Voice of Reason
Banned
Maybe "It is finished" references to the loop being finished. Maybe the Prophet foresaw all of this.
It's the point at which Elizabeth realises what's going on because of the nosebleed, but Booker is still repressing it. As for the idea of Comstock knowing that he's leading Booker onto the path of becoming him, I don't buy it. What happens after Comstock is killed doesn't lead to the baptism, but rather to the destruction of Comstock's existence.
It just doesn't fit into place.
Maybe "It is finished" references to the loop being finished. Maybe the Prophet foresaw all of this.
Maybe "It is finished" references to the loop being finished. Maybe the Prophet foresaw all of this.
Maybe "It is finished" references to the loop being finished. Maybe the Prophet foresaw all of this.
yea, from what i gather in those videos, Comstock may have been able to accurately see the futures as well thanks to the Luteces who were helping him for some reason. i still don't understand why the Luteces helped him tho.
dat paradox (sorry, i dunno if that term actually applies to this)
I just thought, "It is finished" was an appropriate final line for super religious arrogant Jesus freak kinda antagonist.
I also like that he drowned him.
He paid them.
Maybe "It is finished" references to the loop being finished. Maybe the Prophet foresaw all of this.
I just thought, "It is finished" was an appropriate final line for super religious arrogant Jesus freak kinda antagonist.
I also like that he drowned him.
I just thought, "It is finished" was an appropriate final line for super religious arrogant Jesus freak kinda antagonist.
I also like that he drowned him.
yea, from what i gather in those videos, Comstock may have been able to accurately see the futures as well thanks to the Luteces who were helping him for some reason. i still don't understand why the Luteces helped him tho.
I like how stupid he looked
![]()
Comstock did gain some info from the tears, it's how he was able to get the information about the 'prophecies'. He didn't get all of the information though, just took what he thought he needed, which is why he believed all of his prophecies would come true.
The female Lutece helped Comstock in order to be able to upgrade her tear viewer to a tear creator, in order to bring her brother/male clone over to her universe.
Her brother realizes how 'evil' Comstock is, and convinces her to bring Booker back in to stop Comstock's manipulations.
At some point, Comstock blows up Lutece's time machine while they are 'in' it, in order to make sure they rebel against him, supposedly killing them. But it seems more likely that throwing them into the time stream, which is how they are able to keep tabs on all of the Bookers' progress and appear/disappear seemingly at will.
I like how stupid he looked
![]()
I like how stupid he looked
![]()
I like how stupid he looked
![]()
I like how stupid he looked
![]()
I find that theory a bit confusing though. Isn't the origin of Comstock the baptism that happens way before the events of the game? How does it loop back around with his death?
Or was his criticism of Booker a way to make him and Elizabeth realize what's actually going on?
to create Comstock. he knew what was gonna happen. he even said "It's finished." before he died.
this guy replayed that part and explained it. pretty good explanation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XNJ5MmJRcI
edit: he also showed the images on the walls before you confront Comstock and it already predicted the future. such nice details.
This one actually confused me more...
I am not quite following how killing Comstock creates him? I was under the assumption that the baptism is what split Booker/Comstock.
I'm not on board with that theory either. This guys videos have been good other than that. But that makes zero sense to me. How would Booker return from all this and then somehow end up turning in to Comstock in another loop? Regardless, we know he doesn't because we see him get drowned.I find that theory a bit confusing though. Isn't the origin of Comstock the baptism that happens way before the events of the game? How does it loop back around with his death?
Or was his criticism of Booker a way to make him and Elizabeth realize what's actually going on?
Maybe "It is finished" references to the loop being finished. Maybe the Prophet foresaw all of this.
This one actually confused me more...
I am not quite following how killing Comstock creates him? I was under the assumption that the baptism is what split Booker/Comstock.
This one actually confused me more...
I am not quite following how killing Comstock creates him? I was under the assumption that the baptism is what split Booker/Comstock.
I'm guessing Elizabeth was telling herself to use Songbird to destroy the siphon instead of having Booker fight him (since he always loses).
quick question, did you choose the bird or cage for Elizabeth?
i chose bird.
Just read through this thread, some thoughts.
Old Elizabeth became what Comstock wanted her to become and in 1984 she rains fire upon New York. (Curious as to why it took so long, considering it looked like Comstock was near ready to attack "sodom" already.) Ok so at this point in time as she watches New York burn, she brings Booker to 1984. Why would she do this? The only explanation to me is that the Lutece's at somepoint came to the conclusion that they needed her help to break the cycle repeating over and over. If they went to old Elizabeth (it would have to be after the destruction of sodom was inevitable). and showed her that Booker had tried over and over again to try and save her, but Songbird always stopped him, she could realise how huge a mistake she had made giving up hope.
In the Bioshock universe not every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Some actions never change (coin flip), some actions do change but have no real consequence (the necklace), some actions are cosmic anomolies where universes converge and then branch off from (the baptism). It may have taken the Lutece's a very long time just to figure out the branching out point, let alone trying to stop it.
Slate's fate becomes rather ironic when you look back, he sees DeWitt as a hero, Comstock as dictator. He wants DeWitt the hero to kill him, but either way it's the same man killing him.
How the hell did Comstock get rich? In his version he was a farmer, which is probably a lie, merely suiting the prophet narrative. Curious as to where his money came from and how he met Lutece.
Oh and if you take the end of credit scene as our Booker + Anna. Then by killing himself, Booker stopped himself becoming Comstock, thus stopping himself selling Anna to himself, thus never having to kill himself. Which is the exact same explanation to Red Dwarf series 7.
I was curious about this as well. He goes from being a hired gun of Comstock to being a Vox sympathsizer (with an adopted Indian kid). He's a pretty nasty piece of work too, similar to Booker, who tries to find redemption.
quick question, did you choose the bird or cage for Elizabeth?
i chose bird.
Bird. Doesn't seem like it mattered though.
Forming a cult around yourself makes you wealthy. Look at Scientology
I also chose bird. It just created the illusion of choice, that we can choose our own path as Booker DeWitt but in the end we were just a pawn in the Luteces' plans.
Both the cage and the bird are the same in a way. Elizabeth was confined both by the cage that she was restricted to, and the bird (Songbird) that restricted her. They were both means of confinement.
Both the cage and the bird are the same in a way. Elizabeth was confined both by the cage that she was restricted to, and the bird (Songbird) that restricted her. They were both means of confinement.
to me, it was just one of many timelines he predicted would come true.
but you have a point. you guys should post comments so he will make an updated theory.
So why did Elizabeth code the note to herself instead of just, you know, writing it in plain engrish?
Both the cage and the bird are the same in a way. Elizabeth was confined both by the cage that she was restricted to, and the bird (Songbird) that restricted her. They were both means of confinement.
So why did Elizabeth code the note to herself instead of just, you know, writing it in plain engrish?
Yeah I have a feeling that guy is reading into that scene wrong. The more I think about it, it seems like Comstock's death was similar to Ryan's in B1. He was trying to make a point and the only was with his death.
BTW did they explain what was on the note? I'm guessing Elizabeth was telling herself to use Songbird to destroy the siphon instead of having Booker fight him (since he always loses).
to me, it was just one of many timelines he predicted would come true.
but you have a point. you guys should post comments so he will make an updated theory.
Yea I'm convinced he's reading that scene wrong. He's commenting heavily on the "self-criticism" of Booker towards Comstock and I think mistook this as evidence that Booker becomes Comstock through his self-loathing or something. As Elizabeth said, there are an 'infinite' amount of Comstock's, only killing the Prophet won't change anything.
The video did show me some things I totally missed. Like how the NYC bombardment scene takes place in 1983. Shit I can't believe I missed that.
The video did show me some things I totally missed. Like how the NYC bombardment scene takes place in 1983. Shit I can't believe I missed that.
Okay...
WHAT
THE
FUCK.
Damn..there are so many little things in Infinite that I feel like I missed.
Fuck, you could do a whole fucking literarry analysis on this fucking game. Man, O man. Fucking blows my mind that was '83 NYC.
This might be a very dumb question, but how was Comstock sterilized exactly?