wsippel, stop trying to backtrack, sidetrack, and diffuse blame.
This is how it began:
wsippel said:
EDIT: Sorry, Haruhi is shit. Honest to god shit. If you think it has any redeeming qualities, you're wrong. Even the first episode of Horizon is a billion times better than anything even remotely Haruhi related could ever hope to be.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31527177&postcount=4531
This was what started the discussion in the first place. You calling Haruhi shit and Horizon's 1st episode being a billion times better than anything Haruhi-related.
And then your first exchange here:
Jexhius said:
This position seems a bit...extreme, even if you don't like Haruhi as a show. It's character designs, cinematography, photography, animation, script and editing are all far better than Horizon. I think Haurhi is a pretty weak series, but it's actually constructed very well.
The same cannot be said of Horizon, which is a random selection of scenes slotted together with no rhyme or reason.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31527564&postcount=4533
wsippel said:
They're not. Horizon definitely has better character designs. At least they're imaginative and not generic as fuck. Haruhi's script make just as much (or little (or even less)) sense, and Horizon definitely has better animations. Dunno about editing, don't remember Haruhi all that well. But it's probably worse in that aspect as well.
Also: Fuck rhyme and reason.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31527689&postcount=4534
That was the main point of contention. That Haruhi's script was comparative to Horizon's. Editing perhaps too.
So here you elaborate how bad Haruhi is:
wsippel said:
It is? Could have fooled me.
It's not. It's a really, really bad show, with terrible characters, a nonsensical script, terrible designs and no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31527850&postcount=4537
So Haruhi is a bad show with no redeeming qualities basically. And due to your prior comments, Horizon is a billion times better than anything Haruhi-related.
Another reply you made to another poster:
wsippel said:
It took me a piss to even remember who Kyon was. So no. No visible direction, no interesting story, no likable characters. Smugdouche might be an asshole, but at least I can relate to him. Kyon is a faceless loser. And Haruhi is just as abusive, but far less likable than even Louise from Zero no Something.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31528201&postcount=4545
Alright, so you mainly don't find the characters likable in Haruhi. Fine. However, "no visible direction" nor "interesting story" is highly debatable, yet it never came to that because of your following reply:
wsippel said:
The problem with animu these days, and the problem we have thread titles like these, is that people think there has to be more to it. There's not. It's entertainment. That's what it's supposed to be. If I have to think about a show, look for a deeper meaning that actually really isn't there, it failed at the one quality it's supposed to have. Haruhi fails. Evangelion fails. Madoka fails. All those shows are actually terrible, but they're so unbelievably bad that people try to see something in them that simply isn't there. I take tits and explosions over philosophical, metaphysical bullshit any day of the week. Because anime authors simply aren't clever enough to do that stuff, and anything I'd try to see in those shows would be my very own imagination. It's not my job to pat somebody's back for something I made up myself.
And by the way, I have nothing against KyoAni. They did FMP, which is one of my favorite shows, anime or otherwise, ever. That shit was honest. No bullshit, no deeper meaning - it was simply there to entertain the viewer, and it succeeded.
Then again, I guess I have a very different taste than most of anime GAF, so feel free to ignore my ramblings. What I wrote is just my opinion. I hate pretentious bullshit, and I consider many beloved anime shows pretentious bullshit.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31529004&postcount=4547
So you were defining "entertainment" and suggesting this is how entertainment should be by your definition to defend Horizon while practically insulting what you call "pretentious bullshit" as being terrible shows inherently because subtext is essentially non-existent and only imagined/create by the audience? That's not a good argumentative point and rather insulting with such a blanket statement, which deflected/sidetracked the current discussion since your argument only isn't about how bad Haruhi is now, but also, how bad it is due to your value of "entertainment" you're judging Haruhi with. It's fine you don't like Haruhi or think it's bad even (I don't like Haruhi that much either), but I think it's a weak argument to make why Haruhi is a bad show if you simply hate shows with subtext.
And when confronted about your recent accusation:
wsippel said:
I'd never whine or cry or pull some card when it's about opinions. Don't mistake my incoherent ramblings for actual emotions.
you try to diffuse blame by stating that, and from your previous comment:
Then again, I guess I have a very different taste than most of anime GAF, so feel free to ignore my ramblings. What I wrote is just my opinion. I hate pretentious bullshit, and I consider many beloved anime shows pretentious bullshit.
You were trying to lessen blame for your opinions. Which is it? Because if you really didn't care, you had no argument to begin with.
And then our exchange:
wsippel said:
I'm fine with anyone who's honest enough to say "you know, Haruhi is shit, but I like this or that about the show". That's fine. I actually wrote that I like Horizon even though I know it's shit. I have no problem admitting I like Queen's Blade for crying out loud, but I'm old enough not to make up any excuses. I know it's a terrible show. But it still entertains me. Saying "the shitty show I like is better than the shitty show you like, because my shitty show actually isn't shitty" - even though it actually is just as bad - is something I don't like.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31531129&postcount=4573
Except Haruhi doesn't suffer from the same problems as Horizon.
Geneijin said:
Except the shitty show I like is better than the shitty show you like because my shitty show actually isn't as shitty as the show you like, so they're not equally bad shows. Same with "good" shows. In this case, you think Haruhi is shit and Horizon is shit, but now you're going back on your earlier argument:
So which is it: Haruhi is shit and Horizon is a billion times better or is Haruhi and Horizon equally shitty?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31531934&postcount=4581
With you ignoring the question:
wsippel said:
They're both terrible in the writing department, but Horizon has bigger boobs and more explosions. That alone makes it a billion times better by default.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31532145&postcount=4585
Which says nothing about the writing. You're sidetracking the argument.
Also, there's this statement you made:
wsippel said:
No, that's actually not the case at all. And it wasn't my point. My point was that people compare stuff they don't like to stuff they like, claiming the stuff they like is better, without actually thinking about it. In their opinion, it's not better because it's actually better, it's better because they like it. And that's rather one dimensional. Stuff isn't good because you like it. Maybe you like it because it's good. That's rare, though. Especially in art or entertainment. You usually like stuff because it touches you in some way. And that's cool. But that's also all there is to it.?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31532479&postcount=4591
Which is pretty asinine and detracting from the argument even further because now are you trying to imply those who like Haruhi's writing more or thought was better than Horizon's is because they like it, so which in turn means it's good writing?
And then this is where the argument stops:
wsippel said:
How the fuck am I supposed to know? Read the stuff you quoted: I didn't read the subtitles. I have no idea what was said or how terrible the writing was. And I didn't care. I had my fabulous character designs to look at, and that was good enough. Considering it doesn't get much worse than Haruhi's writing, it doesn't really matter, though. At least Horizon doesn't even try to come across believable. Maybe the problem was the realistic setting or something, maybe it would have been better with a gay incubus, lesbian witches and a flying blackface serving curry, but it tried to be realistic at times, then complete asspulls happened without any rational explanation whatsoever, and those weren't even fun or funny. That's bad writing. I can deal with a few minutes of braindead exposition and random shit happening as long as it's awesome.
And again, that doesn't mean I consider the writing in Horizon better. All I say is that I can deal with a stupid script as long as the end product entertains me. Maybe some people like the unfunny randomness in Haruhi. Maybe some people like something else about the show. And a lot of people like the show, so there's obviously something to like. Whatever it is, I either didn't notice it or it didn't entice me.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31533480&postcount=4600
So you really had no argument to begin with and sidetracked yourself.
wsippel said:
I didn't start the argument about writing quality. I don't even care, in case you didn't notice (especially not about dialogue, as that's a) only part of the writing and b) very dependent on the translator). It was all about this one sentence: "You can be self-aware and well made, like Haruhi." - and I personally consider that show neither all that self-aware nor well made (in the story department). Details about the writing outside the context of self-awareness are therefore almost entirely irrelevant.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31534057&postcount=4611
wsippel said:
It isn't, because I don't compare the writing. I called the writing in Haruhi bad. I can judge that part, because I actually watched that show and did read the subtitles. And it is bad. That has nothing to do with Horizon's writing. And it's also not important if Horizons writing is any better or worse, either. I never argued either way, and it's not relevant to the point I made: Haruhi is not better in the "self-awareness department". You don't need a single sentence to realize that Horizon is highly self-aware. They get that point across within a few minutes, without any character speaking even a single sentence.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31534325&postcount=4613
So what were you even trying to argue?
wsippel said:
I'm not sidetracking, my initial post was a response to this:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=31525000&postcount=4521
As you can see, it was always about comparing self-awareness and overall presentation, not writing in particular. I guess I should have made that clearer in subsequent posts.
Yes, you were. Your failure to not address that until now, and then, claim this was your initial argument all along is sidetracking whatever began this argument in the first place.
I simply consider the writing in Haruhi so bad that it can't get much worse. Maybe Horizon will manage to achieve that feat in the end (it's a bit early to tell after just one episode - and I doubt it, as I've written in the post you quoted), but Haruhi already set the bar quite high - or low, depending on how you look at it.
Then you have low standards because it isn't that bad and isn't as insensible as you make it to be. Especially never as offensive as Horizon.
I don't really get your point. I'm fine with bad writing as long as the show is still overall entertaining. And I didn't consider Haruhi entertaining - it didn't have a good plot and there was nothing there to offset that shortcoming. To me, at least. I don't see what's wrong with that?
And you're doing exactly what you claim "pretentious" viewers of doing with Haruhi, Madoka, and Evangelion. Bad = something you dislike instead of good = something they like, which doesn't describe the quality of the show at all.
So again: It doesn't matter if Horizon's writing is better, as the initial point of the whole discussion wasn't writing, but self-awareness. Horizon is more obviously self-aware, right? And there's also no arguing it's well made I guess.
No, it wasn't. Don't start this revisionist crap. It's only about it now because you're sidetracking the discussion yet again.