BronsonLee
Member
Well, I guess if there is even a 1% chance that you are right then I guess I have to take that as an absolute certainty.
If it helps, I totally write for the Orlando Sun. AND Forbes!
Oh no.
Well, I guess if there is even a 1% chance that you are right then I guess I have to take that as an absolute certainty.
If it helps, I totally write for the Orlando Sun. AND Forbes!
You haven't provided a single specific example of why Bale's Bruce was better though. You're just shooting down what other people are using to show that Keaton's Bruce had some depth to him. For the record I don't hate Bale's Bruce, but his Bruce is only solid in Batman Begins and then his Bruce becomes a one-dimensional plank of wood in the sequels while every other character upstages him.
I'm fine with people preferring Keaton. But him being a better Bruce is too ridiculous for me to take seriously considering how 1 dimensional he was. Anyways, we're shitting the thread with this argument.....You need to relax. Luckily there is an iteration of the character for everyone. A lot of people prefer the Keaton movies. A lot of them prefer the Nolan movies.
It really boils down to what your expectations are from what you want to see in these types of movies.
"Forbes Contributor"
Because Bruce is truly aware that the world around him is fake and that the real world is far more violent and unhinged and he uses both of his personas to fit in accordingly. nolan verse had the same idea with Alfred wanting Bale to do more of what Keaton was doing...fit into the phoniness.
But they aren't? It's specifically people saying they don't listen to early impressions because reasons.Neither is yelling "ECHOCHAMBER" when people are sharing their hesitation about this movie.
So I guess you missed the ellipses (indicating sarcasm) when I said that was 100% what I was saying? I proceeded to parse out my response in the next sentence.
That is not what ellipses are used for.
There will be a lot of crow eating regarding:
- Aflleck as Batman
- Jessie playing Luthor
- Gal as Wonder Woman
Aren't early impressions always almost exclusively positive ?
Um...yes.
They serve more than one purpose.
The haters backed off of Gal pretty early on after the initial furor died down.
Um...yes.
They serve more than one purpose.
can't wait to see it, marvel doin it for money, DC doin it for pleasure.
Huh, didn't know he's Iranian. Cool.Also even from the NY chief of Variety:
![]()
No hate on Gal but she would honestly be last person I would want to play as Wonder Women.
I'm still very hesitant on her playing as Wonder Women, but who knows she could be very great.
Grace Randolph loved it too.
I'm glad to hear its doing well. I'm really hoping this somehow changes people's perception on MoS (which I still defend), since it addresses the fallout of Zod/Supes.
The true mastermind behind it all.
You're talking nonsense, did you fall asleep during the sequels especially TDKR?
Keaton did not have a contained rage at all, he just played a happy go round playboy. And Nolan's Batman trilogy is far superior to Burtons. Bale saying he didn't do as good of a job as he wanted to doesn't diminish him being better than Keaton's 1 dimensional performance. Bale is one the premiere actors of his generation, him not being satisfied doesn't mean it's better than whatever Keaton at the time came up with.Different movies with different expectations. Nolan's movies were thrillers about what drives a man to put on a bat costume. The trilogy were movies with a more character driven plot that pushed characters to their next scenes, sometimes correctly in way of their MO and others by (mostly) using convenient plot devices to get them to the next scene. this is why i have disdain for the Nolan movies. They put in good work into character building and then betrayed them with horrible screenwriting so ultimately, the means didnt justify the end.
'89 and Returns took pride in being able to have a dark tone yet still have fun with the source material and retain much of a comic book feel. They were meant to be spectacles first and foremost and not intended to be some deep seeded psychiatric look into these characters. With that being said, Keaton recognized then in interviews that there was something wrong with Bruce and he made the most he could with the material which did take the time to provide insight in way of dialogue (that batcave scene i mentioned was a glimpse into this). This was never intended to be a look into what drove him to being Batman. By the beginning of the movie, he WAS Batman. With that said, Keaton displayed a contained rage about him across both films. This is why i say it was a nuanced performance. It's in his eyes, his actions, and not explicit exposition.
While Bale had a more character driven performance, it is questionable if it was even a successful one. Again, even Bale himself attested that it wasn't so there's that.
What ways are they deceptive?
In the comments:
Because rushing a team up movie from which to spin off a crapload of spin offs to make a movie-verse like marvel, isn't doin' it for money...
In all seriousness though, first reactions are almost always more positive than when it properly releases, so i will remain sceptical.
Keaton did not have a contained rage at all,
Seph's view is one of the most ridiculous opinions I've ever heard, especially as he saw Bale as 1 dimensional and nuanced Keaton as having depth (...).
How was he 1 dimensional? All his scenes with Alfred. His scene with Harvey at dinner is how you portray a nuanced bruce playboy. Rachel scenes. I don't know how the hell someone can say 1 dimensional for 2 and 3 considering Bruce is a different character in both movies.
I will say, it does hurt one's ego to hear their opinions kind of dismissed outright or lumped into one... aren't all early impressions usually positive.
Doesn't mean couldn't have legit enjoy it!
No. Never. We knew from the moment we walked out of Episode I that something was wrong.I honestly would take impressions from fans with a grain of salt.
I mean wasn't there a time where fans thought the prequels of Star Wars were good? Not to say the impressions are 100% wrong because they could be right.
Agree withe everything except in bold. The blurred lines of facade vs reality is made clear when you watch him have dinner with Vale, for example, then watch him dance with Selina in returns. One "Bruce" is real while the other isn't. Dude sat in his cave alone and socialized only when he had to.
Remember, early impressions of TDK Rises were very positive too. Keep that in mind before hoping on the hype train.
My main concern is the writing.
Have you seen it and given impressions on it here? If so, could you give me a link? I thought your Deadpool review/impressions turned out to be very accurate, so i'd be interested in what you thought about this film, provided that you didn't spoil much.
To be fair DC are not even rushing it though. Compare the movie universe line ups:
1) Iron Man
2) Incredible Hulk
3) Iron Man 2
4) Thor
5) Captain America
**Avengers**
1) Man of Steel
2) Batman V Superman
3) Suicide Sqaud
4) Wonder Woman
**Justice League: Part 1**
1 film less in DC universe in build up to team up.
![]()
To be fair DC are not even rushing it though. Compare the movie universe line ups:
1) Iron Man
2) Incredible Hulk
3) Iron Man 2
4) Thor
5) Captain America
**Avengers**
1) Man of Steel
2) Batman V Superman
3) Suicide Sqaud
4) Wonder Woman
**Justice League: Part 1**
1 film less in DC universe in build up to team up.
![]()
Yeah, this has me the most worried. It's the same writer (David Goyer) from Man of Steel, which had some stilted-ass dialogue. And from the BvS trailers, it sounds like the trend continues: Lex's "three-syllable word" quip, "tell me, do you bleed," "you've never met a woman like me," so many eye rolls in such a short amount of time. Maybe the story will be good, but I'm afraid that dialogue is gonna keep knocking me out of the movie. My only hope is Terrio, who's also billed as a writer, but that hope dwindles further with every trailer I see.
On the plus side, I have such low hopes for this movie that it can only meet my expectations or exceed them. Only going up from here!
No. Never. We knew from the moment we walked out of Episode I that something was wrong.