That's daily reminder to you that there is only person who constantly tags you while truly caring about you.You know, I just did my bi-weekly check and that boy is *still* salty at me for 'getting him banned'.
Multiple tags to me minutes apart.
That's daily reminder to you that there is only person who constantly tags you while truly caring about you.
First time learned the whole story.Yep. Here is one of the screenshots that was passed around at the time. I saw another where he just thumbed his nose at the mods and said he wasn't going to change. Basically talking a lot of shit on another board instead of just taking his ban like a man and trying to make an effort to be a part of the community.
Anyway.....back on topic.
Those sellout reviewers never ever give bad scores to games published by big platform holders, lets not forget concord got 62, redfall got 56, and they both shouldnt get more than 20-30 range.
On a side note, cringe watching many a true nerd's enthusiastic playthrough could be a good time.
The first one didn't have anywhere near the sharpness of Fallout
He's not wrong with that final sentence. People literally go into threads for games they have no interest in just to shit on them. I don't even go into the Intergalactic threads and I barely went into the Marathon one.Yep. Here is one of the screenshots that was passed around at the time. I saw another where he just thumbed his nose at the mods and said he wasn't going to change. Basically talking a lot of shit on another board instead of just taking his ban like a man and trying to make an effort to be a part of the community.
Anyway.....back on topic.
I'm not saying it didn't. But you can read some of those reviews by yourself and see that it wasn't just that. That's the point im trying to make.
This looks pretty nice.Colleague's Review (8/10) with 15 4K Screenshots at Max Settings (I captured the pics, heh) > https://www.pcmrace.com/2025/10/23/the-outer-worlds-2-review-pc-analisis/
He is. But he also played Fallout 4 just recently.
It's strange, but didn't the hype die down pretty quickly?
Yup, right after people started playing it.
Yes, the game was not very good. It was also Epic Store exclusive at launch.
I doubt there's a significant percentage of people who go into threads of games they truly don't care about "just to shit on them". That's a common accusation from people who don't like seeing a game they like criticized, which does nothing but try to invalidate those comments. That's more "toxic" behavior. If you've ever been on the other side of it you'd know how infuriating it is to have someone do that to you.
What about 85? You seem to have missed that out? Below 85 is mid and 86-89 is the sweet spot apparently so what's 85 on your not very well thought out scale?
Lets wait and see what the punters say. There is plenty of history that reviewers do not align with release impressions. It is absolutely the case with a pretty significant number of MGS games in this era. Fans wave around 80+ metacritics and then it becomes clear that the game is either pretty mid or perhaps just has narrow appeal. But hey it got 85 so it must be good right? I'd hold up Avowed as an example. Hit 80 in metacritic, general sentiment now doesn't really have the weight to support that. Its too mixed. Its subjective and all that but I think its a fair take.
He used to do that exact thing with games he didn't like, the irony is hilarious. Apparently it's only bad when it's a Sony game.
I finished the game. It was a game of contradictions in terms of evaluating it. So from my pov it wasn't an 80, 70 would be fair. But I was more referring to general sentiment of people playing the game. I filter out the obvious warriors when I'm reading.
Colleague's Review (8/10) with 15 4K Screenshots at Max Settings (I captured the pics, heh) > https://www.pcmrace.com/2025/10/23/the-outer-worlds-2-review-pc-analisis/
www.videogameschronicle.com
you know I don't game pass, man.
