Batman V Superman’ Takes A Dive With -70% Second Weekend

Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn't someone say that like 70% of the BvS screens were going to be changed to some other movie the week after it released? That would explain the epic drop (WB hopes).

There is a Sammo Hung movie woth Andy Lau coming it, so there is a little competition over there. And there is a tradional holiday coming up. It's not just a China thing, Hong Kong isn't buying into BvS either, it's dropped by 75% there as well, the shame is that in HK it's taking all the screens from Zootopia which also opened last week.
 
Is that the one where Reed Richards explains the differences in their geniuses? Because yes, that was brilliant. Really speaks to what makes these characters tick.

Yup. Hickman's run was really one of the best modern runs in recent memory.
 
Believe Polygon had a article about something similar to this and why you DON'T have to see it, not about how bad the movie is but the mentally of some people and that they HAVE to see it, despite the movie not having many redeeming qualities.
There is some inherent value in seeing a movie for yourself and in order to have a more informed opinion on why you don't think it works. (This is directed at the Polygon article)

I really wanted this movie to be good. Even though it's in-universe and real world raison d'être was flimsy for me right from the start. I even had my reservations about Snyder, but I figured what the hay, "I''ll give a chance anyways" I was really disparate to see my favorite childhood characters on the screen for the first time.
 
Who is this douchenozzle supposed to be?

CfDDF8ZUkAMAzr1.jpg

I'm somehow more disturbed by this than I am by our proposed "avatar" for AlteredBeast.
 
I'm sure the number of screenings for the film has already taken a tumble. As for screens, there's definitely the case that this doesn't need to tie up 3-4 screens in most multiplexes for what would generously be a mid-20s third weekend.

I doubt a ton of venues will completely drop the film in week 3 though. There are two 3k+ venue openers and a couple limited releases coming next weekend. However, you still have shit like Allegiant, Miracles from Heaven, and MBFGW2 tying up over 3k screens each. 10 Cloverfield Lane is still in over 2500 venues. Greek Wedding 2 is the only one of those films hitting 8 digits this weekend. They will take most of the theatre losses next weekend.

My guess is that BvS will drop about 400-500 locations next weekend. Perhaps even less.

Yeah there is no real pressure to switch screens over to anything else next week, not like any showings of anything are going to sell out, and I doubt having a few extra showings of anything else will get more people in the seats.
 
Kiiiiiiiiii, not surprised. I knew when I wasted my $20 on this movie to see it in IMAX 3D and fell asleep 3 times which I have never done in a movie ever, was when I knew this was whack and was going to suffer badly because of it. Sorry but this was just a horribly done movie. One of my friends saw it twice but I understand that his DC fanboyism just didn't want to see it fail.. Lol.
 
LMAO at least B v. S will be remembered for something.
M4oe5vt.gif


Path is now clear for Civil War to get that $200 million opening weekend.
 
Cause that's the way it is. There's no rhyme or reason for half the shit in comics.

A common plot justification is that Bruce flat-out tells Clark to stay the hell out of his city. It works in most circumstances because that just the right amount of pettiness that he would engage in.

The reason why Superman doesn't help out in Gotham is because it would make Batman stories pretty boring. The in-universe reason is that Batman doesn't want the help, or his presence in Gotham undermined, which is fair I guess - he wants to catharsis of beating people up all to himself.

For a movie that is trying to be more “realistic” than it source material, I found Gotham being across the bay in Snyder universe stupid.

I understand comic reasons-“ it’s my turf, stay out!” But this Bats and Sups don’t have the relationship established in the various incarnations of the comics.

Because that the “way things are in comic” or it “would make Batman stories boring” are writer issues. It’s the writers job to make even the stupidest thing in their story world possible. Again, because this is supposed to be “more realistic”, having Gotham across the bay broke that illusion for me.

Gotham being out of normal human sight from Metropilis is a simple trick to keeps up the illusion of Bats and Sups not crossing paths often by simple distance. If this Superman can see the bat signal from his house without trying, there is no logical reason why these two haven’t meet before Lex brought them together.
 
It's for the stupid fresh or rotten system. It makes little sense. Two reviews can give the movie the same score but yet one can give it a fresh while the other gives it a rotten.

It makes perfect sense if you actually take it the way it is meant to be taken. Does the critic believe the film was worth seeing/recommending to others? If a film gets 90% on RT, it means that 9 out of 10 critics think that the film is worth seeing. It's not really RT's fault that people on the internet try to twist that into meaning that the film was a 9/10 or something.
 
It's for the stupid fresh or rotten system. It makes little sense. Two reviews can give the movie the same score but yet one can give it a fresh while the other gives it a rotten.

Percentage of positive reviews is more useful predictor of enjoyment than a straight score average though.

If half the critics hated it and half loved it, there is a larger percentage chance of it not being an enjoyable experience than if everyone pretty much unanimously liked it.

I've often disagreed with review scores or even averages of reviews, but I can't remember a time where I saw an 80%+ on RT and thought it sucked or a 20%- and thought it was good. I might think a film that got an 80 on RT was better than one that got a 90, but I almost certainly enjoyed both.

The average review score system on the other hand, I've seen plenty of movies with middling scores(5-7 or so) and thought they were one of the best movies I've seen or one of the worst. If the review average is a 2 or a 3 or an 8 or a 9, maybe it could be useful, but for that middle range it's basically a dice roll whether you'll like it.
 
Kind of amazing to repeatedly see gaf predictions turn wrong :P

Jurassic World should show that anything is possible

Jurassic World came in much higher than expected, but Jurassic Park was the highest grossing film in the world before Titanic, and even the Lost World was briefly in the WW top 10. JP3 just made us lowball the franchise's potential.

Opening weekend was out of the blue though. Only because we were still getting $130M predictions that Friday.
 
It makes perfect sense if you actually take it the way it is meant to be taken. Does the critic believe the film was worth seeing/recommending to others?
Not really but that's cool if you think that. What if the critic thinks the movie was well made but wasn't interested in the topic. Then you have a well made movie with subject matter that the reviewer wouldn't personally recommend. It's more about the reviewers taste as opposed to the quality of the movie. Just give me scores and let the reader figure it out. When you have one critic giving it a 3 out of 5 and a rotten while another gives it a 2.5 out of 5 and a fresh your system is screwed up.
 
Kind of amazing to repeatedly see gaf predictions turn wrong :P

Jurassic World should show that anything is possible

Last year's Avengers 2, Star Wars, Jurassic World thread is amazing for how wrong some were. Pretending Star Wars didn't have the brand power it once had. Avengers would pass $2bil. Jurassic World would flop.
 
Kind of amazing to repeatedly see gaf predictions turn wrong :P

Jurassic World should show that anything is possible

Jurassic World is a terrible movie. Bad acting, terrible CG, hammy plot, sexist treatment of female characters, cheesy nostalgia throwbacks (that didn't work). Worst film I saw in 2015.

Batman V. Superman is a masterpiece in comparison quite honestly.
 
Not really but that's cool if you think that. What if the critic thinks the movie was well made but wasn't interested in the topic. Then you have a well made movie with subject matter that the reviewer wouldn't personally recommend. It's more about the reviewers taste as opposed to the quality of the movie. Just give me scores and let the reader figure it out. When you have one critic giving it a 3 out of 5 and a rotten while another gives it a w.5 out of 5 and a fresh your system is screwed up.

Nothing in your paragraph explains how score averages are better. Especially when your counterpoint is the voodoo shitshow that is the Metacritic averaging algorithm. A 2 out of 5 is as much the reviewers opinion as "go see the film" is. Only you don't really know what a 2/5 means to the guy/girl unless you follow them. At least RT reviewers get to decide whether their review is rotten or fresh.
 
Yeah I know how it works. Thanks.

Do you? Then why are you so hung up about it. The movie has score averages and has links to every individual review they aggregate.

Are you just bothered that a movie shows a percentage you don't agree with? The information you want and apparently desperately need is right there too.
 
I saw this today with my GF...she fell asleep while I just sat there...angrily looking at the screen in disbelief.

I knew about the score, I even spoiled myself the worst stuff..I expected nothing and I was still dissapointed.
 
I saw this today with my GF...she fell asleep while I just sat there...angrily looking at the screen in disbelief.

I knew about the score, I even spoiled myself the worst stuff..I expected nothing and I was still dissapointed.

Don't worry, the Ultimate Cut coming in July will fix the film's issues.

30 minutes are being added back in!
 
I don't really see your point.
That's fine. Basically the quality of the movie and recommending someone to see it are 2 different things. Obviously I'm not communicating my point very well so I'll give up. I'd rather have numbers and not a mixture of recommendations and numbers. Anyway, carry on.
 
Falls into the same category as the last couple Transformers films in my book. Good spectacle, entertaining, but is it a good movie? No. I'll probably pick it up in a sale on Blu-ray at some point.
 
That's fine. Basically the quality of the movie and recommending someone to see it are 2 different things. Obviously I'm not communicating my point very well so I'll give up. I'd rather have numbers and not a mixture of recommendations and numbers. Anyway, carry on.

It's fine if you don't like it, but that doesn't really change the fact that it's how RT operates, and people seem to be looking more for recommendations than just numbers.

I mean, there's always Metacritic.
 
I saw this today with my GF...she fell asleep while I just sat there...angrily looking at the screen in disbelief.

I knew about the score, I even spoiled myself the worst stuff..I expected nothing and I was still dissapointed.

You looked at the score, you spoiled yourself, and you expected nothing? No, you went in with a lot of negative preconceived notions, expected a shit movie, and that's what you got.
 
I have a hard time believing an extra 30 minutes of shit is going to fix this film's issues. The problems are too big and glaring.

It could fix many specific issues people had with missing connective tissue and unexplained plot points or motivations, but is unlikely to transform the film into something that people who hated it will enjoy.
 
It could fix many specific issues people had with missing connective tissue and unexplained plot points or motivations, but is unlikely to transform the film into something that people who hated it will enjoy.
I can agree with that at least. But honestly I felt the film needed streamlining, not bulking up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom