The Wii U in a worse or better shape after the PS4 reveal?

Dissapointed that the next gen according to Sony will be more of the same in a more beautiful package. Because if that I think Wii U can actually get a surpising comeback as it has the potential to attract games that can't compete on graphics on PS4 combined with (hopefully) a massive Virtual Console library and HD Nintendo games.

Nintendo dropped the ball with Wii U on many fronts imo, but there is a clear path to succes (to be clear, winning the console war is not what I mean with succes, if Nintendo can sell N64 amount of consoles would be good imo).
 
Way better, the ps4 was a let down when it comes to actual exclusives and the wii u has gotten these exclusives announced:


ZmtSs8h.jpg

(not including wii fit u for the soccer moms/pokemon rumble u)

Wow, did you make this yourself?
 
Same for me.

I like Nintendo consoles for Nintendo games.
I like Sony consoles for non multi games and some sony franchises.

I keep saying that :

- WII U will have a great September 2013-2014 season
- Pack in games at same price or a little price cut.
- PS4 won't be out in Europe this year
- PS4 will be 450 euros +, so, i'll wait for better games and <=400 console, late 2014.

Yesterday's conf was just too generic and there was no magic game that gave me chill, i'll wait for E3 to have a real opinion about PS4.
 
Better, I think, for the next year or two. Nothing on PS4 has made me say this is worth $500 yet and all the cross-gen games means I won't be missing much by holding out.
 
This 8gb business wont be that big a deal.

Most games are cross platform so will use wtv the next gen 360 will have. (hopefully im wrong)

Ps4 exclusives will definitely benefit though.

As for Wii U , its in the same shape it was always in , not good right now but its a new console , its always like this.

Watch Dogs announcement pretty sweet :)

Also , i'm leaning much more towards ps4 over MS now.
 
Dissapointed that the next gen according to Sony will be more of the same in a more beautiful package. Because if that I think Wii U can actually get a surpising comeback as it has the potential to attract games that can't compete on graphics on PS4 combined with (hopefully) a massive Virtual Console library and HD Nintendo games.

Nintendo dropped the ball with Wii U on many fronts imo, but there is a clear path to succes (to be clear, winning the console war is not what I mean with succes, if Nintendo can sell N64 amount of consoles would be good imo).

What exactly does the Gamepad bring to the table that's so unique and innovative? There hasn't been a single compelling use for it yet in terms of gameplay. Compare that to the Wiimote which was a completely unique experience right out of the gate (and why it took off). The Gamepad has shown no signs whatsoever of it being a game-changer in any way.
 
Wii landed in the market with a wet splat and only is looking worse as time goes on. The PS4 looks like a great piece of hardware with lots of developer support and some great social features.

The PS4 may well be a huge huge hit but I swear people were saying the same thing with the Vita/3DS.
 
It's focused on 3DS.

Remember at Wii U's first E3 people said..."the 3rd party games are coming, you just need to wait till next E3", at its second E3..."they are coming, wait till pre launch event", still no games. Now it's..."we might see them at ND".

Time to give up on the dream, Nintendo is on its own.

The 3DS ND you're talking about happened this morning. Iwata also promised a Wii U 3rd party Direct, that's supposed to be coming soon.
 
I'd say the WiiU gets a tiny bit more time thanks to cross-gen titles like Watch Dogs, which is appearing both on current gen consoles, the WiiU and the PS4. I honestly didn't think that particular game was going to appear on the WiiU, but it's a nice surprise that it's getting a port.

There have to be more than that, though, for the WiiU's third party situation to survive. Otherwise it's back to a Wii situation where everyone moves onto the more powerful hardware and Nintendo's the only one left supporting their own console, which given the last couple of years on the Wii doesn't instill much confidence.
 
I have to say I've spent recent months being convinced the next gen of "HD twins" would spell the end of Nintendo because that's what you guys keep telling me but I have to say it kind of feels to me like comparing apples to oranges now. Or like comparing my PC to my 3DS, for want of a better gaming analogy.

Nintendo still have problems of their own to deal with though, PS4/Durango have no relevance to that either way.
 
The fact that the PS4 was revealed at least gets us past the "Nobody will even care about the Wii U once they see the PS4". That obviously didn't happen.

The tech gap is there again, but not in way that relegates all games before it to be suddenly no good. Nothing has really changed after the reveal. Sony fans are excited, but it didn't impact the market beyond that.
 
What exactly does the Gamepad bring to the table that's so unique and innovative? There hasn't been a single compelling use for it yet in terms of gameplay. Compare that to the Wiimote which was a completely unique experience right out of the gate (and why it took off). The Gamepad has shown no signs whatsoever of it being a game-changer in any way.


Most of NintendoLand (assymetric gameplay), detective mode in Arkham City....All of ZombiU.

Off screen play is huge, too. Having spent 2 months with it I'm glad ps4 has copied it as I couldn't live without it now.

Also, not a gameplay one, but Wii Street U is a proper "wow" moment when you use it for the first time.
 
Will most likely end up getting a wiiu this year and a ps4 next year. Wiiu will have amazing games this year. Next year is when the ps4 will shine. Could change come e3 but thats how i feel as of now. Cant pass up that ninty first party.
 
I have PS3, Wii and Wii U. Because of the conference I was thinking on my companion for the Wii U. I reflected on what exclusives I played on the PS3 and only the Uncharted games (have all) and GoW3 blew me away. I played KZ2, Resistance and infamous and neither of those pull my interest for next gen. Given this I am on the fence between getting PS4 or a Nice PC or even wait for steam box. Hell I am going to even consider MS if what they show pulls my interest. Right now I am more inclined for a PC based on the games I have for PS3 (Bioshock, Batman AA, BF BC2, Ratchet ACiT, CoD MW2, CoD BOps, NBA2K13, Fifa 13, Dead Space 2, Mass Effect 2, Crysis, Infamous, Uncharte Series)
Sony's future can look as bright as scary. On the one hand they will have a nice high end machine.

On the other hand multi platform games will look better on a Steambox console. It will only get worse year after year in terms of graphics and awareness.

On the other side of the spectrum, PS4 price, no friendly controller hook, increased competition (ouya & co, tablets, HD twins and Wii U), blu ray commoditization, no backward compatibility, etc. will keep their casual gamers audience away.

So in this new landscape, Sony will live and die by their core faithful fans. The ones that don't buy a Vita in masses despite most biggest 1st party franchises released on it, the ones that don't massively buy 1st party franchises on PS3 either. GT5 and Uncharted enjoy the most sales, with <10 millions buyers. Good but not spectacular. If they happen to lose the casual and multi platform buyers fringes of their PS3 audience... and that's a plausible scenario with what I described, well it would be bad, if not ugly.

I haven't put Microsoft in the picture. Sony's hope would be to win over x360 fans, but MS probably has the most faithful audience of the industry, so I don't believe too much in this scenario.

Sony needs a mass market hook, that we didn't see yesterday. It won't be Vita remote play, there's nothing more niche than that, with the price issue it represents.

At last they desperately need to get the PS4 out in Europe in December this year. Missing it would be disastrous considering the fiercer than ever competition.
 
No one buys a Nintendo system to be wowed by its graphics or tech, at least not as their main focus.

Nintendo's selling point has always been their quality first party.
That being said, the WiiU need to start releasing more first party games to stay relevant.
Basically. The PS4 will be largely irrelevant in the success of the Wii U, just as PS Move and the Vita have been. Nintendo's real threat going forward is in the erosion of the $30-$60 software market.

Across all platforms and regions, Nintendo's only real success right now is the 3DS in Japan. Last generation the success of the DS spread from Japan across Europe and the US and that paved the way for the Wii's historic success.

To some extent the Wii was probably a fad, but it still did gangbusters with Nintendo's core business. Mario Kart has sold at 34M copies so far and NSMBWii is at 27M. If Nintendo's first party software can catch on as it has in past generations (and as it doing right now in Japan with the 3DS) then there is every reason to suspect that the Wii U can sell to levels approaching what the Wii did.
 
Then it won't sell, and it'll be a non-issue. I'm having a difficult time following your point. All I'm saying is that it's odd to assert that Killzone looks stale and is just another FPS game and therefore it's boring because it's retreading the same old territory in one breath, and then in the other be looking forward to Nintendo's lineup as something fresh. I'm honestly not sure what's controversial about this observation. Your only stake in this seems to be to knock Killzone down a peg, which seems inconsequential to the conversation.

I've never played a Killzone game and am somewhat tired of FPS games as well, but that doesn't make Nintendo's lineup of desired titles a shining beacon of original ideas.

I don´t think it´s really hard to understand, due to its genre (FPS) there are a lot of very similar games and especially in this gen that got waves and waves of FPS it´s not surprising that some people get tired from this genre and isn´t exactly something fresh except a new coat of paint.

The contrast to that is that Nintendo makes a lot of games in genres that aren´t supported by other publishers, this means there aren´t many similar games to begin with. To make an example Pikmin3. a) the last game releases in 2004 b) there aren´t many similar games. Therefore it´s no rocket science that it feels to be a much fresher experience. Also Nintendo in most cases only releases only 1 entry on a system, which is quite different to what happens for example tp Call of Duty, Assassins Creed. Even the critisised NSMBU series has only seen one entry per system so far.
 
What exactly does the Gamepad bring to the table that's so unique and innovative? There hasn't been a single compelling use for it yet in terms of gameplay. Compare that to the Wiimote which was a completely unique experience right out of the gate (and why it took off). The Gamepad has shown no signs whatsoever of it being a game-changer in any way.

Can you provide any examples of the Sony expanding the medium past better graphics?

Killzone demo:
-Scripted flyover
-Scripted walking through environment
-Scripted explosion
-Player character is immobilized but instantly recovers and becomes super soldier
-Linear level
-Chest high walls
-Iron sights
-Enemies just standing around
-Scripted on rails set piece segment

Sony choosing to highlight this specific game sends a strong signal that they view next gen solely in presentation terms, not game design ones. You can say you weren't compelled by Wii U software all day (and you will) but it's ignorant to say they aren't at least trying.
 
Can you provide any examples of the Sony expanding the medium past better graphics?

Killzone demo:
-Scripted flyover
-Scripted walking through environment
-Scripted explosion
-Player character is immobilized but instantly recovers and becomes super soldier
-Linear level
-Chest high walls
-Iron sights
-Enemies just standing around
-Scripted on rails set piece segment

Sony choosing to highlight this specific game sends a strong signal that they view next gen solely in presentation terms, not game design ones. You can say you weren't compelled by Wii U software all day (and you will) but it's ignorant to say they aren't at least trying.
You completely ignored the question/point in the quoted post, which actually says a lot.
 
Made Wii U look a bit better actually, what with the whole GBA-GameCube connectivity angle. Looked very cool though. Can that be streamed anywhere?

I don't think I'm going to be wowed anymore by graphics and I know thats how people judged these things.
 
Sony showed a piece of hardware that's probably around $500 that doesn't really have any appealing software that's going to sell anyone on the console.

I honestly think nintendo feels pretty good after watching that.

This is almost delusional. What games do Nintendo currently have that anyone can point at and say "this will sell consoles"? A HD remake of Wind Waker?

Smash Bros needs to be some seriously hot shit if they want to stay competitive for the next 5 or 6 years at least.

Snip.

I'll let you guys play console fanboys, I'll play and enjoy both
lawd.png

Man, it's amazing what 7 months can do. I thought that Zelda tech demo looked amazing last year and now it looks average in comparison :(
 
Same for me.

I like Nintendo consoles for Nintendo games.
I like Sony consoles for non multi games and some sony franchises.

I keep saying that :

- WII U will have a great September 2013-2014 season
- Pack in games at same price or a little price cut.
- PS4 won't be out in Europe this year
- PS4 will be 450 euros +, so, i'll wait for better games and <=400 console, late 2014.

Yesterday's conf was just too generic and there was no magic game that gave me chill, i'll wait for E3 to have a real opinion about PS4.

Jeez I hope you are wrong. Sony don't, please, I can't even wait until the Christmas, I can't imagine another three months later.
 
This is almost delusional. What games do Nintendo currently have that anyone can point at and say "this will sell consoles"? A HD remake of Wind Waker?

Smash Bros needs to be some seriously hot shit if they want to stay competitive for the next 5 or 6 years at least.



Man, it's amazing what 7 months can do. I thought that Zelda tech demo looked amazing last year and now it looks average in comparison :(

It still looks amazing to me. I never played Dragon's Dogma so I don't know how good the game is, but I pretty much always love Zelda games so obviously I'm biased. But the same goes for Infamous. If it's the same as PS3 graphics but with 60fps I'll be there excited with my card in hand.
 
The weak machine won the last three console generations. What changed in 2012?

The Dreamcast won its generation?

Plus, there's a danger in equating (or at least implying) correlation with causality. After all, when was the last time the console that launched first win its generation?
 
To keep my post short: The Wii U will do fine off of Nintendo's first party offerings plus the rare 3rd party gem, like the Gamecube and N64 before it. Games are what sell these video game consoles, even with the bigger push for multimedia capabilities. It will exceed the Gamecube's sales due to the bigger market, but never meet Wii's lifetime sales and hype.
 
I don´t think it´s really hard to understand, due to its genre (FPS) there are a lot of very similar games and especially in this gen that got waves and waves of FPS it´s not surprising that some people get tired from this genre and isn´t exactly something fresh except a new coat of paint.

The contrast to that is that Nintendo makes a lot of games in genres that aren´t supported by other publishers, this means there aren´t many similar games to begin with. To make an example Pikmin3. a) the last game releases in 2004 b) there aren´t many similar games. Therefore it´s no rocket science that it feels to be a much fresher experience. Also Nintendo in most cases only releases only 1 entry on a system, which is quite different to what happens for example tp Call of Duty, Assassins Creed. Even the critisised NSMBU series has only seen one entry per system so far.

I do kind of get what you're arguing, but it just ultimately seems rather flimsy. "I'm tired of all these other companies milking franchises and genres too much, they should take a lesson from Nintendo who milks their franchises just enough."
 
Weak machine with MOST games released for it won the last three generations.

So the Wii U is already out of running for that race.

How's it out of that running race when we only know of three or four games for PS4 that aren't ports?

Seriously, I don't think this supposed "weakest console" rule of thumb is that legible as a whole but this stuff is way too early to call at this point.
 
Doesn't affect anything for me. If I can pick one up for less than 200 and there's Mario Kart, Mario, Zelda, etc - I'll definitely get one.
 
I'm convinced that the Wii U will hold up just fine. I think we've gotten to the point where it's hard to make a bad looking game anymore. It's not likely going to be like last generation where the new generation games makes the old generation games hard on the eyes.

This gen and the next gen are literally times where you'd have to TRY to make a shitty looking game.
 
The Dreamcast won its generation?

Plus, there's a danger in equating (or at least implying) correlation with causality. After all, when was the last time the console that launched first win its generation?

So far, when Sony launched first with a headstart of more than a half year they won, when Nintendo launched first or in the same period it was Nintendo. Examples:

PSX vs N64 -> PSX
PS2 vs GC -> PS2

DS vs PSP -> DS
Wii vs PS3 -> Wii
3DS vs PSV -> 3DS
 
Anyone who says better is lying to themselves

We have been going through this same cycle since PSP vs. DS.

Sony shows the graphically superior machine, and a good segment of the gamers say Nintendo is toast.

But that is never the case, and more times than not, Nintendo trounces Sony.

We don't know the price yet, but this thing is likely to cost $499 US Dollars minimum. In today's economy, with all the other entertainment options out there, and the diminishing returns the upgrade in visuals will provide to the masses, I think Nintendo is feeling pretty good this morning.
 
ibjxCz37mFXzrX.gif


201j1q.gif


I'll let you guys play console fanboys, I'll play and enjoy both
lawd.png

Until we 100% know that footage is rendered in real time on a ps4, the Zelda demo wins as that was at least confirmed running on very early Wii U dev kits and interactive on a Wii U gamepad.

I think the Zelda demo isn't that far behind still.
 
So far, when Sony launched first with a headstart of more than a half year they won, when Nintendo launched first or in the same period it was Nintendo. Examples:

PSX vs N64 -> PSX
PS2 vs GC -> PS2

DS vs PSP -> DS
Wii vs PS3 -> Wii
3DS vs PSV -> 3DS

Well exactly, you can select whatever stats you want to prove whatever point you're trying to make. It's all meaningless.
 
Until we 100% know that footage is rendered in real time on a ps4, the Zelda demo wins as that was at least confirmed running on very early Wii U dev kits and interactive on a Wii U gamepad.

I think the Zelda demo isn't that far behind still.

Yep. And honestly, does anyone think the better graphics int he Capcom demo will add anything of benefit to gameplay? At all?

This isn't SNES->N64, or even PS1-->PS2. Except for big budget open world games, I will be surprised if graphical enhancements will add anything to gameply on the new XBox and PS4, unless developers actually invest in better AI (yeah right)
 
Top Bottom