Scalebound cancelled [Platinum Games and Kamiya have commented]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Glad to see Kamiya hasn't lost his wit.
Fuck that cold MS statement. That upcoming lineup is pathetic. Hope they'll pay for their weak line-up this year as will Scorpio.

dfghj.gif
 
Platinum Games confirms cancellation..



responses..
"ohhhh.. glad they are okay... "
"Kamiya, you the man."
"Bless Kamiya san. He really is the God Prince."
"Good to hear from folks at Platinum. Hope they bounce back from this mess."

-------------------------

Microsoft confirms cancellation:



Repsonses...
"Cancelling one game and in the same breath trying to promote other games. Pretty heartless response. "
"That was one of the most heartless and corporate statement I have ever seen.

Fuck MS"
" that is? That's all they say about a game in dev for this long?!
15 words.

Amazing. My heart sinks even more for the dev team."
-------------------------

Is Platinum really so loved on here..? or is Microsoft just not so much loved here?

Both statements are short and mentions upcoming games..

what is the difference?

You do not understand the difference between a 163 men studio hit by a massive cancellation and a 114 000 men company saving some money?

You do not understand why people are concerned about someones health, when reliable insiders like shinobi gave reason to be concerned?

Do you seriously see it as an issue when people are concerned about someones health? Are you drunk?

Okay, but if that were uniformly true then Sony wouldn't have ever gotten to their current position. Everybody would still be slave to their 360 Modern Warfare & Gears of War friends list.

Yes, 8 years after Xbox 360 people moved on.
 
I'm surprised Sony still hasn't worked with Platinum on a project, always seemed like a no-brainer to me. They're the most obvious first party to partner with them, and yet they're the only one who hasn't.
 
One is from the party that made the decision, the other is from the party that had the decision inflicted upon them.

One is from a developer well beloved by most of the community.

The other is from the most hated company on NeoGaf.
 
Glad to hear the stuff about him being in bad shape wasn't accurate.

Keep on keeping on I guess.

Looking forward to his next title, hopefully they have some backburner titles brewing.


Don't get me wrong I'm happy kamiya is fine but I'm not glad to hear it was bullshit, that's super shitty reporting that slanders Microsoft in a way that maybe they dont deserve.

Games get cancelled all the time, even ones that have been in development for a long time. Sometimes things just don't work the way envisioned. Scalebound was one of those and no one should be surprised by its cancellation. Look at people's reactions the last few times it's been shown, it didn't look good.

I really hope Patrick or Austin at waypoint look into this. It would be nice to get the real story on this from a trustworthy news source.
 
Don't get me wrong I'm happy kamiya is fine but I'm not glad to hear it was bullshit, that's super shitty reporting that slanders Microsoft in a way that maybe they dont deserve.

Games get cancelled all the time, even ones that have been in development for a long time. Sometimes things just don't work the way envisioned. Scalebound was one of those and no one should be surprised by its cancellation. Look at people's reactions the last few times it's been shown, it didn't look good.

I really hope Patrick or Austin at waypoint look into this. It would be nice to get the real story on this from a trustworthy news source.

definitely would be nice if someone got a story out on this. polygon people seem to maybe know something!
 
One is from a developer well beloved by most of the community.

The other is from the most hated company on NeoGaf.

People were less concerned that a 85 billion dollar per year company will survive the cancellation of Scalebound. I can pretend shock and awe if you want me to.
 
Is Platinum really so loved on here..? or is Microsoft just not so much loved here?

Both statements are short and mentions upcoming games..

what is the difference?
Creativity?

If like me, you've played any MS first party game in the last couple of years, another Devil May Cry clone with a refreshing setting, would be completely fine.

... I just can't play Gears or Forza or Halo again this year. I'm just numb to those franchises now.

Also, while Platinum could be at risk because of all of this, MS I would expect, are not. That's probably the biggest difference.
 
Insiders hinting at some omnious bullshit between the two parties. Talking shit about people's health. MS delaying Scorpio and possibly some disasters or god knows what before E3.

Dear god.

Fucking "insiders" ladies and gentlemen.
 
There's no specific wording, he's saying that in a polite and professional way for all of his (and his company's) fans, and would have probably done the same whichever the situation was.
yeah i suspect you're right - it's just that polite, twitter and Kamiya don't often appear in the same sentence, hence interesting. 😂
 
They probably all got tipped off from the same source. A big game of DM/PM-Telephone.

I sure wonder how all this stuff works. Dunno if Patrick and Austin or anyone at Waypoint know stuff about the story here, but all I got so far this week is:

Liam Robertson, the first person to mention the game was about to be cancelled, said he was tipped off by a few sources. In the video he did, it seems like he got decently familiar with a few Platinum employees due to him recently interviewing a few of them to get info on The Wonderful 101's development.

Kotaku's Jason Schreier got a story out not too long after that, where he said he was tipped off by multiple sources. Going by the Kotaku story and his Twitter, he doesn't hint at knowing anything more than the game's cancellation

On Twitter, Michael McWhertor of Polygon engaged with Adam Bolton, a CNET Australia contributor They both seemed to to hear some things about Microsoft being particularity shady to Platinum in Scalebound's development.

I would love a story on all of this.
 
One is from the party that made the decision, the other is from the party that had the decision inflicted upon them.

Responding differently to each statement is perfectly logical.

How was the decision inflicted upon another? Do you have evidence of how/why this got cancelled?
 
Platinum Games confirms cancellation..



responses..
"ohhhh.. glad they are okay... "
"Kamiya, you the man."
"Bless Kamiya san. He really is the God Prince."
"Good to hear from folks at Platinum. Hope they bounce back from this mess."

-------------------------

Microsoft confirms cancellation:



Repsonses...
"Cancelling one game and in the same breath trying to promote other games. Pretty heartless response. "
"That was one of the most heartless and corporate statement I have ever seen.

Fuck MS"
" that is? That's all they say about a game in dev for this long?!
15 words.

Amazing. My heart sinks even more for the dev team."
-------------------------

Is Platinum really so loved on here..? or is Microsoft just not so much loved here?

Both statements are short and mentions upcoming games..

what is the difference?
One is aplogizing to fans for cancellation while other is trying to say it was the right decision to make. Which one sounds better to you?

Also MS has a shit history with third party devs and cancellation of games. There was Rare, Lionhead Studios and then the Phantom Dust studio. You don't need to see anything from their cancellation message to get a clear picture.
 
Poor MS.

I mean you have to feel sorry for a corporation that just cancelled this game and incurred the ire of angry gamers in the same week it had to patch its latest browser for a security risk caused by console going on hyperlinks & a Word exploit that could allow someone to take control of a PC via a 3 line script embedded in a document's metadata - neither exploit they identified themselves.

Yeah, poor MS. The injustice of it all.
 
Can we say "fuck microsoft!" now? Somehow it doesn't sound as good as "fuck konami"

MS made a business decision, totally fair and on one harm. Konami lock Kojima away from team plus bunch other inhuman things, not in the same league.
 
Seriously? Will you go that far just to defend Microsoft? Read the first line again.

Fact: Microsoft wants to sell games and Xbox/W10 systems.

Also, they paid for development of a game.

Then, they decided to cancel it.

Now... do you think they've done this just for hobby? Or to demonstrate they are evil?

Or MAYBE (maybe) something went wrong?Like, the game was not on schedule or it did not go across a quality check or such?

Also, do you have proof Platinum has not been paid fro the job?

Because it is very easy to give all the fault to Microsoft, especially after a similar situation with Phantom Dust.

Yet... i guess that maybe there are other reasons for the cancellation, behind the "Heheh... let's cancel this one!" thing.
 
Fact: Microsoft wants to sell games and Xbox/W10 systems.

Also, they paid for development of a game.

Then, they decided to cancel it.

Now... do you think they've done this just for hobby? Or to demonstrate they are evil?

Or MAYBE (maybe) something went wrong?Like, the game was not on schedule or it did not go across a quality check or such?

Also, do you have proof Platinum has not been paid fro the job?

Because it is very easy to give all the fault to Microsoft, especially after a similar situation with Phantom Dust.

Yet... i guess that maybe there are other reasons for the cancellation, behind the "Heheh... let's cancel this one!" thing.
I'm gonna go with the wish to demonstrate they are evil option
 
PG´s is using the same or more space of the notification to apologize to their fans and people who were expecting to play the game. MS is stating that the game´s cancelled in an aseptic way and right after that promotes the upcoming releases. One reads like an apology while the other´s like "this stuff happened BUT LOOK HERE WE HAVE AWESOME GAMES COMING!". The tone of both is very different.

Both statements are designed to give reassurance to fans and customers.

The two companies are in completely different positions regarding the matter so tonal differences should be expected.
 
Fact: Microsoft wants to sell games and Xbox/W10 systems.

Also, they paid for development of a game.

Then, they decided to cancel it.

Now... do you think they've done this just for hobby? Or to demonstrate they are evil?

Or MAYBE (maybe) something went wrong?Like, the game was not on schedule or it did not go across a quality check or such?

Also, do you have proof Platinum has not been paid fro the job?

Because it is very easy to give all the fault to Microsoft, especially after a similar situation with Phantom Dust.

Yet... i guess that maybe there are other reasons for the cancellation, behind the "Heheh... let's cancel this one!" thing.

Pretty sure they cancelled it for a laugh. Obviously.
 
Fact: Microsoft wants to sell games and Xbox/W10 systems.

Also, they paid for development of a game.

Then, they decided to cancel it.

Now... do you think they've done this just for hobby? Or to demonstrate they are evil?

Or MAYBE (maybe) something went wrong?Like, the game was not on schedule or it did not go across a quality check or such?

Also, do you have proof Platinum has not been paid fro the job?

Because it is very easy to give all the fault to Microsoft, especially after a similar situation with Phantom Dust.

Yet... i guess that maybe there are other reasons for the cancellation, behind the "Heheh... let's cancel this one!" thing.

I think the "Heheh..let's cancel this one!" idea starts to make some sense when you consider that Microsoft's strategy going forward doesn't seem to be these single player focused games with only sequel potential, but rather, games as services. They want to put money in developing individual Gears, Halo, and Forza titles to be able to profit from a single consumer for the entirety of the 2-3 years before the next one, rather than a consumer buying one game, then waiting 2-3 years for the next to pay $60 on.
 
And now it’s 2017! We’re starting this year off strong by releasing “NieR:Automata” at the end of February in Japan and early March in the West, and we have a few more releases planned before the year is over. The video game industry is constantly changing at a rapid and dramatic rate, and we plan to be as flexible as we can in order to deal with these changes. I think 2017 will be an important year for achieving results with the company reforms we implemented last year.
Source: https://www.platinumgames.com/official-blog/article/9217

Switch games, or something completely new?
 
Fact: Microsoft wants to sell games and Xbox/W10 systems.

Also, they paid for development of a game.

Then, they decided to cancel it.

Now... do you think they've done this just for hobby? Or to demonstrate they are evil?

Or MAYBE (maybe) something went wrong?Like, the game was not on schedule or it did not go across a quality check or such?

Also, do you have proof Platinum has not been paid fro the job?

Because it is very easy to give all the fault to Microsoft, especially after a similar situation with Phantom Dust.

Yet... i guess that maybe there are other reasons for the cancellation, behind the "Heheh... let's cancel this one!" thing.
Maybe they decided to add more to their requirements without adding more to the budget, similar to Phantom Dust?

I mean, it's pretty much a certainty that MS now requires a Windows 10 release, that could definitely cause issues.

Maybe they needed to figure out some sort of Games as a Service venture, something like Halo 5's REQ packs or Gears of War's Gear packs.

I dunno, I've got to assume there was a valid reason for the cancellation but Platinum has proven time and time again that they can release a good stream of games.... so unless MS (the contract holder, which is usually the one with the freedom to make public statements) says otherwise, I'm gonna assume it's all on them.

Edit:
Is this thread on loop?
It's not my fault that the same things need replying to...
 
More businesses fail than succeed so that is not a surprise. That said, Western business culture, primarily US, is very different than the rest of the world.

I totally agree, but I get the feeling that if some of us where in the shoes of the people who cancelled Scale-bound, they would continue funding it.
 
Fact: Microsoft wants to sell games and Xbox/W10 systems.

Also, they paid for development of a game.

Then, they decided to cancel it.

Now... do you think they've done this just for hobby? Or to demonstrate they are evil?

Or MAYBE (maybe) something went wrong?Like, the game was not on schedule or it did not go across a quality check or such?

Also, do you have proof Platinum has not been paid fro the job?

Because it is very easy to give all the fault to Microsoft, especially after a similar situation with Phantom Dust.

Yet... i guess that maybe there are other reasons for the cancellation, behind the "Heheh... let's cancel this one!" thing.

As you are already aware, there are more options than a) game bad b) MS evil
 
I think the "Heheh..let's cancel this one!" idea starts to make some sense when you consider that Microsoft's strategy going forward doesn't seem to be these single player focused games with only sequel potential, but rather, games as services. They want to put money in developing individual Gears, Halo, and Forza titles to be able to profit from a single consumer for the entirety of the 2-3 years before the next one, rather than a consumer buying one game, then waiting 2-3 years for the next to pay $60 on.

Nah that idea never makes sense.

They cancelled the game because they felt like they wouldn't get a return on their investment, so they cut their losses. Even if they are shifting to a games as service model, if they felt that releasing this game would allow them to at least break even, they'd have gotten it out the door.

The fact that they chose to throw away the entire investment after making it a pillar of their marketing and stomach the inevitable backlash and concern, tells me that the game was in an awful state (which is a feeling i couldn't shake from the first time it demoed).

I get that people are upset that this Platinum game won't see the light of day, but in addition to being a creative work for Platinum , it WAS a business venture for both parties. Frankly, This is what happens when the dollars and cents don't add up.
 
I think the "Heheh..let's cancel this one!" idea starts to make some sense when you consider that Microsoft's strategy going forward doesn't seem to be these single player focused games with only sequel potential, but rather, games as services. They want to put money in developing individual Gears, Halo, and Forza titles to be able to profit from a single consumer for the entirety of the 2-3 years before the next one, rather than a consumer buying one game, then waiting 2-3 years for the next to pay $60 on.


So you completely dismiss the option that Platinum was pulling another Star Fox with Scalebound?
 
Nah that idea never makes sense.

They cancelled the game because they felt like their wouldn't get a return on their investment, so they cut their losses. Even if they are shifting to a games as service model, if they felt that releasing this game would allow them to at least break even, they'd have gotten it out the door.

The fact that they chose to throw away the entire investment after making it a pillar of their marketing and stomach the inevitable backlash and concern, tells me that the game was in an awful state (which is a feeling i couldn't shake from the first time it demoed).

I get that people are upset that this Platinum game won't see the light of day, but in addition to being a creative work it WAS a business venture. Frankly, This is what happens when the dollars and cents don't add up.
Develop game for another year, ship it, possibly recoup more development costs than just throwing it all away for the sale of no one? (unless they are gonna sell it to someone, that would be neat).

I'm also not entirely sure that Microsoft ever intended to break even with this game? It totally seemed like a loss leader from the start. At the position Platinum was in when Microsoft probably hired them to make this game, I'm sure they were aware about the weak numbers their games tend to sell. It was probably more a move to attract a different audience to the Xbox platform.

I don't literally think there is a carefree "let's cancel a video game because I feel like it" idea in Microsoft. I backed up my post with some reasoning on why I feel like this game could have been unfairly cancelled.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom