The Blackfish is still one of Robb's only relatives who would qualify as his successor - remember, Robb was under the assumption that he would have a son soon, so the legal writing of the letter is more in line with naming a steward than an heir. I wouldn't be surprised if he's named steward of some type (as a precaution), but Winterfell is given to a Royce. After all, Robb does not know his Royce relatives.
Yeah, sorry, for some reason I had a brain lapse when I posted that.
It'd be funny if he named Theon his heir.
Catelyn was concerned that Jon would be next in line if Robb's children were eliminated, giving Jon a motive to have them killed.
Anyone else think most of the politics shit won't matter and the series will end in a maelstrom of chaos with barely anyone coming out alive?
Cause it looks like where it's all headed and if George wants to end the series in two books, that seems like the most likely way to do it.
I don't think we'll get any fairytale endings a lot of fans are predicting. Jon and Dany getting married and saving the world? ...yeah, sure.
I said they'd marry, didn't say they'd save the world.
Yeah I think we can all agree that Cat had some seriously clouded judgement when it came to Jon due to her hatred towards him.I think what Catelyn was concerned about was that Jon killing Robb himself. At the time, if Jon was named heir, he was next in line period since Robb and Cat thought the rest of the kids were dead other than Sansa and the entire purpose of naming an heir was disinheriting Sansa.
What was this? I don't remember that.Kind of tangential to the conversation at hand, but one thing I've always wondered is if Jon is legitimized and is the heir, would the Riverlands even accept him? He has no Tully blood, and the Blackfish made it pretty clear that he didn't trust him, going so far as to suggest that he was in on the RW and got his spot as Lord Commander due to a deal with the Lannisters. Doesn't seem like Jon would be able to keep Robb's kingdom together long.
I think that's what will probably happen, at least I hope it does to an extent.Anyone else think most of the politics shit won't matter and the series will end in a maelstrom of chaos with barely anyone coming out alive?
What was this? I don't remember that.
When Jaime parleys with him at Riverrun in AFFC, Jaime says he can take the black. Blackfish says that they'd probably have Jon kill him, and that other stuff.
Anyone else think most of the politics shit won't matter and the series will end in a maelstrom of chaos with barely anyone coming out alive?
Cause it looks like where it's all headed and if George wants to end the series in two books, that seems like the most likely way to do it.
I don't think we'll get any fairytale endings a lot of fans are predicting. Jon and Dany getting married and saving the world? ...yeah, sure.
I think what Catelyn was concerned about was that Jon killing Robb himself. At the time, if Jon was named heir, he was next in line period since Robb and Cat thought the rest of the kids were dead other than Sansa and the entire purpose of naming an heir was disinheriting Sansa.
God, I hate that bitch.
Winterfell. What are you, Swedish or something?Idk I viewed it more as her not wanting the child created out of her husbands affair becoming the ruler of Winterhold. Not so much her thinking Jon would kill Robb for it.
Idk I viewed it more as her not wanting the child created out of her husbands affair becoming the ruler of Winterhold. Not so much her thinking Jon would kill Robb for it.
Probably not, but it doesn't seem like the King in the North thing is going to stick anyways. I would have to imagine that at this point the North would be happy to settle with the original status quo so long as the person on the Iron Throne isn't a gigantic psychopath; assuming it goes back to that Riverrun were Lords of the Riverlands in their own right, so they weren't sworn to anyone else anyways.Kind of tangential to the conversation at hand, but one thing I've always wondered is if Jon is legitimized and is the heir, would the Riverlands even accept him? He has no Tully blood, and the Blackfish made it pretty clear that he didn't trust him, going so far as to suggest that he was in on the RW and got his spot as Lord Commander due to a deal with the Lannisters. Doesn't seem like Jon would be able to keep Robb's kingdom together long.
Catelyn was always a huge bitch to Jon. The TV series really toned it down to try and convince you Catelyn wasn't an idiot making horrible decisions all the time. If you look back at her history during and prior to the series, she caused a fucking shit-ton of problems for everyone.Idk I viewed it more as her not wanting the child created out of her husbands affair becoming the ruler of Winterhold. Not so much her thinking Jon would kill Robb for it.
Edmure's son would be heir to Riverun, he wouldn't have any claim to Winterfell. Sansa still has claim to Winterfell assuming Bran and Rickon are never seen again.Probably not, but it doesn't seem like the King in the North thing is going to stick anyways. I would have to imagine that at this point the North would be happy to settle with the original status quo so long as the person on the Iron Throne isn't a gigantic psychopath; assuming it goes back to that Riverrun were Lords of the Riverlands in their own right, so they weren't sworn to anyone else anyways.
That also assumes that Edmure dies AND his kid dies. That does bring up an interesting question though; when Cat and Robb have that conversation about legitimizing Jon, Robb tells Catelyn that Sansa is his legal heir and Arya after that. But then in AFFC, Jaime comments that if Edmure's wife gives birth to a boy, Walder Frey will have Edmure killed because then he will have a grandson with a claim as heir apparent to Lord of the Riverlands. Why is Sansa (who is not even technically a Stark at this point since she's married to Tyrion) able to inherit Winterfell, but Edmure's daughter can't?
How was Catelyn a huge bitch to Jon?
The one time we know she was cruel to him, .
Did you not read got?
IIRC Catelyn hated Jon not because he was a bastard but because Ned treated him like a true son.
It stems from her paranoia about Jon's mother, and her fear that Ned loved whoever birthed him. Remember the incident when Catelyn confronted Ned about Ashara Dayne and he went into a cold fury? It's not so much about Jon as it is about what his mother potentially was to Ned. She's at Winterfell just having given birth to Robb and her husband comes back from the war with a child. Ned refuses to ever tell her anything about it and shuts her down brutally the one time she asks. I think most women would have a problem with that.
And her fears about Jon's children potentially being a threat if he is legitimized are hardly unfounded.
Anyone else think most of the politics shit won't matter and the series will end in a maelstrom of chaos with barely anyone coming out alive?
Cause it looks like where it's all headed and if George wants to end the series in two books, that seems like the most likely way to do it.
I don't think we'll get any fairytale endings a lot of fans are predicting. Jon and Dany getting married and saving the world? ...yeah, sure.
Kind of tangential to the conversation at hand, but one thing I've always wondered is if Jon is legitimized and is the heir, would the Riverlands even accept him? He has no Tully blood, and the Blackfish made it pretty clear that he didn't trust him, going so far as to suggest that he was in on the RW and got his spot as Lord Commander due to a deal with the Lannisters. Doesn't seem like Jon would be able to keep Robb's kingdom together long.
It stems from her paranoia about Jon's mother, and her fear that Ned loved whoever birthed him. Remember the incident when Catelyn confronted Ned about Ashara Dayne and he went into a cold fury? It's not so much about Jon as it is about what his mother potentially was to Ned. She's at Winterfell just having given birth to Robb and her husband comes back from the war with a child. Ned refuses to ever tell her anything about it and shuts her down brutally the one time she asks. I think most women would have a problem with that.
And her fears about Jon's children potentially being a threat if he is legitimized are hardly unfounded.
That also assumes that Edmure dies AND his kid dies. That does bring up an interesting question though; when Cat and Robb have that conversation about legitimizing Jon, Robb tells Catelyn that Sansa is his legal heir and Arya after that. But then in AFFC, Jaime comments that if Edmure's wife gives birth to a boy, Walder Frey will have Edmure killed because then he will have a grandson with a claim as heir apparent to Lord of the Riverlands. Why is Sansa (who is not even technically a Stark at this point since she's married to Tyrion) able to inherit Winterfell, but Edmure's daughter can't?
Probably because a boy heir would be better and they're still young and can whelp a boy.
I don't know if this was discussed here.
But I got a sense from AFOC that Jaime and Cersei may not be Tywin's sons.
Did I misread something there?
There have been ongoing theories about Tywin's kids, especially Tyrion but Jaime and Cersei to a lesser extent, secretly being a product of King Aerys either raping or seducing his wife. I really doubt it though. It seems like it would really cheaper all the family conflict we've seen for five books if they suddenly weren't family anymore. I'd be pissed if it were true. No more secret Targaryens please.
Also, to the earlier comment about Blackfish protecting Jon, why would he? Has he ever even met Jon? It seems like he would trust Catelyn's impulses.
I found the segment in question:
This is Jaime Speaking to Lady Genna.
Jaime kissed her cheek. He left a son.
Aye, he did. That is what I fear the most, in truth.
That was a queer remark. Why should you fear?
Jaime, she said, tugging on his ear, sweetling, I have known you since you were a babe at Joannas breast. You smile like Gerion and fight like Tyg, and theres some of Kevan in you, else you would not wear that cloak . . . but Tyrion is Tywins son, not you. I said so once to your fathers face, and he would not speak to me for half a year. Men are such thundering great fools. Even the sort who come along once in a thousand years.
Pretty sure that just means that Tyrion is much more like Tywin than Jaime is.
That is the last quote that should be taken literally. There are indications that aerys might have raped tywin's wife and some or all kids aren't Tywin's, but that's not one of them.I found the segment in question:
This is Jaime Speaking to Lady Genna.
Jaime kissed her cheek. He left a son.
Aye, he did. That is what I fear the most, in truth.
That was a queer remark. Why should you fear?
Jaime, she said, tugging on his ear, sweetling, I have known you since you were a babe at Joannas breast. You smile like Gerion and fight like Tyg, and theres some of Kevan in you, else you would not wear that cloak . . . but Tyrion is Tywins son, not you. I said so once to your fathers face, and he would not speak to me for half a year. Men are such thundering great fools. Even the sort who come along once in a thousand years.
That "the lannister kids are secret targaryens" theory is only slightly less retarded than the "everyone wargs into everything and Neds spirit is in the sword Ice" theory.
That "the lannister kids are secret targaryens" theory is only slightly less retarded than the "everyone wargs into everything and Neds spirit is in the sword Ice" theory.
I found the segment in question:
This is Jaime Speaking to Lady Genna.
Jaime kissed her cheek. “He left a son.”
“Aye, he did. That is what I fear the most, in truth.”
That was a queer remark. “Why should you fear?”
“Jaime,” she said, tugging on his ear, “sweetling, I have known you since you were a babe at Joanna’s breast. You smile like Gerion and fight like Tyg, and there’s some of Kevan in you, else you would not wear that cloak . . . but Tyrion is Tywin’s son, not you. I said so once to your father’s face, and he would not speak to me for half a year. Men are such thundering great fools. Even the sort who come along once in a thousand years.”
Winterfell. What are you, Swedish or something?
Does anyone else hate the concept of resurrecting in the got universe? The number of people that have been rezzed is almost comical by now. Also, all of GRRM's red herring "fake deaths" are written in the same way at the end of a chapter that I'm not even shocked at anything anymore, since I don't believe whichever character it is is actually dead.
Edmure's son would be heir to Riverun, he wouldn't have any claim to Winterfell. Sansa still has claim to Winterfell assuming Bran and Rickon are never seen again.
The problem, I think, is that while it's easy to just call someone else Lord Paramount (or whatever the traditional title is for the Lord of the House that is in control of one of the Seven Kingdoms), the rest of the Lords and peasants don't just stop being loyal to the house; i.e. how pretty much all of the Northman revere the Starks. Just having a Frey as Lord of Riverrun is probably not seen as likely to "stick," unless they get a Tully back in there.Yep. A male heir is more useful, a girl would have to be married off to a non-Frey and whoever her husband was would effectively control Riverrun.
Though the whole situation is odd here because Gemma Lannister's husband is the Lord of Riverrun and Littlefinger is Lord Paramount of the Trident, whatever claim Edmure's son has is purely theoretical because the Tullys have been divested of all their lands and titles.
The problem, I think, is that while it's easy to just call someone else Lord Paramount (or whatever the traditional title is for the Lord of the House that is in control of one of the Seven Kingdoms), the rest of the Lords and peasants don't just stop being loyal to the house; i.e. how pretty much all of the Northman revere the Starks. Just having a Frey as Lord of Riverrun is probably not seen as likely to "stick," unless they get a Tully back in there.
I said the same thing about Aegon is alive theories back in the day. I can't discount anything after ADWD. GRRM loves his secret identities, false deaths, and soap twists.
He's the mummer's dragon. I've seen theories that he's actually Illyrio's son because of the statue he has in PentosI'm still wagering that new Aegon is a hoax. Or a massive waste of pages. Either or.
He's the mummer's dragon. I've seen theories that he's actually Illyrio's son because of the statue he has in Pentos
That "the lannister kids are secret targaryens" theory is only slightly less retarded than the "everyone wargs into everything and Neds spirit is in the sword Ice" theory.
ADWD
ADWD mentions that Aerys might have raped Tywin's wife, which lends itself more to the theory. Still, I don't believe it at all. Way too contrived
Isn't the line something like "he took some umm liberties during the bedding" I took that as the king rubbing some titties and maybe some fingering, I doubt Aeries just went and raped her with all the western lords watching.