The Hermit
Member
What was actually wrong with Aonuma's TP anyway?
I wish I knew, but there's a lot of things right, including the music:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPin8YYV5-c
What was actually wrong with Aonuma's TP anyway?
Hah, some of that guy's comments are gold.
How is this even relevant in a Skyward Sword review!?
avatars are back yay!
And the fact that Anihawk likes TP and hates Metroid Prime nullifies every opinion he has about good games.
Still love your posts though! <3
EDIT: quick edits are awesome!!
actually i did it this way because i used to do the stupid old ign 100 point scale thing, so when i gave an 8.2 to super paper mario, i was doing it to place under other games i liked and above others i disliked.
this was easier for me to categorize.
10- once or twice every generation. mirror's edge, for example
9- goty games and maybe some lighter gotg contenders.
8- great games i would recommend to anyone, probably goty contenders
7- good games i would recommend to fans of the genre or series. usually some flaws that are easy to overlook or are overruled by other, far better stuff (like with spirit tracks)
6- games i enjoy that i would have trouble recommending to anyone not a fan of the series or genre. usually it might be something that enjoy despite its problems.
5- can't recommend, but can't really recommend not to buy either. a game's biggest problem here is that it might be just boring, not that the good or bad come to a dead heat.
4- games i didn't enjoy, but still thought had some redeeming features. sometimes it's probably something i dislike despite its high points. i wouldn't recommend against purchasing a game like this, but i might suggest someone proceed with caution
3- games i didn't enjoy, and thought had some serious problems far outweighing the good. sometimes it's one dumb thing that's used all the time, others it's just a mess of different things. there might still be a good game in there if it was handled in a different way.
2- a bad game through and through. haven't actually played too many of these, thankfully. a lot of those games james rolfe plays would probably fit here. i guess that batman forever gb game would be one (i actually owned and tried to play it too). and phantom hourglass, of course.
1- these are more common than 10s, but truly awful game shit is still hard to achieve. fortunately, i don't think i've played a single one of these. sonic the hedgehog 06 might fit the bill, same with stuff like superman 64.
jak ii - jak ii
I wish I knew, but there's a lot of things right, including the music:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPin8YYV5-c
not that hard to figure, honestly. theres always going to be a very "eager" group out there that declares the newest zelda release to be the best in the series. i know ive heard that almost in equal measure with MM, WW, TP, and now SS.Honestly though, I dont understand how these reviews are varying so much. How does one call the game perfect for what it is, then another just give it a score just above average.
I don't trust game journalist in the first place so...they are all pretty bad to me.Are the wild ones the ones who give the low scores or the ones who give the 10s?
This VentureBeat review feels exactly like what Jeff Gerstmann was talking about on one of his Jar videos.
What exactly was that? (I wish I could watch those)
Just like there is always very eager group to shit on the newest Zelda. Every single one of those games could be considered the best in the series by different people.not that hard to figure, honestly. theres always going to be a very "eager" group out there that declares the newest zelda release to be the best in the series. i know ive heard that almost in equal measure with MM, WW, TP, and now SS.
That's reassuring, and I'm glad the few that've played it on GAF seem okay with the controls. When it comes this aspect in particular, I generally prefer what GAF has to say over the "pros".Dude trust me, don't worry about this. The controls work perfectly. Not once have I slashed in a direction I didn't intend to.
Can't believe the amount of false information that's floating around about this game. I did call it a year ago though. Some people just won't give motion controls a try.
Whatever mod changed the thread title mentioning the Venturebeat review must be laughing out loud right now. There's the perfect shitstorm rigth there.
The reviewer is getting slammed in the comments section and he is even responding to some of them. It's been a fun read all together![]()
Fuck. The cycle is real! Time to go!
![]()
"In what is easily the game’s largest offense, after completing all three temples, you’ll then be sent back to the same exact areas and dungeons not once, but twice."
that was sort of my point. but then, i was saying thats going to play a part in the "wild" variance of scores.Just like there is always very eager group to shit on the newest Zelda. Every single one of those games could be considered the best in the series by different people.
Obviously most of that VentureBeat review is trollbait for an anti-Wii agenda, but some of it rang true. The motion controls do feel a bit iffy, nowhere near as fluid as Wii Sports Resort, the games clearly main inspiration.
Also:
I might have to stop playing the game right now if this is true.
venturebeat said:ere too ignorant to realize it. But I deleted all that, because this interview with Nintendo of America President and COO Reggie Fils-Aime speaks for itself. In it, Fils-Aime claims that he believes there hasnt been a game of the same caliber and score of Skyward Sword, based on what he counts are eight perfect ratings on Metacritic.
I dont know if theres going to be a video game in history thats going to be able to compare to Skyward Sword, he (reggie) said.
can it be he means that you come back later on in the game to get a hidden heart container part or something like that?
10- once or twice every generation. mirror's edge, for example
Comedy gold
That's one way to interpret it, but I think it would've been a stronger case if we're talking about a random sampling here and not the gaming press specifically, who sorta have a tendency to over-inflate scores, go overboard with praise, and gloss over flaws.Here's what I find interesting about the outliers to the SS review scores:
In this particular case, most of the 9-10 scores seem to be specifically citing that "this is the game the Wii was made for and it deserves recognition for that" and "this is the Zelda that finally introduces progressive features to update the Zelda experience, in addition to using motion controls the right way". From what I've seen, almost EVERY positive review has emphasized how this Zelda feels fresh in some way - be it world layout, storytelling, dialog style, characters, or whatever.
A few of the outlier opinions, either overtly or between the lines, say that it's just more of the same old Zelda and motion controls are broken and don't work.
So... when 50 people say "this Zelda has new things" and 2 guys say "meh, more of the same", I think the odds are, the 2 outliers don't just have different opinions on the same content everyone else experienced. But rather went into it determined to find something lacking and disregarded the impact of what the game does that is new, in favor of harping on traditional aspects that exist because without them, it wouldn't be Zelda anymore.
When 50 people say "these motion controls work at last", emphasizing they had to be convinced the motion controls work this time, and 2 say "same old trash, whatever", I think it's much more likely the outliers didn't give a crap, rolled their eyes, shrugged, and vaguely waved their arm around the room while looking away from the TV in disgust at the fact that they were being asked to play a mere Wii game.
I find the opposite is generally true with Wii games.That's one way to interpret it, but I think it would've been a stronger case if we're talking about a random sampling here and not the gaming press specifically, who sorta have a tendency to over-inflate scores, go overboard with praise, and gloss over flaws.
Dude Mirror's Edge's Time Trials are absolutely incredible.
Agreed. One of only a few 10s this generation, together with Super Meat Boy and possibly SpaceChem.
Dude Mirror's Edge's Time Trials are absolutely incredible.
How can anyone call SS progressive? The extreme levels of hand-holding so far indicate that not only has it NOT progressed, but it has actually taken SEVERAL steps backwards.
The over abundance of "HEY LOOK YOU GOT RUPPEE" "HEY LOOK YOU GOT HEART" "HEY YOU SUCK AT THIS GAME GET SOME HEARTS" "HEY THERE'S A LOCKED DOOR GUESS WHAT YOU NEED TO GET A KEY TO UNLOCK IT" etc etc etc etc is just mind blowing. HOW did they not only re-implement this commonly complained about aspect but also manage to increase the frequency tenfold?
How can anyone call SS progressive? The extreme levels of hand-holding so far indicate that not only has it NOT progressed, but it has actually taken SEVERAL steps backwards.
The over abundance of "HEY LOOK YOU GOT RUPPEE" "HEY LOOK YOU GOT HEART" "HEY YOU SUCK AT THIS GAME GET SOME HEARTS" "HEY THERE'S A LOCKED DOOR GUESS WHAT YOU NEED TO GET A KEY TO UNLOCK IT" etc etc etc etc is just mind blowing. HOW did they not only re-implement this commonly complained about aspect but also manage to increase the frequency tenfold?
All of that sounds the same as every Zelda since OoT.
I take it you're not enjoying it, though?
It's worse, man.
It's worse.
How can anyone call SS progressive? The extreme levels of hand-holding so far indicate that not only has it NOT progressed, but it has actually taken SEVERAL steps backwards.
The over abundance of "HEY LOOK YOU GOT RUPPEE" "HEY LOOK YOU GOT HEART" "HEY YOU SUCK AT THIS GAME GET SOME HEARTS" "HEY THERE'S A LOCKED DOOR GUESS WHAT YOU NEED TO GET A KEY TO UNLOCK IT" etc etc etc etc is just mind blowing. HOW did they not only re-implement this commonly complained about aspect but also manage to increase the frequency tenfold?
It's worse, man.
It's worse.
I have not read much of this topic but is this really returning in SS? I hated that in TP.
When 50 people say "these motion controls work at last", emphasizing they had to be convinced the motion controls work this time, and 2 say "same old trash, whatever", I think it's much more likely the outliers didn't give a crap, rolled their eyes, shrugged, and vaguely waved their arm around the room while looking away from the TV in disgust at the fact that they were being asked to play a mere Wii game.
This thread has made me realize that Sega has some of the best IPs in the industry yet is the absolute worst and developing any of them. Hell if they even outsourced a few, it would go miles and miles.
Just give Suda51 the Jet Set Radio franchise and awards will be showered upon faces.
Or maybe, just maybe they didn't like it as much.
this thread made you realize that?
not sega themselves?
it's the 1st Zelda chronologically so you need to know
no, it absolutely did not. not to this extent. this is truly the low point in terms of hand-holding in zelda history.TP had the same bull and people weren't complaining.