There is at least one thread a month about how nobody takes risks with big budgets in gaming.
This is something different and many shit on it while the game is not even out.
This is why nobody dares to risk 200 million on a game out of the norm.
But how this risky? It's Bungie, chasing multiple GaaS trends, wearing Fortnite's color palate, all while Weekend at Berie's-ing an established (if old) beloved (though niche) IP to stir up the core.There is at least one thread a month about how nobody takes risks with big budgets in gaming.
This is something different and many shit on it while the game is not even out.
This is why nobody dares to risk 200 million on a game out of the norm.
Literally when people ask for risk in gaming is to make let's say a high budget JRPG (Legend of Dragoon?), a high budget Action Shooter (Parasite Eve?), a metal gear clone, some hack and slash like the old god of wars, etc etc etc, not yet another GaaS trying to milk the audience.There is at least one thread a month about how nobody takes risks with big budgets in gaming.
This is something different and many shit on it while the game is not even out.
This is why nobody dares to risk 200 million on a game out of the norm.
It is easier when you have no expectation of ever seeing the people you are speaking to face to face. Anonymity is a hell of a buff.Why don't they ever make these impassioned pleas for sanity to their peers in the industry to do better instead of always casting themselves as the victims?
There is something wrong if dev has to spend 200 million on a video game.
Going by reactions it doesn't seem to be the case.But how this risky? It's Bungie, chasing multiple GaaS trends, wearing Fortnite's color palate, all while Weekend at Berie's-ing an established (if old) beloved (though niche) IP to stir up the core.
It's a big investment, sure, but it's also the closest thing to a surefire ROI that a suit could dream up.
Do you realize you just listed sequels and remakes? That's not what the threads I mentioned talk about.Literally when people ask for risk in gaming is to make let's say a high budget JRPG (Legend of Dragoon?), a high budget Action Shooter (Parasite Eve?), a metal gear clone, some hack and slash like the old god of wars, etc etc etc, not yet another GaaS trying to milk the audience.
To prove my point, no one was shitting on Dark Souls when it was the new thing, quite the opposite, no one is shitting on physint, no one is shitting on Death Stranding (even if it's not for everyone) and that game is super unique compared to what is there, people are just tired of GaaS with smell of woke, those one will always get people riled up
As crazy as it seems, that indie game Schedule One for $20 US is getting more players and great reviews than most full budget games. On steam right now there's over 200,000 peaking at 450,000ish.Not the consumers fault you can't wow them. Either bad trailer or unimpressive gameplay in a crowded genre.
Devs/trailer contractor should have understood the industry esp bungie's prior games (trailers).
There will be other chances to impress the masses.
cancel culture mob getting cancelled so theyre now asking gamers to stop cancellingWe, as consumers are now being asked to give products a chance.....
What the fuck happened to our hobbie.
We, as consumers are now being asked to give products a chance.....
What the fuck happened to our hobbie.
When people beg, they are down to their last gasp. That's where were at in gaming (at least for Bungie/Concord).cancel culture mob getting cancelled so theyre now asking gamers to stop cancelling
I was giving names as examples not that I am expecting them to create remakes/remasters or sequels to them, but to take the risk as they took it back then with those types of games. For instance, create a brand new high budget JRPG that can compete or improve over the Giants like Persona series or Final Fantasy series.Why? How much would be ok?
Going by reactions it doesn't seem to be the case.
Do you realize you just listed sequels and remakes? That's not what the threads I mentioned talk about.
What's woke about marathon?
A former Concord developer (confirmed by mods) came foward and asked users to give Marathon a chance:
"Marathon is no different. Be kind, and be cool, as video games are meant to be fun."
"Marathon is another woke mind virus injector full of androgynous avatars endlessly pew-pew-ing via unappealing graphics and rote game design. Be naive and be submissive, as modern western video games are meant to be leftist propaganda."
Marathon isn't being made by Firewalk though.Remember when Picasso said "Give my next painting a chance!"?
True.
But I think we can all agree that it's pathetic for a bunch of grown men to still hold a grudge towards a game while the world moved on?
The haters are literally the ones keeping it alive.
That would be the same, indeed.I had the same thought when the Starfield review thread was still appearing on page one months after launch.
What does Firewalk have to do with Marathon though?Damn, i was so used to the industry calling me "inexcusable" for being "harmful" in their disclaimers or just "a mistake" for existing. And now i'm asked to show sympathy.
So awkward.
I wasn't talking about Firewalk in particular. Just the western industry as a whole. I don't give a shit anymore tbh.What does Firewalk have to do with Marathon though?
Fair, you're not wrong. I actually agree with you on that, to some extent.I wasn't talking about Firewalk in particular. Just the western industry as a whole. I don't give a shit anymore tbh.
Firewalk had X bungee devs. This one has been, apparently, hired back and is saying "marathon is no different". That's not a good sign and makes me assume decisions were made during Covid on this one too.Marathon isn't being made by Firewalk though.
Where did this come from?this one has been apparently hired back and is saying "marathon is no different".
The TLDR of the main post.Where did this come from?
How did you come to the conclusion that he now works at Bungie and that Marathon is the same as Concord?The TLDR of the main post.
Ah ok. I only skimmed through it. I don't need to listen to anything he says if he doesn't work there.How did you come to the conclusion that he now works at Bungie and that Marathon is the same as Concord?
That's not what he said at all.
All he said was that he worked on Concord and that they failed and that he doesn't want others to be punished for Firewalk's failure.
And that at the end of the day, all devs want to make a great game and in that regard, it is no different for Marathon.
The whole thread is based on an ex Concord devs thoughts yet somehow haters are the ones keeping its memory aliveI had the same thought when the Starfield review thread was still appearing on page one months after launch.
And who were the ones defending it?The whole thread is based on an ex Concord devs thoughts yet somehow haters are the ones keeping its memory alive
It's not haters its people laughing at the biggest flop in gaming history and people who defended it.
Here you go mate, could've spend 1 minute by going to the steam forum yourselfAnd who were the ones defending it?
You have been saying that for months but not a single quote to back it up.
Talking about Gaf.Here you go mate, could've spend 1 minute by going to the steam forum yourself
![]()
no, it didnt flop because its "wOkE" :: Concord™ General Discussions
It flopped because it was one of many hero shooters that doesnt have enough interesting gameplay. By blaming "dEi" or "wOkEness" you have given up your sense of genuine criticism and chose hatred instead. Are the character designs great? A good chunk of them, yeah. Not all, but on average its...steamcommunity.com
I just remembered what the Marathon character designs remind me of; that of oldschool WoW player characters with random mix of outfits that clash with each other because the stats are maximized, but they look ugly as hell.
At best i can try to say they look like fashion models in impractical clothes that you see in catwalks. What is with the complete lack of aesthetics?
I understand that they are literally synthetic bodies rebuilt after each death, but I felt like the characters are what gets made if you hit "randomize" on a character outfit creator.
you ask for quote, someone gives you a quote then you made up a new requirement "tAlKinG aBOut gAf"
I was askingyou ask for quote, someone gives you a quote then you made up a new requirement "tAlKinG aBOut gAf"
So…. here's a quote from Gaf:
Post in thread 'Is Concord being sacrificed in the current culture wars?'
https://www.neogaf.com/threads/is-c...e-current-culture-wars.1674531/post-269516241
are you happy now or are you just going to continue moving the goalpost?
i'm almost certain people defended the game on GAF -at the very least before it came out - and blamed the hate on crusaders against woke games
Why? How much would be ok?
Going by reactions it doesn't seem to be the case.
What's woke about marathon?
Did they defend the game? Or did they just not hate on the game?i'm almost certain people defended the game on GAF -at the very least before it came out - and blamed the hate on crusaders against woke games
before it launched? absolutely, people defended it in different discussions and contextsDid they defend the game? Or did they just not hate on the game?
Since I was one of the more outspoken Gaffers who enjoyed the game for what it was:before it launched? absolutely, people defended it in different discussions and contexts
hey, i'm not judging. there's no shame in defending a game you likeSince I was one of the more outspoken Gaffers who enjoyed the game for what it was:
All I said was that the core gameplay was solid and on a technical level did they a good job, but other than that I agreed with everything that was said about the game.
Does that classify as defending the game?
That's not what I asked.hey, i'm not judging. there's no shame in defending a game you like![]()
Ahh… just as I expected… goalpost: moved. he has to provide King Killjoy with the quote himself, okay mate