(edit) I realize this is a terrible long post, and I'm sorry. It's the last essay I want to dedicate on it, as I'm tired of the crap here.
The thing people seek here can differ wildly, though. Some would prefer shots of pure gameplay, whereas others relish in carefully constructed shots that would never grace your screen in-game. Some come here to show (off) their latest screencap, where for some the quality of content is paramount; not quantity of output. Even if Jim's comment was a bit snide, it was in fact glossing over what I think was his actual beef (but I might be mistaken, and Jim won't be here to correct me). I think both Frans and Nick are very well capable of shooting memorable shots, but quite a few of the Darksiders shots we've seen could be perceived as interchangeable. (I feel I should add, that the same could be said of much of my own stuff, but that's besides the point.) I think Jim--and I agree--would rather see a few of your better shots, rather than a lot of okay or iffy ones.
If that's the case, he should have said so, sorry. And even then, it's too vague to use. I mean, the comments made on my darksiders shots came across as : "You post shots of game X, I'm bored with game X, stop posting shots of game X". Not about what's in the shots, the composition, the colors, the use of (negative) space, light, eye flow, camera angles, depth, nothing. The
game was the center of the criticism. I can take criticism on how my shots are constructed, how they're composed, what could be done better etc. etc., please do! But... nope, that wasn't it.
The game itself, that's a totally different thing. I don't have 10 hours a day to play a game, maybe 1-2 at most. So playing a game takes weeks. Telling a person bluntly to stop posting shots from a game is simply a rotten thing to say. What is the end result you're seeking? That the person then stops taking screenshots till he has finished the game and can finally post shots from another game, just because some person doesn't want to see shots of that game? Or stops playing that game, and switches to another one, to please that person? You got to be kidding me.
That's the core issue I have with the point made by Jim. If you think that's not his point, I'll DM you to show you otherwise.
Now, you mention interchangeability of the shots. The first time I hear criticism on them. Wouldn't have been great if the criticism you now mention would have been given with the shot? With explanation why, what could have been better, so we can all learn?
Again, I think both Jim and I are here to fulfill our yearning to see games in the best of lights, however subjective that may be. In that case, less is often more. I know neither of us feels he's above any kind of criticism, as we habitually critique the other's output, and not always in the most congenial manner. It takes time and effort to construct a careful exposé on what makes or breaks a shot, and often saying 'that shit is all shit' is all that's needed to make someone take a second look at their own output and arrive at their own conclusions. Many have been the times where I've sought out the people I know and whose opinion I value, showing off a shot I thought the world of at the time, only to find them less enthused or outright shocked. 'Maybe you should try shooting some other game' is one I get a lot, and often it's exactly what I need.
That's great, but as I explained above: not everyone wants or can switch a game. Some of us are simply playing a game to ... play a game and play _that_ game in particular because they love it, and shoot shots along the way, because they like doing that too. So much so that they spend 30-40 hours writing cheat tables just to get a better working camera, or spend whole weekends writing shaders for reshade to get an effect they want to add to a scene they ran into. Like I can't move to another planet to take shots of the insect life there, I have to do it on this planet, I can't just switch a game because someone doesn't like shots from that game. And why should I? As that was precisely what was told me. No reason why (publicly at least), just that blunt point.
And sorry, but 'this is shit' or 'do something else' is never good criticism. You learn nothing from it. Someone pointing out your mistakes and _why_ does make you learn something. Like I said many times before, if there's something wrong _in_ the shot, by all means tell me, so I can learn from that and take better shots.
In the end I think y'all could do with a mite thicker skin.
Or... some other people should

Like, take a peek over at the console screenshot thread. 50% car game shots, 30% made by one guy, last time I checked.
Jim sure isn't the lowlife you make him out to be. Frankly, I find it galling to read through the past page and a half. Be glad not everyone out there is out to be friends first. If you think someone should be the bigger person and ignore your output if they don't like it, lead by example and ignore the way he goes about expressing himself if it stings. Or start talking instead of arguing. Are we all nine here? Surely not. Don't turn this into something it's not.
Not sure I follow. I have asked multiple times what he meant, and without swearing. In fact I posted just 1 post with swear words, as enough was enough for me. Did I get an answer? Not in public. Was it what you think it is? Nope. Was it what I think it was: yep. It wasn't surprising though.
I would love to see more criticism on shots, constructive criticism that is. "This sucks", "please stop" and "shoot another game" aren't, and you know very well those aren't usable criticisms. They're just qualifications without value.
But, sorry to piss on your galling, I haven't seen a single word of constructive criticism on my nor on Nick's shots here. None. What was told to us wasn't criticism on the shots. It was criticism on the choice of game, it had nothing to do with composition, color, light, eyeflow, camera angles, depth of field. Nothing.
Much of what I'm saying here is based on my own perception of how poisonous pandering can be for anyone trying to become better at what they do. If someone tells me that what I do is shit, at the very least it breaks away any kind of complacency I might have felt. I don't have to like the person for how they said it, and I sure as hell don't have to thank them for phrasing it in a less than constructive manner, but silently, I'm thanking them all the same.
Sure, if one thinks "Hey look at this great shot I took!" and it looks flat, has bad camera angles, unbalanced composition, terrible eyeflow, ugly usage of light, you can say "This looks shit". You also know that doesn't teach the person anything. There are an infinite number of possibilities why the shot sucks. Pointing them out, explaining why and what could be done better, will teach the person something. Like Phil did here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/52066611@N00/30537179225/in/dateposted/. I really appreciated that, as it teaches me something.
I can't imagine your students will be pleased with just "This sucks" from you, they need to know what's wrong, what can be done instead, so they learn for next time (you hope

).
Look, I don't like what happened, I really don't. It's a hobby, and should be fun. For me it's not anymore, at least not posting here, as simple as that. That's not because of my skin thickness (usenet's comp.sys.databases.theory teaches you how to grow a skin of titanium

) but because of all the friction and drama and shit, and I don't associate that with a hobby. If someone tells me I should stop posting shots of the game I'm currently playing (and it's a long game so it can take a while) it surely stops being fun for that moment, doesn't it?
Sure, I can just ignore it and move on, but this time I chose not to. Simply because I wanted to know
why on earth I should stop posting shots.