Valedix
Member
Hmm? Kid has his tshirt taken out from the window and the Mother was holding onto the kid.I see I’m not the only one who misread the thread title.
Hmm? Kid has his tshirt taken out from the window and the Mother was holding onto the kid.I see I’m not the only one who misread the thread title.
Man, the fuck is going on with quality control at Boeing?
I haven't watched this yet but now I want to
The NTSB have found the door. It ended up in a school teachers back yard in Portland
Crazy
Crazy
This was released last April and I've read additional detail that the fitting should be of great concern. Yet, they shrugged THIS ONE off.Alaska Airlines plane had warnings days before mid-air blowout
Alaska Airlines plane had warnings days before mid-air blowout
The jet involved in Friday's incident had been prevented from long trips over water, US investigators say.www.bbc.co.uk
Lessen learned that’s their settings fault not the phones.NGL if that was my phone I'd be a bit mad it didn't autolock. What if I was browsing something.....sensitive in the privacy of my 16,000 foot high cabin and drop my phone???
Crazy
Yes and no. Yes for those whose phones were unrecovered. No for the person with the recovered and working iPhone. iPhone did a few marketing ads on an 'unbreakable' iPhone a couple years back. Well...this one dropped 16,000 after being jettisoned from a plane on ascent. I don't think many manufacturers can boast that. Creative money there if they pitch that to Apple or sell the story to a large news outlet.They better give out compensation for the phones. I'd be fucken pissed if mine got sucked out and damaged/lost.
MD?Those fucking ex-MD execs have destroyed this company.
mcdonnell douglas
Managing Director in the financial world... there is more than one path to get MD lol.
I've started looking at what plane is attached to which flight in recent years. I prefer flights with Airbus planes if possible, but at the very least I avoid any flights on 737 MAX planes.
Unfortunately my preferred airline when flying domestically has long been Southwest and that will no longer be possible in a few years as Southwest has committed to replacing their entire fleet with 737 MAX sometime in the future.
The crashes that occurred years ago appeared to be from a mistake in risk analysis leading to a design and training flaw…tragic mistake, but once you go back and reexamine everything for two years, should be good to go on that front.
Boeing internally had written reports warning about MCAS since 2011 and they chose to ignore them.MCAS is a critical system and it had a single point of failure (the angle of attack sensor). These need to be duplicated.
In order to camouflage it to avoid triggering pilot training they didn’t even have a switch to deactivate it - the only way was to turn off trim aid altogether.
This was not a failure of risk analysis, this was deliberate malfeasance. After the first crash the FAA sent a risk analysis to Boeing that this would happen on average every two years. And when the Ethiopian plane crashed, they still blamed the pilots.
See the first part- lack of redundancy in a critical failure point- was where I thought this was a risk analysis failure. But if what you’re saying is true- that they recognized it and tried to work around it in that way- then yeah, shit. That’s diabolical. Just add the second sensor, dipshitsMCAS is a critical system and it had a single point of failure (the angle of attack sensor). These need to be duplicated.
In order to camouflage it to avoid triggering pilot training they didn’t even have a switch to deactivate it - the only way was to turn off trim aid altogether.
This was not a failure of risk analysis, this was deliberate malfeasance.
The knew before the accident.See the first part- lack of redundancy in a critical failure point- was where I thought this was a risk analysis failure. But if what you’re saying is true- that they recognized it and tried to work around it in that way- then yeah, shit. That’s diabolical. Just add the second sensor, dipshits
Loose bolts on the door.... Imagine the rest of the plane. Boeing is done. Garbage company. Until they change management, it's best to just fly only with Airbus.Boeing 737 Max 9: United Airlines finds loose bolts in jet inspections
Alaska Airlines also said it found loose hardware on some aircraft after a blow-out mid-flight over Oregon.www.bbc.com
Bolts in need of "additional tightening" have been found during inspections of Boeing 737 Max 9s, United Airlines has said.
That’s fucking insane. Just that caused this. Someone couldn’t be assed to do their job correctly and now this.
So luckily not a design flaw just incompetence which can be solved.
Bruh, they better be giving out compensation for pain and suffering from the PTSD everyone is going to have, especially that kid and mom.They better give out compensation for the phones. I'd be fucken pissed if mine got sucked out and damaged/lost.
The story is quite crazy when you think about it hard. They were pressed by time and wanted to make the plane fast to stay close to Airbus. During test they found out that the plane was not acting like the 737 NG, the predecessor of the MAX, in some situations. Their solution: a software that would hide that from the pilots. Because if any pilot had to do some training to use the new plane, they had 1 million to pay per plane to one of their customers. They told stuff to the regulator, saying that it was no big deal, then make changes that they did not disclose to them that make it a really big deal. Namely making this stupid software able to control the plane a lot more than it should. No pilot knew of MCAS before the first crash, I think. Imagine finding yourself figthing against the plane, and it not moving as it should? That is what happened to the plane that crashed.See the first part- lack of redundancy in a critical failure point- was where I thought this was a risk analysis failure. But if what you’re saying is true- that they recognized it and tried to work around it in that way- then yeah, shit. That’s diabolical. Just add the second sensor, dipshits
Model | Rate | Flights | FLE* | Events |
Airbus A300** | 0.61 | 6.51M | 3.99 | 7 |
0.30 | 6.06M | 2.00 | 2 | |
0.46 | 12.57M | 5.99 | 10 | |
1.35 | 4.74M | 6.39 | 9 | |
0.09 | 119.0 | 10.58 | 14 | |
0.19 | 10.26M | 1.99 | 2 | |
0.44 | 26.8M | 11.86 | 15 | |
0.50 | 76.61M | 38.6 | 51 | |
0.62 | 58.29M | 36.43 | 50 | |
0.15 | 79.60M | 11.99 | 19 | |
0.07 | 100.3M | 7.19 | 12 | |
3.08 | 0.65M | 2.00 | 2 | |
0.24 | 238.84M | 58.4 | 83 | |
1.02 | 12.98M | 13.23 | 26 | |
0.06 | 8.42M | 0.50 | 2 | |
0.22 | 25.0M | 5.41 | 9 | |
0.28 | 20.0M | 5.50 | 6 | |
0.18 | 11.11M | 2.01 | 3 | |
0.58 | 62.59M | 36.40 | 45 | |
0.64 | 9.30M | 5.91 | 15 | |
0.37 | 2.79M | 1.02 | 3 | |
0.26 | 46.38M | 11.94 | 18 | |
UNK | UNK | 3.38 | 5 | |
UNK | UNK | 3.10 | 4 | |
0.39 | 11.56M | 4.49 | 6 | |
11.36 | 0.09M | 1.00 | 1 | |
0.03 | 16.67M | 0.44 | 1 | |
1.62 | 9.53M | 15.45 | 21 | |
0.18 | 11.11M | 2.01 | 6 | |
0.47 | 5.40M | 2.54 | 5 | |
0.19 | 11.2M | 2.10 | 3 |
Insane number.Plane crash rates by model
Chart listing the rate of plane crashes involving passenger fatalities in fatal events per million flights for selected airliner models.www.airsafe.com
"
Aircraft models have no fatal events involving airline passengers:
- Airbus: A220, A319neo, A320neo, A321neo, A340, A350, A380
- Boeing: 717, 747-8, 787
- Embraer: ERJ 135, ERJ 140, ERJ 145
Fatal crash rates per million flights
** No longer in production
Model Rate Flights FLE* Events Airbus A300** 0.61 6.51M 3.99 7 0.30 6.06M 2.00 2 0.46 12.57M 5.99 10 1.35 4.74M 6.39 9 0.09 119.0 10.58 14 0.19 10.26M 1.99 2 0.44 26.8M 11.86 15 0.50 76.61M 38.6 51 0.62 58.29M 36.43 50 0.15 79.60M 11.99 19 0.07 100.3M 7.19 12 3.08 0.65M 2.00 2 0.24 238.84M 58.4 83 1.02 12.98M 13.23 26 0.06 8.42M 0.50 2 0.22 25.0M 5.41 9 0.28 20.0M 5.50 6 0.18 11.11M 2.01 3 0.58 62.59M 36.40 45 0.64 9.30M 5.91 15 0.37 2.79M 1.02 3 0.26 46.38M 11.94 18 UNK UNK 3.38 5 UNK UNK 3.10 4 0.39 11.56M 4.49 6 11.36 0.09M 1.00 10.03 16.67M 0.44 1 1.62 9.53M 15.45 21 0.18 11.11M 2.01 6 0.47 5.40M 2.54 5 0.19 11.2M 2.10 3
*** No longer in commercial service
- 31 October 1996; Transportes Aéreos Regionais (TAM) Fokker 100; PT-MRK; flight 402; São Paulo, Brazil: The aircraft banked sharply to the right and crashed into a residential area shortly after takeoff on a scheduled domestic flight from São Paulo to Rio de Janeiro. Evidence suggests that there was an uncommanded deployment of the thrust reverser on the right engine. All of the 90 passengers and six crew members were killed. Also killed were three people on the ground.
TAM crashes
- 9 July 1997; Transportes Aéreos Regionais (TAM) Fokker 100; PT-WHK; flight 283; near São Jose dos Campos, Brazil: The aircraft was on a scheduled domestic flight from São Jose dos Campos to São Paulo and experienced an explosion shortly after takeoff in the rear of the passenger cabin, blowing one passenger out of the aircraft. The explosion was of undetermined origin and blew out about a 10 by 5 foot (3 by 1.5 meter) section of the right rear of the fuselage. One passenger died as a result of either the explosion or the 7900 foot (2400 meter) fall. Six of the 54 other passengers were injured, and none of the five crew members were killed.
TAM Airlines plane crashes
- 15 September 2001; TAM Linhas Aéreas Fokker 100; PT-MRNs; flight 9755; near Belo Horizonte, Brazil: The aircraft was on a scheduled domestic flight from Recife to São Paulo when the right engine of the aircraft broke up while in cruise at around 30,000 feet (9,140 meters) while enroute from Recifie to São Paulo. Pieces of the engine shattered two cabin windows and caused a cabin depressurization. None of the six crew members were killed, but one of the 82 passengers was killed as a result of the depressurization.
TAM Airlines plane crashes
Models like the 747-100/200/300 are some of the earliest of the fleet and most are retired at this point. I point this out because that 1-rate may scare some. They (the early 747s) were documented by cases spanning nearly half-a-century.Plane crash rates by model
Chart listing the rate of plane crashes involving passenger fatalities in fatal events per million flights for selected airliner models.www.airsafe.com
"
Aircraft models have no fatal events involving airline passengers:
- Airbus: A220, A319neo, A320neo, A321neo, A340, A350, A380
- Boeing: 717, 747-8, 787
- Embraer: ERJ 135, ERJ 140, ERJ 145
Fatal crash rates per million flights
** No longer in production
Model Rate Flights FLE* Events Airbus A300** 0.61 6.51M 3.99 7 0.30 6.06M 2.00 2 0.46 12.57M 5.99 10 1.35 4.74M 6.39 9 0.09 119.0 10.58 14 0.19 10.26M 1.99 2 0.44 26.8M 11.86 15 0.50 76.61M 38.6 51 0.62 58.29M 36.43 50 0.15 79.60M 11.99 19 0.07 100.3M 7.19 12 3.08 0.65M 2.00 2 0.24 238.84M 58.4 83 1.02 12.98M 13.23 26 0.06 8.42M 0.50 2 0.22 25.0M 5.41 9 0.28 20.0M 5.50 6 0.18 11.11M 2.01 3 0.58 62.59M 36.40 45 0.64 9.30M 5.91 15 0.37 2.79M 1.02 3 0.26 46.38M 11.94 18 UNK UNK 3.38 5 UNK UNK 3.10 4 0.39 11.56M 4.49 6 11.36 0.09M 1.00 10.03 16.67M 0.44 1 1.62 9.53M 15.45 21 0.18 11.11M 2.01 6 0.47 5.40M 2.54 5 0.19 11.2M 2.10 3
*** No longer in commercial service
The 787 is a great plane. Always love flying it.Plane crash rates by model
Chart listing the rate of plane crashes involving passenger fatalities in fatal events per million flights for selected airliner models.www.airsafe.com
"
Aircraft models have no fatal events involving airline passengers:
- Airbus: A220, A319neo, A320neo, A321neo, A340, A350, A380
- Boeing: 717, 747-8, 787
- Embraer: ERJ 135, ERJ 140, ERJ 145
Fatal crash rates per million flights
** No longer in production
Model Rate Flights FLE* Events Airbus A300** 0.61 6.51M 3.99 7 0.30 6.06M 2.00 2 0.46 12.57M 5.99 10 1.35 4.74M 6.39 9 0.09 119.0 10.58 14 0.19 10.26M 1.99 2 0.44 26.8M 11.86 15 0.50 76.61M 38.6 51 0.62 58.29M 36.43 50 0.15 79.60M 11.99 19 0.07 100.3M 7.19 12 3.08 0.65M 2.00 2 0.24 238.84M 58.4 83 1.02 12.98M 13.23 26 0.06 8.42M 0.50 2 0.22 25.0M 5.41 9 0.28 20.0M 5.50 6 0.18 11.11M 2.01 3 0.58 62.59M 36.40 45 0.64 9.30M 5.91 15 0.37 2.79M 1.02 3 0.26 46.38M 11.94 18 UNK UNK 3.38 5 UNK UNK 3.10 4 0.39 11.56M 4.49 6 11.36 0.09M 1.00 10.03 16.67M 0.44 1 1.62 9.53M 15.45 21 0.18 11.11M 2.01 6 0.47 5.40M 2.54 5 0.19 11.2M 2.10 3
*** No longer in commercial service
Likewise, jumbo and amazing if you get a wing seat to see the span of those up close. I believe this was one of Boeing's last great planes. That's where they should have thought when engineering Max...The 787 is a great plane. Always love flying it.
It's still waaaaay safer than driving. Ever wonder why they let you have a baby sit on your lap for free. It's not safe, if anything happens to the plane that baby will be bouncing around like a beach ball. But it is still much safer than just the chance of a parent choosing to drive instead.Saw this on the news this morning.
I'm glad everyone is safe, but the sad part is I'm not surprised. All I ever hear is that airline manufacturers are cutting costs.
"Statistically the safest way to travel" might not mean as much is things aren't kept in check. How on Earth does a door fly off? My first guess is improper maintenance.
The story is quite crazy when you think about it hard. They were pressed by time and wanted to make the plane fast to stay close to Airbus. During test they found out that the plane was not acting like the 737 NG, the predecessor of the MAX, in some situations. Their solution: a software that would hide that from the pilots. Because if any pilot had to do some training to use the new plane, they had 1 million to pay per plane to one of their customers. They told stuff to the regulator, saying that it was no big deal, then make changes that they did not disclose to them that make it a really big deal. Namely making this stupid software able to control the plane a lot more than it should. No pilot knew of MCAS before the first crash, I think. Imagine finding yourself figthing against the plane, and it not moving as it should? That is what happened to the plane that crashed.
There is a good documentary on Netflix, but I really liked this one, on Youtube:
I recommend it if you want to know more about the 737 MAX problems.
Good thing those diversity requirements didn’t start yet.Look at it the other way - a door flies out, pilot still manages to land the plane.
Sounded like a female pilot on the ATC recording…Good thing those diversity requirements didn’t start yet.
So? Could be a merit based hire if she started before the new change.Sounded like a female pilot on the ATC recording…