Does it not mean "factually"? Because, as I was saying, if you look at the ratings of the games at that point in the 3DS's life and this point in the Vita's life, you'd see that Vita's lineup is objectively better.
That's still not what objectively means.
Vita games objectively have higher scores than 3DS games at this point. That doesn't mean Vita games are objectively better. There's a distinction.
Reviews are subjective. They are people giving their opinions on things. Compiling a bunch of opinions together doesn't suddenly become fact, it just gives you a trend of what people's opinions tend to be.
It is impossible for something to be objectively better. It is a contradiction.