Guys, seriously how can i buy this? i'm from europe.
One option would be to buy it from ebay.com where Game Informer issues are being sold at normal price - but shipping might bite you in the ass, not sure how much this is worth to you though
Guys, seriously how can i buy this? i'm from europe.
It should, charging $40 for a glorified demo is fucking absurd.
Yeah, I'm hella worried looking at that sentence =/
We had four hours of exclusive hands-on time with Ground Zeroes, which we used to play through the main mission and experiment with extra modes.
One option would be to buy it from ebay.com where Game Informer issues are being sold at normal price - but shipping might bite you in the ass, not sure how much this is worth to you though
I really enjoyed mgs 2 and mgs3Fixed to show this was what many said and felt after 2, then we got 3.
I hope I can pick up this issue somewhere.
The wording isn't confusing at all. It really is quite overt, and clear cut. And obvious.
There's no room for interpretation if you read the context.
"play through". Four hours is enough time to "play through" the mission and try the extra modes. I think it's 100% clear.
I don't get how this is a problem though. 4 hours is in line with some (if not a lot of) FPSs campaigns these days.
I really enjoyed mgs 2 and mgs3
Mgs4 killed the series for me. Crap game
You're correct. I'm mostly a single player guy so I don't care much for multiplayer play value, which is why I made the comparison.Those games have hundreds of hours of play value in multiplayer, hardly a good comparison.
I do not wanna be that guy, but are they saying they played around with the main mission for 4 hours, or that they played THROUGH the main mission in 4 hours?
I have high hopes for this game since I've loved odd-numbered MGS entries while even-numbered entries have been shit.
MGS1, MGS3 = awesome
MGS2, MGS4 = bananomachines
I'm 36. Don't know what this has got to do with age.I dont know how old or young you are but MGS2 gets better every time you play it. I played it when it came out (I was 18) and played it again when I was 27 and enjoyed it realy realy much......
MGS4 is the opposite for me...how longer I play it how worse it gets.
MGS1>MGS3>MGS2>MGS4
I'm 36. Don't know what this has got to do with age. Nice try though.
I dont know how old or young you are but MGS2 gets better every time you play it. I played it when it came out (I was 18) and played it again when I was 27 and enjoyed it realy realy much......
MGS4 is the opposite for me...how longer I play it how worse it gets.
MGS1>MGS3>MGS2>MGS4
I don't dislike it myself, but there's a limit to how much I'm willing to endorse hyperbolic statements.A lot of people really dig Yoji Shinkawa's art, now you know that I guess.
Main mission is less that 4 hours long. "But no, Alienous, you can't possibly say that. Nobody knows". Nope. It's fact now.
Are you one of these people who thought a cut price 'tutorial' game would take longer than the entirety of MGS2?
complicated story is hard to understand when you are young
![]()
Excuse my photo editing skills.
![]()
I'm not even one of those people who think 40 dollars is "cut price," so no. Its just nobody else had said anything yet and I didn't want to risk spreading FUD.
It should, charging $40 for a glorified demo is fucking absurd.
This could easily be the offical box art!
But nope, Konami.. y u no use Shinkawa?![]()
they said they spent 4 hours playing it and never said it was 4 hours long. Learn to read.
Shinkawa is God.
Watch the NA cover artwork be some shitty 3D model, lol.
they said they spent 4 hours playing it and never said it was 4 hours long. Learn to read.
I played the shit out of the mgs2 demo that came with the zone of enders.
Its in the OP.![]()
That's not a bad choice for a cover. I think what they've shown about ground zeroes from a stealth gameplay point of view is atrocious and another example of "modern stealth", but there's a lot about the main game that I'm still interested in finding out. The idea of open world stealth really intrigues me.