Crossing Eden
Hello, my name is Yves Guillemot, Vivendi S.A.'s Employee of the Month!
How in the world has the behavior of the posters in this thread even remotely resembled GG?The GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
How in the world has the behavior of the posters in this thread even remotely resembled GG?The GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
Someone in the OT claims another player saw them. Well, technically I guess it's the other guy making the claim.
The GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
Yeah "practically zero" chance of two players hitting the same planet they said.
Even Alex from Hello games on the playstation blog referenced it here http://blog.us.playstation.com/2015/08/03/35-amazing-things-about-no-mans-sky/
![]()
Blame marketing for that.Also pretty shit tbh.
The GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
The GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
The GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
It's about ethics in space.How in the world has the behavior of the posters in this thread even remotely resembled GG?
This is my point. And my guess is that most of those people don't even own the game
The GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
A)To suggest that there was never any gaming controversies years before is some hardcore revisionist history B)This is an incredibly tired argument, no one is disrespecting the devs by asking questions about game features that were advertised and repeated verbatim by the developers. A confirmation that the feature was either A)On the CRF B)Coming in a later patch or C)Not working due to server issues would've avoided this entire controversy.
How would they even implement essentially a one million player mmo? Everyone online together all the time, in a universe that vast. Imagine tracking all those players on all those planets?
The GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
The GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
I'm seeing very little insulting and more just asking questions.
Exactly. If players spawned randomly on planets far from the center of the universe, there is no way in hell that two would encounter the same planet on day one. It would be almost impossible in YEAR one, in fact.
There is no way this game is 18,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets then. Two instances of people finding each other on day one?
There has to be a pattern for spawns, it's definitely not random.
This is the back of my US copy. Looks completely different...
![]()
There is no way this game is 18,000,000,000,000,000,000 planets then. Two instances of people finding each other on day one?
There has to be a pattern for spawns, it's definitely not random.
I just listed a bunch of hypotheticals about why and how we arrived at this situation and how it could've been avoided. Hindsight is 20/20 but better communication from the devs in this situation would've been incredibly helpful.How the heck do you know it's not server issues? People are in here speaking with such certainty, calling the man a liar without knowing what the heck is actually going on. Both those instances may be the same planet, but the different time of day makes it seem like they aren't playing in the same instance.
He may very well have lied, but we don't know shit right now and everyone is just jumping to conclusions.
The GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
How in the world has the behavior of the posters in this thread even remotely resembled GG?
Right. And this is more potentially troubling to me than the no visible player issue.
For example, what if the "18 quintillion" claim just means that, given the permutations of the variables used to generate planets, there are ~18,000,000,000,000,000,000 possibilities?" Might have nothing at all to do with actual size.
Not trying to be a downer. I am certainly reserving judgement until HG addresses this. Just musing.
No sticker on mine.
Here's some footage of Sean talking about multiplayer
https://youtu.be/1ORFgfhj_hM?t=2m38s
It's the neogaf way. Vilify someone else as GG and you automatically win.
Man, this thread is utterly pathetic. I miss the days when people played games because they were fun and not attacked the developer every chance they got because it's not everything they thought it would be. It's just mesmerizing how rude and disrespectful people can be. Grow up
best joke post ittThe GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
It's really fucked up and insensetive to compare this to GamergateThe GamerGate style attack squad is much worse.
Read my other posts. People have every right to be upset but there have been personal attacks towards Sean in this thread. Absolutely not the way to go about handling thisSo people spent 60 bucks and months of excitement on a product that doesn't deliver what was repeatedly, constantly hinted at and promised. 90% of my excitement for this game was the idea of exploring a massive continuous world with the chance of running into other players who might be friendly, evasive, combative... who knows?
Right up to launch the game was advertised as having multiplayer, just not being built with that as the focus.
If someone spends 60 bucks on something and find out that the part of it they've based their decision to buy on doesn't even exist, how is it "rude" and "disrespectful" to be upset about being mislead? Isn't it MORE "rude" and "disrespectful" that the devs couldn't make any of this clear in the months leading up to release and are possibly perfectly happy taking out money knowing we're trying to buy something they don't provide?
So people spent 60 bucks and months of excitement on a product that doesn't deliver what was repeatedly, constantly hinted at and promised. 90% of my excitement for this game was the idea of exploring a massive continuous world with the chance of running into other players who might be friendly, evasive, combative... who knows?
Right up to launch the game was advertised as having multiplayer, just not being built with that as the focus.
If someone spends 60 bucks on something and find out that the part of it they've based their decision to buy on doesn't even exist, how is it "rude" and "disrespectful" to be upset about being mislead? Isn't it MORE "rude" and "disrespectful" that the devs couldn't make any of this clear in the months leading up to release and are possibly perfectly happy taking out money knowing we're trying to buy something they don't provide?
So people spent 60 bucks and months of excitement on a product that doesn't deliver what was repeatedly, constantly hinted at and promised. 90% of my excitement for this game was the idea of exploring a massive continuous world with the chance of running into other players who might be friendly, evasive, combative... who knows?
If they had built a solid mulitplayer system into the game but only a tiny handful of players who happened to meet actually used it, that would have been an incredible waste use of dev time.
It's really fucked up and insensetive to compare this to Gamergate