• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

A Song of Ice and Fire -- **Unmarked Spoilers For All Books including ADWD**

Status
Not open for further replies.

Iksenpets

Banned
The Blackfish is still one of Robb's only relatives who would qualify as his successor - remember, Robb was under the assumption that he would have a son soon, so the legal writing of the letter is more in line with naming a steward than an heir. I wouldn't be surprised if he's named steward of some type (as a precaution), but Winterfell is given to a Royce. After all, Robb does not know his Royce relatives.


Kind of tangential to the conversation at hand, but one thing I've always wondered is if Jon is legitimized and is the heir, would the Riverlands even accept him? He has no Tully blood, and the Blackfish made it pretty clear that he didn't trust him, going so far as to suggest that he was in on the RW and got his spot as Lord Commander due to a deal with the Lannisters. Doesn't seem like Jon would be able to keep Robb's kingdom together long.
 

ZeroRay

Member
Anyone else think most of the politics shit won't matter and the series will end in a maelstrom of chaos with barely anyone coming out alive?

Cause it looks like where it's all headed and if George wants to end the series in two books, that seems like the most likely way to do it.

I don't think we'll get any fairytale endings a lot of fans are predicting. Jon and Dany getting married and saving the world? ...yeah, sure.
 
Anyone else think most of the politics shit won't matter and the series will end in a maelstrom of chaos with barely anyone coming out alive?

Cause it looks like where it's all headed and if George wants to end the series in two books, that seems like the most likely way to do it.

I don't think we'll get any fairytale endings a lot of fans are predicting. Jon and Dany getting married and saving the world? ...yeah, sure.

I said they'd marry, didn't say they'd save the world. :p
 
I think what Catelyn was concerned about was that Jon killing Robb himself. At the time, if Jon was named heir, he was next in line period since Robb and Cat thought the rest of the kids were dead other than Sansa and the entire purpose of naming an heir was disinheriting Sansa.
Yeah I think we can all agree that Cat had some seriously clouded judgement when it came to Jon due to her hatred towards him.
Kind of tangential to the conversation at hand, but one thing I've always wondered is if Jon is legitimized and is the heir, would the Riverlands even accept him? He has no Tully blood, and the Blackfish made it pretty clear that he didn't trust him, going so far as to suggest that he was in on the RW and got his spot as Lord Commander due to a deal with the Lannisters. Doesn't seem like Jon would be able to keep Robb's kingdom together long.
What was this? I don't remember that.
Anyone else think most of the politics shit won't matter and the series will end in a maelstrom of chaos with barely anyone coming out alive?
I think that's what will probably happen, at least I hope it does to an extent.
 

Rei_Toei

Fclvat sbe Pnanqn, ru?
Anyone else think most of the politics shit won't matter and the series will end in a maelstrom of chaos with barely anyone coming out alive?

Cause it looks like where it's all headed and if George wants to end the series in two books, that seems like the most likely way to do it.

I don't think we'll get any fairytale endings a lot of fans are predicting. Jon and Dany getting married and saving the world? ...yeah, sure.

While I can see it going down like that (the whole 'it will end with everything covered in ash or snow' thing) I'd be a little disappointed. After everything that happens in Westeros over the span of the books, I kinda want to see some grand alliance kick ass and take names.
 

Victarion

Member
I think what Catelyn was concerned about was that Jon killing Robb himself. At the time, if Jon was named heir, he was next in line period since Robb and Cat thought the rest of the kids were dead other than Sansa and the entire purpose of naming an heir was disinheriting Sansa.

God, I hate that bitch.
 

Victarion

Member
Idk I viewed it more as her not wanting the child created out of her husbands affair becoming the ruler of Winterhold. Not so much her thinking Jon would kill Robb for it.

I hate her because of her bitching toward Jon, mostly in the second Jon chapter from AGOT, where she said it should have been Jon dying instead of Bran.

And lol @ Winterhold, this aint Skyrim :p
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Kind of tangential to the conversation at hand, but one thing I've always wondered is if Jon is legitimized and is the heir, would the Riverlands even accept him? He has no Tully blood, and the Blackfish made it pretty clear that he didn't trust him, going so far as to suggest that he was in on the RW and got his spot as Lord Commander due to a deal with the Lannisters. Doesn't seem like Jon would be able to keep Robb's kingdom together long.
Probably not, but it doesn't seem like the King in the North thing is going to stick anyways. I would have to imagine that at this point the North would be happy to settle with the original status quo so long as the person on the Iron Throne isn't a gigantic psychopath; assuming it goes back to that Riverrun were Lords of the Riverlands in their own right, so they weren't sworn to anyone else anyways.

That also assumes that Edmure dies AND his kid dies. That does bring up an interesting question though; when Cat and Robb have that conversation about legitimizing Jon, Robb tells Catelyn that Sansa is his legal heir and Arya after that. But then in AFFC, Jaime comments that if Edmure's wife gives birth to a boy, Walder Frey will have Edmure killed because then he will have a grandson with a claim as heir apparent to Lord of the Riverlands. Why is Sansa (who is not even technically a Stark at this point since she's married to Tyrion) able to inherit Winterfell, but Edmure's daughter can't?

Idk I viewed it more as her not wanting the child created out of her husbands affair becoming the ruler of Winterhold. Not so much her thinking Jon would kill Robb for it.
Catelyn was always a huge bitch to Jon. The TV series really toned it down to try and convince you Catelyn wasn't an idiot making horrible decisions all the time. If you look back at her history during and prior to the series, she caused a fucking shit-ton of problems for everyone.

As for your point, granted, her hatred of Jon certainly was a part of it, but she was probably legit scared that Jon would kill Robb for the crown. I mean, she treated him like shit 100% of the time so its not like she really has any good insight into whether Jon was a good guy or not.
 
Probably not, but it doesn't seem like the King in the North thing is going to stick anyways. I would have to imagine that at this point the North would be happy to settle with the original status quo so long as the person on the Iron Throne isn't a gigantic psychopath; assuming it goes back to that Riverrun were Lords of the Riverlands in their own right, so they weren't sworn to anyone else anyways.

That also assumes that Edmure dies AND his kid dies. That does bring up an interesting question though; when Cat and Robb have that conversation about legitimizing Jon, Robb tells Catelyn that Sansa is his legal heir and Arya after that. But then in AFFC, Jaime comments that if Edmure's wife gives birth to a boy, Walder Frey will have Edmure killed because then he will have a grandson with a claim as heir apparent to Lord of the Riverlands. Why is Sansa (who is not even technically a Stark at this point since she's married to Tyrion) able to inherit Winterfell, but Edmure's daughter can't?
Edmure's son would be heir to Riverun, he wouldn't have any claim to Winterfell. Sansa still has claim to Winterfell assuming Bran and Rickon are never seen again.
 

Preachsuh

Banned
How was Catelyn a huge bitch to Jon?
The one time we know she was cruel to him, her favorite son had just fallen from a great height and appeared to be near death.
Her husband was leaving them, and now here comes the blight on her otherwise perfect marriage.
Im sure most people have been just as cruel once in their lives, but with less dire circumstances surrounding them.

The rest of the time, she just ignored him.

And her dislike of Jon was perfectly rationale, given that her beloved uncle won acclaim fighting the last rebellion/invasion of the bastard branch of the targaryen line.

Jon looked more like his famed ancestors than her trueborn children did.
Jon was raised and taught to think as a lord, whereas most bastards are hidden away and secretly provided for.
Jon learned his family history, whereas most bastards don't get that level of involvement.

The last time any highborn bastard got the treatment Jon did, the realm suffered the Blackfyre rebellions.

And her decisions regarding her family were the best ones she could make at any given time, from taking Tyrion to releasing Jaime.
 
Did you not read got?

In AGOT Jon says Cat pretty much ignored him most of the time, that one incident was an outlier driven by grief.


Jon's character arc in AGOT is about his misplaced sense of entitlement and how despite being a bastard he had it pretty good. Catelyn was cold to him, but that's not really all the unexpected and many wives would have done worse than that.
 
IIRC Catelyn hated Jon not because he was a bastard but because Ned treated him like a true son.

It stems from her paranoia about Jon's mother, and her fear that Ned loved whoever birthed him. Remember the incident when Catelyn confronted Ned about Ashara Dayne and he went into a cold fury? It's not so much about Jon as it is about what his mother potentially was to Ned. She's at Winterfell just having given birth to Robb and her husband comes back from the war with a child. Ned refuses to ever tell her anything about it and shuts her down brutally the one time she asks. I think most women would have a problem with that.

And her fears about Jon's children potentially being a threat if he is legitimized are hardly unfounded.
 

Preachsuh

Banned
It stems from her paranoia about Jon's mother, and her fear that Ned loved whoever birthed him. Remember the incident when Catelyn confronted Ned about Ashara Dayne and he went into a cold fury? It's not so much about Jon as it is about what his mother potentially was to Ned. She's at Winterfell just having given birth to Robb and her husband comes back from the war with a child. Ned refuses to ever tell her anything about it and shuts her down brutally the one time she asks. I think most women would have a problem with that.

And her fears about Jon's children potentially being a threat if he is legitimized are hardly unfounded.

Exactly.

See what happened with Domeric and Ramsay.
See what happened with the Blackfyres.
See what the innerworkings of the Twins are.

There's a trend of bad things happening when bastards are raised alongside their trueborn siblings.
Jon we know wouldn't hurt his brothers and sisters, but as Catelyn said, could the same be true of whatever children he had?

Most of the time, i find peoples hatred of Catelyn to be for wholly unrealistic reasons, and at times borders on misogyny.
 

Massa

Member
Anyone else think most of the politics shit won't matter and the series will end in a maelstrom of chaos with barely anyone coming out alive?

Cause it looks like where it's all headed and if George wants to end the series in two books, that seems like the most likely way to do it.

I don't think we'll get any fairytale endings a lot of fans are predicting. Jon and Dany getting married and saving the world? ...yeah, sure.

We already know the politics shit won't matter. From the first book:

"When dead men come hunting in the night, do you think it matters who sits the Iron Throne?"
 
Kind of tangential to the conversation at hand, but one thing I've always wondered is if Jon is legitimized and is the heir, would the Riverlands even accept him? He has no Tully blood, and the Blackfish made it pretty clear that he didn't trust him, going so far as to suggest that he was in on the RW and got his spot as Lord Commander due to a deal with the Lannisters. Doesn't seem like Jon would be able to keep Robb's kingdom together long.

Some people believe the Blackfish was misleading Jaime, and ultimately protecting Jon. I dunno. On one hand it's possible, but on the other hand the Blackfish had just lost his niece and her children largely due to Robb's lack of judgement. Is he going to give Robb the benefit of the doubt that Jon is a worthy heir, knowing the last guy Robb trusted killed his brothers?
 
It stems from her paranoia about Jon's mother, and her fear that Ned loved whoever birthed him. Remember the incident when Catelyn confronted Ned about Ashara Dayne and he went into a cold fury? It's not so much about Jon as it is about what his mother potentially was to Ned. She's at Winterfell just having given birth to Robb and her husband comes back from the war with a child. Ned refuses to ever tell her anything about it and shuts her down brutally the one time she asks. I think most women would have a problem with that.

And her fears about Jon's children potentially being a threat if he is legitimized are hardly unfounded.

Exactly. Catelyn's behavior is perfectly understandable. Saying "it should have been you" was a nasty and horrible thing to say, but that's the only time she ever does anything even the slightest bit cruel towards Jon, and she was stricken with grief at the time.
 

Tacitus_

Member
That also assumes that Edmure dies AND his kid dies. That does bring up an interesting question though; when Cat and Robb have that conversation about legitimizing Jon, Robb tells Catelyn that Sansa is his legal heir and Arya after that. But then in AFFC, Jaime comments that if Edmure's wife gives birth to a boy, Walder Frey will have Edmure killed because then he will have a grandson with a claim as heir apparent to Lord of the Riverlands. Why is Sansa (who is not even technically a Stark at this point since she's married to Tyrion) able to inherit Winterfell, but Edmure's daughter can't?

Probably because a boy heir would be better and they're still young and can whelp a boy.
 
Probably because a boy heir would be better and they're still young and can whelp a boy.

Yep. A male heir is more useful, a girl would have to be married off to a non-Frey and whoever her husband was would effectively control Riverrun.

Though the whole situation is odd here because Gemma Lannister's husband is the Lord of Riverrun and Littlefinger is Lord Paramount of the Trident, whatever claim Edmure's son has is purely theoretical because the Tullys have been divested of all their lands and titles.
 
I don't know if this was discussed here.

But I got a sense from AFOC that Jaime and Cersei may not be Tywin's sons.

Did I misread something there?
 

Iksenpets

Banned
I don't know if this was discussed here.

But I got a sense from AFOC that Jaime and Cersei may not be Tywin's sons.

Did I misread something there?

There have been ongoing theories about Tywin's kids, especially Tyrion but Jaime and Cersei to a lesser extent, secretly being a product of King Aerys either raping or seducing his wife. I really doubt it though. It seems like it would really cheaper all the family conflict we've seen for five books if they suddenly weren't family anymore. I'd be pissed if it were true. No more secret Targaryens please.

Also, to the earlier comment about Blackfish protecting Jon, why would he? Has he ever even met Jon? It seems like he would trust Catelyn's impulses.
 
There have been ongoing theories about Tywin's kids, especially Tyrion but Jaime and Cersei to a lesser extent, secretly being a product of King Aerys either raping or seducing his wife. I really doubt it though. It seems like it would really cheaper all the family conflict we've seen for five books if they suddenly weren't family anymore. I'd be pissed if it were true. No more secret Targaryens please.

Also, to the earlier comment about Blackfish protecting Jon, why would he? Has he ever even met Jon? It seems like he would trust Catelyn's impulses.

I found the segment in question:

This is Jaime Speaking to Lady Genna.

Jaime kissed her cheek. “He left a son.”

“Aye, he did. That is what I fear the most, in truth.”

That was a queer remark. “Why should you fear?”

“Jaime,” she said, tugging on his ear, “sweetling, I have known you since you were a babe at Joanna’s breast. You smile like Gerion and fight like Tyg, and there’s some of Kevan in you, else you would not wear that cloak . . . but Tyrion is Tywin’s son, not you. I said so once to your father’s face, and he would not speak to me for half a year. Men are such thundering great fools. Even the sort who come along once in a thousand years.”
 
I found the segment in question:

This is Jaime Speaking to Lady Genna.

Jaime kissed her cheek. “He left a son.”

“Aye, he did. That is what I fear the most, in truth.”

That was a queer remark. “Why should you fear?”

“Jaime,” she said, tugging on his ear, “sweetling, I have known you since you were a babe at Joanna’s breast. You smile like Gerion and fight like Tyg, and there’s some of Kevan in you, else you would not wear that cloak . . . but Tyrion is Tywin’s son, not you. I said so once to your father’s face, and he would not speak to me for half a year. Men are such thundering great fools. Even the sort who come along once in a thousand years.”

Pretty sure that just means that Tyrion is much more like Tywin than Jaime is.
 
I found the segment in question:

This is Jaime Speaking to Lady Genna.

Jaime kissed her cheek. “He left a son.”

“Aye, he did. That is what I fear the most, in truth.”

That was a queer remark. “Why should you fear?”

“Jaime,” she said, tugging on his ear, “sweetling, I have known you since you were a babe at Joanna’s breast. You smile like Gerion and fight like Tyg, and there’s some of Kevan in you, else you would not wear that cloak . . . but Tyrion is Tywin’s son, not you. I said so once to your father’s face, and he would not speak to me for half a year. Men are such thundering great fools. Even the sort who come along once in a thousand years.”
That is the last quote that should be taken literally. There are indications that aerys might have raped tywin's wife and some or all kids aren't Tywin's, but that's not one of them.
 

Tacitus_

Member
That "the lannister kids are secret targaryens" theory is only slightly less retarded than the "everyone wargs into everything and Neds spirit is in the sword Ice" theory.
 
That "the lannister kids are secret targaryens" theory is only slightly less retarded than the "everyone wargs into everything and Neds spirit is in the sword Ice" theory.

I said the same thing about Aegon is alive theories back in the day. I can't discount anything after ADWD. GRRM loves his secret identities, false deaths, and soap twists.
 

ahoyhoy

Unconfirmed Member
That "the lannister kids are secret targaryens" theory is only slightly less retarded than the "everyone wargs into everything and Neds spirit is in the sword Ice" theory.

So does Ned's spirit now reside in Tommen/Brienne's swords (assuming Tommen inherited Joffery's sword), or did his spirit escape when the sword was smelted?
 
I found the segment in question:

This is Jaime Speaking to Lady Genna.

Jaime kissed her cheek. “He left a son.”

“Aye, he did. That is what I fear the most, in truth.”

That was a queer remark. “Why should you fear?”

“Jaime,” she said, tugging on his ear, “sweetling, I have known you since you were a babe at Joanna’s breast. You smile like Gerion and fight like Tyg, and there’s some of Kevan in you, else you would not wear that cloak . . . but Tyrion is Tywin’s son, not you. I said so once to your father’s face, and he would not speak to me for half a year. Men are such thundering great fools. Even the sort who come along once in a thousand years.”

ADWD has more convincing segments than that, which isn't convincing at all imo. I took it as her basically telling Jaime he's dumber than a bag of rocks, and Tyrion is the true heir to their father's cunning.

ADWD mentions that Aerys might have raped Tywin's wife, which lends itself more to the theory. Still, I don't believe it at all. Way too contrived
 

Korey

Member
Does anyone else hate the concept of resurrecting in the got universe? The number of people that have been rezzed is almost comical by now. Also, all of GRRM's red herring "fake deaths" are written in the same way at the end of a chapter that I'm not even shocked at anything anymore, since I don't believe whichever character it is is actually dead.
 
Does anyone else hate the concept of resurrecting in the got universe? The number of people that have been rezzed is almost comical by now. Also, all of GRRM's red herring "fake deaths" are written in the same way at the end of a chapter that I'm not even shocked at anything anymore, since I don't believe whichever character it is is actually dead.

It would be a lot worse if there were no repercussions but as is, I think it's ok. Bit of a Deus ex machina though.
 

Angry Grimace

Two cannibals are eating a clown. One turns to the other and says "does something taste funny to you?"
Edmure's son would be heir to Riverun, he wouldn't have any claim to Winterfell. Sansa still has claim to Winterfell assuming Bran and Rickon are never seen again.

No, no no. I'm not saying a claim to Winterfell, I'm saying why would his son have a claim to Riverrun but not a daughter.


Yep. A male heir is more useful, a girl would have to be married off to a non-Frey and whoever her husband was would effectively control Riverrun.

Though the whole situation is odd here because Gemma Lannister's husband is the Lord of Riverrun and Littlefinger is Lord Paramount of the Trident, whatever claim Edmure's son has is purely theoretical because the Tullys have been divested of all their lands and titles.
The problem, I think, is that while it's easy to just call someone else Lord Paramount (or whatever the traditional title is for the Lord of the House that is in control of one of the Seven Kingdoms), the rest of the Lords and peasants don't just stop being loyal to the house; i.e. how pretty much all of the Northman revere the Starks. Just having a Frey as Lord of Riverrun is probably not seen as likely to "stick," unless they get a Tully back in there.
 
The problem, I think, is that while it's easy to just call someone else Lord Paramount (or whatever the traditional title is for the Lord of the House that is in control of one of the Seven Kingdoms), the rest of the Lords and peasants don't just stop being loyal to the house; i.e. how pretty much all of the Northman revere the Starks. Just having a Frey as Lord of Riverrun is probably not seen as likely to "stick," unless they get a Tully back in there.

Yeah, but it's not like you can just replace the Lord of Riverrun with Edmure's son. Emmon Frey was given that title for a reason, he's married to Tywin's sister.
 

John Dunbar

correct about everything
He's the mummer's dragon. I've seen theories that he's actually Illyrio's son because of the statue he has in Pentos

That or a Blackfyre, or possibly both. Some have also argued that he's the real deal, and the mummer refers to Varys, making him Varys' dragon.

Funny things is that if he is a Blackfyre, he's actually more of a "dragon" than Dany or anyone other spawn of Aerys.
 
Well, how can Ned go into his sword (wut) if his sword was melted?

I was genuinely upset at that. What the fuck. The Greatsword Ice melted into some shit sword for Joffrey.
 

diunxx

Member
ADWD

ADWD mentions that Aerys might have raped Tywin's wife, which lends itself more to the theory. Still, I don't believe it at all. Way too contrived


Isn't the line something like "he took some umm liberties during the bedding" I took that as the king rubbing some titties and maybe some fingering, I doubt Aeries just went and raped her with all the western lords watching.
 

Tacitus_

Member
Isn't the line something like "he took some umm liberties during the bedding" I took that as the king rubbing some titties and maybe some fingering, I doubt Aeries just went and raped her with all the western lords watching.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droit_du_seigneur (Right of the First Night). IIRC the Boltons practice this. I think Ramsay got made this way after Roose got denied his rights and he killed the man and raped the woman after that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom