[GameRant]If Hogwarts Legacy 2 wants to avoid the same boycotts its predecessor faced, the sequel can't take the same approach that the original did.

I'm not into Harry Potter so didn't get the game but JK did absolutely nothing wrong and just had common sense by not giving in to the worst and most insanely retarded folks out there.

Something as insane and twisted like that shouldn't even be a debate in the first place and never should have been normalized. Hope the game becomes mega successful again with JK not giving into those evil freaks and abominations again. And this time don't even have a single abomination like the bartender in the first one.
 
Last edited:
She ain't against trans, she is against insanity. Social outcasts deciding over a summer that they are another gender ain't gender dysphoria!

These people want Harry to buttfuck Ron in the girls bathroom.
 
This is strictly the writers opinion, not the devs.
What in the fuck are you foaming at the mouth about again?
And even if they did include that stuff - "so fucking what?" will be the markets response. 35 million
for the first. Mass market doesn't give a fuck if they if they like the overall product enough.
Not sure why u would reply so agressively, because a lot of devs have done whats descriped by the author of the article, and failed miserably. Im not foamig, simply stating what ive seen happen the last past years with a bunch of "inclusive" games
 
You Are Dumb Mario Lopez GIF


Games journalism is peak idiocy.
 
Reminder that these "people" will never leave JK Rowling alone, never let her have her opinions, will always feel personally betrayed by her, and will piss on her grave when she dies. And they feel the same way about everyone who agrees with her.
 
Reminder that these "people" will never leave JK Rowling alone, never let her have her opinions, will always feel personally betrayed by her, and will piss on her grave when she dies. And they feel the same way about everyone who agrees with her.
Having a trans Hermione Pissing on a grave labeled JK on the game would probably be the only thing they would accept as a reparation for all the suffering and deaths brought by JKR comments.
 
They did everything they could to avoid the backlash. They stated that the author wasn't involved. Gave a trans character creation option.

And regardless a boycott still happened.

And yet... the game sold 20+ million units. Boycott didn't do fuck all except sell more copies.
 
They did everything they could to avoid the backlash. They stated that the author wasn't involved. Gave a trans character creation option.

And regardless a boycott still happened.

And yet... the game sold 20+ million units. Boycott didn't do fuck all except sell more copies.
Im going to say that a lot of "boycotters" played this game in stealth mode and really enjoy it .. including the retarded author of this piece

This people have no integrity and are on the "do what I say and not what I do" camp.
 
Last edited:
Im going to say that a lot of "boycotters" played this game in stealth mode and really enjoy it .. including the retarded author of this piece

This people have no integrity and are on the "do what I say and not what I do" camp.

While the author of this piece does seem to have a great amount of familiarity with the game (I didn't play it and did not know about this NPC), I think portraying these people as just opportunists or grifters is incorrect. Remember that the New York Times ran an ad taking the side of the alphabet mafia: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...imagine-Harry-Potter-WITHOUT-J-K-Rowling.html

The "paper of record", with a very prominent and respected book section that writes about authors all the time, ran an ad praising someone trying to erase the author of a book. This is very real and very personal for these people and they have not stopped and they will not stop. And JKR knows this, and she has accepted the price for taking her stance, she is one stubborn woman.
 
Its not that unlikely how it sounds...it seems to me the western AAA video game industry is more interested in lecturing/educating than selling lots of video games. So yeah, destroying a successful game with nonsense politics is basically their signature move at this point.

It will be a shame if WB games decides to wokify the game design for part 2




NOT!
 
I personally could care less about HP, but still being pseudo familiar with the movies and having watched family play Hogwarts, I honestly don't know what they could do more. Legacy seemed to me like a full blown HP experience. Pretty impressive tbph. I can see why it sold so well.
 
Kinda frustrating this charade of an "article", and its text space, was wasted on this pointless rambling shit, when instead that energy could've went into, say, maybe pick up some of the numerous modern in-development smaller games that barely get any recognition due to lack of discoverability, put together a dense list that highlights these or talks/informs about them. But, no, producing this nonsense was apparently seen to be more "relevant" to Gamerant's staff and editors. Ridiculous.

Btw, LectureMaster LectureMaster , please include this archive link in your OP: https://archive.md/xlikL

No need to reward Gamerant and this contributor free engagement over this opinion piece. Its from January earlier this year anyway.
 
Last edited:
It's amazing we are on 2025 and that people have their head so deep still in woke ass 😂

Game sold 35+ million copies and laughed pointing with the finger to the boycott wannabes, yet this amateur journalist still thinks they can address it and threaten it with boycott repeating itself? It's beyond idiocy..
 
I'd love to see Rowling put a clause in all future licensing deals that no trannies can appear in any Harry Potter-related works.

In other words, make it canon that they don't exist in the world of Harry Potter.
And they shouldn't. A character that uses magic to switch genders for some reason MIGHT have an in-universe reason to be there, but otherwise it's out of place in the world and really, how can you even tell if an artificially created digital being is 'trans'? Are they deliberately made to conform to a negative stereotype (aka the bearded pot-belly 'lady')? Are their genitalia on display? Or do they have to tell you, over and over and over, just so you 'get it'? Presumably in a video game, even with the graphic fidelity we have today, any trans characters ought to be indistinguishable from their professed gender, UNLESS they are playing the pronoun game or have a voice actor with a baaaad falsetto. Or they are loaded with the modern signals like multi-colored paisley colored hair, that half shaved haircut, the trans flag, etc which wouldn't make any sense in another context.

It's like a gay character. The only way you can tell is if they either have a VERY stereotypical affect, they tell you in some sexual context, or they are just LOADED with flags to indicate their sexuality. So you get the blacksmith who is always referring to 'his husband' or the butch Space Marine with an extended sub-plot about messages to her girlfriend that no one else has. It stands out because it's not about anything plot related or even relevant backstory/lore, it's just put out there for LGB points.
 
Pretty insane to me that "hey do what you want, but stay out of female-only spaces if you aren't a female because we deserve our own safe places too" is fucking controversial.
 



For years, the Harry Potter franchise has dominated pop culture, with Hogwarts Legacy acting as the franchise's most popular video game adaptation. It's no wonder that controversy surrounding the franchise has sprung up at some point, as the first Harry Potter book was released almost thirty years ago. Nevertheless, it's disappointing that such a well-loved piece of pop culture has been sullied in the eyes of many Potterheads despite new content for the franchise, like Hogwarts Legacy, continuing to release.

Unfortunately, Hogwarts Legacy was unable to unmuddy the name of the Harry Potter franchise. While the game may have been met with a positive player and critic response, it was also the subject of boycotts upon release. Avalanche Software and Warner Bros. Games tried to placate fans within the game itself, but the developers' attempt was poorly received. It goes without saying that Avalanche Software and Warner Bros. Games cannot try to avoid controversy the same way Hogwarts Legacy did in the game's allegedly slated sequel.

J.K. Rowling Has Hurt Harry Potter and Hogwarts' Legacy

Creeping through the promotion and marketing for Hogwarts Legacy prior to release was the never ending controversy surrounding J.K. Rowling's transphobic comments. Rowling's comments on the trans community, in conjunction with the reexamination of portrayals of people of color in the Harry Potter books, have essentially reduced the legacy of Harry Potter from a juggernaut in young adult fiction to a nostalgic, but messy, memory. The large majority of Rowling's comments were posted on her X (formerly Twitter) account, with the catalyst of these views being publicly perceived when she liked a Tweet in 2018 that described transgender women as "men in dresses." Since then, she has constantly posted about the issue on X and has been publicly labeled a TERF – a trans-exclusionary radical feminist.

Knowing J.K. Rowling's controversial positions on the trans community specifically led Avalanche Software and Warner Bros. Games to include a minor transgender character in Hogwarts Legacy. Sirona Ryan is the main bartender at the Three Broomsticks in Hogsmeade. The game establishes that she is fiercely loyal to Hogwarts and its students, as she stands up to Victor Rookwood in a key scene. Though it's always great to see more representation in any kind of media, Sirona Ryan does not truly add much to Hogwarts Legacy's plot other than being a minor NPC. As such, some have viewed the character's addition as performative representation rather than a meaningful statement against Rowling.

J.K. Rowling's harmful statements toward the transgender community cannot be fixed by simply adding a transgender woman to her most popular work and main source of income. Candidly, there is nothing that Avalanche Software or Warner Bros. Games can do to avoid Rowling's controversial statements, as it's likely that she will never change her mind on the subject. But that doesn't mean the developer can't strive to improve the brand's trans representation with Hogwarts Legacy 2, likely with the intent of avoiding its predecessor's boycott that was due to Rowling's statements.

Hogwarts Legacy 2 Will Likely Take the Same Approach as its Predecessor

Transgender Potterheads still exist despite Rowling's statements, so the expansion of Sirona Ryan as a character could be one way that Avalanche Software and Warner Bros. Games attempt to prevent a hypothetical boycott of Hogwarts Legacy 2. This expansion would have to be rather large and genuinely impact the story rather than Sirona Ryan's role from the previous game maintained, proving the character is not performative representation but something more substantial.

Right away, a few ideas spring to mind. Sirona Ryan's role as the head proprietor of the Three Broomsticks could be beneficial to the plot if the bar serves as a key location in Hogwarts Legacy 2. Perhaps she could once again come to the defense of her patrons, like the main students in the hypothetical sequel. If the game takes the mystery route, Sirona Ryan could essentially act as the archetypal trustworthy adult or mentor that mysteries led by teenagers tend to have. She could be a major quest giver and ally on certain tasks, appearing regularly throughout the entire game. Another option would be to include a transgender student as one of the key protagonists or companions in Hogwarts Legacy 2.

The statements made by J.K. Rowling over the last seven years regarding the transgender community have unfortunately damaged a piece of media that was once widely loved. Though it ultimately comes down to fans deciding if they are willing to separate the art from the artist, and Avalanche cannot clean up Rowling's mess, the developer behind Hogwarts Legacy can do more than insert a very minor trans character in its next game. Hopefully, characters like Sirona Ryan can be featured more heavily in Hogwarts Legacy 2, alongside transgender students, to bring a sense of comfort to trans Potterheads who decide to give the game a try.


Why do you put the link to their webpage... 😒
Please remove it, dont give them clicks
 
Last edited:
Pretty insane to me that "hey do what you want, but stay out of female-only spaces if you aren't a female because we deserve our own safe places too" is fucking controversial.
It's because:

a) Troons are severely mentally ill.
b) They hate real women because they can never be one, so they will do whatever they can to hurt them and/or make them feel uncomfortable
c) like most liberal social causes, it's not about being accepted and co-existing, it's about dominating and forcing their will upon other people.
 
This is just social conditioning, the game sold fine. It was nothing but a vocal minority screaming at the clouds. The landscape has also changed and less people care about these issues now. If anything a sequel will do better. The game was HUGE
 
Last edited:
Fuck that. The only reason I swear anyone on here was picking it up was out of spite lmao.

Double down and go all in.

But also make a good game this time.
 
The landscape has also changed and less people care about these issues now.
I think more people care now, just not in the way the author of this article wants them to care.

They have seen the damage that the tranny movement has done - the stupidity of allowing biological men to compete against women in sports, the rapes and assaults that have happened by allowing these people to share bathrooms/locker rooms with girls, etc...

The "other side" is losing support and grasping at straws
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom