Guilty by suspicion? That wouldn't set any particularly good precedents. He had not been charged with anything.
But that program is already in place regarding other topics, such as the No-Fly designation.
Guilty by suspicion? That wouldn't set any particularly good precedents. He had not been charged with anything.
I care only marginally what his motivation is or his beliefs are or where he got the idea from
At the end of the day, he got the idea to kill, EASILY and LEGALLY purchased the killing machines necessary for his idea, then went and did it
You can't regulate ideas, but you can regulate killing machines
I can pledge to the cause of ISIS before I eat a sandwich. His ex-wife described him as not being particularly religious, a devout muslim he does not appear to be
Yes, scrap the 2nd amendment and while were at it, lets also a scrap the 1st amendment so racists, homophobes and islamaphobes get put in jail along with people with guns.
RIP to the victims.
No, There are a ton of us who are right politically but every time we speak up we are told to fuck ourselves or many of us have gotten banned. I will stand with any peaceful Muslim as would any other sane American.
Gun control in the United States is a pipe dream, most citizens who are told to give up their weapons would kindly tell the government to fuck off. If you want gun control than by all means call a convention of the states and change the constitution. That is the protocol but it is very hard to do and for good reason.
Gun control will not curtail hate, I grew up in a state where a man killed almost 200 people with a uhaul and some fertilizer. I will not give up my right to protect myself and my family for control measures that will not work.
Because we all know how great Gun control has been for Detroit and Chicago.
Here's what it takes to buy a car
1) You need a driver's license. To get a driver's license, you have to take a driver's test to show that you're capable of driving a car.
2) Have proof of insurance. You legally cannot drive a car without it.
3) Register your car with the state.
Here's what it takes to buy a firearm (it varies by state, to be fair, but this is the easiest)
1) Purchase said firearm
2) Wait the required time for the background check
3) Take said firearm
There's not license to ensure that you're qualified. The govt doesn't keep tabs on what happens to the gun after the purchase.
Why do people interpret a stricter background check for guns as "banning all guns"?
I care only marginally what his motivation is or his beliefs are or where he got the idea from
At the end of the day, he got the idea to kill, EASILY and LEGALLY purchased the killing machines necessary for his idea, then went and did it
You can't regulate ideas, but you can regulate killing machines
Because the politicians advocating for stricter gun control absolutely do want to ban guns, they just know that to come out in favor of a total ban would be political suicide, so they water down their rhetoric. Obama/Hillary/Reid, etc would all ban guns in an instant if they thought they could get away with it.
It seems there are lots of scared people in this thread which is heartbreaking. Perhaps more than death, fear and terror is what the perpetrators want to cause. Please do not let this act stop you from being yourself or doing what you want to do. For perspective, around 90 people die in fatal car accidents in the US every day, but as citizens, we cannot let that statistic rule our lives.
This was a despicable act and we should continue to spend our time mourning the victims and praying for their families. But we should be level headed; we cannot let the perpetrators of such acts take charge of us.
But that program is already in place regarding other topics, such as the No-Fly designation.
It really is that simple.
There's no reason we don't have better gun regulation. I say that as an owner of multiple semi-auto handguns (Spring XD45, XD40c, FN Herstal Five seveN) and a revolver (.38). Whatever limitations they need to implement, ID/thumbprint systems they need to put on the grips, owner tracking and paperwork changes they need to do, magazine capacity reductions deemed appropriate, I'm all about it.
Seriously.I care only marginally what his motivation is or his beliefs are or where he got the idea from
At the end of the day, he got the idea to kill, EASILY and LEGALLY purchased the killing machines necessary for his idea, then went and did it
You can't regulate ideas, but you can regulate killing machines
Kinda strange the emphasis on ISIS is weaker when an attack happens in the US compared to Europe.
Because the politicians advocating for stricter gun control absolutely do want to ban guns, they just know that to come out in favor of a total ban would be political suicide, so they water down their rhetoric. Obama/Hillary/Reid, etc would all ban guns in an instant if they thought they could get away with it.
Kinda strange the emphasis on ISIS is weaker when an attack happens in the US compared to Europe.
Kinda strange the emphasis on ISIS is weaker when an attack happens in the US compared to Europe.
Deadliest terrorist attack on US ever.
I would say "what the fuck is wrong with people?", but I've been through that numerous times already.
Absolutely sad. 50 lives gone because of one bigot shit-stain.
First person I ever put on my ignore list gets banned ~10 minutes later. Nice work.
Yikes. What are you implying?Deadliest terrorist attack on US soil ever
Deadliest mass shooting ever
Deadliest hate crime in modern history.
All have one thing in common. All from a population that makes up well under 1% of the total population of citizens, immigrants, and visitors of the US.
Deadliest terrorist attack on US soil ever
Deadliest terrorist attack on US soil ever
Deadliest mass shooting ever
Deadliest hate crime in modern history.
All have one thing in common. All from a population that makes up well under 1% of the total population of citizens, immigrants, and visitors of the US.
That's one of the more legitimate arguments against outright gun bans. It would do nothing for unregistered weapons, which likely count in the tens of millions. You'd leave law abiding folks powerless.Idk about banning guns. I live in a pretty terrible neighborhood and banning guns would just give more power to the criminals here.
Nope, for domestic that's still OKC, and for foreign that's still 9/11.
The deadliest terror attack is 9/11. Correct.Nope, for domestic that's still OKC, and for foreign that's still 9/11.
Yikes. What are you implying?
Deadliest terrorist attack on US soil ever
Deadliest mass shooting ever
Deadliest hate crime in modern history.
All have one thing in common. All from a population that makes up well under 1% of the total population of citizens, immigrants, and visitors of the US.
I really despise every human who has ever been complicit in why we don't have thumbprint systems to prevent illegal firearm use and to prevent people from bypassing waiting periods and background checks.
Deadliest terrorist attack on US soil ever
Deadliest mass shooting ever
Deadliest hate crime in modern history.
All have one thing in common. All from a population that makes up well under 1% of the total population of citizens, immigrants, and visitors of the US.
Point of my post isn't about total events, just about the worst single event of each typeHow many murders from mass shootings committed by Christian (white) fundamentalists. The total number of deaths might surprise you.
This situation also brought another ugly thing to light: gay people are banned from donating blood if they had sex within a year. I know of the law, but I also heard that it was at least waived for today from several news sources this early afternoon.
Turns out that was false. I'm still barred from donating blood simply because I had sex with my boyfriend recently.
I'm really upset right now. I can't do anything to help because of who I am. The irony in this situation is disgusting.
The deadliest terror attack is 9/11. Correct.
Deadliest terrorist attack on US soil ever
Deadliest mass shooting ever
Deadliest hate crime in modern history.
All have one thing in common. All from a population that makes up well under 1% of the total population of citizens, immigrants, and visitors of the US.
That's one of the more legitimate arguments against outright gun bans. It would do nothing for unregistered weapons, which likely count in the tens of millions. You'd leave law abiding folks powerless.
Point of my post isn't about total events, just about the worst single event of each type
Tell me what religious ideology killed people at Virginia Tech.Zyklon B was deadly, but it was Nazism that put it to use as a tool for genocide. I'm no big fan of guns but the ideology was the core issue here.
It's because mass shootings are more common in the US. Also the ISIS ties are looking a lot weaker than the Paris attacks. And the weapons used in Paris were smuggled in from eastern europe, not bought legally from a local shop. Hence the gun control discussion.
Point of my post isn't about total events, just about the worst single event of each type
The United States has over 350 million + guns already on the street. It's impossible to ban and nobody on the right will ever pass anything remotely close to what you're proposing.
I'd like to see more federal funding of mental health institutions, outright ban gun sales to the people on the terrorist watch list.
Very few people in here are talking about an outright ban. Most of them appear to be driveby posts anyway.
Because the politicians advocating for stricter gun control absolutely do want to ban guns, they just know that to come out in favor of a total ban would be political suicide, so they water down their rhetoric. Obama/Hillary/Reid, etc would all ban guns in an instant if they thought they could get away with it.