Conkerkid11
Member
This thread was spawned from Reddit though.GAF->Internet->GAF
Oh damn, lol![]()
![]()
We have come full circle!
This thread was spawned from Reddit though.GAF->Internet->GAF
Oh damn, lol![]()
![]()
We have come full circle!
http://www.pegi.info/en/index/id/33/
This is what the symbol that has been removed on the EU LE boxes via stickers means.
The "online functionality" on the left does NOT mean online multiplayer, it means stuff like sharing data, uploading saves/scores, things like that.
So something that was supposed to be very rare now has to have its percentage of it happening increased why????At most, his skirting tweets buy him 2 weeks to implement instances, good luck.
I still love how "the chance of two players meeting is SO SLIM it might never happen" and it happens literally half way through day 1.
From that article.
Two years is a long time, things change. But he has repeated the possibility multiple times. And is not clearing it up now, which is a major problem. This is why developers need PR people I guess.
We keep talking about Jacks dad from Lost, basically just to see them in the distance. Like, Did I? What?' Murray said.
Why are you twisting words?So something that was supposed to be very rare now has to have its percentage of it happening increased why????
Because the people demand it? The guy said don't go into it looking for a multiplayer experience, you don't get anymore to the point than that outside of the "single player" icon on the back of box.
I thought the notorious GAF forum knew things change in development stages. People will just ignore the video though. It's already happening.
I knew this will happen , most of time a developer says "that won't happen" ...it happens
Yep. Instead he tweeted something like "holy shit two players already found each other!!!1" (when they actually didn't).Sean never once said "sorry, our development focus shifted and now those features are no longer in the game." He just quietly started downplaying them more and more.
It's not a lie if you clarify.
If he would've said "unfortunately, those earlier interviews where I said you could play with your friends and even grief others were a bit premature, we're not going to be able to include that at launch," this whole thread would've never happened.
Apparently for some people this wasn't a tiny thing.Game devs advertise a lot of things that never end up in games, I don't understand why such a tiny tiny thing out of the whole game is being such a big deal that people are acting like they are trying out for the junior varsity GG team.
Game devs advertise a lot of things that never end up in games, I don't understand why such a tiny tiny thing out of the whole game is being such a big deal that people are acting like they are trying out for the junior varsity GG team.Why are you twisting words?
The feature just needs to exist because they advertised it. It looks like it doesn't. Simple as that. Nothing to do with the odds at all.
From Reddit:
Doing online multiplayer isn't a trivial thing. It takes not only a lot of effort to code, but a ton of infrastructure to support.
So something that was supposed to be very rare now has to have its percentage of it happening increased why????
Because the people demand it? The guy said don't go into it looking for a multiplayer experience, you don't get anymore to the point than that outside of the "single player" icon on the back of box.
So something that was supposed to be very rare now has to have its percentage of it happening increased why????
Because the people demand it? The guy said don't go into it looking for a multiplayer experience, you don't get anymore to the point than that outside of the "single player" icon on the back of box.
From Reddit:
Game devs advertise a lot of things that never end up in games, I don't understand why such a tiny tiny thing out of the whole game is being such a big deal that people are acting like they are trying out for the junior varsity GG team.
I'm literally going through my trash right now. I hate you GAF. Will report back.
EDIT:
![]()
![]()
What's this whole sticker thing about
Some European boxes of the game came with a sticker covering up the "online play" icon. They were printed prematurely before plans changed and the promised multiplayer was completely removed from the game, so they needed to be corrected with a sticker.
Other European boxes don't have a sticker and are printed correctly (lacking that online icon).
junior varsity GG team.
![]()
What the fuck kind of response is this? How hard is it to say "yes you can see each other, no it isn't working right now."
With this total non response and the stickers covering up the online label, its getting harder to give Sean the benefit of doubt.
PS4 data isn't encrypted?
At some level, you gotta stop the mysterious stuff and tell the consumer what the product has in store. Even a small confirmation would work.
It is tiny though, the game is 100% a single player experienceSame can be said why something not so tiny, is being purposely over looked and disregarded by some.
This is the video I remember. He specifically stated that the only way you'd know how you looked was if someone else saw you. So yeah, that might be just a tad misleading unless it is in fact true and those guys who tried to meet up didn't for the reasons people are assuming (different time/instance, etc.).http://youtu.be/ZqeN6hj4dZU
In the Colbert interview (skip to 5:40), arguably the most high profile interview this game has ever gotten, which happened about 10 months ago (not years and years ago), Sean clearly and directly addresses both:
1-being able to see other players (yes);
2-can you run into other players in the game (yes);
This is huge marketing/awe-inspiring carrot to dangle in front of a huge audience, many of whom won't follow a game's developer's twitter account in the lead-up of a release.
If it turns out it's not true, that's a bad look for sure. Those that are saying you shouldn't buy a game based on an unlikely scenario are missing the point that many were buying into this game based on awe-inspiring possibilities and discovery. That's a big one that'd keep players LOOKING.
If it turns out it IS true and possible, it's an amazingly cool thing that two people found each other day 1 against such incredible odds. Shame if tech problems are the reason a rare meeting wasn't actually had.
But yeah, the silence on answering a direct question is deafening and I can't help but assume Sony is keeping the tape over Sean's mouth until reviews on PS4 and PC start rolling out first.
Story? What? I'm three planets and 3 hours into the game and have yet to see any story.
A feature that "might" be in the game not working properly day 1. Shocking!
PS4 data isn't encrypted?
Here you go, stopping the mysterious stuff.
But that's still mysterious.Here you go, stopping the mysterious stuff.
[Keep in mind, this may just be a bug or server stress. We don't even know for sure what's going on. HG themselves might not know what's going on yet.]
Does No Man's Sky have multiplayer or not? |OT|
Story develops as you progress through more star systems, not more planets.
It is tiny though, the game is 100% a single player experience
If you happen to have a Roland Deschain/Man in Black moment where you think you MIGHT see someone off in the distance, it was very rare, there but out of reach..
I don't think the guy ever said you would be able to walk up to each other and hang out.
What's this whole sticker thing about
Does No Man's Sky have multiplayer or not? |OT|