Yes, it's really killing me
What
He means to say read better and post smarter. Probably. I'm not saying this btw. Just what I think he's saying.
Yes, it's really killing me
What
That's indicative of a lot of the posters on this thread.
6 has a lot more viable horror segments than 4. CAPCOM has not misinterpreted the fact that survival horror (translation: tank controls and fixed camera angles) sells less than action.
You mentioned the outbreak thing in Story. As for Ada,she isn't involved any more than she was in BH4 and Separate Ways.
what, people finding witty ways of trying to say "I'm smarter than you".
Based on the demo and the general awfulness seen on the streams I think it's reasonable to call RE6 a steaming turd; especially if one has low tolerance for anti-gameplay bullshit.
I keep hearing this but did RE5 really sell that much more than RE2?. I looked at Capcom's numbers and it didn't seem to outsell it by all that much. I think it took the Gold edition to actually surpass it.
Finished the three main campaigns. I'm zeroing in on a 6.5. The lows are just way too low.
Don't get me wrong, the game is disappointing and way below RE standards, but all the 3's and 4's its getting is too harsh I think.
The thing is, the game is crazy uneven. The game goes from a 2/10 (I'm looking at you vehicle sections) to a 9/10 in a heart beat.
It also can be a 6/10 at times. The quality is all over the place. I know it's a badly made game, yet I'm still utterly addicted to it and having fun.
I think it evens out to something in the 7 or 8 range.
By the way, I wonder what the future of RE is now?
I was exactly right with reviews being all over the god damn place.
However doesnt affect me since I was enjoying the demo, and I regardless it's going to sell well.
I just wonder what this means for Capcom.
RE is one of their best rated franchises (Main Series) and it's their number 1 seller.
I don't think they can affored another all over the place reviews for their 7th outing.
I have a feeling they'll be going to the drawing board again to figure out what to do.
I honestly think the game was just to big for it's self.
Had a huge develoment team and from the RE6 thread some sections are brillant while others are just crap. Not to mention moving the release date up might have been smart sales wise (Its the first BIG title this holiday) but it hurt it in the polishing section.
Finished the three main campaigns. I'm zeroing in on a 6.5. The lows are just way too low.
Between God Hard and the challenge missions I was mostly satisfied. Could have used more challenge missions and maybe a horde/survival mode. I'll take your word about the scoring system, since I don't care for that sort of thing.The scoring system is not good and the game is very slim on content.
It's good, but there's not a lot there.
I'm just catching up to this thread (HOLY BALLS) but there's no way that a major, numbered entry in one of gaming's pinnacle series can be scoring this poorly.
Right?
I'm just catching up to this thread (HOLY BALLS) but there's no way that a major, numbered entry in one of gaming's pinnacle series can be scoring this poorly.
Right?
It's a pretty polarizing game with several elements which people may either find completely disastrous or not care. The whole "different styles of gameplay" in particular did not help them at all.
Yep. Join in on the OT. At least there you'll find people who like the game and aren't just spending their free time in a thread related to a game they don't care about and try to "sell" you on games coming out next week.
Maybe people will do the same thing these guys are doing and jump in the Dishonored and XCOM threads just to say they don't like the games.
Should have been Mass Effect 3.
I'm wondering if their philosophy on that was shotgun.
Yep. Join in on the OT. At least there you'll find people who like the game and aren't just spending their free time in a thread related to a game they don't care about and try to "sell" you on games coming out next week.
Maybe people will do the same thing these guys are doing and jump in the Dishonored and XCOM threads just to say they don't like the games.
Depends on sales. There will be a RE7 for sure. I am going to guess it is going to be crazy large like RE6, but probably most polished and more directed. If the game bombs hard for some reason, then outsourcing is possible.
Activist reviewers and their pseudo-valid criticisms - all they do is fuel hate patrols.
This thread is a hotbed for wonderful new phrases.
I can see their reasoning for the decision but actually putting it into practice did more to hurt the game than anything else. I found Jake's campaign to be almost complete fodder that could be taken out without any real repercussion.
Is that due to the narrative or due to its gameplay.
Both.
So you haven't played it? The demo is a really, really poor representation of the full game, and watching footage does not give you a sense of how the game actually plays. Especially given that the first stream looked as though the guy was playing under the influence. I thought I was going to loathe Chris's campaign, but it ended up being great. Jake's was the weakest for me, although it had some pretty good sections.
It sold more in a shorter time-span, I think. BH2 had like 50 different ports and re-releases over ten years.
This is probably the funniest thing I've read in a while.
Translation: Of all those reviewers, how many are there who actually have good opinions?
What does the 6.5 mean? Part of the divide is that people think a 7 is average when most publications use 5 as their average.
I checked on Metacritic, and apparently the average review score given to a game is 72.5.
So, we'd either have to consider almost every game ever reviewed above average, or just say that RE6 is in an incredibly low percentile by some publications' standards.
Good for Capcom. As a gamer, why would I care. I play the game not the sales chart.
If anything, RE6 selling well is a bad thing.
So you haven't played it? The demo is a really, really poor representation of the full game, and watching footage does not give you a sense of how the game actually plays. Especially given that the first stream looked as though the guy was playing under the influence. I thought I was going to loathe Chris's campaign, but it ended up being great. Jake's was the weakest for me, although it had some pretty good sections.
.
Ugh. Well... that's not promising.
I can't see it selling less than double what ORC did. So at least 5 million.
Wow, I had no idea Jim Sterling gave ORC 7.5/10. And that's the highest score any reviewer gave it.
Well the numbers capcom put out only included the PS release although that might have included the dual shock release. RE5 had two platforms plus the gold edition so it seems like a fairly even fight regardless. I just don't see RE5 numbers as smoking RE2 and completely justifying the new direction the series has taken. I guess we'll see how well RE6 does.
Of course I haven't played it, why would I waste money on something where all signs point to it being garbage? And watching a stream allows me to see what the enemy encounters are like, what the setpieces are like and how terrible the terrible story is. Disregarding a shitty player, there's plenty you can take away from a stream of the game.
Expect a lot of disappointment in next month's NPD when the sales of RE6 are revealed, especially the RE:Revelations fans.
A bit off-topic, and I know the above isn't representative of all OT posters, but this post is the reason why I usually find official threads the least interesting part of visiting GAF. The discourse in them is usually incredibly insular and one-sided, and any opinion against what is considered the regular norm is rejected prima facie without any admission to the alternate perspective on the game in question. It's not that people in them have somehow arrived at a consensus, but that the consensus in itself is not nuanced or complex in its assessment of the game in question. OTs are unfortunately epistemically homogenous and Lucent's post unfortunately serves to illustrate the embracement of such a position.
that is amazingReviewer 1:
The feeling of 'survival' is truly imparted as you battle the zombies and monsters. 10
Reviewer 2:
Dark graphics make this a very scary title to play, especially at night. 10
Reviewer 3:
Past Biohazard characters return, though a cute new 'mascot-type' could have helped. 9
Reviewer 4:
Just like the Gears or Calls, this title truly has an "American" flavor that is very stylish. 10
I have a feeling that an enhance version is coming soon to the Wii U..That is CAPCOM's fault for making it exclusive to the 3DS, of all systems. It mirrors their decision to make the main series exclusive to the GameCube way back when. That hurt their sales quite a bit too, even though it was a great decision from a design perspective.
That is CAPCOM's fault for making it exclusive to the 3DS, of all systems. It mirrors their decision to make the main series exclusive to the GameCube way back when. That hurt their sales quite a bit too, even though it was a great decision from a design perspective.
I think focusing on RE2 would be a mistake, it was pretty evident after that game that sales of the series were declining. Even RE4 did not really start selling until they ported it to the PS2.
I still can't quite put my finger on what made RE2 so popular, outside of being excellent. Part of me hopes RE6 will sell well so that they can continue the series, but another part of me worries that the sales will give them false courage over their action-packed set-piece blockbuster direction, which I think we've had enough of. At the very least, they take criticism quite seriously and try to address specific problems. Unfortunately, some of the decisions they made with RE6 nullified some of their best changes.
But Capcom being Capcom will conclude that the style of RE6/ORC is what sells and thus the game design tat works.
The thing is the decline could very easily be attributed to the platforms Capcom started putting their games on. RE3 sold well since it was still on the PS but CV was never going to sell as much being on the DC and RE was never going to be that big on the GC either. RE4 was comparable but that was only because of the ps2 version. It didn't even really pull ahead until the Wii version dropped.
Reviews aren't solely about opinions. Don't make snide remarks. Forming constructive criticism about a game's design and praising it or breaking it down is one of the reviewer's job. If you seriously think that's how my comment reads go right ahead. You're the one who will end up looking look like a fool.