LOL
Ok. In the stats you quoted, Rose shoots a laughable .396 in the playoffs but he isn't inefficient? TS is stupid to judge Rondo by because he doesn't shoot alot of shots.
Every great PG who actively looks to get others involved has a semi-high turnover percentage. Thats a cherry pick. Rondos assist to turnover ratio is also much much higher than Roses. See I can do it to.
The last bit is still a head scratcher to me. I can't really think of one team that would actively pursue a PG who averages 9-24 shooting and can barely run an actual offense. He might be good as a second option, he's alot flashier for sure but he can never be the best scorer on a championship team that isn't relatively stacked. Nor should he try to be because in general, teams with a PG as the best player/scorer never win. Otherwise, any coach wanting to run a competent offense would want Rondo over Rose.
Stupid argument? Lulz. Rondo outperforms him head-to-head(sometimes even monster games like that triple double) and against the rest of the league but somehow TP is better for reasons you won't even trouble yourself to list. And my argument is stupid? Let logic set you free.....the status quo isn't always right.
And Rondo is easily a franchise PG. Like I said earlier, you guys try way too hard.