I need to read Clash of Kings again, particularly the house of the undying scene. I'm not sure but it may have predicted the red wedding. There was a skeleton with a wolf's head at a feast. I assumed that to be the red wedding but I have to go back and check because I remember some of the descriptions not matching up to what happened in the red wedding. I think the crown was different, maybe Dany saw something yet to come or something that happened to a Stark ruler way in the past?
Yes, but the final chapter certainly implies that she was pregnant without knowing it, so it does seem like she can bear children (and probably always could).
Sounds like she just got her period and is fertile again by the end of ADWD...
Or what the post above me said.
Patchface also foreshadows it in that book
What did Patchface say about it? I can't remember. I should have re-read that book damnit.
Patchface is so creepy.
I know, I know, oh, oh, oh.
Sansa 2024
I'm expecting Sansa to end up turning on Littlefinger and killing him, to usurp his place. As successful as he's been so far, I don't expect him to end up on top.
Bronn will probably be King by the end.
I'm expecting Sansa to end up turning on Littlefinger and killing him, to usurp his place. As successful as he's been so far, I don't expect him to end up on top.
Bronn will probably be King by the end.
I would be more than happy with this.
re-reading clash for the new season and I love these early arya chapters. They are so disconnected with all the political bullshit thats going on and show the real grimy shit that happens to people. its awesome that there is no way they can just skip this stuff even though it has nothing to do with their main story line.
All these kings and queens are playing their game but aside from Tyrion Clash throws them into the backseat behind Arya who is just running around encountering all sorts of messed up shit.
I feel that Arya showed the situation of the Riverlands and the common people a lot better than that awful Brienne POVs. I'm not an Arya fan (especially with the timeskip cut, I've not a good feeling about her storyline..it could become really cheesy, like the 8 years old girl that kills everybody or something...) but I can't wait to see how her story is shown in Season 2, it's probably her best arc to date.
So the seven kingdoms are:
Winterfell (Starks)
The Vale (Arryns)
Dorne (Martells)
Highgarden (Tyrells)
Riverlands (Tully)
Stormlands (Baratheon)
Westerlands (Lannister)
Were the Iron Islands considered a separate (8th) kingdom, or did they swear fealty to a liege lord?
So the seven kingdoms are:
Winterfell (Starks)
The Vale (Arryns)
Dorne (Martells)
Highgarden (Tyrells)
Riverlands (Tully)
Stormlands (Baratheon)
Westerlands (Lannister)
Were the Iron Islands considered a separate (8th) kingdom, or did they swear fealty to a liege lord?
Gotcha.
I must have overlooked that bit of history while reading the books. It explains why Balon was such a god-awful dick.
Seriously, Balon ruined everything. I had such high hopes for a Stark/Greyjoy alliance, with visions of Robb and Theon assaulting Casterly Rock dancing in my head.
Fucking GRRM.
The best part is that the greyjoys weren't even the house of kings for the iron islands. Balon was a dick whose house owed everything to the targaryens. Not the drowned god
The things I've never understood is which kingdom the crownlands are supposed to belong to. The riverlands?
Owed everything is a bit of a stretch. The Targs killed off the previous dynasty, but it was the Ironborn who chose the Greyjoys to rule over them. That's not the sort of situation that would engender some sort of loyalty, it's not like the Targs directly helped the Greyjoys.
Been a while, but I don't think that's right. There wasn't a kingsmoot for thousands of years, what evidence do we have that the iron islanders chose them? My memory is that the targs did. Could be wrong though.
When Harren and his sons perished in the fall of Harrenhal, Aegon Targaryen granted the riverlands to House Tully, and allowed the surviving lords of the Iron Islands to revive their ancient custom and chose who should have the primacy among them. They chose Lord Vickon Greyjoy of Pyke.
It's in the AGOT appendix entry for Greyjoy.
The Iron Islands ruled the Riverlands before the conquest, together they were one kingdom. The Ironborn King Harren built Harrenhal, but was roasted by dragonfire. The Riverlords revolted against Harren and Aegon rewarded the Tullys with overlordship of the region.
Gotcha.
I must have overlooked that bit of history while reading the books. It explains why Balon was such a god-awful dick.
Seriously, Balon ruined everything. I had such high hopes for a Stark/Greyjoy alliance, with visions of Robb and Theon assaulting Casterly Rock dancing in my head.
Fucking GRRM.
So did the Targeryens not have their own kingdom before Aegon? I thought they lived on Dragonstone and were kings of the area south of the Vale.
They were from Essos, Valyria specifically. After the natural disaster that wiped out Valyria, they floated around Essos until Aegon decided to invade Westeros with his dragons. I believe Dragonstone was the launching point for his invasion.
So did the Targeryens not have their own kingdom before Aegon? I thought they lived on Dragonstone and were kings of the area south of the Vale.
Not only was Balon Greyjoy a dick, he was a goddamn moron. Attacking the North instead of the Westerlands went directly against his own self interests.
At that point in the saga, the Lannisters were losing the war, and it didn't look possible for them to come back. Half their forces had already been taken out by Robb, and King's Landing was looking to surely be taken by one of the Baratheon brothers. By allying with Robb and the North, the Greyjoy/Stark alliance would have almost assuredly taken out enough of the Lannisters that the Tyrells would not be so willing to enter into an alliance with the side that is clearly losing the war after Renly's death. With the Lannisters utterly defeated, the Greyjoys have a very good chance of being able to remain Kings of the Iron Islands and however much of the Westerlands they're able to carve out for themselves.
Instead, he decides to attack the North like a fucking dumbass, pretty much ensuring a Lannister victory over Robb. With the North defeated, Tywin would have no reason to allow Balon to continue in open rebellion as King of the Iron Islands and would just go put him down again. He had the choice of allying with the side that, if victorious, would allow him to be a king again, or the side that he damn well knows has no interest in letting him rule.
This decision is so unrealistically dumb that it just struck me as GRRM trying to shit on the Starks as much as possible without any founding in logic, just to add some "shock value."
They were from Essos, Valyria specifically. After the natural disaster that wiped out Valyria, they floated around Essos until Aegon decided to invade Westeros with his dragons. I believe Dragonstone was the launching point for his invasion.
So did the Targeryens not have their own kingdom before Aegon? I thought they lived on Dragonstone and were kings of the area south of the Vale.
Not only was Balon Greyjoy a dick, he was a goddamn moron. Attacking the North instead of the Westerlands went directly against his own self interests.
At that point in the saga, the Lannisters were losing the war, and it didn't look possible for them to come back. Half their forces had already been taken out by Robb, and King's Landing was looking to surely be taken by one of the Baratheon brothers. By allying with Robb and the North, the Greyjoy/Stark alliance would have almost assuredly taken out enough of the Lannisters that the Tyrells would not be so willing to enter into an alliance with the side that is clearly losing the war after Renly's death. With the Lannisters utterly defeated, the Greyjoys have a very good chance of being able to remain Kings of the Iron Islands and however much of the Westerlands they're able to carve out for themselves.
Instead, he decides to attack the North like a fucking dumbass, pretty much ensuring a Lannister victory over Robb. With the North defeated, Tywin would have no reason to allow Balon to continue in open rebellion as King of the Iron Islands and would just go put him down again. He had the choice of allying with the side that, if victorious, would allow him to be a king again, or the side that he damn well knows has no interest in letting him rule.
This decision is so unrealistically dumb that it just struck me as GRRM trying to shit on the Starks as much as possible without any founding in logic, just to add some "shock value."
If I remember correctly, the Tully aren't "kings", the original King of the area was from the Iron Islands.
That is not the 'original' line of kings. The books mention the area being ruled by House Mudd in the time of the First Men.
Not to mention that the Westerlands are rich with gold and silver mines and several port cities, while most of the North is a vast expanse of rocks, forests and swamps.
Balon was a man who thought in terms of conquest not war and was driven by the desire for revenge against Ned Stark for the deaths of his sons. He's also afraid of Tywin and (rightly) judges that holding Lannisport is likely impossible. His decision is stupid, but it's well in character.
Yes, though the Riverlords haven't been independent in a long long time. The Storm Kings conquered the area, then the Ironborn, the Targs, the Starks, and now they are still ruled by the Iron Throne. The curse of geography pretty much makes the area indefensible.
Ah, what could have been.
If only:
- Balon hadn't launched a ridiculous North invasion.
- Robb had kept it in his pants.
- Robb had pardoned Lord Karstark.
- The wildfire hadn't been quite so effective at wiping out Stannis's invading force.
Ah, what could have been.
If only:
- Balon hadn't launched a ridiculous North invasion.
- Robb had kept it in his pants.
- Robb had pardoned Lord Karstark.
- The wildfire hadn't been quite so effective at wiping out Stannis's invading force.
Depending on how these last two books turn out, I think I would have preferred that story to the one we got. Oh well.
The Riverlands are like Europe in Risk. Totally not worth the five army bonus per turn; much better to take North and South America, or South America and Africa.
And:
-What if Lysa didn't betray her family and had helped Robb in the War.
Ah, what could have been.
If only:
- Balon hadn't launched a ridiculous North invasion.
- Robb had kept it in his pants.
- Robb had pardoned Lord Karstark.
- The wildfire hadn't been quite so effective at wiping out Stannis's invading force.
Depending on how these last two books turn out, I think I would have preferred that story to the one we got. Oh well.
And there was that one battle in Storm where one of Robb's bannermen managed to lose a third of his infantry while trying to take some insignificant castle, or some shit like that.
God, it's tragic.
They did that because Bolton sent the fake orders to them to get them to do it, knowing this is exactly what would happen.
Well, Jaime could have not been an idiot, and Robb could have lost the war at the start by failing to break the siege of Riverrun.Every possible thing that could go wrong for Robb and the Starks did.
That was deliberate sabotage by Roose Bolton.And there was that one battle in Storm where one of Robb's bannermen managed to lose a third of his infantry while trying to take some insignificant castle, or some shit like that.
God, it's tragic.
And there was that one battle in Storm where one of Robb's bannermen managed to lose a third of his infantry while trying to take some insignificant castle, or some shit like that.
God, it's tragic.