He said Lakers couldn't beat SAS cuz they blew us out twice.
My point is that SAS blew out OKC twice in a row, then won the 1st two in the playoffs (one a blowout) and OKC still rolled them.
Regular season doesn't mean as much as he thinks it means, is my point. If OKC could lose 4 in a row to Spurs before turning it around, why couldn't Lakers? I never feared SAS in the playoffs (go back through my posts if need be) cuz I thought in a playoff setting they were perfect for Lakers to beat. Thought the opposite of OKC; that they would roll Lakers.
I said we have match up nightmares with the spurs and they beat as terribly in the regular season. On our home floor and theirs. We can't guard 3 points shooters, can't guard penetrating pgs and can't force turnovers and therefore reduce ball movement. We ain't getting past the spurs as is.