That's a seriously good looking game. Undoubtedly the best looking HD remaster yet.
Well there are multiple tendrils to the discussion, part of it being a discussion of how accurate the bloom is to real life (seems we agree on there), another part of it being whether this 'stylized' bloom fits in with the original game's wickedly original art style.
This third discussion started by you is about the original game having a weird vaseline DOF filter (true) and thinking the bloom is superior. I am not sure why the trade off would be one ugly thing for another ugly thing, but I prefer the original because it allows the full range of the primary colors to come through and doesn't have that washed out look.
Once this HD remaster goes indoors or the game is at night, of course, all meaningful comparisons very well end: this HD Remaster obviously massacres the original from that point on.
Heh, "Final Fantasy X & X-2" as well as "KH Final Mix" on both "Kingdom Hearts HD 1.5 ReMIX" & "Final Fantasy X / X-2 HD Remaster" looks way better than that.
I took this pic the other day..I don't know if this qualifies as an "irradiated wasteland of light" or not![]()
Wow. Well, sorry, they totally bastardized the appeal of the original art style. I'm still getting it, but this is definitely not the way it should look.
Why does the DoF look better in the gamecube version?
I took this pic the other day..I don't know if this qualifies as an "irradiated wasteland of light" or not![]()
As per my edited post, I was responding to the bit where you said the game is best viewed on a clear canvas, and I was just highlighting how ridiculous it is to infer that the HD remake isn't anything other than a MUCH cleared canvas.
Could it be even clearer without bloom? But of course. But if we're rating this on clarity, the HD version is much much cleaner and sharper.
My point is, like the bloom or not, it does much less to harm the image quality than the DOF effect. To say they are both bad is to say being punched and being murdered are both bad. Sure... but they aren't remotely equivalent.
I dont see anything wrong with it but this is gaf i guess, so this post doesnt surprise at all.....
Native 1080p, apparently. Still 30 fps, though -- probably because the animations were synced accordingly. No biggie, though -- will look hella crisp, all uncompressed on an HDTV.
Ah, OK.![]()
Bad picture. Does not portray the tropics correctly.
Now, that is more likely:
Aha, that makes everything in this conversation make a lot more sense.
As I clarified in the post you quoted, I prefer the colors to not look washed out in the outdoors, which is what the excessive bloom does. It's obviously a matter of opinion, but I think it really does harm the art style a lot to look that washed out.
I am sure ALL of NeoGAF will be pissed off you just grouped them with my own opinions.
Oh, come on. That second pic is not even close to how WW HD looks.
Listen, I believe that you and I concur on this being the best Zelda of all. I don't really care which version you prefer. That's the only opinion that really matters.
damn, that new dynamic illumination looks great.
Oh, come on. That second pic is not even close to how WW HD looks.
Why Nintendo?
Why?...
![]()
Did they even increase the character models? Link could use more polys around the edges. Looks decent though.
Yeah, that's what's most jarring about it. This art direction has a distinctly 2005, late PS2 through early 360-era vibe to it that it makes this game feel dated before release. Like some kind of Blue Dragon retread.I laugh everytime I see a post trying to justify the bloom by saying it looks like warm & sunny weather. FYI, warm & sunny weather doesn't make the world look irradiated. If you're trying to go for that bright and sunny look then implement some HDR lighting. Bloom is so last gen that it hurts to see it so prominently in 2013.
Because somebody clawed out your eyes.
This particular shot looks good... I've seen worse shots, but overall the game looks really pretty.
I also just noticed there are no black bars on cutscenes anymore.Huzzah
Heh, "Final Fantasy X & X-2" as well as "KH Final Mix" on both "Kingdom Hearts HD 1.5 ReMIX" & "Final Fantasy X / X-2 HD Remaster" looks way better than that.
Wind Waker HD is an improvement from earlier, overall, but still, the annoying bloom...
This is why I dont like the new look. The Wii U version doesnt even look like a cartoon anymore.
Funnily enough, the new lighting model (as evident by the lamp) is also representative of the change in art style. Can't say I'm overly hot on it, and definitely prefer the older look, but whatever.
Running at 1080p is a big boon for me. Looking forward to giving the HD build a run when I can spare some dosh.
HD version is an improvement, imo. Looks like claymation, albeit with super-silky animation. It's the way everything is lit, all nice and rounded.This is why I dont like the new look. The Wii U version doesnt even look like a cartoon anymore.