March 7 at 12:51 PM
The anti-secrecy organization WikiLeaks said Tuesday that it has obtained a vast portion of the CIAs computer hacking arsenal, and began posting the files online in a breach that may expose some of the U.S. intelligence communitys most closely guarded cyber weapons.
WikiLeaks touted its trove as exceeding in scale and significance the massive collection of National Security Agency documents exposed by former U.S. intelligence contractor Edward Snowden.
A statement from WikiLeaks indicated that it planned to post nearly 9,000 files describing code developed in secret by the CIA to steal data from targets overseas and turn ordinary devices including cellphones, computers and even television sets into surveillance tools.
Everybody's covered.
![]()
Am I crazy or is there a huge savings for the middle class and young professionals?
If this passed, it'd be a pain to remove those credits for people that didn't get anything under the ACA. Republicans could accuse Democrats of a tax hike on the middle class if they tried to revert back to the status quo anyway.
These solely the size of the tax credit. What that doesn't take into account is the rising premiums, higher deductibles, higher co-pays, etc that will occur.
I'd rather get a tax rebate of $500 per year on my $400 per month plan than $2000 on my $600 per month plan (and that's being generous in the premium raises...).
Also, Tom Price clearly doesn't understand medicaid. He's making it sound like people on medicaid hate it...yet they like it more than employer insurance...
We reported above the results for individuals. For families, the Republican bill would increase costs by $2,243 if the bill were in effect today. For families with a head of household age 55 to 64, the bill would increase costs by $7,604. For families with income below 250 percent of poverty, the bill would increase costs by $6,228.
These cost increases would explode by 2020. We estimate that the Republican bill would increase costs for families by $4,274. For families with a head of household age 55 to 64, the bill would increase costs by $10,591. For families with income below 250% percent of poverty, the bill would increase costs by $9,024.
lol that surcharge sounds like it will compound forever b/c constantly increasing the price guarantee's missed coverage and more surcharging
Christ on a pogo stick.
The top 400 highest-income taxpayers whose annual incomes average more than $300 million apiece each would receive an average annual tax cut of about $7 million, we estimate from Internal Revenue Service (IRS) data.
This groups tax cut would total about $2.8 billion a year.
The roughly 160 million households with incomes below $200,000 would get nothing from the repeal of these two taxes.
The $2.8 billion a year total tax cut for the top 400, as noted above, is roughly the value of premium tax credits that 813,000 people in the 20 smallest states and Washington, D.C. would lose combined if the ACA is repealed without a replacement.
Anyone know how the tax credit would work for people with insurance through employer?
Yes but, think what it will do for the poorest among us, the top 400 families in america!
![]()
http://www.cbpp.org/research/federa...are-tax-cuts-on-400-highest-income-households
Trump looking out for the white working class!
This thing might as well be stillborn at this point.
It wouldn't. You already have your insurance tax deducted.
The tax credits are for the individual markets only.
The host must not abort.Four Senate Republicans demand that the ACA Medicaid expansion be retained:
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/obamacare-medicaid-repeal-republicans-235736
This thing might as well be stillborn at this point.
Yet another Reverse Robinhood bill by the GOP. They even worked in a clause that removes the cap on how much CEOs can deduct in taxes.
So we now got a trickle down healthcare too. Trump gonna love all these tricklingYes but, think what it will do for the poorest among us, the top 400 families in america!
![]()
http://www.cbpp.org/research/federa...are-tax-cuts-on-400-highest-income-households
Trump looking out for the white working class!
So we now got a trickle down healthcare too. Trump gonna love all these trickling
They are united on repeal and divided on replacement.
What happens to people in the mean time?
They are united on repeal and divided on replacement.
What happens to people in the mean time?
Four Senate Republicans demand that the ACA Medicaid expansion be retained:
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/obamacare-medicaid-repeal-republicans-235736
This thing might as well be stillborn at this point.
Screwed?
Seems like they'll end up just repealing obamacare with no replacement and just say 'F it'
So we now got a trickle down healthcare too. Trump gonna love all these trickling
So this is terrible for anyone who isn't super rich?
To be clear - past this year they don't actually say how they are going to fund this do they?
So this is terrible for anyone who isn't super rich?
Did I hear "free market healthcare" in that speech?
Holy shit, how fucking dumb are these people. The free market system is the monied cartel system that exploits people. We need less of this, not more.
Did I hear "free market healthcare" in that speech?
Holy shit, how fucking dumb are these people. The free market system is the monied cartel system that exploits people. We need less of this, not more.
Partly done by the chief actuary for Covered California.
In other words, it's legit.
I'm sure a $10k increase in costs for families is easily manageable. And that's the average!
They can't actually straight repeal it.
They can mostly repeal it, however. But good luck with winning an election by literally kicking 25 million people off insurance.
Not very likely, considering even some Republicans are saying it sucks.What are the chances this makes it past congress?
Everybody's covered.
![]()
My favorite/least favorite part of this thing is the idiotic GOP talking point that less pages in a bill means it is magically better.
Uh, no thanks. I'd rather have this well-thought out and detailed for any situation.
Everybody's covered.
![]()
Yes but, think what it will do for the poorest among us, the top 400 families in america!
![]()
http://www.cbpp.org/research/federa...are-tax-cuts-on-400-highest-income-households
Trump looking out for the white working class!
You're missing the point, this is a feature! The CBO will ultimately score this thing terribly, saying it not only will result in less people insured but also cost more because their tax cuts don't cover the costs. This is when they can point to these "pro-growth" policies that will create jobs and raise wages, and say the CBO doesn't include that in their scoring. It's freedom baby!
Another reason for the expected rise in the uninsured is that many people might not be able to afford to take advantage of the subsidies under TrumpCare. Here's why, using the stark example of a 64-year-old couple earning 150% of the poverty level, or about $25,500 in 2020:
For this older couple, a silver-level ObamaCare plan would cost roughly $1,150, with maximum out-of-pocket costs likely limited to about $2,000 to $3,000, an IBD analysis finds. Under TrumpCare, the same plan would likely cost the couple between $15,000 and $20,000 in premiums, after subsidies.