http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wOXkKPNRfM
So, I just watched the 3 points video that supposedly is everything the fans are complaining about the ending. Here are my thoughts (sorry for the formatation, I was writing while listening to the video):
Point 1:
- The end of a trilogy has to answer all the questions: that's is something I don't agree with. A lot of things can be left out to imagination, as long as the main plot is explained. That's a "feature" used in lots of trilogies, series...
- He totally explains what the Catalyst is just to yell "who the fuck is the catalyst?" after that.
- So basically his complains are: I just wanted Bioware to put clearly who the catalyst is
- Lot's of complains about the "kill the organics to save them" are typically from someone who doesn't care to give a second though on the matter
- Why does the Catalyst doesn't kill the synthetics: as the Catalyst SAID in the end, advanced organics NEED the the synthetics to leave, that's why the destruction ending is so dumb, and why he waits till the civilization gets more advanced, and thus more dependent of robots, to harvest them.
- Killing the synthetics without killing organics is, again,an opinion from someone who didn't care to think about it: you still keep the knowledge around how to build/who are the synthetics, it was just going to be an endless cycle.
- How can Shepard control the Reapers if he's dead: C'mon, in a series with so much sci-fi going on you can't even stop and create an easy exit like: he turns himself into the energy that controls them: Voi là, problem solves.
- His opinion about the synthesis ending is just he taking his opinion and showing it as a fact. I have a different one, that means I'm righ?