You're asking the movie to treat the audience like idiots. We know they lost Ben, you know they lost Ben. The subtext is there. The allusions are there. We don't need to retread the storyline. His absence and loss is already felt both in the characters and for the audience. His death is a driving force behind the actions of Peter and May. Hell, Neds actions are somewhat tinted by the death of Ben. To me that's a strong storybeat.
That's how serial fiction works. They tell stories across multiple installments. They've been doing this since 2008 and you're still not on board with it, so that means you're just watching to complain, which is odd because your time could be spent doing shit you actually enjoy.
What makes this funnier is the people who complain about MCU movies being too MCU probably have no trouble watching 60 hours of mediocre TV shows that do the same shit.
Ok movie. But not faithful to the character. They never killed Uncle Ben, or showed him. So how do we know he is dead? Bad.
Ok movie. But not faithful to the character. They never killed Uncle Ben, or showed him. So how do we know he is dead? Bad.
some people need a sarcasm detector
How wasn't it faithful?Ok movie. But not faithful to the character. They never killed Uncle Ben, or showed him. So how do we know he is dead? Bad.
Ok movie. But not faithful to the character. They never killed Uncle Ben, or showed him. So how do we know he is dead? Bad.
Reads like Trump's review of the movie.
Yep sarcasmOk movie. But not faithful to the character. They never killed Uncle Ben, or showed him. So how do we know he is dead? Bad.
Reads like Trump's review of the movie.
How wasn't it faithful?
....some people need a sarcasm detector
but what I thought was a bit much was Spider-Man being handed an AI suit. That's my "too MCU" complaint.
Too MCU? Huh? Ever heard of Iron Spider? Amazing Spider-Man #529, man. 2006.
* sigh * no, it isn't the driving force in THIS movie. That's a cheat. You're using your previous knowledge of the character to fill in a missing gap for the movie.
I was clearly quoting someone else. Stop with the cherrypicking.
* sigh * no, it isn't the driving force in THIS movie. That's a cheat. You're using your previous knowledge of the character to fill in a missing gap for the movie.
I don't know if the Vulture really worked for me in this incarnation. He was too much like an Iron Man villain. I think it would have been more "neighborhood" with someone like the Lizard ( I realize they just used him). The movie was too high tech feeling, you could have almost replaced the spider powers with a normal guy in an Iron Man lite suit. Although I still enjoyed it for what it was.
If there is no Martha and Thomas Wayne recap in Justice League, how will we know what Bauman's motivation is?Imagine seriously arguing that we need to see Uncle Ben die in order for Spider-Man's arc to make sense in 2017.
Imagine seriously arguing that we need to see Uncle Ben die in order for Spider-Man's arc to make sense in 2017.
Oh so we're doing this huh. We're gonna pretend that I didn't say at least three times that we didn't need to literally see Ben's death. We're gonna pretend that I didn't elaborate on my point that "I want to be an Avenger" was a weak driving force for Peter. We're pretending I didn't simply suggest that mentioning his uncle by name and what happened in a sentence or two would've gone a long way to making him seem somewhat selfless. Apparently I also didn't say that Ben was just a suggestion and that it didn't HAVE to be him, just anything a little more compelling than what we got.
Nope, apparently I just can't understand the movie and NEED them to spend 30 minutes showing an old man die again. That's EXACTLY what I fucking said. Right?
We'll get a flashback in the next movie.If there is no Martha and Thomas Wayne recap in Justice League, how will we know what Bauman's motivation is?
No Rourke, it'll be Clive Owen.We'll get a flashback in the next movie.
Mickey Rourke as Uncle Ben.
Honestly mate there's nothing in Spider-Man: Homecoming that should provoke such an angry reaction to the movie. It's remarkably inoffensive as a film. I get that you're an aspiring filmmaker and you have all sorts of useful tips you'd like to pass on to the director of Cop Car, but I don't agree that Spider-Man: A Bobo Dakes Film would be any better than Homecoming, so I guess this is where I get off the bus.
So kindly suck my dick from the back.
Holy shit dude, calm down.
No Rourke, it'll be Clive Owen.
People moan that every time a new version of a superhero movie comes round we have to watch the origin story again, and now a movie was good enough to not force that on us people are moaning. Basically you can't win.
The problem is that your arguments don't make sense. Yes, Uncle Ben isn't mentioned by name but his presence (or lack of his presence) is felt and his fate & impact of his fate is super-clearly implied with the words said and even what is left unsaid. I'd even argue that neither being able to talk about him yet just makes it clear how raw those feelings of loss & pain are to both Aunt May & Peter, still, and as such makes it even more powerful as a showcase of what they have gone through and are going through.Okay, ignore my larger to point and hone in on the vulgar thing I said because I'm petty. And project anger that's not there onto it.
Can't wait to see the 20th post that says I hate this film because I didn't see uncle Ben die again.
You see how that's annoying? That's literally what this entire page is.
Okay, ignore my larger to point and hone in on the vulgar thing I said because I'm petty. And project anger that's not there onto it.
Can't wait to see the 20th post that says I hate this film because I didn't see uncle Ben die again.
You see how that's annoying? That's literally what this entire page is.
Damn who knew a movie about dude in brightly colored underwear was such serious business?