BruiserBear
Banned
I guess I shouldn't be including everybody over 50 when I say "retirees," which is what I was doing.
As for the difference between actually having it in their home and having access to it, I don't see much of a difference. I don't see people running out and saying, "Well, this game console needs to be online, so I better start paying an extra $600 a year to sign up for internet."
I agree with you when you say Microsoft doesn't probably care about these people if this is the path they're going. I just think it's the wrong business move. I used to live in the northern part of the mitten of Michigan. The high-speed availability there is so rare it is unbelievable. For this to happen, they'd basically be wiping out the entire upper half of the lower peninsula. Other people in this thread mentioned West Virginia and other states. I just think it's insane to do--it will create such horrible word-of-mouth that it could cause irreparable damage to the brand reputation in those areas for years.
But even then, there are now options like HughesNet, so people without wired access to the internet can still get decent dish internet. So people who have the desire to get broadband, can pretty much get it now.