Court set to rule on Apple vs Samsung case in a few minutes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, here's something:

6:05 PM | Reader murraypaul writes :
I think your reporting that "Jury found Samsung violated antitrust law by monopolizing markets related to the UMTS standard" is incorrect. That was question 31, which was answered with a No.
 
Only in the USA...

Anyways, fuck apple and apple users. Just another day...
8IVIb.gif
 
People say that with every android update. Customers stuck using their slow/non updated android phone for two years may leave with a shitty impression when it's time to upgrade.

It's the wrong impression. "Android" is not really one thing in a practical sense. The people who complain about android phone typically got the shittiest one for free with a contract upgrade. Flagship Android devices are as good, if not better than the annual iPhone.

Perhaps I had a bad one, but my iPod touch straight up died. Stopped opening apps, force closed others, random reboots, etc.
 
Question, is the 1 billion award higher or lower than what Apple asked?

Apple was asking for 20-30 per device for how many devices?
 
Yeah, I think it's like 10-20% of the time, if Samsung is lucky they can probably get some of their phones taken off and save some money, best case scenario is I think 500mil.

But the real damage is done, software and design patents have been validated that I really don't want to be made valid.

Arguing that software patents are invalid on the face of it needs to be done at another time and place not at Apple v. Samsung. It essentially needs to be fixed by the legislature. We just need to reach the tipping point.

If Apple just -sits- on this and doesn't use it to sue anyone else, damage will still be done - lot of people are going to be shitting bricks over their software now, and patent trolls (real ones) are probably going to be reinvigorated by this.

Patent trolls didn't need to be invigorated. They'll keep churning through the system with method patents out in East Texas. It'll be interesting to see if Google ultimately removes these patented features (301 and 381) from Android or if the handset makers do it themselves. Finding infringing across the board gives Apple a lot of leverage and since the patent isn't standards essential they have no requirement to license it.
 
Patent trolls didn't need to be invigorated. They'll keep churning through the system with method patents out in East Texas. It'll be interesting to see if Google ultimately removes these patented features (301 and 381) from Android or if the handset makers do it themselves. Finding infringing across the board gives Apple a lot of leverage and since the patent isn't standards essential they have no requirement to license it.

Bounceback is gone already, as far as I know.
 
So if Apple's a patent troll because they fought for their intellectual property does Google (né Motorola Mobility) also receive the same scorn of Android fanboys?

I mean, are you on your way to protest Mountain View?
 
If Jobs hadn't have been recorded as saying that "great artists steal" line in reference to himself before locking everything down then this would be a lesser issue for me. He leaves a hypocritical legacy.
 
So if Apple's a patent troll because they fought for their intellectual property does Google (né Motorola Mobility) also receive the same scorn of Android fanboys?

I mean, are you on your way to protest Mountain View?

Dunno who this is directed at - but I don't think Apple is a patent troll - I think Apple is a company who is taking far too many liberties with the patent system, to a point where it will be a detriment - specifically for software developers.

Google so far hasn't really done much to flex their new patent portfolio, if the Notification patent goes through and they go after Apple - apart from a part of me hoping that Apple gets knocked on their ass a bit for all their patent shennanigans, I would be pretty worried about the crumbling state of the mobile software industry.
 
So if Apple's a patent troll because they fought for their intellectual property does Google (né Motorola Mobility) also receive the same scorn of Android fanboys?

I mean, are you on your way to protest Mountain View?

Yes most of us are upset that retarded patents are being upheld not because our faves didn't win. Bad day to be a consumer.
 
So if Apple's a patent troll because they fought for their intellectual property does Google (né Motorola Mobility) also receive the same scorn of Android fanboys?

I mean, are you on your way to protest Mountain View?

When did Google last use their patents in the aggressive, anti-competitive "we're going to fucking WAR to kill our competitors" way Apple constantly does? That's right. Google bought Motorola for their patents in order to be able to defend themselves, Android and their Android partners against the like of Apple.
 
I am so proud of you Evilore Apple. I knew you where the administrator corporation with a heart originality for a reason. I am crying right now because we you are protected by someone who actually cares and doesn't let the moderators corporations run around bullying people copying you. Thank you Evilore Apple, thank you.
 
Hoping I see a fucking firestorm destroy this ludicrous patent world before I see the total downfall of human society in my lifetime.

That a judge has ordered 1 billion dollars in "damages" be paid with no hint of parody to proceedings is definitely "I don't want to live on this planet anymore" material.
 
Samsung statement: http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/24/3...-apple-trial-statement-loss-american-consumer

Samsung said:
Today's verdict should not be viewed as a win for Apple, but as a loss for the American consumer. It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices. It is unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners, or technology that is being improved every day by Samsung and other companies. Consumers have the right to choices, and they know what they are buying when they purchase Samsung products. This is not the final word in this case or in battles being waged in courts and tribunals around the world, some of which have already rejected many of Apple's claims. Samsung will continue to innovate and offer choices for the consumer.
 
Apple started all of this....

Apple wasn't the first patent troll. They won't be the last.

What everyone needs to start taking from this case is that the American patent system NEEDS to be overhauled, especially when it comes to software.

In this day and age the worst case scenario of all this shit, the way i see it, is either a market crash or a complete slowdown of innovation.
 
Hoping I see a fucking firestorm destroy this ludicrous patent world before I see the total downfall of human society in my lifetime.

That a judge has ordered 1 billion dollars in "damages" be paid with no hint of parody to proceedings is definitely "I don't want to live on this planet anymore" material.

1 billion is really not alot of money consider how much google has paid for Motorola's patent. The going price for mobile patent is very expensive.
 
Guys you think software patents are bad, you should see the biotech industry. A couple years ago scientists were trying to patent parts of the human genome.
 
Dunno who this is directed at - but I don't think Apple is a patent troll - I think Apple is a company who is taking far too many liberties with the patent system, to a point where it will be a detriment - specifically for software developers.

Google so far hasn't really done much to flex their new patent portfolio, if the Notification patent goes through and they go after Apple - apart from a part of me hoping that Apple gets knocked on their ass a bit for all their patent shennanigans, I would be pretty worried about the crumbling state of the mobile software industry.

Apple having patents of stuff they didn't invent should be a crime and the patent organization should accused too...
 
So if Apple's a patent troll because they fought for their intellectual property does Google (né Motorola Mobility) also receive the same scorn of Android fanboys?

I mean, are you on your way to protest Mountain View?

No, they're actively rallying for a patent attack from Motorola, across the board pretty much.
 
Yup. So the answer to the question is no. No, Android fans don't hold Google to the same standard. Instead, they revert to specious arguments of who started what or if one lawsuit is the equivalent of another.

So, really, the vigor with which some of you believe software patents to be "bad" is predicated on who is presently (ab)using them.

Gotcha. Puerile reasoning at its best.
 
Actually a jury awarded it but let's not let facts get in the way of some Grade A Outrage™.

lets have a semantics shit-pie while we're at it. Here's your slice, eat up, I baked it extra shitty for you.
 
Guys you think software patents are bad, you should see the biotech industry. A couple years ago scientists were trying to patent parts of the human genome.

The shit Monsanto does disgusts me. They could do so much good with some of their tech, but instead they abuse intellectual rights and manipulate their products to not be as good so they make more money. Patents are balls in so many fields.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom