Marvel's The Avengers |OT| (Dir. Joss Whedon) [Spoilers unmarked]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ummm, I liked the show but I think I let the RT score and GAF impressions get to my head. My expectations were sky-high so I left the theater feeling a little underwhelmed. Thor was particularly disappointing in the show. He came across as somewhat weak in the finale and never really did do much.
 
Avengers showing postponed after projectionist accidentally deletes entire film

mw-630-avengers-delete-twitter-.jpg


From our experiences in movie theaters, moviegoers don't typically notice the hard work of the projectionist. They remain secluded in a room where they facilitate the steady stream of light and sound which the rest of us enjoy. Of course, if the enigmatic figure behind scenes mistakenly erases an entire digital film while dozens of critics wait for their chance to glimpse it, he or she becomes much more noticeable. That's exactly what happened during a recent press screening of the hotly-anticipated Avengers flick, and while the emergency was averted within a couple of hours, the incident serves to highlight just how flimsy our digital data really is.

In the gradual migration from traditional film reels to digital projection technology, viewers benefit from sharper images, less distortion, and — usually — better reliability. Unfortunately for the as-of-yet unnamed projectionist who was poised to give a number of critics and other entertainment press their first glimpse at one of the year's most anticipated films, the Avengers film file went out with the digital trash.

According to multiple tweets by various members of the film press, the problem was corrected after about two hours, thanks to a relatively quick download from a distribution source. Of course, had the film been a more traditional 35mm tape version, there would have been little chance of such an issue occurring. I guess that's the price we pay for living in the future.
 
Thanks. I don't understand why they decided to end the Thor movie like that, if they weren't going to have it become a big deal in the Avengers movie.
 
16:9. I think this has to do with Whedon being a TV director, and he might be more comfortable with a regular widescreen format instead of a more theatrical one.

Yeah, while watching it, I thought it felt more like 16:9 and was wondering whether the theater screwed up with the projection or something.
 
What aspect ratio was the Avengers shown in? It wasn't 2.35 was it?

seemed like 1.85:1 to me. Slightly disappointed when the movie started and the curtains didn't open up, but soon forgotten. Its quite a character piece at the beginning so I think it works well at that ratio
 
Oh, and one thing I don't get is how did the Hulk suddenly
go from being an uncontrollable maniac tearing everything up to the civilized and controled version that could differenntiate between friend and foe?

They never really did explain it in the film.
 
I think it's implied in the ending scene of the Incredible Hulk that Banner was getting better at controlling the Hulk.
 
Oh, and one thing I don't get is how did the Hulk suddenly
go from being an uncontrollable maniac tearing everything up to the civilized and controlled version that could differentiate between friend and foe?

They never really did explain it in the film.

I thought the same when I watched it.
 
Oh, and one thing I don't get is how did the Hulk suddenly
go from being an uncontrollable maniac tearing everything up to the civilized and controled version that could differenntiate between friend and foe?

They never really did explain it in the film.

Banner can actually control the Hulk. This was demonstrated at the end of the Incredible Hulk movie. He's actually able to turn into the Hulk and retain a level of control as long as he stays focus. But he doesn't like that and he would rather not turn into the Hulk at all, so he is repressing it on purpose. Because of this, when he does turn into the Hulk involuntarily, it means he generally snaps and totally loses control. That's when he's no longer able to control it.

That's my understanding based on the films so far. Seems to make sense especially when you see that
he is able to retain control in the end because he changes into the Hulk by his own free will, and he tells them his secret is that he's "always angry" so he just holds in back on purpose.
 
Thanks. I don't understand why they decided to end the Thor movie like that, if they weren't going to have it become a big deal in the Avengers movie.

Yeah, didn't make sense to me either. It was also disappointing not to see Jane Foster in the movie given how Thor ended.
 
Whedon actually made Hawkeye and Black Widow seem strong and not useless in this movie.

I think it's because Whedon brought all the superheroes into a normal human state, which I really liked. You never got that sense of "Thor is a god who can kill everyone".

Like that scene where
Stark and Thor were fighting in the forest. Technology can stand up to a god

Really nice work by Whedon
 
I think it's because Whedon brought all the superheroes into a normal human state, which I really liked. You never got that sense of "Thor is a god who can kill everyone".

Like that scene where
Stark and Thor were fighting in the forest. Technology can stand up to a god

Really nice work by Whedon

It was pretty clear there that if the fight went on, Thor would have won though. But it doesn't matter because that scene was all about - WHEN CAPTAIN AMERICA TALKS, EVERYONE SHUTS UP. Fuck yeah! <3
 
Thanks. I don't understand why they decided to end the Thor movie like that, if they weren't going to have it become a big deal in the Avengers movie.
Why waste time on it? I would think that trying to stop the end of the world would have more importance than explaining in detail.

The same goes to not having Jane Foster there. Why should she be? Bring her in a risky zone just to greet Thor. Time for that later ...
 
It was pretty clear there that if the fight went on, Thor would have won though. But it doesn't matter because that scene was all about - WHEN CAPTAIN AMERICA TALKS, EVERYONE SHUTS UP. Fuck yeah! <3

how the hell could Thor win if his attacks only super-charge the Iron Man-suit?
 
I don't think the Thor ending is really compromised here. It still prevents all of Asgard from descending onto Earth whenever they feel like this, and ultimately that directly results in Thor being a lonelier and more isolated character in the Avengers movie. You can definitely feel that he has lost a lot of his witty and charming side here, because he is surrounded by strangers and is unable to spend any time with his friends or loved ones. I thought it was a nice touch, and it simply makes the audience more excited to see that side of Thor again when the sequel to Thor comes out next year.

how the hell could Thor win if his attacks only super-charge the Iron Man-suit?

That was only his lightning attacks. Did you not notice that as the battle went on, Thor was showing that his physical strength was just going to be too much for the Iron Man armor? He was pretty much crushing the arms with his hands alone. It was pretty cool.
 
I guess I'll be in the minority on this one. I enjoyed myself, but was rarely invested in anything going on. It didn't have the layer of heart that Captain America had, which I was hoping Whedon would nail. There are some super entertaining moments, but I honestly did not feel any sort of stakes throughout, mostly due to the bland villain and his army. The first hour just feels like its going through the motions. We've already seen Nick Fury let these people know he is bringing them together, why the need to drag it out? Still, Whedon does inject lots of much-needed comedy and the pacing is spot-on. I just wish I cared about anything going on. Also, the 3D was OK but I took my glasses off during one of the dialogue scenes and enjoyed myself much more. Perhaps a 2D viewing will add more.

B-

Its a SHIELD origin story. What do you expect? We could have had a simple montage where they get the guys together, but the central role of the story IMO is getting the different heroes into one place, the sparks that inevitably creates and the fallout of that.

The enemy in the third act are just dressing.
 
Lesson for film companies: When releasing a film property with multiple characters in it with established films, make them available for digital rental and not just buy only. Heck, it even makes a good time for a rental sale! Now I need to go out to Redbox, which isn't far, but still doesn't help the film studio get rental profits and a potential ticket for The Avengers. It's not going to get me to buy a copy that's one thing!

EDIT: If you have an unredeemed Digital Copy Code for Thor, Captain America, or Hulk, let me know I'll give five bucks for each one.

for the amount of effort you've put in, you could have popped down to blockbusters and got them on bluray/dvd by now.
 
Having not seen the film yet:

Iron Man (A-)
Thor (B+)
Iron Man 2 (B)
Hulk (C)
The Incredible Hulk (C-)
Captain America (D-)


It's funny how you can not seemingly find many people that liked BOTH Captain America and Thor, it's love/hate.

Captain America was better than DareDevil!
 
Any good Avengers comics to read ? I loved the film. I've already read the Ultimates years ago and I thought it was great. Currently reading Avengers Forever, I don't understand shit lulz.
 
I guess I'll be in the minority on this one. I enjoyed myself, but was rarely invested in anything going on. It didn't have the layer of heart that Captain America had, which I was hoping Whedon would nail. There are some super entertaining moments, but I honestly did not feel any sort of stakes throughout, mostly due to the bland villain and his army. The first hour just feels like its going through the motions. We've already seen Nick Fury let these people know he is bringing them together, why the need to drag it out? Still, Whedon does inject lots of much-needed comedy and the pacing is spot-on. I just wish I cared about anything going on. Also, the 3D was OK but I took my glasses off during one of the dialogue scenes and enjoyed myself much more. Perhaps a 2D viewing will add more.

B-

Gotta be honest, that's pretty much how I felt. Don't agree about the whole Nick Fury dragging thing, because I'm a DC Universe reader and don't know any Marvel backstory besides the movies they released so far.. which also caused my frustration of not knowing anything about Black Widow and Hawkeye.

I guess the biggest problem I had with the movie was the faceless army of aliens and the way they didn't have any realistic weight to them because of the cartoony CGI. They had shitloads of armour on their bodies and yet they still bounced off buildings and jumped around like feathers.
 
Banner can actually control the Hulk. This was demonstrated at the end of the Incredible Hulk movie. He's actually able to turn into the Hulk and retain a level of control as long as he stays focus. But he doesn't like that and he would rather not turn into the Hulk at all, so he is repressing it on purpose. Because of this, when he does turn into the Hulk involuntarily, it means he generally snaps and totally loses control. That's when he's no longer able to control it.

That's my understanding based on the films so far. Seems to make sense especially when you see that
he is able to retain control in the end because he changes into the Hulk by his own free will, and he tells them his secret is that he's "always angry" so he just holds in back on purpose.

I took Banner's line "That's my secret, I'm always angry" to mean that he actually wanted to mess them all up in the Hellicarrier, he just got that mad. Hence the scene before the transformation. That's why he's dangerous, he can get incredibly pissed off at anyone. Later he can just vent his anger at the bad guys.
 
No Blockbuster near by. Keep in mind the effort expended was really just checking a few websites.

I think in terms of digital distribution, big studios are still very much behind on the curve. If they really wanted to cash in on this big time, they would have prepared digital packages of all the 5 previous movies a month before Avengers opens, so fans who don't own the discs can either recap, or new fans can catch up. Market it as some sort of "Avengers Declassified" thing, and throw in a special Avengers making of preview in the package too, and it'll be a huge hit.
 
I took Banner's line "That's my secret, I'm always angry" to mean that he actually wanted to mess them all up in the Hellicarrier, he just got that mad. Hence the scene before the transformation. That's why he's dangerous, he can get incredibly pissed off at anyone. Later he can just vent his anger at the bad guys.
Not really,
him saying "i'm always angry" is just a reference to the fact that the Hulk ALWAYS exists within him, and it WILL NOT let him die. That's why he transformed so easily, I think. Because Hulk woudn't let him get hit by that thing, so it appeared and stopped it. That's how I understood it, given the story of how he shot himself in the mouth, and the Hulk spit it out.

Banner can actually control the Hulk. This was demonstrated at the end of the Incredible Hulk movie. He's actually able to turn into the Hulk and retain a level of control as long as he stays focus. But he doesn't like that and he would rather not turn into the Hulk at all, so he is repressing it on purpose. Because of this, when he does turn into the Hulk involuntarily, it means he generally snaps and totally loses control. That's when he's no longer able to control it.

That's my understanding based on the films so far. Seems to make sense especially when you see that
he is able to retain control in the end because he changes into the Hulk by his own free will, and he tells them his secret is that he's "always angry" so he just holds in back on purpose.
But can he really transform voluntarily without a threat? Perhaps, but I thought his second transformation was simply due to the Hulk not letting Banner die from that incoming thing. But yeah, your description of his involuntary transformation is accurate and basically how I understood it as well.
 
It's funny how you can not seemingly find many people that liked BOTH Captain America and Thor, it's love/hate.

Pull up your slacks, son, because I'm about to rock your world.

The Avengers (A)
Iron Man (B)
Captain America (B)
Thor (B)
Iron Man 2 (B-)
The Incredible Hulk (C)

I actually don't think the second Iron Man is that bad, and it startles me that people who liked the first one don't like the second. It's inferior, but not by much. Both films run on RDJ's charisma, yet don't have the good sense to not lock him in a big metal suit for most of the third act.

Captain America seems like a real Marmite film. Me, I love it. It's incredibly kitschy - montages, random explosions, slow motion, identikit lackeys - and I think really accomplishes the whole World War 2 propaganda feel it's going for. It's completely unashamed of what it is. It may be that I'm a sucker for period superhero films, and I dug X-Men First Class for many of the same reasons (and I long for a Fantastic Four film set in the 60s). I thought Evans was really endearing. There are some weak points - mostly side characters that fail to have any impact and a little bit of a flat conclusion - but I find that the end result is strong.

People say that they wanted more Asgard stuff on Thor, but I completely disagree. I felt Thor as a character was at his most interesting when he was having misadventures on Earth ("This is delicious! ANOTHER!") than when he was in a giant magical rainbow world, hitting things. People say that the romance isn't the strongest and, while it's not, I don't feel it's that far-fetched. Hemsworth definitely exceeded my expectations.

The Incredible Hulk didn't leave much of an impression on me, but I wouldn't say it's head-holdingly bad. I just found it unremarkable. Liv Tyler whispering everything got on my nerves a bit, mind you. Bruce?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom