Steam hits 40m concurrent users.

Man, people surely love to make these stupid arguments as if they meant something.

What do you think, that when you get similar numbers from other service they include exclusively users who are playn passionately full time?
Do you actually think bots and idle accounts aren't a part of PSN, XBOX, GOG, EGS, Origin or what else?
I am still getting emails from Xbox Live despite that I haven't owned an Xbox since 36...
 
arnold-schwarzenegger-commando.gif


Alright boys, what are we fighting about?
Lots and lots prankster uncles and people who don't buy games apparently have Steam running everywhere. 40 mil is fake news.

And yes, 40 mil concurrent is how many people have Steam running. In game is a different figure. I think 12.5mil was brought up as highest in game.

This is still pretty large number of people that

a)Have Steam loaded and so vast majority will have games on Steam so can be marketed to buy more games
b)Most people who do have Steam loaded buy games and play games through Steam.
 
Most of these posts have to be satire

There's no way this many of you are actually this clueless
 
Last edited:
Does it matter? They are people logged in, but the amount of people playing will also go up as people logged in increases. You also have to be "logged in" in order to buy games, which is how Valve get their money.
of course it matters.
Because steam is installed in a ton of pcs. Doesn';t mean these are active accounts.
-You can have people who just have their PC on (I would wager that is most of this number
-Accounts sold with 1 game (popular to sell cheap games this way)
-VPNS
-Bots
-Cards bot accounts

Right now, 10 million people are "playing" actively
46n3oAg.png


But the same rules apply to these people. Tons of these are bots accounts, 1 time use accounts etc etc etc.
The 40mil number means nothing. Means my mother got her shitty laptop on and my nephew installed steam in it and it autostarts for 2 years now.
Does not equal playing or money spending accounts
 
Last edited:
of course it matters.
Because steam is installed in a ton of pcs. Doesn';t mean these are active accounts.
-You can have people who just have their PC on (I would wager that is most of this number
-Accounts sold with 1 game (popular to sell cheap games this way)
-VPNS
-Bots
-Cards bot accounts

Right now, 10 million people are "playing" actively
46n3oAg.png


But the same rules apply to these people. Tons of these are bots accounts, 1 time use accounts etc etc etc.
The 40mil number means nothing. Means my mother got her shitty laptop on and my nephew installed steam in it and it autostarts for 2 years now.
Does not equal playing or money spending accounts

lol.....didn't see that chart. These are still impressive numbers so it doesn't diminish that the milestone at all. Not the massive flex over other platforms that some thought it was, perhaps.
 
You'll enjoy the post below yours from Rofif, the walking meme
Where were you past few days when I upgraded my cpu to 5700x3d and enthusiastically shared my benchmark results and didn't whine at all? Even monster hunter benchmark ran kinda fine.
This is it. You always do this. You ignore everything good I have to say about pc and only pick the parts you don't agree with to drive your pcmr fanboy narrative.
A walking meme why? What did I say to upset your hyper intelligence in this thread? Nothing I said is false.
it's 10 mil playing. not 40. And out of that 10mil, real people is obviously less. We don't know how much.

Is facts and statistics also counting towards hating a pc?

You should know that You are one of most blind pc fanboys there is. You are more of a blind pc fanboy, than average ps fanboy is.
Understand that we don't care. Enjoy your pc or whatever the fuck you play that satisfies your ego. But know that other people can and will disagree because you are wrong way more often than you think and nobody likes you

edit: I don't think I remember having a single good interaction with you in past year or two. You are a blemish on this forum and all you do is bitch and moan.
 
Last edited:
of course it matters.
Because steam is installed in a ton of pcs. Doesn';t mean these are active accounts.
-You can have people who just have their PC on (I would wager that is most of this number
-Accounts sold with 1 game (popular to sell cheap games this way)
-VPNS
-Bots
-Cards bot accounts

Right now, 10 million people are "playing" actively
46n3oAg.png


But the same rules apply to these people. Tons of these are bots accounts, 1 time use accounts etc etc etc.
The 40mil number means nothing. Means my mother got her shitty laptop on and my nephew installed steam in it and it autostarts for 2 years now.
Does not equal playing or money spending accounts
There are a lot of factors that people for some reason don't even think about. By the way, you can also add a whole army of trading bots that don't play but just spin and trade cases and other things continuously through Steam. They don't even launch games, they just play the "Valve Best Game ever Made = Cases", but it's better not to even go there.

This is like creating a topic every time about Google breaking another record for the number of accounts. (How Many People Use Gmail? Gmail has over 1.8 billion active users globally, accounting for approximately 21.95% of the world's population).

But how many real people are playing at the moment, these are really interesting figures. But we will never know the exact figures, they are extremely difficult to calculate without direct access to the database, and Valve is unlikely to publish them openly, there are no reasons for this.
 
I get what you're saying, but I'll be in my early 60s in 30 years. Maybe I won't play whatever Roblox (not on steam, bad example) equivalent the youngsters will be playing, but there is a good chance I still would want to get back to the classics, right? People do it with movies, books and music, I don't see why gaming would be so different. In a way, that's also something that we have to "worry" about with YouTube, or Netflix, but that's another conversation to be had since on Steam you do purchase a license to play that specific game, and that license isn't supposed to expire any time soon afaik, so there's definitely some rightful entitlement here.

Going back to my Roblox example, there's a not so slim chance that at some point there will be some store front that will weaken a Gaben-less Valve into submission. Epic and Microsoft sure as shit aren't done trying. That's always kinda the problem when talking about things that are 30 years off, we just can't say. It's gonna be interesting to see how this works out.
That's a good post, I get your point.

But 30 years is so far into the future and now we're just getting started on AI and all the tech advancements that'll come through that. I'm thinking everything will be different. Maybe Nvidia will be king of the hill or some China company or Musk and we'll have a chip connected to our brain pushing images directly to our eyes or maybe it'll be holograms or controlling robots fighting on a colosseum arena on a space station or some other sci-fi thing.
Whatever it'll be I don't think Steam will be around as a launcher, except for retro gaming like playing on Commodore computers today.
 
of course it matters.
Because steam is installed in a ton of pcs. Doesn';t mean these are active accounts.
-You can have people who just have their PC on (I would wager that is most of this number
-Accounts sold with 1 game (popular to sell cheap games this way)
-VPNS
-Bots
-Cards bot accounts

Right now, 10 million people are "playing" actively
46n3oAg.png


But the same rules apply to these people. Tons of these are bots accounts, 1 time use accounts etc etc etc.
The 40mil number means nothing. Means my mother got her shitty laptop on and my nephew installed steam in it and it autostarts for 2 years now.
Does not equal playing or money spending accounts

Actively playing is a much higher percentage than I would have guessed.
 
It's a good post with real data. Don't agree with the "bot" stuff though.
Not disputing the facts, I just don't see the need to downplay the concurrent user milestone every time there's a thread about it.

"The 40mil number means nothing. Means my mother got her shitty laptop on and my nephew installed steam in it and it autostarts for 2 years now."

Pure hypotheticals again. Pulling the bot stuff out of his hairy arse. Just typical rofif stuff in every PC thread.


Where were you past few days when I upgraded my cpu to 5700x3d and enthusiastically shared my benchmark results and didn't whine at all? Even monster hunter benchmark ran kinda fine.
This is it. You always do this. You ignore everything good I have to say about pc and only pick the parts you don't agree with to drive your pcmr fanboy narrative.
A walking meme why? What did I say to upset your hyper intelligence in this thread? Nothing I said is false.
it's 10 mil playing. not 40. And out of that 10mil, real people is obviously less. We don't know how much.

Is facts and statistics also counting towards hating a pc?

You should know that You are one of most blind pc fanboys there is. You are more of a blind pc fanboy, than average ps fanboy is.
Understand that we don't care. Enjoy your pc or whatever the fuck you play that satisfies your ego. But know that other people can and will disagree because you are wrong way more often than you think and nobody likes you

edit: I don't think I remember having a single good interaction with you in past year or two. You are a blemish on this forum and all you do is bitch and moan.
I find most of your posts hilarious and retarded, you've given me lots of entertainment over the years which I appreciate, I love you rofif. shame it's not mutual!
 
Last edited:
Does this count people logged on to Steam but not playing a game?
Yes.
Concurrent people playing games was just short of 13 million (that's not necessarily at the same time the 40m CCU was broken)

Also some people can be playing other games off of Steam so the number of people playing PC games (AAA, AA games) would be higher than 13m too.
 
Last edited:
Does this count people logged on to Steam but not playing a game?

Yes. 40 millions concurrent, 132+ million MAU (not sure what this last month was, 132 is from January) includes people on their PC simply with Steam open and signed in. I for example would count this last week playing mostly WoW on bnet and Avowed on PC GamePass, but Steam is open.
 
There are a lot of factors that people for some reason don't even think about. By the way, you can also add a whole army of trading bots that don't play but just spin and trade cases and other things continuously through Steam. They don't even launch games, they just play the "Valve Best Game ever Made = Cases", but it's better not to even go there.

This is like creating a topic every time about Google breaking another record for the number of accounts. (How Many People Use Gmail? Gmail has over 1.8 billion active users globally, accounting for approximately 21.95% of the world's population).

But how many real people are playing at the moment, these are really interesting figures. But we will never know the exact figures, they are extremely difficult to calculate without direct access to the database, and Valve is unlikely to publish them openly, there are no reasons for this.
the 1.3mil ccu for monster hunter is most likely fully real number. Game is too new and too expensive for trading bots.
So that's a real number and it's a great number.
I just don't see the need to flex a meaningless 40mil number that says us nothing and is artificially inflated to unknown degree
 
the 1.3mil ccu for monster hunter is most likely fully real number. Game is too new and too expensive for trading bots.
So that's a real number and it's a great number.
I just don't see the need to flex a meaningless 40mil number that says us nothing and is artificially inflated to unknown degree
Yes, no one even doubts the success of MH, I also believe that everything is clean there, the game has always been mega popular in China, this is the only region where MH MMORPG were released, which the rest of the world did not receive. So everything is fine there, MH will soon have other problems, it seems like the game code was cracked, so the first cheats will be soon, I think within a couple of weeks, the same thing happened in MH Word, Capcom did not really fight with it :messenger_grinning:
 
Not disputing the facts, I just don't see the need to downplay the concurrent user milestone every time there's a thread about it.

"The 40mil number means nothing. Means my mother got her shitty laptop on and my nephew installed steam in it and it autostarts for 2 years now."

Pure hypotheticals again. Pulling the bot stuff out of his hairy arse. Just typical rofif stuff in every PC thread.

lol....."moms and bots" ain't the most compelling argument, I agree. The numbers speak for themselves and it is an impressive milestone. At the same time, PSN didn't need to dragged into the OP either.
 
Also important to note that many prankster uncles have been installing Steam on old ladies computers and have been for years. These numbers are included in the concurrents and likely invalidate the whole thing.

IMG-1736.jpg
I'm getting a new computer tomorrow, I'm giving my old one (13600k/32GB/1080GTX) to my old mother and installing Steam on it.
So she can play Dx-Ball2. Another Steam user added for the cause!
 
Last edited:
The 40mil number means nothing.
You couldn't be more wrong about that

You don't know how many are bots etc. you are just speculating that there are "tons" (whatever that number means).

Even if a user isn't actively playing, being logged in keeps them within the ecosystem, seeing sales, promotions, and recommendations. This keeps Steam's marketplace thriving.

Even if half of Steam's users are ghosts, they still spend more on games than most platforms living players
 
Are there any hard numbers on the percentages of sales by platform for multiplat games across Xbox, PS, and PC?
 
I'm impressed. I wonder how Xbox, Nintendo, and PS compare. I was an early adopter of Steam and was a huge skeptic of going digital. It has been a bumpy ride, but at the moment they have the best PC game store front by 100 miles. No other competitor comes close. The competitors efforts are laughable and half the time they end up going back to Steam with their tales between their legs. The Steam Deck is the coolest handheld since the original Gameboy. I love it and I never thought I would.
 
I'm impressed. I wonder how Xbox, Nintendo, and PS compare. I was an early adopter of Steam and was a huge skeptic of going digital. It has been a bumpy ride, but at the moment they have the best PC game store front by 100 miles. No other competitor comes close. The competitors efforts are laughable and half the time they end up going back to Steam with their tales between their legs. The Steam Deck is the coolest handheld since the original Gameboy. I love it and I never thought I would.
I fought it when they started screwing around with Counter-Strike. I actually hated Steam at first. Eventually, it grew into a marketplace that I wanted to use.
 
Are there any hard numbers on the percentages of sales by platform for multiplat games across Xbox, PS, and PC?

Not that I've seen. There's a lot of individual games like Helldivers 2 sold more on PC and I think SH2 had more PlayStation sales (might be misremembering this, but was some game around this time) but I haven't been able to find any estimated figures for overall spend by platform.

Regardless, I just appreciate that Steam actually provides these numbers publicly. I wish Xbox, PlayStation and Nintendo were more transparent with their numbers.
 
Are there any hard numbers on the percentages of sales by platform for multiplat games across Xbox, PS, and PC?
Most developers don't share such numbers (trade secret), if they do, it's oft obfuscated & vague. If they have shareholders? Sure, but it's not detailed files for individual games.
I remember how From Software reported details sales numbers once when they were new to PC, I don't think they have done so since? Maybe Sony/MS discourage it.


Some indies like stardew Valley & Terraria update regularly. I would consider it clever marketing, as it helps the trending algorithm and results in more sales.

As of December 2024, Stardew Valley has sold over 41 million copies across all platforms, with over 26 million copies sold on PC, and 7.9 million copies on the Nintendo Switch.

Terraria has surpassed 58 million units sold - 58.7m to be more exact, with nearly 32m from PC alone!" (June 2024).
 
Does this count people logged on to Steam but not playing a game?
Yes, but little timmy playing on his dads laptop is a legit user, its dad when he boots up his machine and has steam installed with auto login that is a slightly dubious count, not the other way round which somebody was alluding to. The kid is an active user on steam and there is no reason why they shouldn't count. Stating this fact upsets some people though, the usual people.
 
At the same time, PSN didn't need to dragged into the OP either.
It really did need to be included in my opinion especially after reading the first few comments.

40m concurrent PC gamers is such an enormous number that the overwhelming majority of people cannot comprehend it.

When consoles used to report concurrent users they were around the 2m mark :LOL:
 
It really did need to be included in my opinion especially after reading the first few comments.

40m concurrent PC gamers is such an enormous number that the overwhelming majority of people cannot comprehend it.

When consoles used to report concurrent users they were around the 2m mark :LOL:




I don't think we ever got concurrent numbers from Sony but last we heard they have 118M MAU between ps4 and ps5. Good numbers.

Of course, we also have to account for pranksters watching Netflix and the bot accounts for farming Fifa cards per rofif rofif request.
 
It really did need to be included in my opinion especially after reading the first few comments.

40m concurrent PC gamers is such an enormous number that the overwhelming majority of people cannot comprehend it.

When consoles used to report concurrent users they were around the 2m mark :LOL:

Consoles have reported MAUs and units sold. I've never heard of them reporting "concurrent" users before. So we don't have apples to apples data to compare and that's why it shouldn't be.
 
It's a good post with real data. Don't agree with the "bot" stuff though.
No, it's not. It's stupid to the point of being almost unintentionally comedic.

It's the type of nitpicking with the delusion of being insightful, more than anything because it doesn't recognize that ANY excuse they can come up with to downplay the number applies to other services.

"Oh yeah, they may be 40 million concurrent, but ONLY 15 are actually playing at a given moment".
So what?

What does these people think?
That when they hear about the "100 million monthly users" on a console service that does not include a MAJORITY of people who are just idling and not actively playing something?
That "200 million XBOX accounts" means people who are playing at the same time?

If you are watching Netflix or Prime Video by your Playstation or XBOX once in a month, you are already included in the users who logged their online services for that month.

The last official confirmation we heard for monthly users on Steam was 130+ millions back when the peak of concurrent users was more than 10 millions lower.
The last declaration about the total number of accounts was over 1 billion.

And the claim that everyone who installs Steam keeps it idling for years without touching it is also complete bullshit. I've been on the platform for 20 years at this point and one of the first things I do when I re-install it on a new PC is disabling the auto-startup at Windows boot.
As I do with pretty much any other non-essential client, incidentally.
 
Last edited:
No, it's not. It's stupid to the point of being almost unintentionally comedic.

I'm talking about the actual data. Not the other stuff. But I get your point. Wasn't a great post with all the nonsense. I was focused on the graph.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom