Plasma, LCD, OLED, LED, best tv for next gen

Ahh I know. And there lies my dillemma. Price isn't as much of a factor as I'm confident the B6 will hit $2k. So tempted to just go pick up a KS8000 tonight for $1500 though. I also worry about the KS8000 not having Dolby Vision IIRC. On the other hand, if input lag is excessively noticeable on the B6 in HDR mode then that's literally a game changer.



Thanks, this makes feel better about brightness. I'm the worst shopper to have every existed; I'm too indecisive. Definitely going with KS8000 or B6 though.


Go with the KS8000. It looks great to me. I love OLED too but it's just too much money for what it is. And I've read multiple places that the input lag in the B6 is in the 50s. I imagine it's worse in HDR mode. If you're deadset on OLED get the C6, the curve is barely noticeable it packs 3D and the input lag is comparable to the E6 as it's in the 30s. That's your best bet. I'm going with the KS8000 because right now there isn't enough content to legitimize oled IMO. I'm also a huge gamer so input lag is also a big factor. C6>B6. Same price. Oh and I don't have the cash for oled!
 
No Dolby vision is pretty worrying. A lot of money for a set that lacks a potentially important tech.

Or less for a format that couldn't matter. Idk. Samsung and Sony both don't support Dolby and they're tv Titans. Probably because Dolby is closed off and requires it's own chip. Everyone supports hdr10 these days like Xbox One S. This shit is so annoying, format wars, but HDR10 seems to have won the battle before it began even though it could be inferior tech. It's just that the major players in tv sets have adopted it, the visionaries like Vizio and LG have both and so do the top content creators like Amazon and Netflix. All the chips just seem to be in HDR10's corner
 
So the KS8000 is a pretty safe bet? Looking to upgrade my old TV in a couple weeks. Probably gonna go with a smaller size for my room and try to keep it under $1500.
 
So the KS8000 is a pretty safe bet? Looking to upgrade my old TV in a couple weeks. Probably gonna go with a smaller size for my room and try to keep it under $1500.

The ks8000 is a hidden gem. Great value. And HDR gaming is awesome on it. I'm not buying a 2500 tv that doesn't display games well on HDR
 
Just ordered the 65" Samsung KS8000.
I have planned to move the PC into the living room for a while, tried importing a 55" monitor out of S Korea, twice actually, both times screen cracked in transit.

Under $1800 for the 65" model, no other TV in this size range does the monitor duty well, does chroma 4:4:4 @60Hz and have reasonable input lag. There are OLED's that should perform better but a lot more expensive and this is already maxing out the budget.
 
Go with the KS8000. It looks great to me. I love OLED too but it's just too much money for what it is. And I've read multiple places that the input lag in the B6 is in the 50s. I imagine it's worse in HDR mode. If you're deadset on OLED get the C6, the curve is barely noticeable it packs 3D and the input lag is comparable to the E6 as it's in the 30s. That's your best bet. I'm going with the KS8000 because right now there isn't enough content to legitimize oled IMO. I'm also a huge gamer so input lag is also a big factor. C6>B6. Same price. Oh and I don't have the cash for oled!

Thanks, I guess if I go the OLED route I'll be getting a C6. I had no idea it mitigates input lag so well. I totally understand how price is an issue though. Those things aren't cheap.

Edit: I think I'm just going to wait until Black Friday before making a decision. Gears 4 releases October 11th and with its release we will be able to get a better idea of what HDR input lag will be like.
 
Or less for a format that couldn't matter. Idk. Samsung and Sony both don't support Dolby and they're tv Titans. Probably because Dolby is closed off and requires it's own chip. Everyone supports hdr10 these days like Xbox One S. This shit is so annoying, format wars, but HDR10 seems to have won the battle before it began even though it could be inferior tech. It's just that the major players in tv sets have adopted it, the visionaries like Vizio and LG have both and so do the top content creators like Amazon and Netflix. All the chips just seem to be in HDR10's corner

The KS8000 is way more expensive than the Vizio p65 here.

Didn't realize Netflix supported HDR10. Thought it was just Dolby. Is there anything that is
Dolby exclusive?
 
Really wish Dolby Vision was the standard HDR10 is a fucking mess right now no dynamic metadata per scene means you get such an inconsistent exp & calibration settings are useless since you need to change your settings movie by movie and sometimes within the freaking movie itself no wonder so many avs members are unhappy.

Now with dynamic HDR10 around the corner if they don't firmware update 'old' sets or if they simply can not there will be so many pissed owners who have been left with an obsolete HDR display. Smh.
 
Really wish Dolby Vision was the standard HDR10 is a fucking mess right now no dynamic metadata per scene means you get such an inconsistent exp & calibration settings are useless since you need to change your settings movie by movie and sometimes within the freaking movie itself no wonder so many avs members are unhappy.

Now with dynamic HDR10 around the corner if they don't firmware update 'old' sets or if they simply can not there will be so many pissed owners who have been left with an obsolete HDR display. Smh.

I'm sure all sets that properly support HDR10 will be updated to support HDR10+Dynamic Metadata in firmware.

Dolby Vision, while currently superior, is proprietary and lacking backing from two MAJOR players: Sony and Samsung. I wouldn't put too much weight on it.
 
I'm sure all sets that properly support HDR10 will be updated to support HDR10+Dynamic Metadata in firmware.

Dolby Vision, while currently superior, is proprietary and lacking backing from two MAJOR players: Sony and Samsung. I wouldn't put too much weight on it.

Well it'll mostly be up to Samsung, considering they dwarf Sony in market share. If they end up supporting it then Sony would likely follow.
 
I'm sure all sets that properly support HDR10 will be updated to support HDR10+Dynamic Metadata in firmware.

Dolby Vision, while currently superior, is proprietary and lacking backing from two MAJOR players: Sony and Samsung. I wouldn't put too much weight on it.


Sadly there is no promise at all that HDMI 2.0a displays will get support for Dynamic HDR.

At the moment it is slated for release with HDMI 2.1. If the HDMI 2.0a spec can't support Dynamic HDR10 it's going to be a huge blow to owners the industry better not play it off as early adapters bs like they have in the past.

http://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1457513362

Oh well now we wait and see hopefully good news for current UHD owners at IFA 2016 which starts this Friday.
 
Then I'd say go for the C6 if you don't mind the curve and one less HDMI port.

I have 0 experience watching a curved set so I'm gonna see if any of the local Best Buy's have the 65" on display. One less HDMI port should be okay since everything runs through my receiver.

I feel like I saw someone say that the c6 and e6 have the same input lag. Am I making that up? I'm having trouble finding numbers for the c6, but it seems that it uses the same processor as the e6...
 
Sadly there is no promise at all that HDMI 2.0a displays will get support for Dynamic HDR.

At the moment it is slated for release with HDMI 2.1. If the HDMI 2.0a spec can't support Dynamic HDR10 it's going to be a huge blow to owners the industry better not play it off as early adapters bs like they have in the past.

http://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1457513362

Oh well now we wait and see hopefully good news for current UHD owners at IFA 2016 which starts this Friday.

Hm, that's some shit -- but then it's also true that IF DV is to be implemented into UHD BR (the only way it'll become a true standard), it would also require HDMI 2.1. With that said, I'm glad I have a Samsung panel (KS8000) with a SmartConnect box. Hopefully if it's the case, I can just get the updated SmartConnect box with HDMI2.1 and be good to go.
 
Hm, that's some shit -- but then it's also true that IF DV is to be implemented into UHD BR (the only way it'll become a true standard), it would also require HDMI 2.1. With that said, I'm glad I have a Samsung panel (KS8000) with a SmartConnect box. Hopefully if it's the case, I can just get the updated SmartConnect box with HDMI2.1 and be good to go.

Oh damn, I forgot about that. Hopefully an updated box will be reasonably priced.
 
From what we know Dolby Vision doesn't require HDMI 2.1.

I have 0 experience watching a curved set so I'm gonna see if any of the local Best Buy's have the 65" on display. One less HDMI port should be okay since everything runs through my receiver.

I had last year's LG 55EF9600/960V for about two weeks and the curve didn't bother me that much, though I'd still go for a flat TV given the choice.

I feel like I saw someone say that the c6 and e6 have the same input lag. Am I making that up? I'm having trouble finding numbers for the c6, but it seems that it uses the same processor as the e6...
Correct about the same input lag number.
 
From what we know Dolby Vision doesn't require HDMI 2.1.



I had last year's LG 55EF9500/950V for about two weeks and the curve didn't bother me that much, though I'd still go for a flat TV given the choice.


Correct about the same input lag number.

Yeah flat would definitely be preffered, but if it can save me a grand I may have to go with the curve. I suppose with Best Buy's 15 day return policy or whatever it is I would have time to really try it out.

Oh and thanks for confirming the input lag!
 
Why is that, Sony and Samsung are willing to take advantage of all the research and work Dolby did to bring HDR to theaters and displays. But refuse to pay the licensing fee. Dolby creating the EOTF(PQ) which represents what HDR10 is, tone mapping and the overall workflow. HDR would be a lot easier to deal with for consumers and studio colorist, if they had supported, the researchers.

When Dolby Vision goes physical, how do they continue to not support them. Samsung and Phollips are trying to create a dynamic metadata standard. It all just seems very messy to me.
 
Hm, that's some shit -- but then it's also true that IF DV is to be implemented into UHD BR (the only way it'll become a true standard), it would also require HDMI 2.1.

From what we know Dolby Vision doesn't require HDMI 2.1.
Yappa is correct here. Dolby Vision only requires 1.4. To quote one of the VPs at Dolby:

Vlaicu: We had anticipated the challenge of getting high dynamic range (HDR) and HDR metadata over HDMI interfaces. So what we did was develop our own technology that tunnels all the way through HDMI interfaces back to version 1.4, including the signaling and the metadata. So for televisions that have HDMI inputs and present Dolby Vision signals, as a requirement from us, the HDMI inputs have to support Dolby Vision in addition to the on-board OTT apps that support Dolby Vision and in order to make that work we developed in-band signaling as well as the ability to send 12-bit video over what is effectively an 8-bit interface. All this is implemented in televisions and storage devices that support Dolby Vision.

In my opinion, I think it is crystal clear how superior Dolby Vision is to HDR10 and, in the future, HDR10+Metadata.
 
What do you guys think of the lg 65ef950v ??

I have 4000 bucks for the best 65" HDR 4K. 2016 oled of this size is 7-8k so it's too much and I still want 3D so Samsung ks8-9k is out of question

I can have this one for 4000(normal price ) with a 1000e payback (which can go for ps neo )
 
What do you guys think of the lg 65ef950v ??

I have 4000 bucks for the best 65" HDR 4K. 2016 oled of this size is 7-8k so it's too much and I still want 3D so Samsung ks8-9k is out of question

I can have this one for 4000(normal price ) with a 1000e payback (which can go for ps neo )

Fantastic TV overall. It has some issues with vignetting and near black gradation, the edges are a bit darker than the center of the display and the input lag at 53ms isn't low, but it barely goes up outside gaming mode (as long as you keep trumotion off) so you can still use it to play HDR games if you're not particularly sensitive to this issue. If that's a problem for you, look into the Samsung KS8000 or the Panasonic DX902. If not, overall image quality on this TV is still better than any LED on the market.

About HDR content, i found this on rtings:
The EF9500 has at least partial HDR support, so the salesman is not quite right. The EF9500 has HDMI 2.0a, so it can read HDR files over HDMI. It also has the ability to display a wider range of colors than average, which is one of the major parts of HDR. It doesn't have the ability to display bright highlights, but how important this is remains to be seen.
At present, we consider the benefits you get from OLED to outweigh the potential downside of not being able to brighten highlights, so if you're interested in this TV, go for it.
http://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/ef9500

Seems relevant considering you specifically asked for HDR 4K.
 
Fantastic TV overall. It has some issues with vignetting and near black gradation, the edges are a bit darker than the center of the display and the input lag at 53ms isn't low, but it barely goes up outside gaming mode (as long as you keep trumotion off) so you can still use it to play HDR games if you're not particularly sensitive to this issue. If that's a problem for you, look into the Samsung KS8000 or the Panasonic DX902. If not, overall image quality on this TV is still better than any LED on the market.

About HDR content, i found this on rtings:

http://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/ef9500

Seems relevant considering you specifically asked for HDR 4K.

Well the ks8000 isn't 3D isn't it ?
I have 700 bluray including 100 3D movie and as I trashed my dvd collection years back I won't do for my bluray as its still amazing looking. So I want 3D playback. I guess this lg is the best for my price ?
I always spend around 3-4K for tv every 3 years. My last and current is a plasma Panasonic 65vt50 which is very good but has made his time

I want ps neo, bluray and UHD. ( btw I saw on Xbox one S Threads about the 4K test does this Lg clear them all ?)
 
Well the ks8000 isn't 3D isn't it ?
I have 700 bluray including 100 3D movie and as I trashed my dvd collection years back I won't do for my bluray as its still amazing looking. So I want 3D playback. I guess this lg is the best for my price ?
I always spend around 3-4K for tv every 3 years. My last and current is a plasma Panasonic 65vt50 which is very good but has made his time

Two things:

1) The LG E6 is currently the best 3D TV on the planet.

2) The 65" costs $5000, so if you wait long enough (Black Friday?) you could buy one with your $4000.

Don't buy a 2015 model. Don't do it.
 
Well the ks8000 isn't 3D isn't it ?
I have 700 bluray including 100 3D movie and as I trashed my dvd collection years back I won't do for my bluray as its still amazing looking. So I want 3D playback. I guess this lg is the best for my price ?
I always spend around 3-4K for tv every 3 years. My last and current is a plasma Panasonic 65vt50 which is very good but has made his time

I want ps neo, bluray and UHD. ( btw I saw on Xbox one S Threads about the 4K test does this Lg clear them all ?)
If you're in the US you can buy the C6 for 4000$ on amazon.com, which is better than the EF9500 in every way and the curved screen is better for 3D content (that+OLED means experiencing the best 3D ever). Not sure about input lag outside gaming mode for hdr games, but if it's like the E6 it should be around 50ms (which is likely considering that input lag in gaming mode is ~34ms for both).
 
the vizio p series keeps calling my name. i want to hold out but it seems like such a good bang for the buck. i would like to hold out for an oled later down the line, but the display lag has me in the p-series corner. does it compare anywhere close to the oled tvs in black levels or is it like night and day?
 
Two things:

1) The LG E6 is currently the best 3D TV on the planet.

2) The 65" costs $5000, so if you wait long enough (Black Friday?) you could buy one with your $4000.

Don't buy a 2015 model. Don't do it.
I'm in France and the 65e6 is at 6500 here ...a tad too much for me

So you're telling not to buy last year model ? ;(


Edit : don't want curved


Price in France :
65c6v : 5500
65e6v : 6500
65g6v : : 7500+
65ef950v : 4000 (promotion)
Panasonic 65dx900 : 5000
Samsung 65ks8000 : 3300


I need :
-3D
-flat
-HDR 4K

I don't want to regret my purchase. I though the 65ef950 would be the best choice
 
the vizio p series keeps calling my name. i want to hold out but it seems like such a good bang for the buck. i would like to hold out for an oled later down the line, but the display lag has me in the p-series corner. does it compare anywhere close to the oled tvs in black levels or is it like night and day?
The P-Series is great. Check out this thread for owners' thoughts. OLEDs are true black, as in the pixel emits zero light, but it's worth mentioning that the P-Series has outstanding blacks. Coming from a 9G Pioneer Kuro Elite, I didn't downgrade in that department (and the HDTV would've went back, if it were the case).
 
HDTVTest reviewed the G6 looks like the G6's offer better light output (732 cd/m2) vs 625 cd/m2 of the E6.

Higher peak brightness in HDR mode was where we felt the OLED65G6V justified its price premium over the step-down 65E6V – our review unit reached 732 cd/m2 (measured using UHDA-ratified window sizes) with both [OLED Light] and [Contrast] left at their default maximum value of “100” in the [HDR Standard] preset. We’ve tested/ calibrated 3 other LG 65G6 OLEDs, and all had no trouble exceeding 700 nits when it came to HDR peak luminance. On the other hand, most 65″ E6 we’ve calibrated usually settled between 630 to 680 nits, with only one single unit managing to close in on 700 nits. We believe this is more than mere coincidence.

Looks like LG bins the panels.

Other differences.

Unlike other OLED televisions from LG Electronics this year, only two out of the four HDMI inputs on the OLED65G6 can have [HDMI Ultra HD Deep Colour] enabled. Indeed, our Murideo Fresco SIX-G signal generator confirmed that only HDMI1 and HDMI ports successfully accepted and displayed 3840×2160@60Hz/50Hz signal with HDCP 2.2, whereas HDMI3 and HDMI4 topped out at 3840×2160@30Hz on our review sample

E6 review: http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/oled65e6v-201608104333.htm

G6 review: http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/oled65g6v-201608304343.htm

Honestly I won't be shocked if next years models come even closer to reaching 1000 nits.

From the rumors I've heard mentioned on forums is that LG is def going to be tackling the problem of motion res in next years model big time. Can't wait for CES. :D

the vizio p series keeps calling my name. i want to hold out but it seems like such a good bang for the buck. i would like to hold out for an oled later down the line, but the display lag has me in the p-series corner. does it compare anywhere close to the oled tvs in black levels or is it like night and day?

No LCD's come close to matching the black level performance of the OLED's. Not to mention the issue of blooming in LCD's that utilize FALD & viewing angles.
 
HDTVTest reviewed the G6 looks like the G6's offer better light output (732 cd/m2) vs 625 cd/m2 of the E6.
732 cd/m2 on an OLED? That's insane when combined with the perfect blacks.

Looks like it'll need HDMI 2.1, so hardware will need to be updated lol.

I wish the industry would just pick Dolby Vision :(
The curse of early adopters :(

I wish that more manufacturers used an input box similar to Samsung so that you could just upgrade that part and keep the panel. Saves on the cost.
 
So much for the 1000 micro dimming zones on the Z9D: according to a german website the correct number on the 65" is 600, just like the Samsung KS9800.

HDTVTest reviewed the G6 looks like the G6's offer better light output (732 cd/m2) vs 625 cd/m2 of the E6.
Jesus Christ, that value is insane for OLED.

If with next year's models LG adopts something like the pixel shifting tech seen in that new Dell OLED monitor to mitigate the image retention issue to the point that it's basically nonexistent, they can probably get rid of ABL and IR will be a non issue like on LED TVs. At that point they shouldn't have any problem to achieve 1000 nits and utterly destroy LEDs even with HDR content.


EDIT:
Just watched the Panasonic IFA conference they talked about their next OLED TV (using LG panel no doubt) which they said will tackle the issue of near black performance with OLED thanks to their new 3D LUT designed to tackle this demanding issue. A prototype will be on the show floor! Can't wait to see what Panasonic has come up with. //Drool

image.jpg

Holy shit. My next TV.
 
Just watched the Panasonic IFA conference they talked about their next OLED TV (using LG panel no doubt) which they said will tackle the issue of near black performance with OLED thanks to their new 3D LUT designed to tackle this demanding issue. A prototype will be on the show floor! Can't wait to see what Panasonic has come up with. //Drool

image.jpg
 
I'm in France and the 65e6 is at 6500 here ...a tad too much for me

So you're telling not to buy last year model ? ;(


Edit : don't want curved


Price in France :
65c6v : 5500
65e6v : 6500
65g6v : : 7500+
65ef950v : 4000 (promotion)
Panasonic 65dx900 : 5000
Samsung 65ks8000 : 3300


I need :
-3D
-flat
-HDR 4K

I don't want to regret my purchase. I though the 65ef950 would be the best choice
If anyone would be kind enough to help my final choice I need to buy it Friday it's the special sell day
 
If you're in the US you can buy the C6 for 4000$ on amazon.com, which is better than the EF9500 in every way and the curved screen is better for 3D content (that+OLED means experiencing the best 3D ever). Not sure about input lag outside gaming mode for hdr games, but if it's like the E6 it should be around 50ms (which is likely considering that input lag in gaming mode is ~34ms for both).

I'm really really really tempted. My ceiling waaaaas $3k. How long until it hits that!? Any guesses? :P

Gaaaah.
 
Looks like this is the Panasonic OLED prototype on the show floor. They promised more news too this winter so I'm guessing holiday 2016 release.

image.jpg


So fucking sexy. We should hear more news within a day or so!
 
Top Bottom