I wonder if the fact that aside from Fink, every major character's death (Booker, Songbird, Comstock) was a drowning is important?
What is Fink based off of? The talk about paying employees in tokens to only buy fink products. I know thats based off of something in real life but I dont remember the guy's name.
It was in the late 1800s early 1900s. Its a direct copy in some way.Ralph Walmart?
Kidding
Kinda.
The thing about the nature of Bioshock Infinite is that basically anything can be explained away with vague, general things that don't make any sense. Why does Elizabeth have powers? Quantum entanglement, you say? Well, ok.
What is Fink based off of? The talk about paying employees in tokens to only buy fink products. I know thats based off of something in real life but I dont remember the guy's name.
Replayed it to grab all the collectibles and love what Booker says to Comstock as he kills him.
I understand why she changed her outfit but I still don't get why she cut her hair.Her little finger is still in Booker's world, so she has some sort of exceptional connection to other worlds.
Three posts in a row with the same answer.
As much as I dislike "oh no what have I done" and there wasn't time for it in the story, I still think it's a little strange that Elizabeth impaling Fitzroy with a giant pair of scissors only amounts to a change of clothes and the far-from-subtle "character development haircut." Again, overly busy and underdeveloped middle section.
The thing about the nature of Bioshock Infinite is that basically anything can be explained away with vague, general things that don't make any sense. Why does Elizabeth have powers? Quantum entanglement, you say? Well, ok.
It was in the late 1800s early 1900s. Its a direct copy in some way.
That's the thing with science fiction and fantasy.
It's like why the fuck do space ships in star wars make sound in space where it's a vaccuum and there is no sound? I don't know, it just fucking sounds cool. Why can Gandalf shoot fire out of his staff? Because wizards!
I understand why she changed her outfit but I still don't get why she cut her hair.
I understand why she changed her outfit but I still don't get why she cut her hair.
What is Fink based off of? The talk about paying employees in tokens to only buy fink products. I know thats based off of something in real life but I dont remember the guy's name.
I know it is a trope, but other than that there is no actual reason given. "I just killed some one, better cut my hair."
I know that. I want to know the tycoon that set that up.Couple of mining towns in the US during 1800s pulled this where there was no law really, and no worker rights whatsoever. Company paid them in "tokens" that paid for little more than a cot and warm meals. Was literally corporate slavery.
The thing about the nature of Bioshock Infinite is that basically anything can be explained away with vague, general things that don't make any sense. Why does Elizabeth have powers? Quantum entanglement, you say? Well, ok,
I know it is a trope, but other than that there is no actual reason given. "I just killed some one, better cut my hair."
I know it is a trope, but other than that there is no actual reason given. "I just killed some one, better cut my hair."
She's split between two realities (pinky).
We have to go deeper.
Oh yeah, I forgot all about her.
Man, the Vox Populi was a wasted opportunity.
That's another question I have.
She can travel to/create entire worlds, and everyone's just okay with it without questioning?
I honestly thought early on, she would be revealed to be God or something.
Her finger came off so she is in two universes at once.
Her little finger is still in Booker's world, so she has some sort of exceptional connection to other worlds.
Three posts in a row with the same answer.
As much as I dislike "oh no what have I done" and there wasn't time for it in the story, I still think it's a little strange that Elizabeth impaling Fitzroy with a giant pair of scissors only amounts to a change of clothes and the far-from-subtle "character development haircut." Again, overly busy and underdeveloped middle section.
We have to go deeper.
Oh yeah, I forgot all about her.
Man, the Vox Populi was a wasted opportunity.
That's another question I have.
She can travel to/create entire worlds, and everyone's just okay with it without questioning?
I honestly thought early on, she would be revealed to be God or something.
The idea that her finger being in 1 other reality thus existing in 2 realities being why she has the powers is silly. Why does she get the power to suddenly see ALL realities when she only exists in 2 of them. Back that up even further and ask why do a few dead cells in another reality even validate the idea that she is in two places at once. A human loses hair and skin cells all the time, so technically there are bits of Booker in multiple realites as well. When you cut off your finger your finger dies, it is not part of you anymore, it is dead. If I lost my leg on the beach of Normandy that doesn't mean I am in Normandy and California at the same time right now, that's ridiculous.
The issue doesn't bother that bad I can still enjoy the fiction even if Elizabeth's powers are a deus ex machina, but I'd love to find out they aren't.
At some point, I just shrug stuff like that off in a suspension of disbelief manner ("The city is floating? It's magic"). From a storytelling perspective, I'm more troubled by how some of the themes introduced early on seem disconnected from the things that happened in the end. Racism, for example, features heavily in the first half of the game, but by the end, the Vox Populi ended up being a slightly modified set of enemies to fight. Booker/Comstock doesn't seem to express any regret about his bigotry, outside of general comments about "the sins" he has committed.
The Rock, Paper, Shotgun review really nailed this problem when it described the game as ultimately being interested in the Elizabeth/sci-fi angle above anything else. Fortunately enough for me, I loved that stuff, even if there could have been a better balance between it and what happened early on.
I'm saying it's stupid. They did it because it is a trope, not for a real or interesting reason.You know it's a trope, but you don't understand why it happened? What?
If you know the trope then there's really not much else to explain. It's a fairly common visual way to show a character's acceptance of change.
She's split between two realities (pinky).
I'm saying it's stupid. They did it because it is a trope, not for a real or interesting reason.
Example, in The Walking Dead you cut Clem's hair so she won't get grabbed again.
I'm saying it's stupid. They did it because it is a trope, not for a real or interesting reason.
Example, in The Walking Dead you cut Clem's hair so she won't get grabbed again.
So do the old timey versions of modern songs come from musicians in Columbia hearing them through the tears or is there something more to it?
So do the old timey versions of modern songs come from musicians in Columbia hearing them through the tears or is there something more to it?
So do the old timey versions of modern songs come from musicians in Columbia hearing them through the tears or is there something more to it?
Why does he have a wrap on his hand?
Didn't have one on in mine :X
The airship ticket guy stabs Booker's hand if you don't draw your weapon on him. I remember seeing it in an old trailer and so I drew the weapon right away.
Also another question I have is, what value does any one reality really have when you explain that there are infinitely many playing out in infinitely many ways? In one reality Elizabeth is old and has already begun her rain of fire.
The point in the story in which you are drown by Elizabeth you are in who knows which reality, and she is effectively killing off one version of Booker. And that happens to be a Booker that didn't become Comstock in his reality so why does killing that Booker do anything to prevent Comstock? How can you change all realities at once when the game has already displayed that these realities aren't connected and don't exist in parallel(some realities are much further in time than others).
The more I think about it the more pointless everything seems, which often seems to be a point in stories about time travel, that you can't really change things.
If you do that, do you not have that moment where Elizabeth helps mend your hand, and consequently you don't have the cloth wrapped around it for the rest of the game?
Why does he have a wrap on his hand?
Didn't have one on in mine :X
Did you pull a gun on the suspicious clerk? If not, he stabs you in the hand.
If you do that, do you not have that moment where Elizabeth helps mend your hand, and consequently you don't have the cloth wrapped around it for the rest of the game?
It's a world where an entire city floats, I tend not to get too questiony about things
Because the Siphon/tower were draining her power. She could always see all dimensions but the tower stopped it or made it a bit hazy. When the tower was destroyed her consciousness suddenly synced with every infinite version of herself. You tend to learn things pretty quick when a million billion minds all think as one
Did you pull a gun on the suspicious clerk? If not, he stabs you in the hand.
No, I understand that her power was being harnessed by the siphon and that destroying the siphon gave her full control of her power. What I meant by:
"Why does she get the power to suddenly see ALL realities when she only exists in 2 of them"
Is why does existing in 2 realities grant you the ability to see all of them and not just the 2 realities you exist in. Not to mention the idea that she is existing in two realities because a lopped off pinky is enough to count as existing in two place is absurd.
I really don't like the explanation for Elizabeth's powers or that the existence of tears are never explained or why they're visible to everyone with being a much bigger deal.
The thing I like about multi-dimensional, time-travel stories is that within their framework everything makes sense and once you can adapt to their internal logic it all seems fairly straightforward. Loose ends really hamper my enjoyment and that the loose end being the mechanism by which all this stuff is predicated on really bugs me.