I wouldnt be surprised if France loses to Algeria
Dafuq? Algeria will go out against Germany, anyway.
I wouldnt be surprised if France loses to Algeria
Tactical intelligence, not so much though. Hazard is very good in possession, like the ball is glued to his shoe (like Dembele), a better dribbler, but he's less "direct" (than both Mertens and Mirallas) and he isn't the fastest of the bunch. He does have the ability to draw up to 4 players closer, and outplay them with a simple pass, freeing space for his teammates.
Tactical intelligence, that's where Debruyne comes in. When he's on his A game, it's difficult to beat us because we will score at least once or twice (and our defense/goalie aren't in the habit of conceding many goals). One of the main problems in the WC so far, is that Van Buyten is playing, instead of Vermaelen (injuries) and he is terrible at setting up the game from the back. Bringing us to the real problem, we don't have any good left and right backs, so there are two central defenders playing there. Otherwise, Vertonghen could just take Vermaelen's place in the centre.
The biggest strength is that we have guys on the bench that can make an impact. Be it Mertens, Mirallas, Origi or Fellaini. It's not luck that they won the past three matches in the last 15 minutes.
Pretty much. The Algeria game confirmed for me that Wilmots isn't the right man for these huge talents.
Agreed about Debruyne, but I see him more as a forward center component. Van Buyten played a good match against Korea honestly.
I can't laugh, my team is also returning home in shame
I think Mexico historically has based most of its succes in confidence/lack of it.
Usually when we play as the underdogs we perform really well. I remember before the 98 world cup, the team played a series of matches afainst european sides in Europe, i think they even lost to some second division teams then, no one was expecting much from the team but they managed to tie Netherlands and Belgium after being 2-0 after half time with both teams.
True.
But in the past, the "better" performances of Mexico in world cups (without being host) have come from the worst qualifiers. USA 1994, for example. Mexico was shit in qualifiers, got knocked out by Bulgaria in penalties, or France 1998 (4 wins, 6 ties, in qualifiers) got knocked out by Germany 2-1 (Mexico was winning at the beginning 1-0).
It's Mexico we're talking about. We're always doomed. The same was said in 2010, etc. It'll be like always, we'll have a good game, one or two ties, and we'll be out in the next round for sure. Boring, to be honest.
Well, his tournament is over.
Well, his tournament is over.
Was there an injury report or are you just assuming that from the gif?
Fractured fibula.
Was there an injury report or are you just assuming that from the gif?
No games today? Oh well here is pink bikini girl.
![]()
I'm so nervous... Please Chile don't beat us. You can have Russia 2018. Just let us win this time. There will be riots if we lose. Your players will never leave the pitch alive.![]()
But I'm sure they weren't waiting with torches and pitchforks by the runway.
![]()
Fractured fibula.
Wait,
Kompany AND Bore are out? Shit. That hurts.
I really really want Mexico to beat Holland but the impact a hypothetical Costa Rica vs. Mexico match would have in both countries' cultural conscience makes me worry it.
Still, go Mexico!
US has to be the luckiest team in the WC.
US has to be the luckiest team in the WC.
US has to be the luckiest team in the WC.
That would be Argentina or Colombia.
world cup draw
Economic collapse for both teams if that happens.
That would be Argentina or Colombia.
world cup draw
US has to be the luckiest team in the WC.
US has to be the luckiest team in the WC.
How would you guys rank the round of 16 teams?
Brasil
Colombia
Netherlands
Costa Rica
France
Germany
Argentina
Belgium
My predictions at least.
US has to be the luckiest team in the WC.
Ghana have been eliminated from the tournament at the group stage
Fifa has revealed it was ready to pay Ghana's players their World Cup bonuses directly and deduct it from the Ghana Football Association's prize money.
It is sad that we end up with a story about a strike, where the players won't play unless they receive their money
Jerome Valcke Fifa secretary general
After Ghana's players boycotted training in protest at not receiving their money, the country's government flew $3m (£1.8m) in cash to Brazil.
Fifa secretary general Jerome Valcke described the situation as sad.
"The players have the right to receive their money but it would be much easier to do this by bank transfer," he said.
"The fact that the money came in cash is also sad because I was ready to sign a letter, as long as I had a copy of the agreement between the national association and the players, that the money would be paid by Fifa by bank transfer into their personal accounts.
"Fifa would have made sure to deduct the players' money from the prize money paid to the national association."
While Ghana have now gone home from Brazil, having been eliminated from the tournament at the group stage, another bonus row is ongoing involving Nigeria.
The Super Eagles, who are due to meet France in the last 16 on Monday, refused to train on Thursday over fears they would not receive their bonus payments from the Nigerian Football Federation, the BBC understands.
Ghana players at the World Cup in Brazil
Fifa has revealed it was ready to pay Ghana's players their World Cup bonuses directly
It prompted Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan to speak to senior players on Friday to assure them that the money will be paid.
There was a similar issue with Cameroon, whose players refused to board their plane to South America because of a row over appearance fees. They arrived for the World Cup a day later than scheduled.
The issue is not a new one - Togo went on strike over bonus money at the 2006 tournament in Germany and Fifa was forced to intervene.
And Valcke says that something needs to be done.
"Future World Cups will ask the national associations to provide us with their agreements with their players to make sure that this kind of episode does not happen again," he said.
How are they luckier than Belgium? Argentina? France? Colombia?
The US was in a tougher group than any of those teams. They beat Ghana, tied Portugal, and lost to Germany. There are several descriptors I can think of to paint the US team in a negative light, but "lucky" isn't one of them.
US has to be the luckiest team in the WC.
I'm so nervous... Please Chile don't beat us. You can have Russia 2018. Just let us win this time. There will be riots if we lose. Your players will never leave the pitch alive.![]()
Then what should I base them on? History? Mexico has never reached the quarter final that wasn't on Mexican soil. Group stage? They weren't that impressive. Were lucky they could draw against Brazil and could make the goals against Croatia, because the Croatians had to win and therefore didn't have sound defensive lines.
Fifa 'tried to stop' Ghana bonus row
Fifa has revealed it was ready to pay Ghana's players their World Cup bonuses directly and deduct it from the Ghana Football Association's prize money.
Make yours.![]()
USA did not deserve the win against Ghana but this is football and thus anything is possible. That being said Argentina is the luckiest team and it will be the world cup winner but not by luck.
Moral victories mean nothing. Only the final score counts. The USA beat Ghana.
Last World Cup it was Togo, this World Cup it's been Cameroon, Ghana and now Nigeria are getting stroppy over bonus payments.
Are the African FA's so shady that the players are scared of being screwed over or am I missing something?
Zico paid the Dutch a visit.