I Believe Having Children Is "Immoral" (Aka: Any Antinatalists Here? )

Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread is absolute proof you can over think it.

The OP and other people who follow his philosophy are arguing that the moral thing to do is to allow our species to die, undoing thousands of years of societal advancement, purely on the off chance that a child might not have wanted to be alive (post-birth I might add).

When the conclusion you've reached involves the self-extinction of a species I'd say you've probably overthought something somewhere.

Or maybe OP just hasn't thought about it enough.
 
No I get it, however saying denying life is immoral is insane... By that logic unless you're constantly using your body for reproduction while you are capable, you are immoral. I and just about everyone ever have denied existence to countless lives by this logic.
You are on a desert island, no food/water. You will starve, die of thirst. If you snap your fingers a duplicate of yourself appears. One more person that will suffer and die.

Is it immoral to snap your fingers?

Creating life isn't black and white but we can surely discuss whether creating a life or not creating a life is moral or not.

Obviously everyone procreating as much as possible is immoral because we have finite resources. More people with not enough resources = misery.
 
I don't get this. How can you say that when before it is conceived it's a POTENTIAL fully birthed human but after conception it's just a ball of cells? How is the ball of cells not POTENTIALLY a fully
Birthed human being as well?

You've drawn a line in the sand that refers to a concept on one side but only the physical on the other.

Somehow you've reconciled that there is something akin to a human soul or essence waiting to be born, but once conceived, the ball of cells doesn't get that essence? When does it?
I don't believe there's something akin to a soul pre-conception.
I believe that pre-conception people are aware that through conception you will be creating living being, and that you'll be thinking about the potential child as a person you will be taking care of prior to having it, and that you should weigh what that really means.
 
Over the past few months I've come to the conclusion that I'm an Anti-Natalist, not along the lines of a "Childfree" zealot, but to the point that if it were possible for me to have a child, I would never choose so as I wouldn't want to force anyone into existence without consent, as it crosses a threshold in my personal moral code.
But I've found that this belief, like with determinism or nihilism, tend to only draw ire/confusion, from people totally unwilling to see your point so they just shut down and act incredibly dismissive towards anyone peddling them.
Have any anti-natalists here dealt with that?
Have any of you been the people I'm describing?
Why are, or why are you not an anti-natalist?
Good to know you've fully understood death and humanity op
 
OTOH everyone exists, none of us have experienced non-existence ;)

I don't mean to be flippant, but neither of us knows if that is the case. Inclined to agree based on the evidence, though.

I realize you were (probably) having a bit of a laugh, but I think about this shit a lot and so I am being awkward.
 
You are on a desert island, no food/water. You will starve, die of thirst. If you snap your fingers a duplicate of yourself appears. One more person that will suffer and die.

Is it immoral to snap your fingers?

Creating life isn't black and white but we can surely discuss whether creating a life or not creating a life is moral or not.

Obviously everyone procreating as much as possible is immoral because we have finite resources. More people with not enough resources = misery.
The morality there isn't one of consent, it's of bringing someone into a world knowing their life will be terrible. That is immoral.

However what op argues is that any creation of any life is immoral. Which it is very very different.
 
The only guy I know who believes this has gone the following route:

1) Charmed a girl in Texas (he's Canadian) by frequently posting updates of his masturbation habits in a chat room.
2) He then sent her his life's savings and flew from Canada to see her.
3) She gave him her car.
4) In a weird twist he mentioned that prostitution is legal in Nevada, so she moved to Nevada to become a "courtesan"
5) He was heartbroken
6) He moved out to NV


After that, I fully support his assertion that his parents were jerks for not asking him whether or not he wanted to be born.
 
I don't believe there's something akin to a soul pre-conception.
I believe that pre-conception people are aware that through conception you will be creating living being, and that you'll be thinking about the potential child as a person you will be taking care of prior to having it, and that you should weigh what that really means.

I don't mean to be an ass, but you seem like someone who is convinced they're the smartest person they know.

You are on a desert island, no food/water. You will starve, die of thirst. If you snap your fingers a duplicate of yourself appears. One more person that will suffer and die.

Is it immoral to snap your fingers?

Creating life isn't black and white but we can surely discuss whether creating a life or not creating a life is moral or not.

Obviously everyone procreating as much as possible is immoral because we have finite resources. More people with not enough resources = misery.

Again you're just overthinking this for the most part. It's not immoral to deny existence to someone who doesn't exist. It's not immoral to not have kids. Hell if you wanna say that person deserves to live people can take my apparently allotted 2 children since that arbitrary number is what were going with, and have extras.

Btw this world has a limited existence, so us using it up is immoral not only to future generations, but all species suffering because of us.
 
I don't mean to be an ass, but you seem like someone who is convinced they're the smartest person they know.



Again you're just overthinking this for the most part. It's not immoral to deny existence to someone who doesn't exist. It's not immoral to not have kids. Hell if you wanna say that person deserves to live people can take my apparently allotted 2 children since that arbitrary number is what were going with, and have extras.

Btw this world has a limited existence, so us using it up is immoral not only to future generations, but all species suffering because of us.
Fuck off.
 
The point is you can't get consent.

I think the point is you don't need it.

Look, do what you want within the bounds of the law, but your 'philosophy' here is literally promoting the end to all life in the universe, so don't be surprised if nobody else takes you up on it.
 
Ask yourself this: when King Piccolo spit out Piccolo Jr. was it immoral? It was a selfish act and King Piccolo only did it for Piccolo Jr. to carry out his will of world domination, but think of the long term effects and how it went for Piccolo. Without that act Piccolo would never have met Goku and later Gohan, nor would he end up as a parent figure for Gohan. In the end Piccolo experienced a lot of things he would else have not experienced, like true friendship and joy.
 
You weren't asking me even a little bit, but I'ma say yes.

Ha yeah I think most of us would agree but the crux of the philosophy is "to live is to suffer" so they believe they're saving theoretical people from potential suffering
 
Fuck off.
Op you do come across as if you've somehow realized some new existence and philosophy . The burden is on you not us. And we can just as easily say fuck off to you . When you go counter humans you have to rack that up with either proof or logical arguments or a I feel this way I may be wrong . I see neither a scientific or emotional argument in your post neither do I see a I could be wrong acknowledgment either . So yes op you should be prepared for a bunch of posters asking why how . It's only logical .
 
Is it immoral to wipe my butt? The tree didn't give its consent to be cut down and made into paper for me to wipe my poo with :/
 
In case you weren't aware, telling other posters to fuck off is banable offense here.

You also can't consent to being banned.
You can actually, but much like in this case, consent doesn't really matter.

And yeah, whilst that poster could have put it better, I am curious as to the answer. Surely a plant that exists is unable to consent to an even greater degree than a non-existent human, so how can you justify eating them?
 
I am curious OP.

Why do you see the desire to have children as a selfish one?

I have personally always seen the desire to reproduce as a form of self preservation that is found in all life. A more simplistic version is when microorganisms combine their DNA with other microorganisms in order for their genetic code to survive. We experience the same thing, it's just much more complex.
 
OP feels like freshman philosophy major man.

3300057-6111320083-921932a06377012ee3c300163e41dd5b


Don't worry OP, us smart introverts like most of neogaf are, we have all been there, rationalizing our own position ad infinitum until we make claims like I don't have kids I don't like kids I must not want kids the categorical imperative states nobody must want kids not having kids is a moral choice not borne out of necessity in fact necessarily one should not get kids.

As you get older you learn to get out of your own head more, and appreciate the phenomenological. You'll meet someone and go along even though you are totally against this kids thing, and before you know it you're lovingly hugging your son who's super excited for finally being able to form a sentence.
 
I've been trying to keep up so not sure if it has already been asked but do you believe that the experience of life is generally a net positive, suffering and all?
My reply from page 2 on a question slightly similar to that:
"I'm glad I was born, and if given the option to be reincarnated I would choose so (as long as I'm born into a body with at minimum my level of intelligence, which isn't much at all but is serviceable)."
I don't know whether life is more negative than positive, some days I might lean towards negative,some day towards postive, and others I might say it's even.
Either way I appreciate all the negativity in my life/the world as apart of the human experience as much as the positivity.
It makes things interesting.
 
I think the point is you don't need it.

Look, do what you want within the bounds of the law, but your 'philosophy' here is literally promoting the end to all life in the universe, so don't be surprised if nobody else takes you up on it.

In terms of morality it is literally evil.
 
You can actually, but much like in this case, consent doesn't really matter.

And yeah, whilst that poster could have put it better, I am curious as to the answer. Surely a plant that exists is unable to consent to an even greater degree than a non-existent human, so how can you justify eating them?

He's raging because he doesn't have an answer to the question. Plants, animals, etc. We use all of these things for countless items not just food.

I'll say again if theoretical beings need to give consent, I don't see why actual living things don't need to.
 
Don't let the dogpile bring you down, OP. I don't agree with you, but I understand how you feel.

The fact of the matter, as someone posted earlier, is that shitty people aren't going to suddenly stop having babies, so it's important for conscientious people to continue doing so.

Instead of focusing on not bringing kids into a garbage world, we should be focused on making the world not garbage.
 
Over the past few months I've come to the conclusion that I'm an Anti-Natalist, not along the lines of a "Childfree" zealot, but to the point that if it were possible for me to have a child, I would never choose so as I wouldn't want to force anyone into existence without consent, as it crosses a threshold in my personal moral code.
But I've found that this belief, like with determinism or nihilism, tend to only draw ire/confusion, from people totally unwilling to see your point so they just shut down and act incredibly dismissive towards anyone peddling them.
Have any anti-natalists here dealt with that?
Have any of you been the people I'm describing?
Why are, or why are you not an anti-natalist?

People are being too hard on you. It's a perfectly fine stance and it's not like you can't change your mind.

When you have uncommon views, others will laugh at you. It's true. And you should be prepared with a little self deprecating joke so you can laugh with them. And don;t try to persuade anyone. You can find a way to express your unique views and uniqueness.
 
This. This is the best post I've seen so far.

I had a daughter a month or so ago, and before we got pregnant, my wife and I had a serious discussion about whether or not we should have kids, given the overall state of the world. Given recent events, I'm even more worried now that she's here. But my conclusion is that while the world is in bad shape, how do I know that my baby girl won't play a part in fixing it? I don't. I can't. She could be a politician someday who enacts meaningful change. She could be an astronaut who helps colonize a new planet to stop overcrowding. She could be a scientist who repairs our environment.

And if she's none of those things, I will love her anyway, because in a few short weeks, she has completely stolen my heart. The possibilities in this little girl are endless, and it's up to me to guide her as well as I can. Because ultimately, you can't win if you don't play.


Yeah, that's a very good post.

I don't get why some people criticize wanting to have children as something selfish when not wanting to have children is also very selfish but from a different perspective.

But only one of these choices is something that actually has a potential for change. Whenever you want something to happen or to not happen, it is selfish. You want it because in a way or another it feels better to you. It might feel good to you to think that there are less people "destroying the planet", but that will still comes from a selfish place.

So I don't think giving birth should be discussed from this perspective at all. I mean, so what if it's selfish. If I want kids to bring joy to me, am I not allowed? If I want to bring joy to kids, am I not allowed?


I feel like people are way too afraid of pain and suffering that it has become toxic mentality in a way that it has brought this types of "extinctional" philosophies into peoples minds. I mean, back in the day people absolutely knew that life is hard as fuck and people eventually will get hurt. But it didn't stop people from getting enjoyment from life and cherishing new life whenever it was born. Now it seems that the mere thought of living or allowing to live a life with burdens and pain is enough to consider ending procreation for good.
 
My reply from page 2 on a question slightly similar to that:
"I'm glad I was born, and if given the option to be reincarnated I would choose so (as long as I'm born into a body with at minimum my level of intelligence, which isn't much at all but is serviceable)."
I don't know whether life is more negative than positive, some days I might lean towards negative,some day towards postive, and others I might say it's even.
Either way I appreciate all the negativity in my life/the world as apart of the human experience as much as the positivity.
It makes things interesting.
So you would say you've generally had a positive experience with life, and yet are rooting for the end of the human species out of moral principle?
 
well we can go a step further and say having children at all is immoral when we are faced with the reality that there are plenty of children out there who already need parents that you can adopt.

looking at it that way, you'd have to be pretty selfish to want to spawn your own right?

I prefer not to overthink things, myself.
 
In case you weren't aware, telling other posters to fuck off is banable offense here.

You also can't consent to being banned.

Between this thread and the guy who is "seeing" a girl who is still sleeping with her ex I have had a ton of good laughs.

If so then I'll take the ban as I broke the rules.
(And I technically consented to being banned by signing up to the site)

I feel sorry for your keyboard as it obviously couldn't consent to typing out this convoluted throw-up logic that are your posts.
 
My reply from page 2 on a question slightly similar to that:
"I'm glad I was born, and if given the option to be reincarnated I would choose so (as long as I'm born into a body with at minimum my level of intelligence, which isn't much at all but is serviceable)."
I don't know whether life is more negative than positive, some days I might lean towards negative,some day towards postive, and others I might say it's even.
Either way I appreciate all the negativity in my life/the world as apart of the human experience as much as the positivity.
It makes things interesting.

So are you then equally concerned that you're depriving life to theoretical people? Say you're in a situation where someone wants to have a child with you, if you say no then you and you alone are responsible for that person not being alive.

Damned if you do damned if you don't?
 
My reply from page 2 on a question slightly similar to that:
"I'm glad I was born, and if given the option to be reincarnated I would choose so (as long as I'm born into a body with at minimum my level of intelligence, which isn't much at all but is serviceable)."
I don't know whether life is more negative than positive, some days I might lean towards negative,some day towards postive, and others I might say it's even.
Either way I appreciate all the negativity in my life/the world as apart of the human experience as much as the positivity.
It makes things interesting.
You are aware that all reincarnation life religions tend on if you do bad you'll be a "lower" life form so yes good being reincarnated as a human ... It's considered a honour to be reincarnated as a human or higher it means you did well in life .... Mostly the expectation is you'll lend up lower etc etc ... Op seriously you have to really read up and study before posting about thing you are obviously unaware of .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom