PS4K information (~2x GPU power w/ clock+, new CPU, price, tent. Q1 2017)

This is the weirdest argument ever. Are we really asking that when we have DF articles for every game? Stop being weird. People asking this know exactly why the thought of a more powerful console so soon is a cause of concern.




And that will continue to happen?

just like ps4 being more powerful than xbox1 it doesn't change the performance of the xbox1, it will would perform the same whether the ps4 existed or not. complaining that your console is no longer the best performing is a different argument.
 
Curious to see the specs of the machine. GPU sounds like Tonga with 28 CU (instead of 18 CU currently). 28 CU = 1792sp against 1154sp in the current PS4. The frequency will be 1Ghz instead of 800Mhz.

Yeah... of if my maths are correct, Tonga is the one fitting the description of the first post. 1792sp at 1Ghz = 3.5~3.6Tflops.
 
As long as this doesn't divide the player base and I can play PS4k games on my PS4 I don't see a big issue. I just hope the difference between the two isn't way too big
 
just like ps4 being more powerful than xbox1 it doesn't change the performance of the xbox1, it will would perform the same whether the ps4 existed or not. complaining that your console is no longer the best performing is a different argument.

Yeah, people keep saying this and it doesn't make sense either because you're not looking at in the sense of this being a successor. The PS4 was more powerful than the PS3; it didn't change its performance, it caused devs to stop making games for it and the games that continued being made for it either ran poorly or were extremely limited compared to the other versions.


If people really care about graphics like that then buy a PC, you'll probably save money in the long run.

But I'm still assuming that this is mainly for VR and everything else is a supplement.
 
BULL!
Look at last gen right at the end. amazing looking games were coming out that people thought were impossible to pull off.

games looks better at the end of last gen, sure, but many of them are also subHD and below 30fps most of the time.

even technical wizard like Naughty Dog's The Last of Us didn't perform as good as Uncharted 2.

end of last gen is when I start to invest upgrading my desktop to be decent gaming pc because PS3 games performance start to bother me too much. I'd be glad if I had the option for mid gen update for PS4 so I'm not having another of those sub HD resolution and below 25fps average
 
This is the weirdest argument ever. Are we really asking that when we have DF articles for every game? Stop being weird. People asking this know exactly why the thought of a more powerful console so soon is a cause of concern.




And that will continue to happen?

The only thing weird here is how you think df articles prove that weaker consoles get gimped versions somehow. I thought it was ps4 no parity... Now I'm learning that xboxone is getting gimp versions apparently since weaker consoles get screwed
 
If they release a $499 PS4k+PSVR bundle with no controller, camera or move controllers for existing PS4 owners this would be a win for Sony. I would do that.

You're expecting a 50% discount on two brand new pieces of hardware just because you own an old PS4? That's straight up impossible to happen.
 
But that doesn't stop PS4 sales momentum, PS4 still on track to hit 100m with weak ass hardware.

Before we know about PS4.5, not many people asking for it, not many say "I'm done with console if PS4 can't be more powerful"

That doesn't mean those people can't have an option that is better for them. I'm not even one of those complainers, I find that whining to be so over the top about such minor crap, but I would definitely upgrade a PS4 to get better visuals/performance.
 
Yeah, people keep saying this and it doesn't make sense either because you're not looking at in the sense of this being a successor. The PS4 was more powerful than the PS3; it didn't change its performance, it caused devs to stop making games for it and the games that continued being made for it either ran poorly or were extremely limited compared to the other versions.

this wouldn't be a jump in power anywhere near ps3 to ps4. that was around a 10 times jump in power. this is only a 2 times jump.
 
BULL!
Look at last gen right at the end. amazing looking games were coming out that people thought were impossible to pull off.

Games at the end of last gen had lots of compromises in resolution and framerate. This is to specifically avoid situations like the end of last gen. The space between the release of the PS4 and this is almost as much as the original Xbox and the 360 and isn't nearly as much of a jump in power. I think it's a reasonable timeframe, especially if the original PS4 is properly supported afterward.
 
This is the weirdest argument ever. Are we really asking that when we have DF articles for every game? Stop being weird. People asking this know exactly why the thought of a more powerful console so soon is a cause of concern.




And that will continue to happen?
Yes, but to a smaller degree than we've ever seen before.
 
this wouldn't be a jump in power anywhere near ps3 to ps4. that was around a 10 times jump in power. this is only a 2 times jump.

It's still a more powerful successor which gives devs reasons to leave the prior system alone for their game instead of trying to accommodate for it or make sacrifices. That's a reasonable reason for people to not like it.

Yes, but to a smaller degree than we've ever seen before.

But still not really close.
 
That doesn't mean those people can't have an option that is better for them. I'm not even one of those complainers, I find that whining to be so over the top about such minor crap, but I would definitely upgrade a PS4 to get better visuals/performance.

Yes, option is good, I want PS4K too.
If we keep transitional generation transition but add a high performance hardware option, I wound't complaint that much.
But I fear this will lead the industry into PC/iOS model and I don't want console to follow that.
 
Updated:

Pros
• Backwards and forwards compatibility;
• No more restarting OS from scratch;
• Less risk with introducing new (costly) tech;
• Less chance of PS2/3 situations for devs having to learn alien tech;
• Closer to the bleeding edge (for those that want it);
• Consumer choice regarding how much to spend;
• No/less need for remasters.

Cons
• Faster transitions.
• Exclusives on PS4K due to not being possible on PS4.

I honestly think that is the part where Sony could cause the most damage to their seemingly admirable reputation. The pros listed are fine as long as the PS4 continues to receive support which is very likely mostly due to the immense fanbase. 4K VR games or even an indie exclusive game here and there imo wouldn't necessarily be as bad for the obvious reasons, but if something like Uncharted 5 or Bloodborne 2 goes PS4K exclusive, I am predicting riots from Sony fans.

My primary concern is some gamers prefer like console gaming because of simplicity and knowing that the game they are purchasing will work on their console of choice for several years without having to add peripherals or upgrades to keep it relevant or fully functional. A PC/ios/android upgrade model for console gaming imo could be very detrimental for the industry when you know your investment could be rendered obsolete within a couple of years. Of course other companies would follow this trend if they see one company succeed with it. Two models can coexist if they implement this strategy properly. Admittedly, I might even consider a PS4K if it is legitimate depending on the situation. I definitely think making exclusive "high profile" games for it is a vast mistake that will cause an outrage amongst gamers imho.
 
I honestly think that is the part where Sony could cause the most damage to their reputation. The pros listed are fine as long as the PS4 continues to receive support which is very likely mostly due to the immense fanbase. 4K VR games or even an indie exclusive game here and there imo wouldn't necessarily be as bad for the obvious reasons, but if something like Uncharted 5 or Bloodborne 2 goes PS4K exclusive, I am predicting riots from Sony fans.

VR games are the only area where I think Sony would allow a 4k exclusive. Maybe an indie title if it was really pushing tech but they'll absolutely make sure all of their first party games work on the PS4 for the next several years.
 
Yes, option is good, I want PS4K too.
If we keep transitional generation transition but add a high performance hardware option, I wound't complaint that much.
But I fear this will lead the industry into PC/iOS model and I don't want console to follow that.

I mean it could go that way but it could just as easily do the concept but with longer durations. Nothing at this time shows that Sony wants to start annual updates.
 
I honestly think that is the part where Sony could cause the most damage to their reputation. The pros listed are fine as long as the PS4 continues to receive support which is very likely mostly due to the immense fanbase. 4K VR games or even an indie exclusive game here and there imo wouldn't necessarily be as bad for the obvious reasons, but if something like Uncharted 5 or Bloodborne 2 goes PS4K exclusive, I am predicting riots from Sony fans.

I don't think AAA like Bloodborne 2 or U5 will be PS4K exclusive, that is probably going to be the biggest fuck up than X1 announcement. But I expect a half ass performance on OG PS4 especially from Ubisoft which is why I'm upset with this idea.
 
Yes, option is good, I want PS4K too.
If we keep transitional generation transition but add a high performance hardware option, I wound't complaint that much.
But I fear this will lead the industry into PC/iOS model and I don't want console to follow that.

3-4 years is a good timeframe for updates like this. I really hope that if it's continued in the future, that's the standard.
 
I mean it could go that way but it could just as easily do the concept but with longer durations. Nothing at this time shows that Sony wants to start annual updates.

It's no that much about annual update, thou I hate that too, it's the infinite cross gen of PC/iOS model that I fear the most.
 
I don't think AAA like Bloodborne 2 or U5 will be PS4K exclusive, that is probably going to be the biggest fuck up than X1 announcement. But I expect a half ass performance on OG PS4 especially from Ubisoft which is why I'm upset with this idea.

I stopped buying Ubisoft games after AC3, maybe you should too.

Edit: Stopped buying AAA Ubisoft games.
 
Well no, not really. Your point wasn't simply "people need to chill". It was "it's gonna be a slim". Which makes it not as valid.
To be more clear, the point I was referring to was what you quoted.
'No it's not'
'prove me wrong'
'Prove yourself right'
Was the round of one liners I believe. :)

All the speculation by the smartest analysts in the world won't give us any more valid arguments than yours or mine.

2x power and higher price point are the only leaks we've really heard. My objective view that this is just a 'slim' type release like they do with every console they've made thus far, in the year that a slim version would normally come in a PlayStation console life cycle, and that isn't so far fetched now is it?

I think they are just changing the formula a bit, so the 'new model' has a bit more kick to it rather than just a bigger hard drive/smaller form factor. And will be priced accordingly while the original model gets a price drop instead.

All this while maintaining the player base as a whole by allowing the same games to be played throughout the generation, this is also much more inline with what the leaks have told us this far from my view, at least more so than most of the 'Sony screwed us all' posts that have ravaged the thread.

So once again, people need to chill, and any one telling me I need to 'prove myself right' should honestly take their own advice. ;) in matter of speaking. (And I'm not singling you out mind you, just repeating the phrase)
 
I don't think AAA like Bloodborne 2 or U5 will be PS4K exclusive, that is probably going to be the biggest fuck up than X1 announcement. But I expect a half ass performance on OG PS4 especially from Ubisoft which is why I'm upset with this idea.

What's with all the conspiracy theories.

Its going to be like PC. Higher spec gets better framerate, shadows etc. Just like with PC if you want better performance you have to pay up
 
Forward compatibility is my only problem with this idea.

We can have all the pros you listed without risking any problem a quick iteration will bring if Sony just wait another 18 month, release PS5 instead, without forcing forward compatibility.
We really don't need a new hardware at year 3 to achieve all that.

But...What if PS5 is further away than we think. Nearer 2021/22 than 2019/20? Also, are you suggesting that when PS5 hits they drop support for PS4 completely? If not then a level of forward compatibility is implied - unless PS5 is a radical departure in hardware architecture then it'd be the usual cross-gen porting scenario.

Looking at PC, IOS and Android development where hardware range remains more diverse Its hard to see how this is going to be a serious problem for most devs to achieve.

Cons
• Faster transitions.
• Exclusives on PS4K due to not being possible on PS4.

As with others, this is the possibility that concerns me. It's the only real issue with the plan. Eventually it has to happen, but timing is everything. In ideal world this wouldn't happen until near or around PS5 lunch, assuming that to is going to be a similar iterative jump in hardware performance rather than a complete new hardware design.

It's a bad message trying to force gamers to switch too quickly, and it's a bad idea to leave a large install base in the cold. In the past they had little choice because the old hardware had its life span stretched for as long as possible come the end it was so tired that continuing support was difficult. Now they have an opportunity, a method, to smooth the cycle so they are not forced into leaving customers behind. It becomes one platform.
 
What's with all the conspiracy theories.

Its going to be like PC. Higher spec gets better framerate, shadows etc. Just like with PC if you want better performance you have to pay up

Except on PC you have the ability to change the visual settings and resolution to boost framerate, you can't do that on console.
 
By who though? PC crowd? yes
the many randoms I play with online? Nope.
GAF? You know it since people seem to never be happy on here about anything. Will call a game awesome and great and then 1-2 years later say it was bad really.


... The games media were pretty clear about the consoles not being cutting edge when they released Listen to Gerstman or go read the Digital Foundry articles...

I didn't realize you had 39 million friends on your friends list to gauge how PS4 owners feel about the consoles performance.

I know GAF loved the frame rate of Fallout 4 and Just Cause LOL or even the stuttered gameplay of Bloodborne (Admittedly a great game)

The point is the consoles are using architecture very close to PC so the days of eeking out every last bit of power towards the end of the lifespan is just not a reality on the current machines. People hanging their hat on the PS3 producing the best looking games at the end of the lifespan neglected to take into consideration that it was on the cell architecture (something brand new and unexplored) If you legitimately believe there is some hidden power inside the PS4 that is yet to be tapped by developers you are kidding yourself...
 
You say that, but gamers seem to be the ones doing as much to immolate that draw these days, since they seem less and less impressed with what devs can eke out of hardware later in a generation and more often just seem to wish they had moved the game to next-gen hardware so it had a better framerate.

I don't recall anyone ever saying that. What i hear is complaining about performance issues which is not a hardware problem but a developer problem that is almost always eventually solved via patch.

And those others who want 60fp, higher res, higher AA ect have always been better served on PC. There's literally no connection with the hardware or the users who have bought over 40 mil of these things and being disappointed.
 
This is probably a really dumb question but..assuming the GPU is at least twice as powerful does that directly translate to twice the teraflops? So we can assume PS4K is at minimum 3.68 teraflops?
 
I don't recall anyone ever saying that.
And those others who want 60fp, higher res, higher AA ect have always been better served on PC. There's literally no connection with the hardware or the users who have bought over 40 mil of these things and being disappointed.

I'm a PS4 owner and I want 60fps higher AA etc on my PS4... so I will buy the new PS4K if it delivers on those fronts. What the hell is wrong with options?
 
Except on PC you have the ability to change the visual settings and resolution to boost framerate, you can't do that on console.

Not to mention your PC gaming library will still be generally compatible with any upgrades you make. The current PS4 gaming library will only be updated via patch by choice of developers.
 
I'm a PS4 owner and I want 60fps higher AA etc on my PS4... so I will buy the new PS4K if it delivers on those fronts. What the hell is wrong with options?
Options on a console... Heh.. No. Locked hardware for a reason. Want all them options go play pc really. Why should the average consumer hey betrayed for a few entitled pricks?

/slightlydrinkintonight
 
Forward compatibility is my only problem with this idea.

We can have all the pros you listed without risking any problem a quick iteration will bring if Sony just wait another 18 month, release PS5 instead, without forcing forward compatibility.
We really don't need a new hardware at year 3 to achieve all that.

What don't you like about forward compatibility?
That just means PS4 games can run on PS4.5.
It likely won't go on past that (for the big games at least) as I'm sure Sony would want people to upgrade.
Keeping two systems alive at any one time is enough.

There won't be PS4K exclusives, 2x the power doesn't justitfy to jeopardize a 40mn install base. Maybe (!) some VR games just won't be playable on PS4, but don't worry about costly AAA productions. "Faster transitions" perfectly summarizes the problems with this new approach, incl. costs.

I was just referring to VR (maybe should mark as such)
 
I'm a PS4 owner and I want 60fps higher AA etc on my PS4... so I will buy the new PS4K if it delivers on those fronts. What the hell is wrong with options?

So what happens when your PS4K games progress to the point where they're not 60fps anymore and start making sacrifices as all consoles will? at what point will you decide to get a PC?
 
This is probably a really dumb question but..assuming the GPU is at least twice as powerful does that directly translate to twice the teraflops? So we can assume PS4K is at minimum 3.68 teraflops?

I wouldn't take any of it at face value just yet, as mentioned the CPU isn't finalised so really anything could change since the whole SKU isn't locked down.
 
Options on a console... Heh.. No. Locked hardware for a reason. Want all them options go play pc really. Why should the average consumer hey betrayed for a few entitled pricks?

/slightlydrinkintonight

What reason? Simply because that's the way it was/is currently?

Entitled? I think the entitled one is the person wanting to hold back technology simply because they don't want to feel like their box is obsolete.

Also I have a PC so yes I am used to 1080/60fps gaming but I'd like to have that on my console also or at least have the choice

No need for name calling <_<
 
What reason? Simply because that's the way it was/is currently?

Entitled? I think the entitled one is the person wanting to hold back technology simply because they don't want to feel like their box is obsolete.

Also I have a PC so yes I am used to 1080/60fps gaming but I'd like to have that on my console also or at least have the choice

No need for name calling <_<
Oh shush technology isn't held back at all. Look at battle front
Looked amazing on consoles even.
Tech is progressing still add developers continue to develop p. You make it sound like they're too dumb to progress paid console
 
PC gamers see their expensive video cards surpassed by new models every year. Getting hung up on not having the "best" isn't really an option unless you have a lot of money to dump into this hobby. Console gamers are just not used to this way of thinking.

The initial investment in a PS4 or Xbox One shouldn't be looked at any differently as long as the future games are forward/backward compatible, and they will be. This move isn't intended to force people to upgrade their hardware, it just makes the option available for those that want better. The only change I expect is more 30 FPS titles which is pretty common now anyways. And of course PSVR should work much better with PS4K.
 
Entitled? I think the entitled one is the person wanting to hold back technology simply because they don't want to feel like their box is obsolete.

Nail. On. The. Head.

So many people so worried that their current consoles aren't going to be supported. They will be until PS5 hits...

If Sony went with a PS5 in 2018 rather than this iterative model then your existing console wouldn't be forward supported at all!

This allows them to extend the life of the PS4 to 2021 and have the full 8 year cycle before moving onto brand new hardware with games designed only for it.
 
PC gamers see their expensive video cards surpassed by new models every year. Getting hung up on not having the "best" isn't really an option unless you have a lot of money to dump into this hobby. Console gamers are just not used to this way of thinking.

The initial investment in a PS4 or Xbox One shouldn't be looked at any differently as long as the future games are forward/backward compatible, and they will be. This move isn't intended to force people to upgrade their hardware, it just makes the option available for those that want better. The only change I expect is more 30 FPS titles which is pretty common now anyways. And of course PSVR should work much better with PS4K.
So nostrils gamers are supposed to just sit by and watch their shit just turn into steam boxes where there's variety depending no! Fuck no! If I wanted that shit I would further have upgraded my goddamn pc for fuck sake! Get real
 
Nail. On. The. Head.

So many people so worried that their current consoles aren't going to be supported. They will be until PS5 hits...

If Sony went with a PS5 in 2018 rather than this iterative model then your existing console wouldn't be forward supported at all!

This allows them to extend the life of the PS4 to 2021 and have the full 8 year cycle before moving onto brand new hardware with games designed only for it.
/looks back at all the games wlsyill releasing for ps4 and 360 to this day... What?
 
Nail. On. The. Head.

So many people so worried that their current consoles aren't going to be supported. They will be until PS5 hits...

If Sony went with a PS5 in 2018 rather than this iterative model then your existing console wouldn't be forward supported at all!

This allows them to extend the life of the PS4 to 2021 and have the full 8 year cycle before moving onto brand new hardware with games designed only for it.

saying this with full confidence like there's a precedent for it
 
Top Bottom