Pachter -PS4 will feature "hyperrealistic games" and "render games at 240fps"

720p (real 720p, not sub HD bullshit) 60 FPS 16af and decent AA

anything above that and i'll be surprised

lol you have low standards. 16x AF a given. At least 1080p minimum (It can be 1920x1080 or some anamorphic variation). I expect better post AA solutions like FXAA, TXAA, SMAA T2x and SMAA 4x to be used rather then MSAA or SSAA since those take so much a performance hit unless it's a PS2 HD remaster. Prefer 48-60fps. 30fps locked isn't too bad as long as there is no screen tearing.
 

M-PG71C

Member
To be fair, everything sets GAF off.

This is true. We have people getting pissed off at tipping threads and other social nonsense. You can't have a forum as large as NeoGAF without the wide range of opinions.

With that said, Pachter, I would prefer analysis that had more professionalism in place and less hyperbole. Pandering to fourteen-year old losers on the internet who spend their days playing console warriors on GT is uncanny at best.
 
there is an old saying that if you do not know what you are talking about you should not speak about it. unfortunately in this world we live right now that behavior is rewarded.
 
Pachter's drunk rant on the Bombcast at E3 2012 makes more sense now.

He spouts bullshit, gets called on it, and then whines about those 'fucking fanboys' on GAF.
 
On Tuesday, I'm taping a show dedicated to how GAFfers are (mostly) smart and are (mostly) assholes. It should be fun.

Yes, I always wonder what will set GAF off, and this was truly an innocent comment. To be honest with you, I have no idea how many frames per second the human eye can process, am pretty sure it's more than 60 fps, since we can all see the difference between 30 and 60, but I have no clue if we can see more than 120 fps, or if we can even see that. I was merely explaining to Cliff Edwards that four times the processing power would make the machine capable of rendering at that speed. I have no idea what the games will look like, which features they will incorporate, but my guess is that the specs will be sufficiently powerful that developers won't be particularly constrained from getting the look and feel that they desire. As one commenter pointed out, PC games have once again moved past console games, and each new generation of consoles allows the consoles to partially catch up.

GAF usually reacts if I comment on technical specifications, charging more money for anything, or make any comment that has the word "Nintendo" in it. To answer your question, I always presume that if I talk about any of these topics, GAF will go ballistic.

And as you pointed out, I'm amazed at the asshole factor on this website. The asshole/civil ratio must be 2:1 or more.


I am as well. Sometimes I just shake my head at the negativity here.

That said, you are still wrong most of the time, and say completely ill informed and ridiculous things. All to (What I can only assume) get your name out there a bit more and self promote.
 
On Tuesday, I'm taping a show dedicated to how GAFfers are (mostly) smart and are (mostly) assholes. It should be fun.

Yes, I always wonder what will set GAF off, and this was truly an innocent comment. To be honest with you, I have no idea how many frames per second the human eye can process, am pretty sure it's more than 60 fps, since we can all see the difference between 30 and 60, but I have no clue if we can see more than 120 fps, or if we can even see that. I was merely explaining to Cliff Edwards that four times the processing power would make the machine capable of rendering at that speed. I have no idea what the games will look like, which features they will incorporate, but my guess is that the specs will be sufficiently powerful that developers won't be particularly constrained from getting the look and feel that they desire. As one commenter pointed out, PC games have once again moved past console games, and each new generation of consoles allows the consoles to partially catch up.

GAF usually reacts if I comment on technical specifications, charging more money for anything, or make any comment that has the word "Nintendo" in it. To answer your question, I always presume that if I talk about any of these topics, GAF will go ballistic.

And as you pointed out, I'm amazed at the asshole factor on this website. The asshole/civil ratio must be 2:1 or more.
hawk.gif

Amazing.
Dyack's meltdown was still better though. Sorry.
 

Eliciel

Member
confirmed, Pachter is the new Kevin Butler. That's his first commercial.

btw. I thought there is no such thing as super-, mega-, hyper- etc. realistic. I thought we're just trying to imitate what's possible in real life and that's called : "realistic". Or did I miss something?
 

nbthedude

Member
You're so awesome. Swoon. How about you stop acting like a primadonna and actually start taking notice as to why you're not that well revered on these boards

...

This is an excellent post and brings up many of the reasons why I don't particularly care about Pachter. Especially the belittling of people that don't agree with him.

I watch his GT show weekly and have for years, but admitedly it is primarily for eye candy, which I'm not ashamed to admit. I may have a bit of a crush, but that doesn't blind me to his utter hypocrisy in terms of his name calling and his tendancy to make cocky, unqualified, unsubstantiated claims. The less buttons on the shirt the more tolerable I find the episode, to be entirely honest. It is a guilty pleasure.
 

Corky

Nine out of ten orphans can't tell the difference.
I'm sorry Pachy don't listen to these guys, we can still be friends. Right? Pachy?
 

Dr Dogg

Member
Is that the real Pachter posting here? Or just some masterful troll?

Some where out there is Bizaro World Pachter where his predictions are spot on, he's tech savy to the extent of being able to manipulate quantum mechanics and knows the answer to everything. Oh and he also has a goatee, all nega doppelgangers have a goatee.
 

apana

Member
I don't hate Pachter, he seems like a nice enough guy, but didn't he at one point say that PS360 would be the last generation of consoles?
 

bud23

Member
And as you pointed out, I'm amazed at the asshole factor on this website. The asshole/civil ratio must be 2:1 or more.

Definitely more. I agree with you, Michael. There is no need to be upset. I love your opinions, mostly because you always talk properly. For example, when a few weeks ago you said;

Grand Theft Auto may struggle and sell “only” 20 million units-I think that conventional wisdom is that GTA V will attach to 25 percent of all Xbox 360s and PS3s out there (around 25 million units at launch mid-year), but it might have some trouble doing so for a couple of reasons: first, the game is primarily single-player, and the industry has morphed into a primarily multiplayer world; second, the game is launching the same year as next generation consoles, meaning that people who are willing to “wait” for the next generation are less likely to buy the game. If there is any franchise that defies logic, it's this one, so I could be completely wrong, but I think that people who love multiplayer will not be as likely to buy a primarily single-player game, limiting sales to “only” 20 million units or so. That's the price Rockstar pays for releasing games so far apart-the industry has moved away from them, and they haven't necessarily adapted.

primarily single-player game? Judging your words , you seem to be very close to the Rockstar team (In June 2009 he was reported saying that we could expect a new GTA by end of 2010, and two days ago he predicted GTA V for May), so you should know that;

Leslie Benzies, Rockstar North producer since 2001, and the head of Edinburgh development studio;
"on the multiplayer side we hope that GTA V will do for multiplayer open world games what GTA 3 did for open world single-player games

“That’s what we’re working on. Refining open world multiplayer into something really special has been a huge focus of developmentLeslie Benzies, Rockstar North producer since 2001, and the head of Edinburgh development studio.

And If I´m not wrong, Rockstar already confirmed that has two development teams, one for the single player and the other one only for the multiplayer.

Argument based in a wrong premise?, Unfounded statement? Misleading? What? Nah. Michael, I believe in you.
 

Jezbollah

Member
On Tuesday, I'm taping a show dedicated to how GAFfers are (mostly) smart and are (mostly) assholes. It should be fun.

Yes, I always wonder what will set GAF off, and this was truly an innocent comment. To be honest with you, I have no idea how many frames per second the human eye can process, am pretty sure it's more than 60 fps, since we can all see the difference between 30 and 60, but I have no clue if we can see more than 120 fps, or if we can even see that. I was merely explaining to Cliff Edwards that four times the processing power would make the machine capable of rendering at that speed. I have no idea what the games will look like, which features they will incorporate, but my guess is that the specs will be sufficiently powerful that developers won't be particularly constrained from getting the look and feel that they desire. As one commenter pointed out, PC games have once again moved past console games, and each new generation of consoles allows the consoles to partially catch up.

GAF usually reacts if I comment on technical specifications, charging more money for anything, or make any comment that has the word "Nintendo" in it. To answer your question, I always presume that if I talk about any of these topics, GAF will go ballistic.

And as you pointed out, I'm amazed at the asshole factor on this website. The asshole/civil ratio must be 2:1 or more.

I think the problem here is that you have a voice that a lot of people listen to (and I'm talking about markets). And quite frankly your opinion combined with a lack of understanding at times has put you in a position of severe ridicule.

If you think people here are assholes for giving you such ridicule, perhaps you should do yourself a favour and either do more research to get a better understanding, or be more careful about how you are quoted to the press.

The root cause to this whole laughable saga lies solely at your feet, Mr Pachter.
 
So wait, Pach-dawg, a man paid to give his predictions on the game industry, says something which anyone with a rudimentary understanding of gaming technology knows is total bullshit, then comes here and calls everyone assholes for calling him on it? Did that just happen?
 

KHarvey16

Member
Definitely more. I agree with you, Michael. There is no need to be upset. I love your opinions, mostly because you always talk properly. For example, when a few weeks ago you said;



primarily single-player game? Judging your words , you seem to be very close to the Rockstar team (In June 2009 he was reported saying that we could expect a new GTA by end of 2010, and two days ago he predicted GTA V for May), so you should know that;

Leslie Benzies, Rockstar North producer since 2001, and the head of Edinburgh development studio;


And If I´m not wrong, Rockstar already confirmed that has two development teams, one for the single player and the other one only for the multiplayer.

Argument based in a wrong premise?, Unfounded statement? Misleading? What? Nah. Michael, I believe in you.

Wait...you think GTA V isn't going to be primarily single player?
 

Duxxy3

Member
lol you have low standards. 16x AF a given. At least 1080p minimum (It can be 1920x1080 or some anamorphic variation). I expect better post AA solutions like FXAA, TXAA, SMAA T2x and SMAA 4x to be used rather then MSAA or SSAA since those take so much a performance hit unless it's a PS2 HD remaster. Prefer 48-60fps. 30fps locked isn't too bad as long as there is no screen tearing.

After the expectations we had last generation and what we actually received, yes i have low expectations.

What i was expecting was a beautiful 1080p, 60fps and all that stuff. What we typically got 540p and 30fps.
 
Why the fuck is there going to be a show that tries and generalise GAFfers? What? Can you at least invite EviLore on, or is this E3 2012 Bombcast all over again?
 

Diablos54

Member
Why the fuck is there going to be a show that tries and generalise GAFfers? What? Can you at least invite EviLore on, or is this E3 2012 Bombcast all over again?
Because why not? Gotta get them hits I suppose. It's not like he's going to reply to any genuine criticism, I mean, he still hasn't answered why Fuse is set to break that 5 Mill mark.
 
D

Deleted member 80556

Unconfirmed Member
There is no way he is Pachter. No way.

His avatar is just ridiculous, I can't take him serious. Wasn't there someone who said mods should approve and tag a Pachter account just earlier in the thread?

EDIT: Here it is:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=47245602&postcount=9

This is so freaking fake.

EDIT 2: And please, like he's going to do a show about a single forum. Please. GAF is big, but not like that.
 

Randdalf

Member
An increase in RAM makes longer loading? Am I missing something?

If we are under the assumption that disc load speeds are the same as the PS3, and the RAM is filled at the same speed as the PS3... then yes you are. It takes longer to fill a bigger bucket full of water from a tap if you're filling it at the same rate as you filled a smaller one. Obviously, those two assumptions are likely to be incorrect.
 

Sn4ke_911

If I ever post something in Japanese which I don't understand, please BAN me.
How the hell does this guy still has a job in the gaming industry.

A blind monkey could do his job.
 
Top Bottom