IndieStatik Founder apologizes for "inappropriate" comments to female game dev

Status
Not open for further replies.
Perhaps I have some sort of spider-sense or something because her responses (or lack of) in the conversation seem more damning to me than 'fuck off' would have been. It's blatantly obvious that she is not picking up what he's putting down.

I can't look down on her for an unwillingness to be confrontational. In my experience that's a pretty normal reaction for people being harassed in the moment.

Bro you have this thing called understanding social cues, what did I tell you about that?
 
Awwwwwyeaaaaahhhhh!

Nothin like a good'ol fashion Social Justice Warrior internet mob lynching!

I think it's almost been a week since the last one.

I always wonder though, and please try to enlighten my ignorant ass on this.

But has it ever occurred to you people that this matter is best settled in private? As in, maybe, just maybe that this incident is none of ya'll business?

That guy is an obvious asshole, and I doubt that anything can be done about that, but the amount of righteousness, and zealotry around here is sickening.

Ohhh and for the record, this guy represents himself and himself ONLY!

Not Gamers, not game journalists, not the gaming industry, so can it with the whole "I'm embarrassed to be part of X,Y,Z group" bullshit!
Well you could like read the thread and you would have answers to some of your questions.
 
This thread reminds me that today, while I was walking around downtown, I saw an instance of street harassment (which I always hear a lot about but rarely see, being a dude). I was walking along behind this guy with suspenders and a hipster beard when a girl walked past (this was a pretty busy sidewalk and I'm not entirely sure why she got singled out). He just opened a conversation with "Hi, you're so beautiful" or something like that and made a 180 degree turn to follow along behind her, continuing to talk at her as she basically refused to acknowledge him at all. I was sufficiently taken aback that they were a good 20 feet away (she had just kept walking, and maybe sped up a bit) by the time I thought to say anything; I do wish I'd had the presence of mind to at least loudly comment on the creepiness of it, add some social pressure or something.

The wrongness of the interaction was just so obvious - I felt incredibly uncomfortable just as an observer - that it strikes me as absolutely absurd to think that anything less than an enthusiastic response grants a license to continue. Really that's just a terrible thing to do to a random person on the street in the first place. And I'm getting that same feeling looking at these Facebook messages. This is so egregiously creepy that surely we are well past the point where the recipient has any obligation at all to punch through the awkwardness with some active rejection.
 
WvBHiRG.png


oh

bJVrBBe.gif


JAFFE WHY

Hah. Lol. Nothing serious, but lol.

Hah. Lol. Nothing serious, but lol.

Okay. You got your point across.
 
This is why I hate Twitter and I'd agree only with the thought that its a shit medium to have any kind of discussion, especially an emotional one, because people make assumptions and everything has to be read between the lines. People here are assuming the worst and I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt that he's not being a prick.

Its not your fault when you're attacked, but its your responsibility in how you respond to it - a responsibility to yourself. Rather than being passive when in an environment that you control, you should attempt to halt things.

Ignoring the slimy side of his comments and making light was taking a scalpel to work that a hammer would be far more effective with. I guess I just don't find a passive response to be a good one, not once a line has been crossed.

Dude. There is nothing to read between the lines. David Jaffe said in one of his tweets that she didn't keep it professional. That's not between the lines, those are the lines.
 
I mean, the idea that you'd take her saying she's "chugging along in [her] divorce" as a cue that she wants you to kiss her vagina shows a mind-bogglingly lack of awareness.
"So uh, I once read an article on the internet that suggested you might be vulnerable and looking for validation right now....".

Bro you have this thing called understanding social cues, what did I tell you about that?
Sorry. I need you to spell this sort of thing out very clearly, I'm not a mind reader.
 
Well, is not like they were not justifications (as justice) to woman second class citizens during the colonies. Surely, as a fellow writter, you can see how your answer can be troubling even if you are just responding a mostly ignorant commenter.

Yes, but that's the thing. Context.
 
I'm losing track of this conversation. Is she being accused of giving him rope to hang himself with or something? Like should she not have posted the images? I think maybe people want to say what he did isn't unforgivable, wrong, but not lynch worthy, but they (e.g., Jaffe) are going about it in the worst way. When you try to explain circumstance, you make it sound like you are shifting blame. Doing it aggressively makes this even worse.

If you want to others to keep perspective then instead of saying she could have prevented something that is ultimately his doing, it should be said that he the error he made was a human one and not one which resulted in great harm - something that can be apologized for in words.
 
This thread reminds me that today, while I was walking around downtown, I saw an instance of street harassment (which I always hear a lot about but rarely see, being a dude). I was walking along behind this guy with suspenders and a hipster beard when a girl walked past (this was a pretty busy sidewalk and I'm not entirely sure why she got singled out). He just opened a conversation with "Hi, you're so beautiful" or something like that and made a 180 degree turn to follow along behind her, continuing to talk at her as she basically refused to acknowledge him at all. I was sufficiently taken aback that they were a good 20 feet away (she had just kept walking, and maybe sped up a bit) by the time I thought to say anything; I do wish I'd had the presence of mind to at least loudly comment on the creepiness of it, add some social pressure or something.

The wrongness of the interaction was just so obvious - I felt incredibly uncomfortable just as an observer - that it strikes me as absolutely absurd to think that anything less than an enthusiastic response grants a license to continue. Really that's just a terrible thing to do to a random person on the street in the first place. And I'm getting that same feeling looking at these Facebook messages. This is so egregiously creepy that surely we are well past the point where the recipient has any obligation at all to punch through the awkwardness with some active rejection.

But there is some nuance here if for whatever reason you don't think social cues are a thing or you're more likely to empathize with the guy crossing the line.
 
Well you could like read the thread and you would have answers to some of your questions.

But if he reads the thread how will he cry foul about those yucky social justice warriors who expect basic emotional intelligence and mutual respect?
 
Should she not be free to handle it however she wants? If yes then why the fuck does it matter how she handles it?

You can follow that line of reasoning out to an extreme though. Just being a victim doesn't give you carte blanche to respond however you want. In this situation I think she responded fine, attempt to passively defuse the situation by not responding to the inappropriate sexual comments. Apparently afterwards a friend of hers suggested posting these comments for the public, as it does seem to be a problem in this industry, and exposing something like this can help correct that attitude. I don't think the guy should lose his career in the industry forever, but a hefty fucking timeout isn't beyond reasonable IMO.
 
I mean, the idea that you'd take her saying she's "chugging along in [her] divorce" as a cue that she wants you to kiss her vagina shows a mind-bogglingly lack of awareness.

It's rather insulting to her and in my opinion emotionally abusive if he saw her divorce as an opportunity for "it's clear she no longer has access to the D, I bet she'll totally go for me"
 
But there is some nuance here if for whatever reason you don't think social cues are a thing or you're more likely to empathize with the guy crossing the line.

The empathy is the part that always scares me the most. Feeling sorry for someone who is being a creeper because they got shot down just seems all kinds of wrong.
 
I'm guessing [URL="http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/877458309/indie-statik]the people that funded the kickstarter for his entire website (indiestalk)[/URL] might not have if they knew this was the type of man they were giving their money to.

GpJEckz.png


Well said alex.

If something I learned with the years is that ppl have different reactions to being drunked. Some really nice ppl can become assholes with alcohol in their blood. Also add depression to the mix and someone can reach that lows.

Going "I'm still a perfectly human being when drunked" is cool, but is not the same for 100% of people, even more when you consider the hole this person seems to be in.
 
I'm losing track of this conversation. Is she being accused of giving him rope to hang himself with or something? Like should she not have posted the images? I think maybe people want to say what he did isn't unforgivable, wrong, but not lynch worthy, but they (e.g., Jaffe) are going about it in the worst way. When you try to explain circumstance, you make it sound like you are shifting blame. Doing it aggressively makes this even worse.

If you want to others to keep perspective then instead of saying she could have prevented something that is ultimately his doing, it should be said that he the error he made was a human one and not one which resulted in great harm - something that can be apologized for in words.

Jaffe went on to say that sexual harassment is defined by being undesired, so the fact that she didn't shut it down after the first message means that it's not harassment.

wQh6w2Y.png
 
I do at least have to give this guy credit for one thing. "Have a great Sunday" is up there with "please respond" for pathetic hilarious thirst backpedals.
 
Jaffe went on to say that sexual harassment is defined by being undesired, so the fact that she didn't shut it down after the first message means that it's not harassment.

wQh6w2Y.png

I would think that the complete lack of acknowledgement multiple times is a clear as day signal that it was unwanted.
 
Yes, but that's the thing. Context.

And some of the Internet Social Activism has been pretty questionable and, worse, trivializing real issues (like Leigh Alexander bringing the "why people hated that I got drunk SEXISM" at the spotlight in every single opportunity).

Thats why I see a problem that somebody tries to be an asshole for "a greater cause". Ends doesn't justifies the means, and all.
 
The empathy is the part that always scares me the most. Feeling sorry for someone who is being a creeper because they got shot down just seems all kinds of wrong.

And yet it continually happens. There was a thread about a cop who went out of his way to look up a woman's address and leave a note on her car. And his actions were defended and not lauded as creepy. There are some people who will totally ignore the wishes and boundaries of others or sympathize with someone doing the same. I wish there weren't but it's a given, especially on the internet.
 
I'm losing track of this conversation. Is she being accused of giving him rope to hang himself with or something? Like should she not have posted the images? I think maybe people want to say what he did isn't unforgivable, wrong, but not lynch worthy, but they (e.g., Jaffe) are going about it in the worst way. When you try to explain circumstance, you make it sound like you are shifting blame. Doing it aggressively makes this even worse.

If you want to others to keep perspective then instead of saying she could have prevented something that is ultimately his doing, it should be said that he the error he made was a human one and not one which resulted in great harm - something that can be apologized for in words.

I don't think her actions were bad or wrong considering the situation he put her in but I am curious why not first tell him to stop then follow it up with taking it to the internet if any inappropriate behavior continues or if she feels her job has been damaged by turning down the advances of a member of the press.
 
Didn't Jaffe say something or another that ruffled feathers a couple years ago as well, or am I mistaken? I feel like this isn't the first time.
 
I suppose if I were in her shoes I would sit back and let the lewd comments roll, too. Let him dig his own grave.

I wouldnt be surprised if some people assumed that what happened here. The fact is that she probably panicked because sexual harassment on a professional environment is something real to her but not to most men and someone out there was going to criticize her reaction and put some of the weight on the blame to her.

It must be really jarring to her to see that this person is the guy that made God of War, a potential co-worker is actually putting a small part of the blame (1% is too much) on what happened to her, that pretty much justifies her initial measured response.

Didn't Jaffe say something or another that ruffled feathers a couple years ago as well, or am I mistaken? I feel like this isn't the first time.

"I tell you why, Twisted Metal, February 14th — Valentine's Day — it's a great, great romantic gift, if you have a lady friend and she really wants to know the best game ever, and she will give you a fucking blowjob, if you play this game. If you let her win Twisted Metal split screen, she will suck your dick."
-Jaffe

It honestly didnt bother me that much back then, but couple that comment with this comments and its hard to file this into the "Dumb shit you say in panic" file.
 
If she knew the guy had serious depression maybe that's why she didn't say anything. I mean who knows what his state of mind is like, he could be suicidal. Having this blow up like it did will force him to get help.
 
I'm not like gonna set my copies of God of War on fire or anything but insinuating that she wasn't being professional when the other person is repeatedly talking about his penis and kissing her vagina is one of the most willful exercises in missing the point that I've ever seen.
So you think Jaffe thinks the guy *was* being professional? I don't. I read those tweets as it being presumed the guy was a shithead and that we could all agree on that, and that David was advising being forthright about the line being crossed. And communicating that. And thinking that would be not only a good thing to do (as something he would teach his kids) but a professional thing to do as well, as in: applicable advice for when something like this happens in the business sphere.

I think it can be read in the worst possible way too, thats also a possibility. Its not the one I'm assuming though.
 
Perhaps I have some sort of spider-sense or something because her responses (or lack of) in the conversation seem more damning to me than 'fuck off' would have been. It's blatantly obvious that she is not picking up what he's putting down.

I can't look down on her for an unwillingness to be confrontational. In my experience that's a pretty normal reaction for people being harassed in the moment.

Would you keep asking if you could simply KISS a woman (on the cheek) let alone her vagina? Or would you take the hint?

Hey....heeeeey...can I kiss you?

Can I?

...I'm good at it.

Please?

Lemme kiss you.

Can I?


Sometimes what isn't said matters.
 
Well like I said, you could enlighten me, since this thread is now mostly about some other dude and what he tweets.
She didn't upload the tweets, her friend did. She initially just sent the convo to her friend with both names blurred. I'm not sure where you got the whole "I'm embarrassed to be part of X,Y,Z group" bullshit! thing from. Since I haven't really seen those posts in this thread.
 
And yet it continually happens. There was a thread about a cop who went out of his way to look up a woman's address and leave a note on her car. And his actions were defended and not lauded as creepy. There are some people who will totally ignore the wishes and boundaries of others or sympathize with someone doing the same. I wish there weren't but it's a given, especially on the internet.

tl;dr version: "Serial Killers are not bothered by other serial killers."
 
This thread reminds me that today, while I was walking around downtown, I saw an instance of street harassment (which I always hear a lot about but rarely see, being a dude). I was walking along behind this guy with suspenders and a hipster beard when a girl walked past (this was a pretty busy sidewalk and I'm not entirely sure why she got singled out). He just opened a conversation with "Hi, you're so beautiful" or something like that and made a 180 degree turn to follow along behind her, continuing to talk at her as she basically refused to acknowledge him at all. I was sufficiently taken aback that they were a good 20 feet away (she had just kept walking, and maybe sped up a bit) by the time I thought to say anything; I do wish I'd had the presence of mind to at least loudly comment on the creepiness of it, add some social pressure or something.

The wrongness of the interaction was just so obvious - I felt incredibly uncomfortable just as an observer - that it strikes me as absolutely absurd to think that anything less than an enthusiastic response grants a license to continue. Really that's just a terrible thing to do to a random person on the street in the first place. And I'm getting that same feeling looking at these Facebook messages. This is so egregiously creepy that surely we are well past the point where the recipient has any obligation at all to punch through the awkwardness with some active rejection.


And if she said "Fuck off" or "Leave me alone" or even "No thanks" He'd probably leave and think she's a bitch or even say it to her face. Or the the small potentiality that he would escalate the harassment.
 
And yet it continually happens. There was a thread about a cop who went out of his way to look up a woman's address and leave a note on her car. And his actions were defended and not lauded as creepy. There are some people who will totally ignore the wishes and boundaries of others or sympathize with someone doing the same. I wish there weren't but it's a given, especially on the internet.

That one almost seems like someone trying to copy some fantasy from a romcom and doing it in the worst way possible.

Didn't Jaffe say something or another that ruffled feathers a couple years ago as well, or am I mistaken? I feel like this isn't the first time.

Jaffe says something that pisses people off every few months. I know he means well but he is not good with words or getting his point across. I usually agree with the eventual blog post he writes explaining what he actually meant but his Twitter/Bonus Round comments are always off the cuff and not thought out well.
 
Jesus Christ. Does everything have to be made this male/female stuff? How about the dude is just a moron who said moronic things?
 
Would you keep asking if you could simply KISS a woman (on the cheek) let alone her vagina? Or would you take the hint?

Hey....heeeeey...can I kiss you?

Can I?

...I'm good at it.

Please?

Lemme kiss you.

Can I?


Sometimes what isn't said matters.

If the woman turns away and ignores you the answer is pretty obvious either way
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom