BadAss2961
Member
I predict Joey Crawford will be summoned for Game 2.Also this is some OKC-type advantage on the FT line. It won't happen again
I predict Joey Crawford will be summoned for Game 2.Also this is some OKC-type advantage on the FT line. It won't happen again
33 FT's to 13.
Favoritism? haha sure...
David West is the key. Miami has no answer for him
Yeah, I agree to an extent. But that's why I think game 2 is the important one. If they get cocky and lose 3 or 4, ok, fine, they lost a road game. Last year those cocky losses were at home, which was the killer.I don't think you want the Pacers to start suddenly believing in themselves again, like earlier in the year. To me, the Heat continue you show you kinks.
Lebron will just try to score more points.
Amazing that dude never gets hurt.
33 FT's to 13.
Favoritism? haha sure...
Yeah, I agree to an extent. But that's why I think game 2 is the important one. If they get cocky and lose 3 or 4, ok, fine, they lost a road game. Last year those cocky losses were at home, which was the killer.
Old man pierce will suit up for the pacers?Yeah, Game 2 is big. Lebron is going to make a huge impact on everything like the 49 point game.
I would be using Battier, wtf he was a beast last year, it's not like he doesn't play D.
Old man pierce will suit up for the pacers?
Maybe he will want to play for Phil and with Melo...Three more L's until Bron bron takes his talent elsewhere, peace
LolThree more L's until Bron bron takes his talent elsewhere, peace
cry more. that is on miami for not playing smart.
Hahahahahah noThree more L's until Bron bron takes his talent elsewhere, peace
Hahahahahah no
I'm watching the 2011 ECF game 1 against Chicago to help calm me down. That Bulls team was 1000000% overall better team than these fraud Pacers
Homie we had Arroyo and Zydrunas Ilguaskas starting back then.....They arent, cry and worry more lol. Heat were more fresh back then,now with like the 4th attempt at a finals they will be gassed.
Hahahahahah no
I'm watching the 2011 ECF game 1 against Chicago to help calm me down. That Bulls team was 1000000% overall better team than these fraud Pacers
I disagree...I think 2011 Rose>Paul George now. Rose was quick as hell..maybe quicker than Westbrook. He can penetrate with ease even with the Heat defense and can create his own shot. Deng was great at creating his own shot as well. Boozer=West as far as offense is concerned but I would give Boozer the edge. Noah was still a bit raw but was a better defender than Hibbert.I still think Miami wins but the Bulls team wasn't nearly as good as Indy. They have 4 or 5 guys who can create their own shot and an inside presence. They also have multiple guys who can guard Bron and Wade 1on1. Miami's trapping style defense does not work as well when there are several guys who can get the ball
I disagree...I think 2011 Rose>Paul George now. Rose was quick as hell..maybe quicker than Westbrook. He can penetrate with ease even with the Heat defense and can create his own shot. Deng was great at creating his own shot as well. Boozer=West as far as offense is concerned but I would give Boozer the edge. Noah was still a bit raw but was a better defender than Hibbert.
This tough guy....Am I supposed to care about something that happened in the past that you use to make yourself feel better?
I disagree...I think 2011 Rose>Paul George now. Rose was quick as hell..maybe quicker than Westbrook. He can penetrate with ease even with the Heat defense and can create his own shot. Deng was great at creating his own shot as well. Boozer=West as far as offense is concerned but I would give Boozer the edge. Noah was still a bit raw but was a better defender than Hibbert.
Am I supposed to care about something that happened in the past that you use to make yourself feel better?
Btw how was I roasted? Did he back up his crappy post with stats and shit?
I disagree...I think 2011 Rose>Paul George now. Rose was quick as hell..maybe quicker than Westbrook. He can penetrate with ease even with the Heat defense and can create his own shot. Deng was great at creating his own shot as well. Boozer=West as far as offense is concerned but I would give Boozer the edge. Noah was still a bit raw but was a better defender than Hibbert.
I disagree...I think 2011 Rose>Paul George now. Rose was quick as hell..maybe quicker than Westbrook. He can penetrate with ease even with the Heat defense and can create his own shot. Deng was great at creating his own shot as well. Boozer=West as far as offense is concerned but I would give Boozer the edge. Noah was still a bit raw but was a better defender than Hibbert.
This is complete reductionist drivel. This player-by-player breakdown of teams never gets at the core of what makes a team better than another. In terms of defensive efficiency, this Pacers team in top form is virtually unparalleled in NBA history. They also have multiple playmakers, superfluous interior passing, superior three point shooting, and a deeper bench than that Bulls team had. They also have significantly more playoff experience and is going up against a decrepit, smaller Heat team.I disagree...I think 2011 Rose>Paul George now. Rose was quick as hell..maybe quicker than Westbrook. He can penetrate with ease even with the Heat defense and can create his own shot. Deng was great at creating his own shot as well. Boozer=West as far as offense is concerned but I would give Boozer the edge. Noah was still a bit raw but was a better defender than Hibbert.
In terms of defensive efficiency, this Pacers team in top form is virtually unparalleled in NBA history. They also have multiple playmakers, superfluous interior passing, superior three point shooting,
Trying to dumb down your argument? What's to dumb down? You're the one making things more complicated than they need to be. Your argument is already simple. No need to dumb it down. You believe there is an arbitrary line that warrants violent retaliation. I say there isn't. Even if someone makes racist comments or threats to another player, I still don't agree that it should be answered with violence. And in the case of an actual threat to another player, if the player seriously feels threatened then get the authorities involved. How would me being okay or not with those things change that? It doesn't. You're just trying to change the argument into something else.Quit making false equivelncies, it makes you look silly.
And quit trying to dumb down my argument into a more easily beatable straw man.
So again, answer the question, you are ok with with racist comments, threats to other players, and verbally abusing people about life altering and devastating tragedies?
Just yes or no is all that is needed.
And frankly I just don't understand how you justify intentional fouls with your bleeding heart feelings toward violence.
You're just trying to change the argument into something else.
There is a difference between advocating violent retaliation to verbal abuse and being ok about a singular, minor, physical retaliation as a response to extreme verbal abuse, as is the case with CP3 and that singular incident.Trying to dumb down your argument? What's to dumb down? You're the one making things more complicated than they need to be. Your argument is already simple. No need to dumb it down. You believe there is an arbitrary line that warrants violent retaliation. I say there isn't. Even if someone makes racist comments or threats to another player, I still don't agree that it should be answered with violence. And in the case of an actual threat to another player, if the player seriously feels threatened then get the authorities involved. How would me being okay or not with those things change that? It doesn't. You're just trying to change the argument into something else.
Tell me where I said teams should have equal free throws? Much like the above poster you have a knack for making assumptions about people and then arguing said assumptions.He pulled the same thing with me during the Thunder series, after making an arbitrary and ignorant claim that teams should receive a statistically similar number of free throws. When several others (including me) pointed out the absurdity of that claim in light of the plethora of factors that affect that outcome, he kept moving the goal post. He brought up an entirely irrelevant previous conversation about Rajon Rondo (who sucks at free throws but had nothing to do with the topic at hand), used diminutive language in attempting to address me (though I'm one of the older cats on these forums in terms of age), and made up at least two separate and absurd straw man arguments that I certainly never did in attempt to feel like he "won" some debate that existed solely on his mind.
That last part in particular should sound plenty familiar to you in light of how he's been completely dominated in you current discussion regarding smack talk and intentional violence, yet keeps making stuff up and shifting those goals posts. I suggest you do what I did and cease communicating with him. Feeding a troll only gives them exactly what they want and encourages further descent down a rabbit hole of stupidity.
Back on topic, Heat fans can pretend otherwise, but they received a grade A butt whooping today. The score doesn't even reflect how bad they looked. Of course, the probably "weren't trying," right?
You're right and seeing his post right after yours just proved it. Won't waste anymore keystrokes on replying to him on this particular topic. If he feels like he somehow "won" something for having the last say, no matter how flawed his arguments were, then good for him.He pulled the same thing with me during the Thunder series, after making an arbitrary and ignorant claim that teams should receive a statistically similar number of free throws. When several others (including me) pointed out the absurdity of that claim in light of the plethora of factors that affect that outcome, he kept moving the goal post. He brought up an entirely irrelevant previous conversation about Rajon Rondo (who sucks at free throws but had nothing to do with the topic at hand), used diminutive language in attempting to address me (though I'm one of the older cats on these forums in terms of age), and made up at least two separate and absurd straw man arguments that I certainly never did in attempt to feel like he "won" some debate that existed solely on his mind.
That last part in particular should sound plenty familiar to you in light of how he's been completely dominated in you current discussion regarding smack talk and intentional violence, yet keeps making stuff up and shifting those goals posts. I suggest you do what I did and cease communicating with him. Feeding a troll only gives them exactly what they want and encourages further descent down a rabbit hole of stupidity.
Back on topic, Heat fans can pretend otherwise, but they received a grade A butt whooping today. The score doesn't even reflect how bad they looked. Of course, the probably "weren't trying," right?
You're right and seeing his post right after yours just proved it. Won't waste anymore keystrokes on replying to him on this particular topic. If he feels like he somehow "won" something for having the last say, no matter how flawed his arguments were, then good for him.
I disagree...I think 2011 Rose>Paul George now. Rose was quick as hell..maybe quicker than Westbrook. He can penetrate with ease even with the Heat defense and can create his own shot. Deng was great at creating his own shot as well. Boozer=West as far as offense is concerned but I would give Boozer the edge. Noah was still a bit raw but was a better defender than Hibbert.