Starwolf_UK
Member
While not smart and now too late to do anything I wonder if releasing the hack for 5 minutes on the 21st and then taking down the link could have been a method to both release the game and still comply with resolution 1. How far would they be willing to go to disprove an argument of "I released it then read your letter and complied with it".
But if it does or doesn't isn't really relevant the legal route they are going down is trademark violation (uses the names and characters for starters) rather than DMCA takedown notices which the others were (here there is nothing to take down) and which they also threatened?
How loose do we get. Pokemon cries of Pokemon release gen II, moves and types as well. How about by ear copies of music from other Pokemon games.Does the patch file contain copyrighted work from other Pokemon games?
But if it does or doesn't isn't really relevant the legal route they are going down is trademark violation (uses the names and characters for starters) rather than DMCA takedown notices which the others were (here there is nothing to take down) and which they also threatened?