• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Rogue One: A Star Wars Story |OT| They rebel - SPOILERS

Status
Not open for further replies.
TFA was GREAT!. Rogue One was Great!
Nuff said.

Yes!

TFA was greater though

Yeah, that rumor was on the first page of this thread, before anyone had seen it.



I wondered if maybe the source of the rumour was saying there were no light sabre battles, implying two parties weilding lightsabres against each other and got misconstrued? Or it was just a flat red herring.

This. Which is a GOOD thing.
 
I wonder if they would be willing to go back before the home release to reduce any of the unnecessary facial movement on Tarkin. That seems to be a common problem people have with him
 
Anyone get a poster at their theater? I got a small version of this

IMG_4888.jpg
 
It has probably been discussed here but... what happened with James Earl Jones? Age? :(

The delivery of the first lines of his dialogue were spot perfect. like usual Darth Vader, but the rest :( it felt wierd and it made me sad :(

Kylo Ren is the most interesting villain in the SW universe.
incoming avatar quote

If we are talking about the 8 movies (seven episodes and R1), he sure damn is!
 
It has probably been discussed here but... what happened with James Earl Jones? Age? :(

The delivery of the first lines of his dialogue were spot perfect. like usual Darth Vader, but the rest :( it felt wierd and it made me sad :(

Well, yeah, he's 85. He sounded better here than in Rebels. I'd rather have JEJ over an impersonator.
 
Two thoughts from this movie:

1. How bad are the Rebel spies if they didn't already know the Empire had been building a world-destroying space station THE SIZE OF A MOON FOR THE LAST 20 YEARS?

2. Why are the Genosians already working on the Death Star in Episode 3 when Galen Erso doesn't figure out how to make the darn thing work until many years later? The Empire put a down payment of a bazillion credits and just crossed their fingers that the big laser would eventually work?

The galaxy isn't JJ Abrams big. They did find out eventually.

Prequels, need I say more.
 
Some of the new characters in TFA were good, but stuck in a terrible movie which lost itself in nostalgia while simultaneously undermining the foundations of the very nostalgia it was based on.

No point going down this road again in the Rogue One thread, but to wrap-it-up somewhat on topic:
I felt that TFA was so busy ripping up the rule book so they could come up with new dumb shit for future films, it forgot to use the pre-existing movies as anything other than marketing material.
Meanwhile Rogue One leaned on the nostalgia a bit, but it really paid attention to the universe in which it was set and has consequently added some great additions to the Star Wars canon.


It's interesting, I have the near opposite impression of the films. TFA feels like a movie that understands the core of what makes Star Wars. It feels like a natural part of the series.

RO is the film that feels like it has been filtered through decades of Star Wars culture. RO felt like a extended universe book or videogame. Right down to its forced cameos that felt like they where crammed in an attempt to borrow some legitimacy from the mainline films.

TFA feels like a natural part of the series. RO is that extended universe book that you tell all of you friends to read because "This one is actually pretty good!"

I want to stress that I enjoyed Rouge One and I am glad that Disney is carving out this new place for films in the Star Wars universe. A place where they can be more ambitious.
 
They did use real people. Guy Henry and Ingvild Deila were the Tarkin and Leia stand-ins.

MV5BMjA3MzYyNDgxNF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzgwMDExOA@@._V1_UX214_CR0,0,214,317_AL_.jpg


MV5BNjU2NzY0NDY4NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNDYyNzg3OTE@._V1_UX214_CR0,0,214,317_AL_.jpg


But obviously it must have been a lot more difficult than just ageing down an actor like ILM did with Douglas and Downey Jr.

Ah, cool. Guess it isn't enough then. You can't match the subtleties with a different person.
 
It's interesting, I have the near opposite impression of the films. TFA feels like a movie that understands the core of what makes Star Wars. It feels like a natural part if the series.

RO is the film that feels like it has been filtered through decades of Star Wars culture. RO felt like a extended universe book or videogame. Right down to its forced cameos that felt like they where crammed in an attempt to borrow some legitimacy from the mainline films.

TFA feels like a natural part of the series. RO is that extended universe book that you tell all of you friends to read because "This one is actually pretty good!"

I want to stress that I enjoyed Rouge One and I am glad that Disney is carving out this new place for films in the Star Wars universe. A place where they can be more ambitious.

i do feel that's the whole point.

The anthology films are quite literally the cinematic 'extended universe'. The fact that it feels different is its biggest strength.
The film has quite a lot of flaws (most of which i can easily overlook), but i wouldn't count it feeling 'different' as one of them.
 
I really liked the bit when they are preparing for jump at the end and a bunch of ships start jumping away. I immediately thought, "So much for Vader taking care of the flee...oh there he is."
 
It's interesting, I have the near opposite impression of the films. TFA feels like a movie that understands the core of what makes Star Wars. It feels like a natural part if the series.

RO is the film that feels like it has been filtered through decades of Star Wars culture. RO felt like a extended universe book or videogame. Right down to its forced cameos that felt like they where crammed in an attempt to borrow some legitimacy from the mainline films.

TFA feels like a natural part of the series. RO is that extended universe book that you tell all of you friends to read because "This one is actually pretty good!"

I want to stress that I enjoyed Rouge One and I am glad that Disney is carving out this new place for films in the Star Wars universe. A place where they can be more ambitious.

I'm not actually a very big Star Wars fan. Like, I think the movies are fine. Enjoyable. I rewatch the original trilogy once every couple of years

I think that's a large part of why I like RO over TFA honestly. RO feels like an expansion of the galaxy, of what we can see and what can happen, in a way that makes me suddenly much more interested in Star Wars than I've been in ages. Whereas TFA left me with a constant feeling of "oh this again, oh its still all about Jedi, oh its all about Skywalker, oh its literally all the old characters, Death Star 3, Millennium Falcon, yadda yadda"

TFA does understand what "the core" of Star Wars is. The problem is that over 40 years "the core" of Star Wars has suffered such overexposure that I'm just tired of it
 
Both movies have some bad part.

The problem with TFA, the bad part is the second half, ruinnig the beginning, IMO.

For Rogue One, the movie end up strong.

So on one side, we have "They ruined everything despite starting good" and on the other side, you leave the theater with a good mood "The beginning was difficult but they save it at the end".

Also, for rogue one, an extended vesion with more character development would be good, whereas for TFA they would have to remove and reshoot the second part.
 
Seeing as I haven't put them down yet, my thoughts on the film:

- Overall pretty good. First half was iffy, but the second half was what I come to expect from Star Wars.
- Outside of Kaytoo and the Whills duo, I didn't care for any of the characters introduced in the film. Hoping to see the Whills duo in other media in this universe.
- Disney is now 1/1 for Star Wars villains. After the compelling Kylo Ren, Krennic felt like a huge downgrade; he's just your average "I'm a higher-up Imperial who enjoys doing awful things" we're all familiar with now. He's basically Hux if he were the villain of his own movie.
- Vader scenes were good, but how his helmet meets his cape seemed off, reminded me of a fan cosplay. Also, Jones definitely phoned it in with his lines.
- Tarkin and Leia CGI didn't bother me that much. They were obviously fake, but it never took me out of the experience.
- They wasted Saw Gerrera, as everyone has already said. Sure he whined all the time in TCW, but it still would've been nice to see him actually do something.
- RO's score is one of those where its more enjoyable while watching the movie, but less so when listening to it standalone; TFA has the opposite problem, in my opinion.
- Lack of a crawl was jarring, both due to keeping the "A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away...", and for keeping the end credits fanfare. Why include both of those if you aren't just going to go all the way and include the main titles and crawl?
- Atmosphere was good, and I liked that asteroid trading post at the beginning. Wish there were more locations like it, but that's what the Han film is for.
- Final battle was really good from beginning to end, though, as others has said, Leia's dialogue to Vader in ANH now makes less sense.

All in all, I liked it, even if it had negatives.

Also, did anyone else notice that the new TIEs look like the Sith fighters from KotOR?
 
The Vader scene at the end is one of the crowning moments of Star Wars in general. The payoff after years of suffering. I think the first third of the movie is uneven due to switching the setting so frequently, and I had an issue with the transition from second act to third act, but overall this movie is legit. Jyn ain't no Rey, but she's likable. Good acting from the cast. Mads still got it. Ending was worth the entire ride.

Will re-watch on Blu-ray, but definitely good stuff. Looking forward to Episode 8 even more. I also didn't notice the Tarkin CG. And Vader looked like his helmet was a bucket.

Pretty good quality of the 1st vader scene on youtube: https://youtu.be/1I1Q8cz05v8
+ final Vader scene: https://youtu.be/5HySEXPS1pY
This legit got blocked in the last 5 minutes, crazy.
 
The problem with TFA, the bad part is the second half, ruinnig the beginning, IMO.

I dunno. The final lightsaber battle was pretty cool. And it felt impactful yet restrained (even with the dramatic planet destruction). I'd say it ended well.

Weaker parts are sprinkled throughout. Like the goofy Rathtars lol
 
How are you not talking about Rogue One with this line? Movie was almost completely fan service wankery

The story beats in TFA are nearly identical to A New Hope. Moments are complete mirrors to the original movie so much so that I rolled my eyes when Rey spots, from afar, Solo confronting his son.

Rogue One felt more like vintage Star Wars and I'm sure the lack of Jedi flipping around contributes to that. But to be fair, it is filled with a ridiculous amount of fan service, a lot of which breaks the flow of scenes. While the stuff in Rogue One is in your face distracting, the mirroring in TFA completely interferes with and dictates the story.

Just saying that because I can see where that poster is coming from. I still really like both movies.

Anyone get a poster at their theater? I got a small version of this

Got a free shirt at mine.

rijdpgQ.jpg
 
The story beats in TFA are nearly identical to A New Hope. Moments are complete mirrors to the original movie so much so that I rolled my eyes when Rey spots, from afar, Solo confronting his son.
I liked both movies too but I think the criticism is overused by detractors. Many movies use the same basic plot points and structure such as the mentor getting offed and as long as its well done with new takes on the material I'm good. A lot of the callbacks in Rogue One felt really pointless to me and had no bearing on the movie. R1 chose to wink and nudge the fan base over focusing on telling its own story way too much imo.
 
I liked this one. It actually got better as it progressed. Most popcorn movies have good opening acts with a dull 3rd act.

This movie suffers from something many summer movies suffer, which is expending all of your visual effort during grand plot and action scenes but neglecting scenes with expository dialogue.

The initial command room scene was simply dull. Angles a, b, c and repeat with no interesting blocking. Just this face, then back to this face, and then this face. It reminded me of how Captain America: Civil War managed to make an expository torture scene boring and forgettable.

I was actually afraid the rest of the movie's visual language/cinematography would be this bland, and many times it was. But it was carried by strong writing, beautiful in-world visuals and good characters.

Another nitpick I have was the contrived hurdle of accessing the Death Star data (needing to control a robot arm with a steady hand to grab the hard drive on a skyscraper tower) I understand its purpose to the plot and the movie's flow, but felt it could be accomplished without that.
 
How are Donnie Yen's and Wen Jiang's characters being perceived? I really enjoyed both their characters for some reason and their arc.
 
The more I think about it the more it annoys me that they gave Leia a stupid grin to end the film. Shes still in a fuckload of trouble, being chased. But time to give a big smile to the audience "wink wink" It seemed very "unLeia" like
 
I'm not actually a very big Star Wars fan. Like, I think the movies are fine. Enjoyable. I rewatch the original trilogy once every couple of years

I think that's a large part of why I like RO over TFA honestly. RO feels like an expansion of the galaxy, of what we can see and what can happen, in a way that makes me suddenly much more interested in Star Wars than I've been in ages. Whereas TFA left me with a constant feeling of "oh this again, oh its still all about Jedi, oh its all about Skywalker, oh its literally all the old characters, Death Star 3, Millennium Falcon, yadda yadda"

TFA does understand what "the core" of Star Wars is. The problem is that over 40 years "the core" of Star Wars has suffered such overexposure that I'm just tired of it


Damn. Preach.
 
I'm not actually a very big Star Wars fan. Like, I think the movies are fine. Enjoyable. I rewatch the original trilogy once every couple of years

I think that's a large part of why I like RO over TFA honestly. RO feels like an expansion of the galaxy, of what we can see and what can happen, in a way that makes me suddenly much more interested in Star Wars than I've been in ages. Whereas TFA left me with a constant feeling of "oh this again, oh its still all about Jedi, oh its all about Skywalker, oh its literally all the old characters, Death Star 3, Millennium Falcon, yadda yadda"

TFA does understand what "the core" of Star Wars is. The problem is that over 40 years "the core" of Star Wars has suffered such overexposure that I'm just tired of it

I agree with this.

TFA made me feel nostalgic.

Rogue One made me feel excited.
 
I'm not actually a very big Star Wars fan. Like, I think the movies are fine. Enjoyable. I rewatch the original trilogy once every couple of years

I think that's a large part of why I like RO over TFA honestly. RO feels like an expansion of the galaxy, of what we can see and what can happen, in a way that makes me suddenly much more interested in Star Wars than I've been in ages. Whereas TFA left me with a constant feeling of "oh this again, oh its still all about Jedi, oh its all about Skywalker, oh its literally all the old characters, Death Star 3, Millennium Falcon, yadda yadda"

TFA does understand what "the core" of Star Wars is. The problem is that over 40 years "the core" of Star Wars has suffered such overexposure that I'm just tired of it

I like you.
 
What a weirdly bland movie this was for me. It wasn't bad. It was great. I was just bored. I almost left after the intro of Vader because I was hungry.
 
How are Donnie Yen's and Wen Jiang's characters being perceived? I really enjoyed both their characters for some reason and their arc.


I fucking loved Wen's portrayal. Asians don't get a lot of roles as the strong brutish type. I love how they conveyed it naturally. He would fit right into Starcraft as a marauder.
 
Why would the rebel say "we're on a diplomatic mission" in ANH when darth vader literally saw them escape like 5 minutes ago?

This is why the whole thing just feels like fan fiction to me. It was written way later and slotted into a story that didn't anticipate any of this back when it was originally written. I wish they'd just make new shit instead

They did use real people. Guy Henry and Ingvild Deila were the Tarkin and Leia stand-ins.

It would have been less distracting if they just used some makeup and left it at that because the CG cartoon people don't even slightly look real. Not even slightly. My mind has an easier time suspending disbelief for the character now being a different actor than it does the character looking a roger rabbit insert
 
If there's one thing that detracts from TFA after watching RO, it's that they played the Starkiller Base card way too early -- should've saved that for IX given how much of a big fucking deal planet-killers are, especially one that blows up 3 simultaneously.

I'm glad they got Starkiller out of the way personally. I didn't have a problem with it and think people are being a bit too wacky about it, but now they they did it in VII they can do new things going forward.
 
I liked both movies too but I think the criticism is overused by detractors. Many movies use the same basic plot points and structure such as the mentor getting offed and as long as its well done with new takes on the material I'm good. A lot of the callbacks in Rogue One felt really pointless to me and had no bearing on the movie. R1 chose to wink and nudge the fan base over focusing on telling its own story way too much imo.
I feel like the issue with TFA isn't just rehashing the same plot points, it's that it borders on a pastiche of it during the second half.

Han's line about finding the weak point of Starkiller Base is a particularly absurd (and oddly self-aware) moment of the film. Also the base being so much bigger and badder than the Death Star, yet is destroyed just as dumbly. It's like the people making the film realised how stupid the whole thing was.

Rogue One at least has conviction in its own story telling, even if it is rather uneven.
 
If there's one thing that detracts from TFA after watching RO, it's that they played the Starkiller Base card way too early -- should've saved that for IX given how much of a big fucking deal planet-killers are, especially one that blows up 3 simultaneously.

Apart from that, I much prefer TFA over this.


The eyes look so flat.

Well it was 30 years after the last one.
 
Why would the rebel say "we're on a diplomatic mission" in ANH when darth vader literally saw them escape like 5 minutes ago?

This is why the whole thing just feels like fan fiction to me. It was written way later and slotted into a story that didn't anticipate any of this back when it was originally written. I wish they'd just make new shit instead
Antilles was bullshitting Vader. That hasn't changed.
 
I'm glad they got Starkiller out of the way personally. I didn't have a problem with it and think people are being a bit too wacky about it, but now they they did it in VII they can do new things going forward.

Yeah, now they can go the full Yuuzhan Vong route as primary conflict for IX




(I'm kidding, Lucasfilm. Please do not do this.)
 
I feel like the issue with TFA isn't just rehashing the same plot points, it's that it borders on a pastiche of it during the second half.

Han's line about finding the weak point of Starkiller Base is a particularly absurd (and oddly self-aware) moment of the film. Also the base being so much bigger and badder than the Death Star, yet is destroyed just as dumbly. It's like the people making the film realised how stupid the whole thing was.

Rogue One at least has conviction in its own story telling, even if it is rather uneven.

And no engineer intentionally put a weak point into 2nd death star or starkiller so why was it so easy?

Antilles was bullshitting Vader. That hasn't changed.

it's such an obvious lie though. they just escaped 5 minutes ago. why bother? it makes no sense
 
Han's line about finding the weak point of Starkiller Base is a particularly absurd (and oddly self-aware) moment of the film. Also the base being so much bigger and badder than the Death Star, yet is destroyed just as dumbly.

Yeah, but there's so much more going on which is why I guess I don't really care or think about it much. In ANH the central focus was on destroying the Death Star, in TFA destroying Starkiller was basically the backdrop to a more personal drama. That's how I see the climax rather than a ANH repeat. You get about 40 seconds of the squadron flying through a trench and shooting up a core. The rest is totally different from ANH. The setup is similar. The execution and how the events play out are wildly different.
 
I feel like the issue with TFA isn't just rehashing the same plot points, it's that it borders on a pastiche of it during the second half.

Han's line about finding the weak point of Starkiller Base is a particularly absurd (and oddly self-aware) moment of the film. Also the base being so much bigger and badder than the Death Star, yet is destroyed just as dumbly.

Yeah I can agree with that (although his line was hilarious to me). Starkiller Base felt dumb to me too but hopefully its appearing early in the new trilogy means they can avoid this uber superweapon must be destroyed plotting for the rest of them. I'm really hoping this is the case

Saw Brandon just said the exact same thing lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom