yet.
Where was Keaton ever shown have a semblance of personality other than cool rich guy.
My friend went to the NYC premiere yesterday, and the first thing out his mouth was that Wonder Woman was the best part of the movie. That surprised me, too!
I can see that going about as well as the Ant-Man crow thread.Im setting the table for crow. Who ever wins, someone is eating it.
Variety Chief called it better than The Avengers. Grace Randolph, notorious detractor, says everyone should see it, there are other few. And the mexican one who sounds like was having babies of the excitement lolWhich critics? What publications?
Should I bother watching Man of Steel before this?
I dunno Bobby maybe not all of them but my friends who are parents swear that their favorite babysitter is the first Avengers movie. It has whatever je ne sais quois is required to engage a two year old for the duration, which is pretty impressive for a 2+ hour movie.