Los Angeles Clippers: F
The problem here isn't that coach and team president Doc Rivers traded for his son. The problem is that the Clippers gave up real assets to get a player who isn't one, as evidenced by both the Pelicans and Celtics moving him so readily. By taking on Austin Rivers' salary in this trade, the Clippers did Boston a favor. So why on earth are the Celtics getting the second-round pick, too?
There's also a strong case to be made that Bullock, 23, is the better prospect than Rivers. Rivers is more than a year younger, but Bullock has actually produced at near replacement level, something Rivers has yet to do in the NBA. Given the Clippers' desperate need for a 3-and-D backup on the wing, their willingness to give up on Bullock so quickly -- during a season where he's making a strong 38.5 percent of his 3-pointers -- is difficult to understand.
Rivers is probably a better player than he has shown this season. The difference between his performance now and in 2013-14, when he took a solid step from one of the worst rookie campaigns in recent memory, basically comes down to 3-point shooting. Rivers hit 36.4 percent in Year 2, giving him a legit NBA skill, before dropping to 28.0 percent in just 50 attempts this season.
His true talent level likely lies somewhere in between. Of course, when a player starts as far below replacement level as Rivers did as a rookie, even a solid step forward isn't enough to be a useful rotation player. Because of his age, it's too early to give up on him as a prospect. At the same time, it's also too late to be giving up valuable pieces for him.
The other issue at play here is Austin Rivers' difficulty evaluating his own talent. If we're going to give him the benefit of the doubt that he will regress to the mean, we have to do the same for Jordan Farmar, who will apparently be waived today. Farmar's performance this season is out of line with the rest of his post-Lakers career, yet the Clippers weren't patient enough to keep him on the roster as a third point guard.
There's a natural tendency on the part of coaches, who are so emotionally invested in their team, to want to make drastic changes based on small sample sizes. Part of the reason teams separate GM and coaching duties is so the front office can maintain a more detached perspective that seems to be badly lacking with the Clippers.
The upside is that trading two players and waiving one creates three open roster spots for the Clippers, who previously had 14 players on their roster. As noted by Dan Feldman, it doesn't appear the Clippers can fill all three spots yet because they are hard-capped at $4 million above the luxury-tax line, but they should be able to sign two players now (possibly Robinson, who briefly played for Rivers in Boston) and a third at the trade deadline. Such flexibility has value. The question is whether we still trust Rivers the GM to correctly fill those spots.