If it reaches $2 mill.... I will eat a shoe
If it reaches $2 mill.... I will eat a shoe
If it reaches $2 mill.... I will eat a shoe
If it reaches $2 mill.... I will eat a shoe
Minecrafts model isn't the same as putting up a pitch and requesting money from random people on the internet. Minecraft actually delivered a product initially that you could play with so people saw an immediate return.
Scale of the project is also a huge concern. Minecraft would have been ruined if it was a large scale project following the same business model.
I'm not saying these things can't be successful to some degree, just trying to temper enthusiasm that publishers are somehow going the way of the dodo.
If it reaches $2 mill.... I will eat a shoe
The point is Double Fine has proven they don't need a kick starter to get a game developed and published. Simple as that. I would prefer supporting someone who can't realize and fulfill their dreams and aspirations as opposed to a group that already has.
I think the business with Notch yesterday kind of kick started the Kickstarter. I wonder if we would have seen the same kind of insane support if it weren't for him bringing Double Fine into the limelight right before they announced this campaign.
This whole thing has made me very happy. I've been F5'ing twitter a lot today with a stupid grin on my face. Hope this takes of as a model, I know of plenty other projects I'd like to fund.
That is Anna Kipnis, Lead Gameplay Programmer on Costume Quest. She is pretty darn cute.Girl on the left is super cute!
What is with people like you?
Why do you think people are funding this instead of donating to a charity?
You paid $15 to see Hangover 2? My god there are STARVING CHILDREN IN THE WORLD.
Get out of here.
You're not really saying "to each their own", though, you're just throwing it at the end of your post as a way to avoid responsibility for the rest of your drivel. It's just the same as the other bullshit escape that cowards use--"just saying, man." What you're really doing here is telling people how you think they should spend their money.
What makes you think that people funding this don't also donate to charities?
Whenever anyone makes a purchase for their own enjoyment, do you make snide remarks about how children are starving in Africa?
lol enough of this Holier-than-thou horseshit. You're spending your free time (luxury) posting on a video game (luxury) message board (free speech, luxury) on your personal computer (luxury) on your high-speed internet connection (luxury). Gimme a break.
You read his post wrong but I guess you were probably blinded by your own self righteousness.
It is exactly the same thing. You are being all self righteous about people raising money for a frivolous cause the same way I'm sure you frivolously spend money on things for you instead of donating all of your extra cash to charity and "good causes." Get off your fucking high horse.
If it helps, just label the things people are saying to you as opinions as well. Just, you know, opinions about your opinions. Now everyone has a right to tell you anything, no matter how nonsensical, negative, or pointless they may be!
You must've completely missed early this week when Schafer gave an interview exactly saying that no publisher would back up his pitch for Psychonauts 2.
But no, keep thinking they're an overly privileged big-box studio that are gaining completely undeserved amounts of backing from gullible fans. You're pissing in your own cereal just to hear yourself scream about it.
Then go fund them and stop telling me how to spend my money. We do not share the same opinion. Are you really expecting to convince someone who loves double fine's work that they should abstain from helping Double Fine fund a new game? You seem a little dense and out of touch.
The entire point of this is that they can't get this game developed or published under traditional methods.
Keep in mind that I'm the bad person here even though my original post clearly stated "it's cool that their experiment paid off" and at no point did I ever say people SHOULDN'T have supported them, that they were wrong for holding a kick starter, or that nobody should spend any money except on charity. I like how I'm expected to get off my 'high horse' when I specifically stated that it was good that this paid off for them. It seems to me like the hive mind of this thread are the ones acting holier than thou.
Keep in mind that I'm the bad person here even though my original post clearly stated "it's cool that their experiment paid off" and at no point did I ever say people SHOULDN'T have supported them, that they were wrong for holding a kick starter, or that nobody should spend any money except on charity. I like how I'm expected to get off my 'high horse' when I specifically stated that it was good that this paid off for them. It seems to me like the hive mind of this thread are the ones acting holier than thou.
Girl on the left is super cute!
lol enough of this Holier-than-thou horseshit. You're spending your free time (luxury) posting on a video game (luxury) message board (free speech, luxury) on your personal computer (luxury) on your high-speed internet connection (luxury). Gimme a break.
If it reaches $2 mill.... I will eat a shoe
![]()
via RockPaperShotgun
I was wondering how long it would take Arkh to notice the Double Fine trend.
http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lz5g9jalYh1qhbud5o1_500.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]
Are you serious? Is this real life?
Except you actually did suggest such a thing.
"Hivemind"? Ah, yes, another cowardly escape tactic that the crazies like to use when they discover that their horrible opinion is (naturally) in the minority.
You're in here saying that you'd rather see money go to charity or unproven developers. That's suggesting that people spend their money in a different way. You are on a high horse, because you think your ideas for spending money are superior to that of others. It doesn't matter how many times you write "to each their own", you obviously don't mean that.
Exactly. Because the "industry" deemed the genre dead, despite the fanbase, no publisher wants to invest in it. This has given voice to the cause of the fans in a great way and made the point that the market exists, despite the haters and non-game-playing executives who deemed it dead.
Keep in mind that I'm the bad person here even though my original post clearly stated "it's cool that their experiment paid off" and at no point did I ever say people SHOULDN'T have supported them, that they were wrong for holding a kick starter, or that nobody should spend any money except on charity. I like how I'm expected to get off my 'high horse' when I specifically stated that it was good that this paid off for them. It seems to me like the hive mind of this thread are the ones acting holier than thou.
Hey Vic, would this work for a localization deal? What do you think?
Keep in mind that I'm the bad person here even though my original post clearly stated "it's cool that their experiment paid off"
and at no point did I ever say people SHOULDN'T have supported them
It seems to me like the hive mind of this thread are the ones acting holier than thou.
I kinda have to disagree. If Tim REALLY wanted to do an adventure game, he easily could have gotten $400k from a publisher to make one. He would be talking with Focus Home Interactive, or someone along those lines. That really isn't a lot of risk at $400k.The entire point of this is that they can't get this game developed or published under traditional methods.
I really don't think you want to go down the 'majority opinion=fact' road. Also, I specifically said that I would have preferred to see something different. Unlike some people in this thread, I have the ability to hold my own opinion without trying to beat down other's for theirs.
I like the way you think.Hey Vic, would this work for a localization deal? What do you think?
I looooove the way you think.We're about to find out. DoubleFine beat us by a week.
We're about to find out. DoubleFine beat us by a week.