That's fair. The catch is, that only makes it a "console" looking backwards. What about the way forward? If next gen games are all PC SKUs and you have PC-like settings screens, is it still a console? May be Xbox Store will have shaders precompiled in the future, with preconfigured/auto-detected defaults, but otherwise the user experience within the game would be PC-like through and through.Just my 2 cents if it plays my old Xbox library and plays GTA 6 day one then I call it a console
They aren't. Sega never made it up either. They will have to change into a leaner 3rd party publisher with a PC store, and a small boutique hardware for profit business, and Gamepass. It's a different thing.
This system will have high attach rate with gamepass.
Cannot imagine getting this but skipping on GPU.
No it was the Dan guy. Rhyker or whatever his last name is.
Just my 2 cents if it plays my old Xbox library and plays GTA 6 day one then I call it a console
That's a good point. Hardware will still be x86 and DirectX if quite different in makeup. It will be interesting to see what happens either way."Furthermore, thanks to new silicon from AMD (already approved all the way up to CFO Amy Hood and CEO Satya Nadella), the new Xbox will also run all games currently available on the Xbox Series X|S library. This means all the OG Xbox back-compatible games, all the Xbox 360 back-compatible games, all the Xbox One back-compatible games, and all the current and future Xbox Series X|S games. These games will run natively on the new Xbox and launch seamlessly via the Xbox launcher's library."
Seems Jez went from "entire Xbox console library" in the title to "back-compatible games" in the article.
I don't think Xbox One/Series would need a translation layer. They are already DirectX. Probably have some low level mode switching like PS5 does for PS4 games.
Where is the part about no multiplayer paywall??![]()
I need to look up Jeff's impressions. They sound juicy.Yeah funny enough both Jeff Gerstmann and Dan Rhykerd had major issues with the Xbox Ally X Windows software.
They won't dictate that themselves but if people are playing on Steam, Epic, etc, and pc game requirements rise substantially, the machine will show its age. If Microsoft is just licensing to vendors why would they care.? You buy a new machine and Microsoft makes money. It kind of sounds like a conspiracy, I get that. If you are on the Xbox side, you probably are safer and Microsoft appreciates you, if you buy it for the other storefronts side, well Microsoft will just shrug it off as that is not their responsilbity.
Gamers can run out and get a new card. You probably will not be able to get a new APU for this Xbox machine.
"Right now, I'm told the current plan is for the next Xbox specifically to have no paywall for multiplayer. It wouldn't make a lick of sense for a "PC" to have paid multiplayer, particularly since it would create a strong incentive for players to simply install Steam instead of use the Xbox ecosystem on that device for online games. It remains to be seen if that plan actually plays out into reality, though."
But don't say anything about the Xbox games there."Right now, I'm told the current plan is for the next Xbox specifically to have no paywall for multiplayer. It wouldn't make a lick of sense for a "PC" to have paid multiplayer, particularly since it would create a strong incentive for players to simply install Steam instead of use the Xbox ecosystem on that device for online games. It remains to be seen if that plan actually plays out into reality, though."
If there will be no more "xbox" versions of games moving forwards then it's a PC.
In that context, framing not having to pay for online gaming as some sort if win is insane.
But don't say anything about the Xbox games there.
Where is the part about no multiplayer paywall??![]()
It's not that it sounds like a conspiracy. It's that it's just a horrible business strategy. The good thing about PCs is that you can upgrade "parts" of your PC and not the whole thing. For this, you'd need to upgrade the whole machine for another $1,200 (potential price).
At that point.....who is this for?.
Can people NOT realize that Jiz is playing the whole gaming community with this part of the story? Why do so many get tricked by him time after time?
It would not. But this thing has the console "portion" and its games MP so far requires paywall.Why would a PC that runs Steam have multiplayer paywall???
Hmm… considering the desire for profit, I can't see them dropping paywall on the "Xbox" side. Incentive for GP subs will decrease even more then.I guess all Xbox games will have free multiplayer with this device. That's what I'm assuming anyway. Question becomes whether that is extended to all existing Xbox consoles. Possibly. In which case, T Tobimacoss would have been right about taking down the paywall.
I need to look up Jeff's impressions. They sound juicy.
I was someone that optimistic about the Ally X over the summer, but Microsoft didn't deliver an OS experience anywhere close to what I was expecting. And that bar was low.
Hmm… considering the desire for profit, I can't see them dropping paywall on the "Xbox" side. Incentive for GP subs will decrease even more then.
And it's not like the audience for the $300-500 console will migrate to $1200+ devices en masse.
They have a lot of moving parts. People get paid to do this stuff professionally.Agreed. Totally different thing. Which leads me to question how can they predict that this will get them their 30% accountability margin if it's a different thing that's literally never been done before?
Imagine being so asshole to let players play for free on this vs keep charging other Xbox's users...Hmm… considering the desire for profit, I can't see them dropping paywall on the "Xbox" side. Incentive for GP subs will decrease even more then.
And it's not like the audience for the $300-500 console will migrate to $1200+ devices en masse.
They're doing that right now. The Xbox PC store has multiplayer stuff up now. PC GP is cheaper. It wouldn't be any different.Imagine being so asshole to let players play for free on this vs keep charging other Xbox's users...
That's true. It's a huge issue for MS of course since they can't lock down online paywall in "PC Mode".I get it.....but man....the backlash from console folks will be massive. That would be one final "fuck you" from Microsoft to Xbox console owners.
I don't think this will be viewed as any other prebuilt PC though. So in that sense it not having MP paywalled will enter the calculus for some people deciding on whether to buy PS6 or this imo.
It's free right now unlike Sony or Nintendo. Cloud saves are one thing that MS did right.No multiplayer paywall, but I bet you'll still need a sub for Xbox cloud saves.
He is the ultimate fanboy/mouthpiece for Xbox. He's telling you 1 thing making out like he knows what is going on BUT, if it doesn't eventuate, he can then say "but I did say it may not happen" or "they changed their minds". He speaks out of both sides of his mouth, much like his mate Phil Spencer.Can people NOT realize that Jiz is playing the whole gaming community with this part of the story? Why do so many get tricked by him time after time?
Have you seen MS management team?Imagine being so asshole to let players play for free on this vs keep charging other Xbox's users...
??No multiplayer paywall, but I bet you'll still need a sub for Xbox cloud saves.
They have a lot of moving parts. People get paid to do this stuff professionally.
Valve has barely any employees. They'll have to shrink the actual store / hardware staff way down, and they already have surface staff elsewhere in the company. Developers can pretty much stay as is for now. Bethesda and Activision were already 3rd party publishers. And expand into porting everything on Switch 2, and keep pushing cloud / free ad-tier GP. And they will no longer lose money on hardware. They'll just have to stumble through it.
You can't play there exclusive multiplayer modes that tons of Xbox games still have like Gears 2 and 3.They're doing that right now. The Xbox PC store has multiplayer stuff up now. PC GP is cheaper. It wouldn't be any different.
There's one positive thing about all this: if Microsoft removes the paywall for online gaming, that means Sony will too.
There's one positive thing about all this: if Microsoft removes the paywall for online gaming, that means Sony will too.
Otherwise, for me, this isn't a console, it's a PC. End of discussion.
Personally I think that once we get over $1K, the ROI for such device on user side is not there.
Since it's "mostly" a PC, it will become outdated on PC schedule and it's not like you can do piecemeal upgrades. You can't stagger your CPU, RAM, GPU changes so have to do it all at once.
Imagine being so asshole to let players play for free on this vs keep charging other Xbox's users...
Imagine being so asshole to let players play for free on this vs keep charging other Xbox's users...
They're doing that right now. The Xbox PC store has multiplayer stuff up now. PC GP is cheaper. It wouldn't be any different.
You're just not getting that this stuff is better than nothing. Nothing is the alternative. Sega went from Dreamcast, to nothing but 3rd party sales. MS is going from Xbox Series, to PC store, boutique hardware, GP, and 3rd party sales, and cloud / firestick / TVs. They will just have to work it out. Not sure what you're not understanding.Hasn't Microsoft been paying people professionally to do things for the Xbox division for the last 10 years? I'm just not sure why this news for Jez of all people is that interesting, considering how he's been used in the recent past to stomp out a bad news press run.
And if they aren't losing money on hardware, that means this machine will be extremely expensive. Which means it'll obviously sell to a very small amount of people. Which THEN means the amount of GP subs will go down, since we know for a fact that the total number of GP subscribers is closely linked to their total number of Xbox console owners.