2013 High-Res PC Screenshot Thread of Let the JPEG Die Already
- Thread starter Stallion Free
- Start date
Try, as mentioned above - it's a cointoss whether or not it works but I'm on 310.64 drivers.
Remember to copy every setting.
At your own risk that is
Damn, this works, and I even found a way on Guru3D to get 3840x2160 working at 60Hz, but it only gives me Limited RGB and not Full, so everything's washed-out looking.
Usually if you put 60.001 as the refresh rate, it'll fix that, but not with anything higher than 3200x1800.BrLvgThrChmstry
Banned
Try, as mentioned above - it's a cointoss whether or not it works but I'm on 310.64 drivers.
Remember to copy every setting.
At your own risk that is
Holy crap, thanks for this! ME looks friggin' amazing. Wanted to know, did you overclock your card?
Next gen object motion blur right here.
Removed the green bars from sides.
God what are you doing, IMGUR? No ANTI-ALIASING? Did you even APPLY Sweet FX?! What utter trash. I don't think I see even a single lens flare.
/TongueInCheek
legacyzero
Banned
Pooh's character model is really bad. No texture detail, or anything.
Oh bother...
Oh bother...
Sax Russel
Banned
Is the web slinging beautiful Spider Man 2 perfection of building attachment and wondrous momentum, or is it super nerfed casual cloud web slinging for dudebros.
It's trying to accurately simulate the web swinging from the 60's cartoon.
legacyzero
Banned
Dude, Spider Man is looking pretty damn awesome.
It's the bad kind where you can swing from imaginary clouds.
TheVampire
Banned
Sorry for the late reply man, went to bed but I see others helped you out. I'm thinking of making a thread here on gaf showing the steps on how to do some downsampling.
You're welcome
, yeah I oc'ed my 670 to 1300 mhz, if you're referring to my " and I get 60 fps " statement keep in mind that it's not 100% without drops. Then again nothing is. Damn, this works, and I even found a way on Guru3D to get 3840x2160 working at 60Hz, but it only gives me Limited RGB and not Full, so everything's washed-out looking.
Good shit, glad it's working. Keep me in mind if you level up your resolution to something above that without any trade-offs
( like losing full rgb range)TheVampire
Banned
BrLvgThrChmstry
Banned
You're welcome
Gotcha', OC'ed up to 1200 on the core and 3500 on the mem. Considering flashing it to bump it up a bit more.
Not going to say I'm floored by this shot, but I am. It looks friggin' great. Like a slightly processed DSLR shot.
No problem man, it was 4 AM in here when I wrote that. about the thread, go for it, you'll do us a great favor.
legacyzero
Banned
I havn't played Mirrors Edge on my new rig yet, so I havn't been able to downsample shots with it. I should check that out.
Dictator93
Member
While the environments look good, I always feel that due to the lighting solution character models look really really out of place. They are lit differently
Thanks man
!I rationalize that by thinking that a) ( if you're referring to Kylen's 3rd person shots ) the game wasn't made to play in 3rd person and b) you meet so few people in the game. For good reason.
Dictator93
Member
Thanks man
I rationalize that by thinking that a) ( if you're referring to Kylen's 3rd person shots ) the game wasn't made to play in 3rd person and b) you meet so few people in the game. For good reason.
Oh I know that! Your shots are wonderful corky. I meant really the chracter models for the enemy soldier types. Those shots of faith just highlight the lighting being stagnant for moving objects.
Because they are
Environments have prebaked high quality GI, characters normal UE solution.
legacyzero
Banned
legacyzero
Banned
legacyzero
Banned
Similar threads
- Poll